|
|
| |
Topic: Why Is Obama so Nasty and Vulgar? |
Why Is Obama so Nasty and Vulgar?
PJ Media, by Michael Ledeen
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Dreadnought, 10/29/2012 7:29:59 AM
|
| Rude, insulting language about Romney (“bullsh****r) from the president. Vulgar sexual innuendo, aimed at seducing young women to vote for him. The vice president asking a bereaved parent about the size of his murdered son’s testicles. It’s quite a spectacle. We’re a fractious people, and our politics have always been full of colorful language, but I can’t recall the current depth of vulgarity. The “politics of personal destruction” have gotten uglier. Does it mean anything? Should we try to understand it? First, it bespeaks a coarsening of public language. No surprise there
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Standlow, 10/29/2012 7:36:44 AM (No. 8970892)
Like Bill Clinton, Obama has no concept of dignity. Both men have a sense of being offended, but they don't have a natural gentleman inside, lacking father figures in their young lives. Obama is crude by nature. He himself has said he was a 'Jakarta street kid'. He has never left that beginning.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
JAN, 10/29/2012 7:40:39 AM (No. 8970900)
No honor, no integrity, no soul, no decency, just plain garbage.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Really?, 10/29/2012 7:43:12 AM (No. 8970906)
No class.....some people do not have it. Sometimes it is understandable due to circumstances. Maybe this is one of those cases. In my opinion, Obama, Clinton, Nixon...all have diminished the Presidency each in their own way. There have probably been others.
Politics aside, I would like to see leadership in all areas, including dignified language. Oh...and Biden ? More pathetic than Obama. Just a foolish man.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
zoidberg, 10/29/2012 7:48:10 AM (No. 8970910)
LBJ had an actual father, and he was as coarse as they come.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
ruready?, 10/29/2012 7:51:19 AM (No. 8970914)
The more liberal, the more vial. Been that way for millenia. Take a look from the Bible
"These people are springs without water and mists driven by a storm. Blackest darkness is reserved for them. For they mouth empty, boastful words and, by appealing to the lustful desires of the flesh, they entice people who are just escaping from those who live in error. They promise them freedom, while they themselves are slaves of depravity..."
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
ruready?, 10/29/2012 7:53:08 AM (No. 8970916)
The more liberal, the more vile
(sorry, guys)
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Mai Bad, 10/29/2012 7:57:17 AM (No. 8970924)
Yo...yo...That is so he can maintain his pimp "street creds" with his peeps!
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
msctex1, 10/29/2012 7:58:32 AM (No. 8970928)
Vulgarity is to Depth as their Pragmatism is to Principle.
A substitute for something they can never have.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
lakerman1, 10/29/2012 7:58:40 AM (No. 8970929)
#3 Nixon is looking pretty good, in retrospect. He used vulgar language, but in private, not out on the campaign trail.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Northcross, 10/29/2012 7:59:29 AM (No. 8970932)
A better question is how did we elect such a low class pretender into office to begin with.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
StormCnter, 10/29/2012 8:02:01 AM (No. 8970940)
Many people didn't realize what a thug Obama is until this campaign season and, most importantly, the third debate. He was exposed and the voters were appalled.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
lonestarm3, 10/29/2012 8:05:02 AM (No. 8970946)
Vulgarity, vocal, behavioral and political has been the hallmark of the Obama presidency. While we are on the subject lets not forget the infamous incident of the vice president of the US stage whisper to the president, live on coast-to-coast TV: "This is a Big F***ing Deal!" And instead of a public apology, the president responded with an only slightly suppressed version of his famous "joker smirk."
Then there is his "spiritual tutor" with "God D**M America from the pulpit of Obama's church of twenty years.
And his cute trick of laying the wrong finger beside his nose as a subtle "high five" to his base during speeches.
And dozens of others....
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Nimby, 10/29/2012 8:11:11 AM (No. 8970960)
One word to define O's campaign------ DESPERATION
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Judith, 10/29/2012 8:13:46 AM (No. 8970963)
Look at his upbringing. Look at the people he CHOSE to associate with as an adult. And consider the core of this man. The sad thing is this weak, stupid, immoral man appeals to almost half, if not more, of the voters in this country.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Teleologicus, 10/29/2012 8:22:50 AM (No. 8970983)
Leftism is a kind of arrested emotional development that keeps victims stuck in adolescence, so it is no surprise they act, think and talk like grandiose, know it all, rebellious teenagers. Much of it is posing and posturing - an act intended to demonstrate independence and superiority to common conventions. Potty mouth is a mark of distinction, not something to be ashamed of. It proves one is no fool that he is righteous, that he is not afraid of transgressing the limits. Once upon a time it shocked and horrified the bourgeoisie. Now, of course, it is old hat. It is expected. And even when people who are supposed to be adults, e.g. the president &etc. use such language, we are only mildly surprised. We are used to it.
Profanity and vulgarity in speech, besides being markers for an immature world view, are highly correlated with impoverished thinking and a constricted working vocabulary. They are manifestations of mental laziness and carelessness, of a mind that is fundamentally undisciplined and subject to emotions. They usually connote a dogmatic, rigid, intolerant personality. And they represent bad manners and disrespect for others, particularly in the presence of strangers. They pollute discourse. It might be acceptable or funny to pass gas noisily and odiferously in the presence of one's friends - but to do so in public is boorish and juvenile, like Leftism itself.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
athina, 10/29/2012 8:23:50 AM (No. 8970985)
As the article says, it's the real Obama coming out. Remember him scratchig the side of his face while surreptitiously giving the finger, in 2008. That told me everything about him. Now, his vulgarity is not the slightest bit surreptitious.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
JLoophole, 10/29/2012 8:26:37 AM (No. 8970992)
Well, I guess when you're a naked emperor and your glass jaw and "marbles" are on display for the whole world to see, there's not much left. So you cuss, hoping that makes you look tougher.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
pinger, 10/29/2012 8:27:13 AM (No. 8970995)
Obama is nasty and vulgar because those characters are molded into his DNA. When things are going well, those things bubble below the surface. When in trouble he has no choice but to let the real Obama surface. If his current opponent was Mother Teresa, his campaign and demeanor would be no different than it is with Gov. Romney today.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
LZK, 10/29/2012 8:29:32 AM (No. 8971000)
Personally speaking -- I'm happy his foul mouth and vulgar antics have been blasted upfront on the television...
What you see -- is what you get....
He's an angry, bitter, anti/american thug -- and his true color is showing.... (no pun intended)...
LZK
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Malia2012, 10/29/2012 8:32:26 AM (No. 8971011)
Amazing that so many people are "surprised and shocked" by the real obama coming out. He went to Church with Jeremiah Wright for more than 20 years, was a community organizer in Chicago and helped Acorn-criminals and unions plant roots in every state. WHAT is the surprise? He and his minions have ALWAYS been "rude, insulting, nasty and vulgar", the people who voted for this horrendous 'president' in 2008 just weren't paying attention. Nov. 6 is coming!
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
pineledger, 10/29/2012 8:34:26 AM (No. 8971014)
This pair of lowlifes would not be allowed in my house.
Not long ago I had a dinner party for some friends and neighbors, and one man "pulled a Biden," complete with language and gross (arm) gestures. He has not been invited back and won't be, and we have declined their invitations.
It's up to each of us to draw the line.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
texaspast, 10/29/2012 8:36:19 AM (No. 8971019)
That's like asking why a skunk stinks - it's just what it do!
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
bpl40, 10/29/2012 8:47:03 AM (No. 8971039)
Gentlemanlyness, courteous behavior toward others is looked upon as a hallmark of the established oppressive culture. Just like non-violence -'because they already have what you deserve and don't want you take it from them'. Vulgarity is a means of differentiating yourself and identifying with the victims. Its the essence of cool. Many of the positions on social issues - homosexuality, abortion, traditional role of women in a nuclear family, faith etc. are also driven by this. They will be vulgar because it is in their very nature as Left Wingers. This is not Liberalism. Hubert Humphrey, George McGovern, Daniel Patrick Moynihan were all Libersls.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
GreatPlains, 10/29/2012 8:47:30 AM (No. 8971040)
In some ways Obama reminds me of a feral child grown into an adult. He exhibits zero manners or etiquette. The first couple of months Brian Kneepad Williams had an hour special where he trailed Obama. As they rode together in the back of the People's multimillion dollar presidential limo- Obama put his shoes up on the seat. During the ram through of Obamacare , I saw him body block Pelosi and shove her out of the way , so he could walk through a door first. She was stunned at his rudeness and started looking around chagrined . Obama wrote often in Dreams of his rage against whites and America. Combine that with his bizarre upbringing , the early indoctrination into the culture of Marxism, pedophilia and Islam, the heavy drug use , the absence of a work ethic, the lack of education and the NPD ( Narcissistic Personality Disorder ) and we have one perfect storm of an extremely dysfunctional POTUS.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
sagman, 10/29/2012 8:49:05 AM (No. 8971045)
Obama War Room: It's You and Me, Baby
OBAMA: OK, we got the Muslims; the generation ship welfarers; dead urban Democrats; the Greens, blacks, and browns; academics; the Mediscared; home-grown communists; Jews; gays; enfranchised illegals; Kos Kids living in their parents’ basements; and drug cartel members with dual citizenship. DAVID PLOUFFE: We need another bloc. JOE BIDEN: How about ''Sucker Moms''? OBAMA: We've lost that demographic. BIDEN: Not ''Soccer Moms,'' Chief — ''Sucker Moms.'' Single women who thought the boyfriend would stay around soon’s he found out there was a bâtard in the oven. OBAMA: And you're proposing? BIDEN: Declare, um, marital law, Boss. Or is it ''common-law''? Whatever. Then, issue a directive defining ''deserter'' as any civilian male AWOL from his family unit. JANET NAPOLITANO: I could transfer to Washington personnel who are busy ignoring human trafficking on the border, sir. They’d team with FBI agents and MPs to track down deadbeat dads and return them to their home bases. OBAMA: Not bad. What else to tempt these women? BIDEN: We find language in ObamaCare guaranteeing 24/7 Supernanny coverage--contingent on your reelection. KATHLEEN SEBELIUS: I'd throw in free tubal ligation. Insurance companies would be free to reject offering these benefits at their peril. BIDEN: Oh, we better keep a lid on Iran attacking us in the Strait of Hormel. JAY CARNEY: That’s the Strait of Hormuz. Hormel is an American company that makes Spam. BIDEN: Why're they in the Strait? Betcha one of Romney’s companies outsourced operations there. We’ll say he’s still involved. We can sic the FCC on ‘em, too, Chief. Everybody’s always complainin’ about spam. You’d be the only one doin’ anything about it. OBAMA: Joe, you’re going to be out of action with the flu until November 7.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
saucy, 10/29/2012 8:59:42 AM (No. 8971067)
Being surrounded by people like the Axe, slumlord ValGer and angry Moochelle certainly tells us who he is.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Linda Ann, 10/29/2012 9:01:33 AM (No. 8971069)
Deleted racist comment. LCom Staff.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
PoliticalJunky, 10/29/2012 9:02:01 AM (No. 8971072)
When it was first reported that Obama "hates" Romney I was puzzled. I could understand Obama having a different philosophy but Romney doesn't seem like someone who would inspire hatredl. Then I realized that Obama is very conceited and wants to feel superior to everyone. He knows he is inferior to Romney in every way. To him that is unforgivable.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
berlin, 10/29/2012 9:02:58 AM (No. 8971075)
The descriptive that comes to mind here is ‘trailer trash’.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Dilettante, 10/29/2012 9:05:12 AM (No. 8971079)
Because breeding always tells.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
fire_mission, 10/29/2012 9:09:19 AM (No. 8971089)
Upbringing plus #6 and #15.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
80coyotekate, 10/29/2012 9:12:05 AM (No. 8971095)
Trucker Observation: #16
Obama is giving his base what they want. They are a vulgar lot. Libtards riot at any opportunity. Look at the rioting and property destruction caused in San Francisco last night after the World Series.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
Hermoine, 10/29/2012 9:15:12 AM (No. 8971108)
I'll agree with Ledeen on the vulgarity, but it's not new. JFK was a sex addict that we KNOW commanded young women to "service" some of his senior staff. LBJ was a mean, snarly, nasty man with very foul language. . .and we're all very familiar with Bill "put some ice on that" Clinton; not to mention the long list of Democrat Senators who played nasty in DC for years (led by Teddy, of course). Obama and Biden are just part and parcel of their gang of thugs.
The cleanest one out of the entire group was Jimmy Carter and that is because he came from completely outside the establishment. He's a bitter, petulant old man, but I don't think I could ever accuse him of vulgarity.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
philemon1967, 10/29/2012 9:15:31 AM (No. 8971109)
What is Alinsky's main thesis? It is basically that one can manipulate people so that power can be achieved and kept by those who are willing to flout society's natural boundaries.
The spirit within Obama, I would hazard a guess based on the fruit that falls from that tree, is not holy but something else altogether.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
Arby, 10/29/2012 9:15:59 AM (No. 8971111)
What does the poet say? Profanity is the attempt of the weak mind to express itself forcefully.
In Biden's case, the attempt of the empty mind.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
Pepper Tree, 10/29/2012 9:18:05 AM (No. 8971120)
"mediscared" is a keeper, #25.
Why's Barry so nasty and vulgar? Why do guys marry girls-next-door instead of seasoned lap dancers?
The answer is, so that their kids won't grow up to be Barack and Michelle Obamas.
If those photos published in porno mags are considered, you'd have to say Barry's mother would have been making grainy movies with a co-star who wore garters to hold up his socks and a half mask - if her father had known the producer of such films, that is.
His mother taught him his social boundaries and manners. That's why he's a lout today.
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
William1, 10/29/2012 9:19:48 AM (No. 8971127)
Reminds me of an excellent comment from National Review years ago. The thrust was that the elites have failed to provide guidance to the lower classes in the area of social behavior. Nowadays, the elites get down in the gutter with the lowest levels of society.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
Rumblehog, 10/29/2012 9:20:56 AM (No. 8971133)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the Democrats have become the American Communist Party.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
GOP_U_BET, 10/29/2012 9:23:04 AM (No. 8971139)
Because he was brought up by nasty and vulgar people. There are nude photos of his Mother on the Internet. His grandparents, particularly his Grandfather were party buddies with Frank Marshall Davis, who was a filthy degenrate mess.
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
Elvira, 10/29/2012 9:23:07 AM (No. 8971140)
Oh Sagman, he who wields imaginative scenarios like a ninja wields his sword, if only my heart weren't so heavy with worry for our nation. I might then be able to enjoy your writings of fancy and wit this day as I always have in the past. Perhaps it is the dreary downpour here that makes my outlook so dour. Most likely it's a combination of both.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
southernboy, 10/29/2012 9:27:27 AM (No. 8971148)
#38 You are not wrong!
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
pomom, 10/29/2012 9:30:41 AM (No. 8971155)
Obama thinks his position of power gives him the right to say or not to say anything he wants. He also thinks he can do anything he wants or not do it. I'll always remember the day he was caught saying ''I don't need this.''
He was placed in the position as President by the dark forces of evil, a complicit MSM, and by ill-informed voters. Now, he's having to do the hard work and he doesn't like it. His campaign is run by juveniles and he'll pay for it next week.
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
LadyVet, 10/29/2012 9:42:21 AM (No. 8971186)
#25, the "Strait of Hormel" reminds me of the true story of the over-friendly waitress in a small Texas town who was serving breakfast to a customer she did not recognize as local. She asked his name and he responded, "Bart Starr." Then she asked what he did for a living. He said, "I'm with the Green Bay Packers." Her response was "Well, we get all our meat from Gooch."
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
Stopstoreload, 10/29/2012 9:52:41 AM (No. 8971216)
Because tacky is forever
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
nerdowell, 10/29/2012 9:55:00 AM (No. 8971223)
Presidents have always cussed in in private, I'd guess. They probably also occasionally or even frequently got a little drunk. They may have had dalliances or kept mistresses or misters even( Who knows or cares?)
The difference is that the press more or less kept their mouths shut out of respect for the office and personal privacy. Politicians, in return for that consideration, never flaunted their business.
Clinton brought sex to the Oval Office, but that was more symptom than cause: over the past few decades the line between private and public has eroded. At the same time we've enshrined a "right to privacy" in our legal and ethical codes we've seen both the extent of that private and public domains diminish. Private acts are routinely displayed in public and the increasingly voyeuristic public is entitled to know whatever secrets any celebrity may be trying to keep.
There is one proviso in this new understanding: we are not allowed to judge the person solely on the revelation alone. We can only condemn that person if a charge of hypocrisy can be sustained.
Welcome to the new error-- I mean, era.
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
J F Ackerman, 10/29/2012 9:57:44 AM (No. 8971229)
More accurately: Why Are Democrats So Nasty and Vulgar? Democrats are the problem. It is almost 98% Democrat where I live and they are the nastiest, crudest, most self-absorbed, vile, and unhappy people one can imagine.
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
chicodon, 10/29/2012 10:01:03 AM (No. 8971234)
My belief... Obama will not go down without a fight. He will challenge every close state and demand recounts. He will claim massive civil rights violations and file court actions. If he loses he may have to be forcibly removed. First and foremost he is an agitator.
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
Eheu Fugaces, 10/29/2012 10:08:55 AM (No. 8971256)
Obama's vulgarity and nastiness reflect his lifelong dwelling within the Leftist stockade. This is common, everyday, acceptable behavior to Leftists. His base sees nothing wrong with it, and undoubtedly finds it [bleep]ing cool.
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
TCloud, 10/29/2012 10:11:18 AM (No. 8971261)
Misery is their MOA! Personally, I am an eternal optimist and like to make things happen and live happily with the results...Peace.
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
Me?Opinionated?Nah!, 10/29/2012 10:27:27 AM (No. 8971309)
Par for the “coarse!”
This thread contains mentions of a goodly number of low-class, no-class Democrats who, over the years, have lowered the level of propriety of our currently not so great nation. Ironically, first on the list is their party’s greatest superstar, Bill Clinton. I mean how ya gonna top what he did with and to history’s most famous intern? It was nothing if not internal. But, let’s not go there.
I can’t help but wonder if our Veep, Mr. Tactful Joe Biden ever inquired of his boss, the POTUS, what the size of his you-know-whats are, only to discover they’re commensurate with a couple of sesame seeds.
That alone answers a veritable plethora of questions, does it not?
|
Reply 51 - Posted by:
mitzi, 10/29/2012 10:30:33 AM (No. 8971320)
They speak that way so casually - it's just part of who they are, how they were reared, and who they associate with now.
|
Reply 52 - Posted by:
chrisrenegar, 10/29/2012 10:41:01 AM (No. 8971356)
Black culture is rife with vulgarity. Everyone else is supposed to laugh while we all look around at each other with dismay in our faces. This is the same garbage that scratches his face with the middle finger when thanking people like Clinton and McCain for a good campaign. No more lying kings in our white house, ever!
|
Reply 53 - Posted by:
freightdog, 10/29/2012 10:41:36 AM (No. 8971358)
The president's language and conduct doesn't say much for a Harvard education.
|
Reply 54 - Posted by:
NotaBene, 10/29/2012 10:43:49 AM (No. 8971375)
Eye candy is so School on Saturday - no class.
|
Reply 55 - Posted by:
joeyinempirestate, 10/29/2012 10:44:53 AM (No. 8971382)
Treat youself to a good laugh and youtube LBJ ordering Haggar slacks over the phone, this thread demands that you do.
|
Reply 56 - Posted by:
Mayzie, 10/29/2012 10:46:31 AM (No. 8971391)
Why does a dog lick his -----?
Because he can
|
Reply 57 - Posted by:
mickturn, 10/29/2012 11:10:31 AM (No. 8971477)
The answer is simple, he was brought up that way, to have zero respect for anyone or anything.
On top of that he's a LIB...and they, as a group, think they are smarter than everyone else so they have no respect for anyone else!
Time to put all of them in a Lib zoo for all of us to throw peanuts to!
|
Reply 58 - Posted by:
leopardtwo, 10/29/2012 11:11:25 AM (No. 8971483)
It has become increasingly clear that anyone who would choose Joe BiteMe as his VP cannot be completely sane. Impeach.
|
Reply 59 - Posted by:
Aunt Agnes, 10/29/2012 12:15:46 PM (No. 8971711)
As other posters have noted - it is a lack of maturity. Libs are stuck in a time warp - they are forever young, rebellious teens flouting theirs parents & the rules of polite society. If the old, fuddy-duddies (parents) want you to be considerate of others & keep your language clean, then it is your "duty" as an in-your-face "rebel" to do the opposite. Nobody is going to tell you what to do! I've got one of these arrested-development-rebels in the family & becuase she hates her successful, church-going Republican father, she uses vulgar language to shock him and disrespect him.
|
Reply 60 - Posted by:
Marilu, 10/29/2012 12:28:42 PM (No. 8971778)
Luke 6:45 KJV A good man out of the good treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is good; and an evil man out of the evil treasure of his heart bringeth forth that which is evil: for of the abundance of the heart his mouth speaketh.
|
Reply 61 - Posted by:
lencu255, 10/29/2012 12:30:02 PM (No. 8971787)
I believe some of us already said that, but I haven't seen it and I will say it. It is not that that the leftists (fascists, commies) are nasty. It is that nasty, miserable freaks become leftists (fascists, commies). The more or less open bureaucrats in USSR shared with me the process how to get into the closed circle. The inner circle freaks vet them thoroughly in different circumstances, like mafia, grade them, and only the highest grade freaks have a go at higher rungs. Remember, how jarrett talked about van jones - they were following him for many years!
|
Reply 62 - Posted by:
cmardh, 10/29/2012 1:06:11 PM (No. 8971935)
Anybody remember that dark Inaugural Day of 1993? Bill and Hillary had opened up the White House (for the little people) and it turned into a logistic nightmare. Someone caught Hillary, on an open mike, chewing out Bill how they (well, him, probably) had just f***** the people. Over and over and over again. It's who they are.
|
Reply 63 - Posted by:
Butch59, 10/29/2012 1:08:35 PM (No. 8971943)
I vividly remember when I was a child and my mother heard me or one of my siblings say a "bad" word, she would literally wash our mouth with soap. Lesson learned.
I have actually heard Bob Blabbermouth on Fox New's The Five use the "F" on live TV. Of course he apologized for it, but you could see by his demeanor that he really didn't mean it. He just got caught.
And one problem with all of this profanity being used in our modern day is that most of us put up with it. I mean, when the last time when you heard someone use profanity in public, did you step forward and politely ask that person NOT to use language like that in public? If not, then you have acquiesced to that type of language. Even here at LCom, there is a code of speech and use of language that if you violate it, you get barred. We can can and should do that in our everyday lives.
|
Reply 64 - Posted by:
sagman, 10/29/2012 1:11:02 PM (No. 8971950)
You know, #40 (Elvira) has a point.
Obama and the left pose a dire threat to our liberty, and up until now one way I've been able to keep my sanity while watching this man sully the presidency and undermine the Constitution is to mock him and his acolytes. Conventional wisdom is that ridicule diminishes such people.
But this administration is immune to ridicule. I can't tell you how many far-out scenarios I've posited in my satires over the last four years that have actually come to pass.
The time for jokes about the poseur in the Oval Office is over. In fact, though I persisted in trying to skewer him, his defilement of the presidency made me wonder more than once whether finding amusement in his actions served any purpose.
I'm not laughing at Obama any more ... just loathing him. No more jokes until, well, at least until he's defeated and I can get the disdain level dialed down. We're way beyond parody with this guy.
|
Reply 65 - Posted by:
redwhite&blue2, 10/29/2012 1:58:16 PM (No. 8972131)
He's not one of us..he's never been one of us. I grew up an All-American kid, loved baseball, the Air Force, fast cars, my country, my family....He's not like me. He likes pimp rap, Muslim brotherhoods, talk shows, and he loves to lie. He's deceptive, he's sinister, he's vulgar, he's so often mistaken(Navy CORPSEman, 57 states, my Muslim faith, I'll balance the budget, I'll close Gitmo, the You Tube Libya LIES)...Whatever hallucinatory TRANCE the idiots who voted for him in 2008 were under, it's ALL OVER! Bye Bye Barry "Stinky" Soetoro, and take that obscene demented idiot liar Bite Me Biden with ya!
Romney/Ryan on Nov. 6th !
|
Reply 66 - Posted by:
Safari Man, 10/29/2012 2:00:18 PM (No. 8972142)
Nearly half our country is just as bad.
|
Reply 67 - Posted by:
Lawsy0, 10/29/2012 2:09:21 PM (No. 8972179)
If either Obama or Biden were kids in our neighborhood, Mom would never have let us play with them. We probably would have invited them to church, however.
|
Reply 68 - Posted by:
scarface67, 10/29/2012 2:21:23 PM (No. 8972224)
Just being himself while trying to appeal to his base.
|
Reply 69 - Posted by:
cheeflo, 10/29/2012 2:33:40 PM (No. 8972283)
I dunno, #3 -- he has lots of class. All of it very, very low.
|
Reply 70 - Posted by:
Photoonist, 10/29/2012 2:35:35 PM (No. 8972295)
'Indeed, as we now see, he’s a bum.'' - article. 0bama is a community agitator and a psychotic malignant narcissist. I'm a bit surprised only in that he's not prone to acts of violence in public, but give him time and a big electoral defeat.
|
Reply 71 - Posted by:
manofparadise, 10/29/2012 3:30:49 PM (No. 8972518)
I've posted this message with Lucianne on various articles for the past 8 months. I'll repeat it one more time, because the election is near.
Mitt 55% Obama 44%
|
Reply 72 - Posted by:
jdmii, 10/29/2012 3:36:56 PM (No. 8972540)
It is in the genes and the jeans.
|
Reply 73 - Posted by:
M2, 10/29/2012 4:10:47 PM (No. 8972635)
He's a narcissistic affirmative-action Marxist liberal Democrat who grew up with pigs like Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn, Jeremiah Wright, Saul Alinsky and potheads from his own generation and others. What else is there you need to know to answer the question why he's vulgar and nasty?
|
Reply 74 - Posted by:
TruthandJustice, 10/29/2012 4:34:24 PM (No. 8972714)
Men who lie and cheat...and have twisted perverted nasty secrets in their closet ...have no business heading an administration...Holds true for Affirmative Action Narcissistic Communists too.
|
Reply 75 - Posted by:
4Justice, 10/29/2012 5:39:36 PM (No. 8972904)
Leftists arw always vulgar and immature. That is why they are leftists...they are constantly looking for immediate self-gratification (usually at the expense of others). That's why they are also controlling tyrants.
#7 & #27 -- I find your turning this into a racial issue very disturbing and off color. Conservatives do not judge people on irrelevant characteristics like race or skin color--that is what leftists do. We see people as individuals who should be judged thier individual character. Let's continue to take the high road, eh?
|
Reply 76 - Posted by:
SoSensible, 10/29/2012 5:45:09 PM (No. 8972922)
My Dream
Someday, all of Sagman's Lucianne posts will be gathered together and offered as the incentive for donations to the site. Of course, Sagman will receive a generous cut. Thank you, as always for your cleverness.
|
Reply 77 - Posted by:
sagman, 10/29/2012 6:30:47 PM (No. 8973055)
My promise:
At some point, when my muse no longer sings to me (and her voice has been growing faint of late), I'll set up a blog and stuff it with everything humorous I've done here at Lucianne's and as a contributor at Breitbart's sites for two years.
The only thing I'll ask is that people continue to support lucianne.com, a beacon of sanity in the maelstrom of political discussion on the internet.
|
Reply 78 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy, 10/29/2012 8:09:16 PM (No. 8973296)
I just got home from work and don't know where to start with this one. All the posters ahead of me understand. And #25.
|
Reply 79 - Posted by:
Tasine, 10/29/2012 8:36:12 PM (No. 8973370)
|
Reply 80 - Posted by:
LC Hoghead, 10/29/2012 8:39:09 PM (No. 8973378)
WASHINGTON – Using a Pakistani Internet Protocol, or IP address, a disposable credit card and a fake address, “Osama bin Laden” has successfully donated twice to Barack Obama’s presidential re-election campaign.
The “Bin Laden” donations, actually made by WND staff, included a listed occupation of “deceased terror chief” and a stated employer of “al-Qaida.”
“Bin Laden” is currently set up on the official campaign website to contribute more to Obama’s campaign. The name is also registered as a volunteer.
Since the “foreign” contribution was sent, “Bin Laden’s” email address has received several solicitations from Obama’s campaign asking for more donations.
The acceptance of foreign contributions is strictly illegal under U.S. campaign finance law.
One $15 donation was made at BarackObama.com using a confirmed Pakistani IP address. In other words, as far as the campaign website was concerned, the donation was openly identified electronically as coming from Pakistan.
Upon clicking the “donate” button, WND staff selected the $15 amount and were taken to a page on the campaign website asking for a first and last name, city, state, zip code, email address and phone number.
The information submitted was: “Osama bin Laden, 911 Jihad Way, Abbottabad, CA 91101.”
While the website only has options for U.S. states and zip codes, there is no mechanism in place on Obama’s website to verify the individual is actually located in that state or zip code, or even in the U.S.
The Obama campaign refuses to release the identification of donors who give less than $200
In the case of this donation, the 91101 zip code is real but corresponds to Pasadena, Calif., and not Abbottabad, the Pakistani city in which bin Laden was found holed up in a compound.
For a requested phone number, WND inputted the White House information line of (202) 456-2121.
The email address used to set up the donation account was osama4obama2012@gmail.com.
|
Reply 81 - Posted by:
Cor-vet, 10/29/2012 8:52:30 PM (No. 8973398)
You'd be nasty and vulgar too, if you had to go home to the Mooch every night!
|
Reply 82 - Posted by:
zapper1979, 10/29/2012 9:09:28 PM (No. 8973428)
All of the low information voters who elected this scum thought they were getting "clean and articulate". Instead they got a thugrat on the DL.
|
Reply 83 - Posted by:
Penney, 10/29/2012 9:28:23 PM (No. 8973467)
''Why...?!' ...It's what dem pols' do. They have NO SHAME.
|
Reply 84 - Posted by:
owl, 10/29/2012 9:32:30 PM (No. 8973478)
Ah , who really cares . Just two more adjectives to add to the already lengthy list . As one poster noted , our countries disintegrating moral fiber could have as much to with it as anything . Look at how popular he ( as well as Clinton ) still is . America actually voted and put him in office without a shred of scrutiny . American Idol nation is one sorry state od affairs .
|
Reply 85 - Posted by:
ColonialAmerican1623, 10/29/2012 10:54:06 PM (No. 8973633)
Ghetto trash all dressed up and pimped. Vulgarity is used by ignorant people. Guess when you have a fake diploma, you don't learn the finer points of an ivy league education. Maybe he learned some 'stuff' from JayZ.
|
Reply 86 - Posted by:
larryp, 10/30/2012 12:23:10 AM (No. 8973738)
Recall "Doo-Dad Pro". That was the donor to Obama from Gaza in the '08 election. Many computer experts on the 'net told them: 'your security is turned off.' and told them how to re-estblish it. But they were not interested and wanted the dough. For the insults of Obama , Paul Rahe of Hillsdale College wrote an article on it. It was called "the Insulting Gestures of Obama", similar to that, posted on powerlineblog.com It might be in their archives. Recall he gave the finger to both M'Cain and Hilary. The audience-morons laughed and both were thrown off the stride and focus. He gave someone the finger this weekend by rubbing his eye with his middle finger.
|
Reply 87 - Posted by:
MSD78, 10/30/2012 10:59:00 AM (No. 8974470)
#1 and #2: Well you have the reason.
|
Reply 88 - Posted by:
MSD78, 10/30/2012 11:14:17 AM (No. 8974502)
Maybe this video can prove what a "brother" says about him. It's worth looking at, it hits right at home... let any liberal accuse conservatives of racism and here you have it from a man who's black and who says it as it is..he's no intellectual but he's not blind-sided by the lies and the bunkum of the media and the president's campaign. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2933126/posts
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
|
|
This Is What Tyranny Looks Like
|
|
American Thinker, by Bryce Buchanan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 10:55:48 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Here is a woman we will need to learn much more about in the coming weeks. Sarah Hall Ingram is a highly valued employee at the IRS. In the last three years she has received $103,390 in bonuses for her excellent work. She was the Commissioner of the Tax-Exempt and Government Entitles Division. Under her leadership, groups that expressed a fear of large, out-of-control government were systematically crushed by her branch of our large, out-of-control government. They were specifically singled out for harassment for political reasons. Secret information about the conservative applicants was leaked to leftist
|
GOP eager to link IRS scandal to ‘Obamacare’ takedown efforts
|
|
Washington Times, by Tom Howell Jr.
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 1:27:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
An exasperated Rep. Pat Tiberi on Friday asked the former acting chief of the IRS to explain to Congress why he would move the leader of the division that targeted conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status to a branch that is overseeing one of the most partisan issues of recent memory — President Obama’s health care law. “Because she’s a superb civil servant, sir,” Steven Miller, who resigned under duress last week, told the Ohio Republican at a hearing before the House Committee on Ways and Means. The transfer of Sarah Hall Ingram to the helm
|
What If the Obama Scandals Had Surfaced Last Fall?
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 1:19:58 AM
Post Reply
|
|
I was on Hugh Hewitt’s radio show last night, talking about the Benghazi talking point emails. Near the end of the segment, Hugh asked whether I thought the presidential election might have turned out differently if Obama and Clinton had not succeeded in covering up the truth about Benghazi. I was skeptical. The story of the election, I said, was the Obama campaign’s ability to turn out, once again, a large majority of the low-information voters who swept Obama into office in 2008. Few of those low-information voters, I said, would either have understood, or cared about, Benghazi
|
|
A Breach of Trust
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Susan Combs
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/18/2013 1:15:18 AM
Post Reply
|
|
As tax collector for the nation’s second-largest state, I know it’s a necessary function — from the fire station to the space station, nothing government does is possible without taxes. But it’s sure no path to popularity. Tax collectors have had a rotten reputation since biblical times. For all the services and all the people that depend on it, our work has to be viewed as fair and even-handed. It’s a basic bond of trust, and once that trust is lost, it’s hard to get back. Our entire nation was born when the colonists decided Britain’s taxes were unfair
|
Durbin Asked IRS’ Shulman to Probe ‘Several’ Conservative 501(c)(4) Groups in 2010
|
|
PJ Media, by Bridget Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:28:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
While many Democrats have joined Republicans in public shaming of the Internal Revenue Service for singling out conservative groups, others say the scandal is just a byproduct of muddied rules about nonprofits and political activity in the wake of the Citizens United ruling — and they’re hoping that they can steer the conversation from outrage over political targeting to fuel for campaign finance reform. But senior Dems may have much more than an opportunity to try to turn scandal to their advantage: they may have a degree of culpability as one especially vocal proponent
|
|
Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part
|
IRS Actions Show High- Level, Political Coordination
|
|
PJ Media, by Bryan Preston
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 9:13:13 PM
Post Reply
|
|
In today’s hearing before the House Ways and Means Committee, outgoing not-really-fired commissioner Steven Miller admitted that a high-ranking member of the Internal Revenue Service planted the question that led to the agency’s apology for targeting conservatives. [IRS official] Lerner disclosed the information last Friday while speaking at a tax conference organized by the American Bar Association. Asked about the incident, she said only that she answered honestly a question that was posed to her. The question, however, was posed to Lerner by Celia Roady, a Washington, D.C. tax lawyer who sits
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Obama a new Nixon? Oh, get serious.
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
When it rains, it pours: Ten press conference take aways
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,
|
Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi auditor Thomas Pickering
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|