|
|
It's Not Over
American Thinker, by William L. Gensert
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:magnante, 10/31/2012 7:31:50 AM
|
| Does anyone believe that when Barack Obama loses on November 6, he will go quietly? This election is shaping up to be a landslide loss for the president, and by the ever-present look of desperation on his face, he knows it. The nation should be preparing for how he might react when it happens -- there is nothing more dangerous than a cornered god. (Snip) He may never have been more than a part-time president, but to expect him to give up the job easily or gracefully is to fall prey to wishful thinking. His monstrous ego will not allow any other course of action but to fight.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
GreatGreyhounds, 10/31/2012 7:34:24 AM (No. 8976244)
I agree! 60+ days for Executive Orders, Pardons, and Decrees from On High could complete Our destruction...
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Woodenleg, 10/31/2012 7:42:51 AM (No. 8976254)
BO is a Marxist and he will react like all Marxists....he will use what power he has to prevent his successor from being effective and he will have his radical troops take to the streets. Since these people believe they are the anointed, they will destroy.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
PChristopher, 10/31/2012 7:45:38 AM (No. 8976259)
I would be very surprised if he goes quietly. Even if he does, his sycophants will not let it go, and I do not want to be downtown next week. I personally think he will pursue a scorched earth policy and lay waste to the country with as much legislation and executive orders as he can. Frankly, I think he should, at a minimum, be stripped of his presidential pension, however much that is, and his Secret Service protection...let his unions and black panthers protect him.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
M2, 10/31/2012 7:50:34 AM (No. 8976263)
If the GOP isn't ready for a black few months after this election, they should all be dismissed from office:
Is this a man we can trust to accept the verdict of the electorate? I would like to believe yes, but all the evidence points to no.
The Democrats are already lawyering up, you'd better believe it. They will claim voting-machine tampering, voter fraud, racism, "disenfranchisement", Sandy and anything else they can think of. It's going to get ugly unless some honorable Democrats, if any are left, stand up and say that Romney's win is legit.
OPEN LETTER TO GOP and the ACLJ: Are you ready? Dems are. You'd damn well better be at least as ready as they are.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Teleologicus, 10/31/2012 7:54:40 AM (No. 8976268)
It's not just Obama, either. There is a big gang of backers, cronies, co-conspirators, accomplices, and assorted camp followers who stand to lose a lot if Obama gets the boot. This unsavory crew includes everybody from extreme Left ideologues to mega-business and high finance. Politics makes strange bedfellows. Then there are our friends in the mainstream(!) media and the liberal establishment. They have staked their all on re-electing Barack Obama. One cannot deny that they have done their best for him. They are not likely to be good losers. Altogether there are many people and interests whose careers, fortunes, plans, dreams, credibility, self-worth and reason for living are contingent upon the re-election of Barack Obama. It is hard to imagine them taking his defeat well.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
doodah, 10/31/2012 8:03:08 AM (No. 8976286)
I believe that there are enough good people who will literally "come out of the woodwork" to declare that the election was honest enough. Remember the Chick-fil-lay surprize, all those folks streaming out for the right thing to do. We have many loud liberals and leftards, but I believe the numbers are on our side. Chrissy might lose his show if he gets anymore obscene. And who watches the alphabets anymore?
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
ebgodard, 10/31/2012 8:05:42 AM (No. 8976288)
It's true. Romney can not just win. He has to win by huge numbers so that no amount of lawyers, no court cases, no challenges can diminish the win. Every person must drag themselves to the polls, regardless of where they live- safe state or not. Rain, snow, sleet, hail, flooding or not. The popular vote must be OVERWHELMING. We have to combat the illegals and dead people voting; the bussing of Somalians who can't speak a word of English voting in Ohio. We must combat their ground game of SEIU, ACORN and teachers unions. Let's roll!
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
overwrought conservative, 10/31/2012 8:05:43 AM (No. 8976289)
When this bunch is finally out they will do more than take the W's off the keyboards.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
revdeppisch316, 10/31/2012 8:07:53 AM (No. 8976296)
Stop fretting-- what a bunch of wusses! A landslide will be the first media wake up-- then begins the re-education of the media who will want the majority who left them for Fox (and Friends) back-- so they will play it more down the middle.
Obama can do all he wants-- and each time he does something unpopular-- Romney will hold a press conference to declare yet another EO or Decree that will be undone in January.
Obama is not God-- God is God-- and if God ordains a Romney presidency-- God will not hamper our new president with things that cannot be changed for the better.
Stop wetting your beds!
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Mass Minority, 10/31/2012 8:22:32 AM (No. 8976316)
There is only one small silver lining to the corrupt manner in which the Won has denigrated his office.
That which was enacted by decree can be repealed by decree. Executive orders are not laws, they are decrees and only carry weight as long as either congress or the executive will tolerate them. Romney can undo much of the worst of Obamas imperial presidency before the inaugural ball, with no more than a pen and a couple sheets of paper.
Obamas "legacy", outside of the disastros obamacare bill, is a house of cards with no supporting legal foundation beyond his whim. Romney will be a fresh breeze from a finally opened window. The house of cards doesn't stand a chance.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
steveW, 10/31/2012 8:36:44 AM (No. 8976349)
Obama could demand that pregnant chads be recounted and that deadlines be shifted by the courts until a "favorable" number of Obama votes are, uh, found. Almost worked for Gore, and he wasn't even prosecuted for that blatant attempt at election fraud. Go for it, Barry. That, or martial law.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Catherine, 10/31/2012 8:44:19 AM (No. 8976366)
I've worried about exactly this. Clinton went crazy during the voting period and when he had to leave the White House. I think we need to change the timing so that whoever wins takes office the next day, or sooner. If he loses, Obama has about 8 weeks to wreak havoc.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Lawsy0, 10/31/2012 8:44:42 AM (No. 8976367)
Even after he lands in Hawaii, he will still be a thorn in our collective side. As they say, he'll hang in there like a hair in a biscuit. The Clintons did. The Beltway is their life.
I've never gotten enough of either of the Prez Bushes and their classy family. Politics may have been in their blood, but they weren't obsessive about it.
Obama will do his very worst from Nov 7th until noon on Jan 20th. If you are just now praying for America, you are almost too late.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Holeymoses, 10/31/2012 8:46:37 AM (No. 8976372)
WE can keep him busy worrying about his role in Bengahzi, Moochelle will be plaguing him wih domesic concerns about their Hawaiian move, and who knows what else will be discovered. I'm a thinkin he'll be glad to get out of there and start making some real money making anti -American speeches.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
RedWhiteBlue, 10/31/2012 9:09:45 AM (No. 8976417)
I know that the Pompass militant and racist Michelle will not go gently into the moving van and neither will Val Jarret!!!
I just feel sorry to the poor dog!!!! I hope he finds a good, loving home!
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Illinois Resident, 10/31/2012 9:10:44 AM (No. 8976422)
I agree with Mr. Gensert. Look at what happend with the "lame duck" legislature and the parting shot of Pelosi by passing ObamaCare! These delusional democrats have managed to put pre-set time bombs into law that will continue to explode and destroy this country and government for years to come. What will Obama do???? if he can't campaign for the rest of Novemeber, December, until January 20? If he starts talking to democrat legislators,for a change, we are in big trouble.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Arby, 10/31/2012 9:18:48 AM (No. 8976440)
Someone should quietly mention the word 'impeachment' and the destruction of his 'legacy'. Sober 'im up.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
blizzard, 10/31/2012 9:21:54 AM (No. 8976446)
I don't care who the loser of the election represents, they should NOT be allowed to give executive orders, and the like, once they have lost.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
FormerDem, 10/31/2012 9:25:32 AM (No. 8976451)
Yes, I agree. But, fine, that will be an opportunity to extend the damage he does to Democrats. They can be asked in public what they think of all he'll say and do, and his supporters will say and do. Down they go, unless they let go of him.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
enuf8, 10/31/2012 9:26:08 AM (No. 8976453)
Well, if he tries to sign more Executive Orders Congress can refuse to fund it or pass a law preventing it, or take it to Court. He may try to veto a law passed by Congress and then it would take 2/3's vote. But with Dingy Hairy in charge of the Senate----not funding sounds like the only alternative.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
fed-up, 10/31/2012 9:30:07 AM (No. 8976460)
Assuming the outcome of the election (I'm taking nothing for granted yet), I think the louse in chief's biggest problem will be to find out he isn't adorned by all those he thought. Unlike Clinton, who has enjoyed the fruits of his post presidency, Obama will not have the Hollywood crowd or even most liberals. You need no more than to look at those who have been stepped on to promote this hollow man. Where do you hear of any in Chicago that are shouting his wonderfulness? He burns bridges faster than terrorist burn flags. He will be left with no one, but Moochell and Axelgrease, and hopefully Stephanie pinnochio.
I hope I never have to hear from any of them again.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Deedo, 10/31/2012 9:35:28 AM (No. 8976475)
Obama will take whatever billions are left in slush funds and distribute them to his buddies and himself during a lame-duck session.
It's all about the Benjamins.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
lasvegaslou, 10/31/2012 9:37:18 AM (No. 8976481)
I hope you are all right but I worry. I remember Clinton's reelection campaign. I did not see how he could be reelected, even with a RINO cabbage like Dole leading the opposition. But he was.
In 2008, I could not understand how a total zero could be elected even with something like McCain running against him. He was.
I also remember all the elections that were flat-out stolen, Starting with Kennedy in 1960, up to Franken in 2010(?), the Governor's race in Washington, where the courts finally concluded, after the Dem was sworn in, that election fraud did indeed occur but sorry, it's too late. The list goes on.
Somebody tell me not to worry.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
woodsman, 10/31/2012 9:38:02 AM (No. 8976484)
I have never understood why we wait two months after an election to pass the baton...It should be immediate with a week for the incumbent to move - Just like in the private sector
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
BeatleJeff, 10/31/2012 9:39:49 AM (No. 8976489)
Let's not be such pessimists. On Day One all Mitt has to do do is declare all of Barry's EOs null and void and start issuing his own. The worst the Choomster can do is issue pardons to a bunch of radicals. He'll do that whatever the outcome, not much we can do about it. But anything else is reversable. Broken glass, People!
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
papasparky, 10/31/2012 9:45:05 AM (No. 8976504)
Mike Huckabee faced a similar situation on a much smaller scale in 1996 when Governor Jim Guy Tucker would not vacate the office after resigning.
Tucker had been convicted of felonies in the White Water scandal involving the Clintons and their minions. The Arkansas Constitution forbids convicted felons from holding public office, so Tucker filed a formal resignation and then refused to leave when the ceremony to swear in Lt. Gov. Huckabee was set to commence.
The legislators in attendance for the ceremony threatened Tucker with immediate impeachment if he did not leave pronto.
IIRC, the Democrats controlled the Legislature at the time this soap opera was playing out.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Pepper Tree, 10/31/2012 9:46:13 AM (No. 8976507)
Obama clearly sees himself beyond the law and may call for the prisons to be emptied onto America. What could be done to prevent it or undo it afterwards?
Imagine the chaos of over a million felons released onto our communities. Citizens would be forced to take up arms against criminals who would be able to blend in, at least superficially. Theft and murder would be rampant, and suspicion of everyone you don't know would become the norm.
If there are still a few responsible people in federal politics and government, they'd better be ready for something like this.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
stablemoney, 10/31/2012 9:48:59 AM (No. 8976512)
Obama is going and anything he tries is DOA. Obama is a lame duck. He will probably pardon all the blacks in jail. No matter they are repeat offenders and will be back within weeks.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
iceman, 10/31/2012 9:49:27 AM (No. 8976514)
Arm yourselves if you can. Cities will burn.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
joeyinempirestate, 10/31/2012 9:49:54 AM (No. 8976515)
The meme will be that he was too good for White America, so they spitefully cut him loose. I'm fine with that as long as he leaves with some dignity. I'll chip in for a golf tour fund where he can't hurt anyone but the gallery lining the fairway.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
lftrn97, 10/31/2012 10:00:55 AM (No. 8976548)
Please, please don't retain a single Washington-based employee hired during the past four years or any that had a referral from any Democratic member of Congress especially with nay connection to Dingy Harry and Pelosi.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
stryker714, 10/31/2012 10:04:01 AM (No. 8976554)
Yeah #9 is correct. There is nothing to fear but fear itself. The writing on the wall is obama will be a new benchmark of scorched earth. So be ready for anything.
A "deep throat" Obama insider interviewed on the sly, indicated the Chicago syndicate has big expectations from the majik mulatto, in the form of a second term. If he fails to deliver, the mierda is going to hit the fan.
Don't worry about martial law-think of it as a an open season chance to set things right. Then we won't have to worry about squashing follow up perks and protections. The baby ruth finally flushes for good.
Just as the 2010 elections, the Wisconsin Gov recall, the Chick Fil A backlash, etc all blew up in their foolish faces, so will any attempt to retain power. The F&F was indeed an "under the radar" attempt to make sure he could stay in office by force. It failed as certainly he will fail. Ceaucescu redux.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
trapper, 10/31/2012 10:12:04 AM (No. 8976574)
OK, so it makes for a nice scary story on Halloween, but there's really not that much damage Obama can do, other than to throw open the prison gates with blanket pardons. Romney's transition team will be all over everything. He and his turnaround guys have dealt with disgruntled lame-duck management before. This is how it works:
The people at the top tier will all be looking for jobs, completely neglecting their duties. Any who DO decide to do damage will run up against the next rung down, the career government employees. Most of them won't jeopardize their own paychecks by participating in the mischief, so the orders and directives and shredding memos will just sit, unimplemented. Passive aggressive resistance. Nothing will get done. Most will be busy trying to figure out who to suck up to next, and the photocopiers will be much busier than the shredders as people frantically try to preserve evidence that it was all someone else's fault, and then cart it home for safe keeping.
And in all honesty, I don't think Obama really cares that much. He's a user, not a leader. I'm thinking he used the left just like he has used everyone else in his life. He knows he has some God awful ugly screaming sessions to look forward to from Michelle and Valerie, but then it's permanent vacation time. Woo hoo!
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
mc squared, 10/31/2012 10:17:18 AM (No. 8976585)
#15, I just feel sorry to the poor dog!!!!
If he stays out of the kitchen he'll be OK.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
Attercliffe, 10/31/2012 10:21:37 AM (No. 8976594)
Perhaps Obama will take a leaf from Gordon Brown's playbook (he was the last Labour Prime Minister in the UK). Look at this Telegraph header just six days ago:
"Gordon Brown’s secret army could defeat the Coalition’s welfare and education reforms: Britain’s charities and quangos are now stuffed to the gunwales with Labour placemen"
In short, a sort of government in exile. For more, please see:
http://tinyurl.com/cstqbvc
It makes for scary reading.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
RoosterBob, 10/31/2012 10:23:08 AM (No. 8976599)
"Don't worry about martial law?" My question relates to Obama's EO to commandeer communications (including the internet) in the event of a "National Emergency." How do patriots become notified? Who organizes? How? Inquiring minds want to know.
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
joeyinempirestate, 10/31/2012 10:23:56 AM (No. 8976603)
#33, from what I've read the Chicago crowd is resigned to the fact that he's history. Oprah will tell you as much, and she's not in mourning over this, either.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
gwmcclintok, 10/31/2012 10:28:51 AM (No. 8976616)
I do not believe that Michelle will spend one minute with O in Hawaii. She can't even stand to fly with the 'down low' boy.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
Aunt Agnes, 10/31/2012 10:45:20 AM (No. 8976663)
I think No. 34's assessment comes closest to reality. Not only is BO an opportunist & user, IMO he is still a drug user. I've seen people throw away professional careers just so they could continue being lazy, do-nothing junkies. Revenge & all of its manifestations takes work & planning. You can't concentrate on that when your next thought is getting high. I think he's looking forward to having nothing to do all day but stay high. He will have his pension & other monies socked away to do with as he pleases. Of course, he would use every opportunity to diss Amercia anytime an interviewer asks, but talking big is all he ever really does & takes no more effort than opening his mouth. The rest of the time, he basically plays.
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
choey, 10/31/2012 10:46:11 AM (No. 8976667)
The EOs he implements can be swept away the day Romney takes office and he won't get congress to pass any meaningful legislation. I doubt that he's stupid enough to refuse to vacate the whitehouse. What worries me is that his czars will remain after he's gone. Romney needs to ferret them out and kick them to the curb before they can continue their destruction of America.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
mickturn, 10/31/2012 10:47:16 AM (No. 8976672)
We know they will steal the silver and furniture...but he will also leave a legacy of pardons for his cronie friends that stole all the money!
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
hurricanegirl, 10/31/2012 10:50:08 AM (No. 8976681)
Warning! Warning! Fear porn galore!!!
Nonsense. Why would any Democrat let this bozo totally wreck their chances of winning any election for 30 years!
He may TRY some idiotic stuff, but it won't work!
Despite what we've been believing for four years, he's not all powerful! He's not God! He's a small small man!
So quit with the scare tactics already!
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
Hardright, 10/31/2012 10:52:55 AM (No. 8976692)
Romney needs to fire ALL of the Obama people, ASAP! Unlike W. who let them stay on to do their dirty work. He also needs to do a sweep for all bugs. Obama and his people want to know what's going on in the government, even after they're gone. Don't doubt me. We're dealing with pure evil.
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
RancherJack, 10/31/2012 10:54:53 AM (No. 8976700)
Duck and Cover
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
oh-heck, 10/31/2012 11:03:16 AM (No. 8976728)
When Romney wins he needs to have a small team review every Obama executive orders and regulations. Most have been written without a legal review and restrict access of the People to something they previously could visit or use freely. The regulation frequently contain totally new substances that need to be regulated and at levels not created in the existing laws. Entirely new hazards, dramatically reduced standards, and rules that only affect some states, all need to originate in Congress.
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
trapper, 10/31/2012 11:08:38 AM (No. 8976746)
Sorry, but just one more thought. I'm not even terribly worried about pardons. Other than Holder, Jarrett, some donors and MAYBE Biden, I can't even see Obama going out of his way to pardon anyone. When has he ever gone out of his way to help anyone in the past besides himself? He jettisons people when the going gets tough, and forgets all about them when he is finished using them. My guess? He's going to make himself scarce between election day and Romney's swearing in. And even if you do track him down, getting him to actually DO anything will be next to impossible.
Romney will, for all practical purposes, take over a week after the election, putting everything in place for him to sign into effect the day after his inauguration. Watch.
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
Lucky4, 10/31/2012 11:14:51 AM (No. 8976769)
I disagree with this 100%. Obama did not like being President. Michelle did not like it. They both love the celebrity lifestyle. They will move to Hawaii in the new home Penny Pritzker has bought for them. He will golf with his celebrity friends, hang out with Jay-Z and Beyonce. He is going to be off the scene. The most I see him doing is giving 100k fee lectures to the 1% he demonized.
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
robert28, 10/31/2012 11:17:38 AM (No. 8976776)
People! If you have never prayed before it is time you started. My wife and I have been praying for over four years that God will forgive this nation and save it. And us. We feel that all of these terrible storms and earthquakes and fires are His way of getting our attention. Birth pains. Pray with all of your hearts. Please.
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
ScarletPimpernel, 10/31/2012 11:22:47 AM (No. 8976789)
FTA: "This election is shaping up to be a landslide loss for the president, and by the ever-present look of desperation on his face, he knows it."
Many polls are showing a very tight race in certain states, with 0bama in a slight lead in some. And don't forget the Electoral College. So how is this shaping up to be a "landslide"? I hope and pray it is true, because Romney needs a large margin of victory to prevent any challenges, but right now I just do not see a "landslide".
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
fransand, 10/31/2012 11:35:42 AM (No. 8976833)
Remember how popular Clinton was even up to the end of his presidency? On inauguration day he,in his hubris, set up a rally site at the airport to ride the wave. Well I was happy to note that even with his popularity and Gore's shenanigans, once inauguration day arrived, the press treated him as old news and moved on to Bush.
|
Reply 51 - Posted by:
PoliticalJunky, 10/31/2012 11:45:14 AM (No. 8976849)
What I foresee is not martial law but Obama's lawyers filing suit to restore the early voting days lost because of the storm. They will argue that the result is unfair to all those who have been unable to vote. This could be a long ordeal with the Democrats losing in court but forever after claiming that they were cheated as they do to this day re the Bush/Gore election. That claim must have some traction since the UN wants to send poll watchers here to be sure conservatives let liberals vote.
|
Reply 52 - Posted by:
M Stuart, 10/31/2012 12:04:27 PM (No. 8976904)
I also remember the Clintons' Long Goodbye!
I thought they'd never leave, and then the damage to the White House had to be fixed and the furnishings had to be counted. Didn't she have to return some of the White House furniture? Remember the Rodhams? Roger Clinton?
0bama will give out whatever goodies he has at his disposal. If he pardons Holder for the things he has done so far, Holder can still be held responsible for charges brought after the pardon, can't he? I hope so. I want him to pay for what he has done to this country.
|
Reply 53 - Posted by:
Marzon, 10/31/2012 12:26:19 PM (No. 8976959)
My biggest worry is that he will do nothing to stop sequestration and thereby push us into the financial abyss as payback for rejecting him. Bonus is that it will that much harder for a Romney admin to turn things around and he can count on the media to blame Romney for everything from day 1 of his administration, no matter what.
|
Reply 54 - Posted by:
lencu255, 10/31/2012 12:40:08 PM (No. 8976993)
#55 and others: let's pray, but don't forget to go out and vote. And the other thing I am incessantly talking about: let's work to create conservative mainstream media. Let's demand from republicans the active measures to buy newspapers and local tv stations. Otherwise, Romney's win will be short lived. We know what the leftist will do in the media, in academia, in education, in local bureaucracy! They will sabotage all our efforts. Don't forget the simple fact - they tax us not to take our money and give it to the leeches and drones. They want it for themselves. Look how it is done in all leftist, radical dictatorships!
|
Reply 55 - Posted by:
Butch59, 10/31/2012 12:59:29 PM (No. 8977045)
I would not put it past Obozo to attempt to re-schedule next week's election, using Sandy as the cause. He will attempt to use the argument that so much infrastructure was damaged or destroyed that it made voting impossible in those areas affected by the storm. And I really don't know how the courts or the country would react to that. Giving the Dims past, I just don't put is past them attempting anything, no matter how outrageous.
|
Reply 56 - Posted by:
MMC, 10/31/2012 1:21:40 PM (No. 8977106)
Bill Clinton is campaigning in Minnesota....the only state Reagan didnt win.
What do these tea leaves say?
However much Obama doesnt want to be pResident, val jar does... Keep praying for Romney!
|
Reply 57 - Posted by:
Nevadadad46, 10/31/2012 1:23:09 PM (No. 8977110)
Knowing Øbama as I do, and believe me, I know him very well based on my life experiences dealing with people just like him and worse, he will cave and run. He can not stand criticism and will not be able to look anyone in the eye after his defeat. Yes, not just the bubble will burst but his own self image will erupt. Instead, his sycophants will surround him, try to rebuild him for the new role as overpaid university speaker, and then take him on the most extravagant vacation anyone has ever had. He will globe trot like Clinton did after the Monica disaster. He will avoid Americans like avoiding a severe case of STD. Too painful. Then, he will leave the WH in tatters, declaring complete ignorance of the vandalistic actions of his entourage, as Clinton did. And we can then close the filthy Øbama chapter in our history and begin to reclaim America. I'll pray every single day that God will grant us, as a people, the wisdom and courage to have learned from this bitter disaster. If history is any guide, I doubt very seriously that prayer vigil will be positively answered. People seldom learn from such mistakes. I cite the example of the Israelites and practically their entire history!
|
Reply 58 - Posted by:
Photoonist, 10/31/2012 2:21:51 PM (No. 8977214)
Any state within 10,000 votes will be challenged. If there aren't any or enough to make a difference within that range it will be within 100,000 or more. The Chicago Marxists won't go quietly and accusations of cheating from them have already started, though they are the ones with a record of cheating.
|
Reply 59 - Posted by:
Bla Bla, 10/31/2012 2:27:01 PM (No. 8977228)
#24 -- Don't worry! Prayer helps. I've been asking God to call on the journalists throughout our media to be true to their consciences & investigate & expose to the public what this administration is really doing.
And, because of how the media treated Palin & her chlidren, the public has less & less trust in them!
Don't ever forget this about Clinton: he won by less votes than Dukakis lost with. That's right! Ross Perot split the conservative vote in both of his election bids. Even when he quit the race "someone" convinced him to get back in. We have no 3rd party doing that in this election.
I don't know about Jack Kennedy, but our GOP congress better be watchdogs like no other election. If there is voter fraud, may it be exposed! I think, personally, that Obama is going to be beaten so bad that even voter fraud won't be enough to save him.
|
Reply 60 - Posted by:
stealthy, 10/31/2012 2:29:34 PM (No. 8977230)
We've got to stop taking it for granted that he will lose. It's really not over at all.
|
Reply 61 - Posted by:
dman, 10/31/2012 5:00:12 PM (No. 8977634)
First, let's all cross the finish line on November 6th. Take nothing for granted.
Second, President Romney will have much to do after 12-noon on January 20th, and may have carpal tunnel syndrome on January 21st after all the directives and executive orders he will sign.
|
Reply 62 - Posted by:
vesicant, 10/31/2012 6:03:26 PM (No. 8977811)
I was thinking about just this thing a few days ago. If scumbama refuses to leave the White House, who's authorized to use force to remove him -- the Secret Service? The FBI? The Capitol Police?
|
Reply 63 - Posted by:
DoktorFranken, 10/31/2012 8:11:22 PM (No. 8978087)
FTA: " If his claim is validated by sycophantic media minions, it could gain traction among the electorate."
IF?!?! Puh-lease!!
Here's one of the greatest worries an incoming Romney will have to face - a White House FULL of bugs and other data gathering devices planted by Barry's administration. Case in point - Exactly WHAT was that 2-year secret "remodeling" all about? There are NO visual differences.
|
Reply 64 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy, 10/31/2012 8:12:47 PM (No. 8978092)
This is the issue that concerns me now. Can we get Red Green to pay Obie a visit on the 7th and duck tape Obie's hands together so he can't sign anything for the next two and a half months?
|
Reply 65 - Posted by:
DebiAnn, 10/31/2012 9:18:27 PM (No. 8978266)
#64....President Romney removes him!!
|
Reply 66 - Posted by:
hamrman, 10/31/2012 9:25:26 PM (No. 8978287)
Scary...
|
Reply 67 - Posted by:
bedub, 10/31/2012 10:15:29 PM (No. 8978392)
Obama will do another world tour advising foreign leaders not to trust Romney. Then he'll play golf and ignore any emergencies that come up. Michelle will be busy relocating her kids to a private school in Hawaii, she'll have to find one where there is a gay sexual predator on staff, which may take some time. Obama's staffers, all 20-somethings with Women's Studies degrees and no real world experience, will be loading up their cars and moving into Mom and Dad's basement and filing for unemployment, and cancelling their subscriptions to the NY Times. The MSM will be trying to figure out how they can suck up to the new boss, who hopefully will be cleaning out the press room and filling it with objective, actual Journalists (there will be empty seats).
|
Reply 68 - Posted by:
EagleJim, 10/31/2012 11:49:26 PM (No. 8978531)
This was over-the-top for me, bordering on the ridiculous. Anyway, it was a fun read, just for the sport of it all.
It reminded me of back in 2008 when the Left put out articles about how Bush, if he lost the election, would declare himself a dictator instead of leaving office; and again, this year when the Right is putting out articles about Obama cancelling the election, declaring martial law, nullifying the election, etc., instead of leaving office.
I think a lot of people need to get a basic reality check and not let their imaginations and partisan desires run away with their minds.
|
Reply 69 - Posted by:
ocjim, 11/1/2012 12:00:06 AM (No. 8978544)
IMO, as a loser with 60 days left, he will stop at nothing. In fact he will compress and accelerate his goals. He wants to be revered by the Far Left. Whatever he does in the last 60 days will raise his stature for the future and I think his ego requires a significant future beyond his luxurious Hawaiian estate. Since he cannot get anything through the House, he will move immediately and aggressively via the enormous federal bureaucracy to quickly achieve his last ditch Leftist goals. Treaties are a special worry since treaties become law with only Senate approval required... Taylor-made for his post defeat situation. We'll need the help of still sane Dem Senators like Joe Manchin to put a stop to this. And it is possible that we all may have go to Washington to protest en masse the shocking things he'll try and do, and do with impunity prior to Jan 20. He will attempt to boil us frogs very quickly and we'll jump. A lame duck Obama would be an Obama in full.
|
Reply 70 - Posted by:
pensom2, 11/1/2012 1:02:50 AM (No. 8978597)
Sorry, I'm not buying it. This article is overwrought. I'm with the poster who commented that Obie is a user, not a leader. He'll do whatever Valerie Jarrett tells him to do. I don't think even she will stick her neck out as far as everyone seems to worry. She'll make sure she picks up a few million dollars though some kind of kickback that she's likely already working on. And Obie will pardon some skunks, especially those who will promise to donate to his presidential library. But he won't pardon the "Blind Sheik." Then Obie & Mooch will get outta town with lots of silverware and furniture.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "magnante"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "magnante"
|
Baby, She´s Back! Sarah Palin´s Debut Back on Fox News
|
|
American Thinker, by Lloyd Marcus
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: magnante- 6/17/2013 11:40:51 AM
Post Reply
|
|
I caught Sarah Palin on Fox & Friends this morning. Wow, talk about a breath of fresh air! While listening to Palin speak on various issues and Obama´s scandals, something occurred to me. Palin on TV fills a desperately needed void. Sarah Palin communicates in plain English, free of the usual guarded TV political speak. Palin fearlessly nailed Obama and company with the truth. Folks, I cannot express how good and hopeful I felt.
|
|
The Consequences of Liberalism
|
|
American Thinker, by Christopher Chantrill
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: magnante- 6/17/2013 8:51:06 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Here we are at the midpoint of the Obama years, assailed on every side by looming consequences of liberal hubris and liberal corruption. But the Obama Scandals don´t get me all riled up with partisan outrage. What´s the surprise? If liberals in the media, in the academy, and in politics stigmatize conservatives as monsters, racists, sexists, homophobes, why be surprised that little Lois Lerner wants to please her teacher? Why wouldn´t the Democrats want to do immigration reform and never mind the consequences to low-paid Americans?
|
|
A Warped Prism
|
|
American Thinker, by J.R. Dunn
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: magnante- 6/17/2013 8:21:34 AM
Post Reply
|
|
There exists a certain real pathos inherent in the NSA´s PRISM program -- and not only because of its attempt to undermine American principles. PRISM, along with its doubtlessly enormous support structure, is based on a worldview that no longer exists among serious intellects (snip) PRISM is much like the other elements of Barack Obama´s great progressive crusade -- ObamaCare, quantitative easing, green economics -- elaborate and expensive systems apt to cause a lot of misery and waste while accomplishing nothing. Liberals like to boast that they are the rational party. But it´s an obsolete rationality
|
|
Man of Steel
|
|
American Thinker, by Marion DS Dreyfus
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: magnante- 6/16/2013 9:53:36 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Superman was created in 1938 by Jerome Siegel and Joe Shuster, designed as an adolescent anodyne and savior, in large part, from the hitlerian juggernaut that had sent so many surviving graphic artists and novelists over the oceans for succor. (snip) The Brit Henry Cavill, who plays American Man of Steel without a lapse back into English (joke intended), is certainly handsome enough, but lacks the smooth, seamless facial planes and hauteur of his predecessor. Certainly, Cavill´s physique is peerless, but he seems querulous and even hesitant onscreen as often as he seems commanding.
|
Michelle Obama´s Irish/German/African Pre-Summer Vacation
|
|
American Thinker, by Jeannie DeAngelis
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: magnante- 6/16/2013 8:20:02 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Every year, like clockwork, Mrs. Obama exploits the president´s official business responsibilities to squeeze in a pre-summer vacation, otherwise known as a PSV. A PSV is where vacation junkie Michelle finds a way to finagle a series of trips at the taxpayer´s expense. Here is how it´s done: The president announces his plan to attend the G8 summit at the Lough Erne resort in Northern Ireland. Michelle convinces Barack to schedule some sort of secondary sideshow so the family can use it as an excuse to travel in the highest possible style, cost-free, compliments of the American taxpayer.
|
Race discussion may crowd out scandals in wake of Supreme Court affirmative action decision
|
|
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: magnante- 6/14/2013 10:11:53 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Get set for a Supreme Court decision that could alter or even end affirmative action. Or not. Predicting SCOTUS decisions is hazardous, but Fisher v University of Texas could plunge the nation into heated discussion of the role of racial preferences in education and beyond. Oddly enough, a decision that would please conservatives, an outright rejection, would also serve the interest of President Obama, firing up his base and diverting attention from his mushrooming scandals and the corruption of federal bureaucracies. It looks as though the Court is saving Fisher for last
|
|
Virginity and Government Payoffs
|
|
American Thinker, by Jeannie DeAngelis
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: magnante- 6/14/2013 8:12:34 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In Madhya Pradesh, the second largest state in India and home to over 75 million people, the government takes sharing the wealth to new levels. In the tribal district of Betul in the Hardu village of Chicholi block, the state government under a social welfare scheme called Mukhyamantri Kanyadan Yojana sponsors a mass marriage ceremony to ensure poor women without dowries marry. (snip) in order to qualify for the $256 wedding gift, under government order, the women recently had to first undergo a virginity/pregnancy tes.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
New State Department scandal: Whistleblower accuses consul general of trysts with subordinates and hookers
|
|
New York Post, by KATE BRIQUELET
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 6/16/2013 10:53:38 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the latest black eye for the scandal-ridden State Department, a whistleblower claims she was run out of the foreign service after complaining about a consul general’s alleged office trysts with subordinates and hookers.Kerry Howard says she was bullied, harassed and forced to resign after she exposed US Consul General Donald Moore’s alleged security-threatening shenanigans in the Naples, Italy, office. As the post’s community-liaison officer, Howard was charged with keeping workplace peace and advising higher-ups on the state of morale, but when she revealed allegations about her boss, State Department officials swept it under the rug,
|
Who is he? Obama keeps allies, enemies guessing in second term
|
|
The Hill, by Justin Sink
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: ketchuplover- 6/17/2013 6:31:12 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Five months into his second term, allies and enemies are as confounded as ever about who President Obama really is. Is he the dyed-in-the-wool liberal that his biggest supporters and critics suggest? Or is he a pragmatic, even cynical, politician who cares more for his popularity than taking risks for his ideological goals or living up to his rhetoric? Even in the short period since his reelection, Obama has provided evidence to support conflicting interpretations. His efforts to pass immigration reform, the unsuccessful push for stricter gun controls and tax hikes on high earners buttress the case for Obama-as-ideologue.
|
Jeb Bush labels conservative critics ‘the chirpers’
|
|
Washington Post, by Aaron Blake
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/17/2013 1:22:30 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Jeb Bush says he’s not worried that his work toward comprehensive immigration reform and his ties to the GOP establishment will alienate conservatives and negatively impact a potential 2016 presidential campaign, referring to critics as “the chirpers.” “If I decide to run for office again, it will be based on what I believe, and it will be based on my record,” the former Florida governor said in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network’s David Brody. “And that record was one of solving problems completely from a conservative prospective.” Bush (R) pointed to his conservative
|
Barbara Walters Defends Maher Calling Trig Palin Retarded: ‘I Don´t Think He Intended it to be Mean-Spirited’
|
|
Newsbusters, by John Nolte
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/17/2013 5:19:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
As NewsBusters reported last week, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin called out vulgarian comedian Bill Maher for referring to her Down Syndrome son Trig as "retarded." On ABC´s The View Monday, co-host Barbara Walters astonishingly defended Maher saying, "I don´t think he intended it to be mean-spirited" (video follows with transcript and commentary): WHOOPI GOLDBERG: At a recent standup show in Las Vegas, comedian Bill Maher apparently called Sarah Palin’s five-year-old developmentally-challenged son Trig retarded. And Sarah blasted him on Twitter as a bully. Is that, is it, is he a bully? Is he a bad, what is he?
|
Melendez warns without legal status ´there will never be road to White House for GOP´
|
|
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 6/16/2013 2:41:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Gang of Eight member Bob Menendez advised Republicans to accept legalization status for current illegal immigrants if they ever want to see another president from their party. “I would tell my Republican colleagues — both in the House and the Senate — that the road to the White House comes through a road with a pathway to legalization,” the New Jersey senator said on State of the Union this morning. “Without it, there’ll never be a road to the White House for the Republican party.” Menendez also warned of triggers on border security
|
Rubio Aide: ‘There Are American Workers Who, For Lack of a Better Term, Can’t Cut It’
|
|
National Review Online, by Rich Lowry
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: trapper- 6/16/2013 11:18:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Politico’s Playbook has an excerpt from a new Ryan Lizza piece from the New Yorker that is not yet online. It contains a passage on the back-and-forth between labor and the Chamber that has a quote from a Rubio staffer that is going to raise eyebrows, to say the least: “There are American workers who, for lack of a better term, can’t cut it. There shouldn’t be a presumption that every American worker is a star performer. There are people who just can’t get it, can’t do it, don’t want to do it. And so you can’t obviously discuss that publicly.” Here is the entire context:
|
Threats made to figures at center of IRS controversy: sources
|
|
Reuters, by Patrick Temple-West and Karl Plume
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 6/16/2013 6:48:57 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A current and a former top tax official have been physically threatened in recent weeks as the scandal over Internal Revenue Service targeting of Tea Party and other conservative groups has gathered steam, people familiar with their situation say.Ousted IRS acting commissioner, Steven Miller, has received such threats, according to a source familiar with his situation. The source declined to elaborate on the nature or the source of the threats.
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|