A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Lack of strike force impeded
Benghazi response
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Lack of strike force impeded
Benghazi response

Washington Times, by Rowan Scarborough

Original Article

Posted By:Dreadnought, 10/28/2012 11:07:53 PM

As U.S. Africa Command waited for any order to rescue Americans on Sept. 11 at the besieged consulate and CIA annex in Benghazi, Libya, it was missing a key unit that the Pentagon gives every regional four-star commander — an emergency strike force. The new command’s lack of such a unit is another piece in the unfolding Benghazi timeline that shows an overriding theme: As radical Islamic extremism swelled in the chaotic coastal city, U.S. security assets in Libya diminished. From the State Department’s denial

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Photoonist, 10/28/2012 11:13:28 PM     (No. 8970542)

'As it turns out, some special operations troops, likely from U.S. European Command, were moved to a naval air station at Sigonella, Sicily, but were never ordered to go farther.'' - article. The attack went on for 7 hours after having been telegraphed for months. NO excuses for not getting some kind of SO force there in time to have some effect.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Distorted, 10/28/2012 11:57:47 PM     (No. 8970598)

For me, the Taliban is on the inside of the Whitehouse.



   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: iamtinman, 10/29/2012 12:50:12 AM     (No. 8970637)

Back up the bushere! We have had embassies and consulates in North Africa for decades and have been in the embassy protection business for hundreds of years. We had enough military assets in the area to provide some cover for those Americans, only we didn't have the political will to give the order. This is a total failure of character from the White House to the commanders in the area. Just disgraceful!


Reply 4 - Posted by: NotaBene, 10/29/2012 1:45:52 AM     (No. 8970669)

Drip,drip,drip.

I think this was not a movie critics uprising. It was an al-Qaida operation triggered by a message from Aiman al-Zawahiri of the Muslim Brotherhood. Hillary removed forces that had asked to remain 60 days more. Hussein and Panetta cowardly let Navy Seals Woods and Doherty die for electoral purposes - not admitting al-Qaida is not on its heels. So they concocted the lie of a spontaneous uprising despite having seen the attack on direct TV for hours. Hussein referred to the Innocence of Islam video six times on September 25 in the United Nations General Assembly, no less, Barry Hussein Obama lied to US and to the entire world to help his re-election. And soon his October Surprise attack to some Camel bystander or aspirin factory is coming.

We need to head Hussein off before he wags the dog.

Why were General Ham and Admiral G. Fired by Panetta? Why did Hillary lie with the bodies of her dead lying in front of her? Do you think our country is safe in the hands of this Acorn Communist Organizer?

General Petraeus has washed his hands. General Dempsey is in it at least as deep as Panetta.


Reply 5 - Posted by: lakerman1, 10/29/2012 5:12:55 AM     (No. 8970727)

We have top military commanders who were assigned the all important task of setting up th obama homosexual dating service. Everything else was secondary.

And as for the muslims, well, hussein obama said, in The Audacity of Hope, when it comes to the muslims, I will stand with them.


Reply 6 - Posted by: pineledger, 10/29/2012 7:12:24 AM     (No. 8970846)

If they didn't have the strike force, why didn't they?

This administration is corrupt and incompetent. Out with them.


Reply 7 - Posted by: fireman28, 10/29/2012 7:38:57 AM     (No. 8970896)

I call BS.

A caller to RUSH said he had previously been stationed in a AfriCom command center and extremis forces were available. They may not have been "assigned" to Gen Ham; but were on the call list.

Someone in AfriCom was manning the ship. They knew what was happening.

Long story; but sound like more cover up.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Maybeth, 10/29/2012 7:42:20 AM     (No. 8970903)

I read new information elsewhere that there were 2 warehouses here also, and it is assumed they were looted.
.... Whew! This is beginning to smell like a set-up.



And still this man continues to 'rule' from his Marxist perch.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Rinktum, 10/29/2012 7:48:51 AM     (No. 8970911)

You know, The world has this idea of what Americans do when our people are at risk. We are the first on site of an international catastrophe. At times of turmoil here at home when dangerous situations arise, we move heaven and earth to rescue and help. It happens time and time again because it is who we are. More than that, our military is known for never leaving any man behind. Without thought to their own safety, our Soldiers commit heroic acts to ensure that their fellow men and women are rescued.

Although I do not have all the facts in the Banghazi situation, I can't for the life of me wrap my brain around the fact that this President and his administration did nothing for seven hours when our people were under direct attack by blood thirsty barbarians who want nothing more than to kill us. Then to find out our Ambassador and the small security team stationed there repeatedly requested more security for months prior to this attack and were denied is beyond belief. Obama and his cronies have committed acts that have trampled our Constitution, but that all pales in comparison to this dereliction of duty by the CIC, SECDEF, and Secretary of State. What we are seeing played out on the world stage is total incompetence brought on by political expediency and Obama must be held accountable. He is a disgrace to the office of the Presidency of the United States of America.


Reply 10 - Posted by: leopardtwo, 10/29/2012 8:01:29 AM     (No. 8970937)

No strike force?! Whoa, Nellie! What happened to that AC-130 gunship and the drones?


Reply 11 - Posted by: Blue-Z-Anna, 10/29/2012 8:04:35 AM     (No. 8970945)

This will make the election a little harder but still not impossible to steal.


Reply 12 - Posted by: LZK, 10/29/2012 8:21:25 AM     (No. 8970981)

Now -- let me get this straight..... The fight went on for seven hours -- the drone was sending pictures to the White House -- the Ambassador and the Navy Seal were pleading for help -- AND -- obama flew off to lasvegas for a fund raiser????

LZK


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: TigerLilly, 10/29/2012 8:58:11 AM     (No. 8971058)

Obama wanted that video to be blamed so badly he repeated over and over the video was the cause and the US government had nothing to do with it. The video maker was arrested and will be held until after the election. As far as I know, there has been no communication with the video maker, no questions asked of him. That just seems strange to me.


Reply 14 - Posted by: oh-heck, 10/29/2012 9:15:35 AM     (No. 8971110)

The Washington Times tries to identify a middle path. They cover parts of the story and float some new excuses that regular assets weren't available. If the full story breaks out they won't look like they were totally in the President's pocket.


Reply 15 - Posted by: chicodon, 10/29/2012 9:28:23 AM     (No. 8971152)

One thing to keep in mind is that the only way Qaddafi's forces were dispersed was by our air power. At some point they will regroup. I've always suspected them in this attack.


Reply 16 - Posted by: lasvegaslou, 10/29/2012 9:39:11 AM     (No. 8971175)

I wish some posters would stop trying to embellish this sad tale with unneeded exaggerations. It is not necessary, it is plenty bad already without trying to make it worse with.

The most common exaggeration is that 2 Navy Seals were killed. Not true. While both of these brave men died American heroes, neither of them were Seals. They were ex-Seals and no longer even in the military. When they died they were working as mercenaries for a private company. When it hit the fan, their Seal training enabled two of them to hold off hundreds of crazed muslims for hours.

I am not denigrating these brave men in any way, I just don't want to help the libs. The libs will seize on something like this and use it to dismiss the whole thing as nothing but a right-wing rant.


Reply 17 - Posted by: goodguyrick, 10/29/2012 10:02:47 AM     (No. 8971240)

So they had the asset (Drone) to send to watch the Embassy burn and four Americans die but no additional resources to send? Kinda curious what type of Drone was it? Could it be armed? Was it armed? At this point in the game I wouldn't be surprised if it was.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: BetseyRoss, 10/29/2012 10:08:27 AM     (No. 8971255)

This is no right wing rant. Not even close. These people were left without help and they died because someone in charge decided not to help them. That someone was the POTUS. Simple, sickening story and it's short.


Reply 19 - Posted by: philemon1967, 10/29/2012 10:19:44 AM     (No. 8971281)

"Lack of a leader in the White House impeded Benghazi response". There, have fixed the headlines.


Reply 20 - Posted by: coldoc, 10/29/2012 10:24:55 AM     (No. 8971295)

The sad part is valerie jarret and obama probably celebrate 9-11.


Reply 21 - Posted by: RancherJack, 10/29/2012 10:43:12 AM     (No. 8971367)

Washington Times article ...

Bull(cough)


Reply 22 - Posted by: Alibi Inn, 10/29/2012 10:56:22 AM     (No. 8971428)

Poster 2 nailed it! I've screamed this for 4 years!


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: leopardtwo, 10/29/2012 10:57:56 AM     (No. 8971433)

The 'lack of information' did not prevent hundreds of brave NY City firefighters from climbing the Towers to try to stop the fires and rescue people in the buildings.


Reply 24 - Posted by: capt scurvey, 10/29/2012 11:21:22 AM     (No. 8971519)

Are you crazy, General? We have an election to deal with...


Reply 25 - Posted by: sgtfox of the jarhead clan, 10/29/2012 11:36:52 AM     (No. 8971578)

It's that incompetant George Bush. He didn't have a policy in place to protect these people. What a wimp. Obama vows that if re-elected he will fight hard to change those policies . His highest priority is to protect Americans.


Reply 26 - Posted by: J F Ackerman, 10/29/2012 11:40:02 AM     (No. 8971592)

Where was Petraeus? Where IS Petraeus?


Reply 27 - Posted by: bmw50, 10/29/2012 11:43:04 AM     (No. 8971599)

But Obama is going to buy me a cell phone...


Reply 28 - Posted by: bmw50, 10/29/2012 12:00:19 PM     (No. 8971665)

Regardless of his birth certificate, Obama is not an American. He was not raised in America or by Americans (his mother and her parents were American in name only, they were Communists), has no history as an American and cares nothing about American history. He feels no allegience or loyalty to America and has no clue what the American spirit or will is. The result it a man who cares nothing about Americans other then their vote potential.


Reply 29 - Posted by: BlueSkies, 10/29/2012 12:22:16 PM     (No. 8971744)

I don't think it's ranting to call the ex-Seals Seals; everyone understands that they were former Seals, but it's a shorthand way of describing them. But also, seems to me ex-Seals are like ex-Marines, no "ex" about it; you're one for life.


Reply 30 - Posted by: 3XALADY, 10/29/2012 12:24:10 PM     (No. 8971757)

These two heroes allowed the 30 CIA people to be rescued or there would have been 34 deaths on the Preezy's hand. I'm just appalled there is not more outrage and now the storm is going to sweep it under the rug.


Reply 31 - Posted by: 3XALADY, 10/29/2012 12:26:55 PM     (No. 8971770)

Sorry for the second post, but I think everyone who saw the video coming in and did nothing should be tried for treason against this country and hung at the end of a rope.

@13 I understand the video had the Arabic language added and then was played on TV over there.


Reply 32 - Posted by: bighambone, 10/29/2012 12:34:43 PM     (No. 8971808)

Question for Obama and crew, why set up a new military command to cover Africa and not give them any bullets?


Reply 33 - Posted by: lavalette, 10/29/2012 12:59:06 PM     (No. 8971915)

A single fighter from Italy could have been staffing the attackers within an hour. don't tell me they lacked a reponse force. I'll bet the drones that were watching the whole thing had hellfire missiles and could have taken out the attackers' mortor site with the push of a button.


Reply 34 - Posted by: Billyc, 10/29/2012 1:40:36 PM     (No. 8972058)

One has to wonder how on earth this incompetant narcissistic person in the WH is Allowed Permitted to control who is to die or not die. This idiot was adamamant that the Benghazi murder of Consulate US Personel were not to be helped, Remember Obama was shooting off his mouth to the world a week or so before Benghazi that it was ME ME that had killed OSAMA and other El Quada top brass. This El Quada Benghazi afilliate were hopping mad at Obama and on the 19 th sept they planned and executed the killing and destruction of our Consulate. They did not pick the week before or the week after it was on the day OSAMA murdered 3000 innocemt people in the USA perished injured or burnt to death. To cover his OSAMA death boasting he had to insure that Libya was tranquil and no El Quada .Obama pertetuated a lie that the spontaneous mob was the result of the anti Muslim video. Obama over a week was still trying to claim that consulate burning and deaths was due to the video.Fighter jets could have been ordered from Sigonella Sicily within 15 mins flight time their presence would have deterrred the attackers to back off the Consulate, Slower transports with shock troops marines or green beret would then be lowered into the Consulate compound. Again how can this individual be allowed to wait and see in real time the certain deaths of these heroes. As a father of one of them said better to die as a heroe than live as a coward.Ex Navy myself OBAMA SHOULD BE COURT MARTIALED.


Reply 35 - Posted by: larryp, 10/29/2012 2:21:50 PM     (No. 8972227)

No, No. On Bryan suits show of KFI640 in L.A on sun night they discussed a rapid reponse force ,faster than Delta.
They train all the time and are hready to go in w/o fore knowlege of anything and assess and fight and win. Once finished they go out quietly like their arrival/
these special forces are no secret just no talked about much.
I don't think he could say whee tehyare HQ'd or stationed but very close by


Reply 36 - Posted by: happy Trails, 10/29/2012 2:48:49 PM     (No. 8972361)

Where are the dead attackers? One of the first reports was that there were no dead attackers, only Americans. What were the Seals doing for seven hours? This story stinks like obama's breath in the morning.


Reply 37 - Posted by: mb5417, 10/29/2012 3:13:52 PM     (No. 8972460)

I read (on Blackfive, I think) that they killed 60 of the attackers.


Reply 38 - Posted by: rexhandsom, 10/29/2012 6:27:55 PM     (No. 8973045)

reply 27..................BINGO

That's what I'd like to know......

Hope I don't have to suspend Disbelief...


Reply 39 - Posted by: Ida Lil, 10/29/2012 7:15:36 PM     (No. 8973190)

Once a Seal always a Seal. They like other special Forces operatives are among the most dangerous men on earth. Obama has methodically
set them up for elimination at every turn since he rushed to declare he got Bin Laden.
Why?
We can presume he has made a deal to leave them in no win situations to appease the muslims who vowed to take his head. Mr. Woods is correct about cowards and Obe is one.


Reply 40 - Posted by: Dodge Boy, 10/29/2012 7:50:36 PM     (No. 8973253)

Oh man.. if this was an inside job involving Obie, he best start looking for a very good lawyer.


Reply 41 - Posted by: sonofboomercat, 10/29/2012 9:53:15 PM     (No. 8973522)

And the AC-130 flying nearby never got permission to go weapons hot.


Reply 42 - Posted by: LC Hoghead, 10/29/2012 10:05:15 PM     (No. 8973546)

America voted in 2008 to prove that we are not racist, now we must vote in 2012 to prove we are not stupid.


Reply 43 - Posted by: Mesa II, 10/29/2012 10:34:58 PM     (No. 8973608)

Both Barack and Hillary got that 30AM call and they both FAILED!


Reply 44 - Posted by: KTWO, 10/29/2012 11:26:28 PM     (No. 8973680)

#24 nailed it. In life you seldom have enough information. In war it is even less frequent.

Did the enemy, those attacking the consulate wait for enough information? I understand dozens of them died. Had they thought it over they would have gone home without a fight.

The firefighters didn't look up and say those buildings might fall upon us. We can't be sure.


Reply 45 - Posted by: PatriotOne, 10/29/2012 11:36:19 PM     (No. 8973688)

In the last presidential election, Americans voted for a black candidate to show it's OK to vote for a black candidate.....

In this presidential election, Americans will show it's OK to NOT vote for a black incumbent because he's proved he's a fraud, an anti-American and a puppet, dancing at the end of strings being jerked by George Soros and other rabid anti-Americans!



Post Reply   Close thread 709320




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"



Tea party looks to take
advantage of moment
Associated Press, by Thomas Beaumont    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 11:02:05 PM     Post Reply
DES MOINES, Iowa — Is the tea party getting its groove back? Shouts of vindication from around the country suggest the movement´s leaders certainly think so. They say the IRS acknowledgement that it had targeted their groups for extra scrutiny — a claim that tea party activists had made for years — is helping pump new energy into the coalition. And they are trying to use that development, along with the ongoing controversy over the Benghazi, Libya, terrorist attacks and the Justice Department´s secret seizure of journalists´ phone records, to recruit new activists incensed about government overreach.

America Waiting on Big
Decisions from SCOTUS
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Ken Klukowski    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 10:49:58 PM     Post Reply
Several major cases will be decided by the Supreme Court over the next six weeks, including historic issues such as gay marriage and affirmative action. These cases make the remainder of the Court’s term—which ends in June—one of the most carefully watched terms by millions of Americans. In addition to several significant cases that have already been decided this year, the justices of the High Court have at least ten important issues to decide before adjourning for the summer. Two headline cases involve race relations

The Emerging Scandal Narrative:
To Make Obama Pay, GOP
Blasts ´Culture of Intimidation´
National Review Online, by Eliana Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 10:47:42 PM     Post Reply
Since his emergence as a national political figure, Barack Obama has managed to deflect accusations of wrongdoing and impropriety with ease. Republicans on Capitol Hill are determined to put that to an end by making him pay for the unfolding scandal at the Internal Revenue Service. “Ultimately responsibility lies with the president. Obama has spent the better part of the last five years doing non-stop campaigning,” says a senior Republican Senate aide who points to the administration’s larger pattern of “using political offices to intimidate and harrass” its opponents. “When bureaucrats see the leader

Obama’s turn inward poses
risk for U.S. interests abroad
Washington Post, by Fred Hiatt    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 10:41:20 PM     Post Reply
“And the war will end by the end of next year .?.?. ” In the elusive search for an Obama Doctrine, that struck me as a telling phrase when I heard the president deliver it last week as he and British Prime Minister David Cameron took a couple of questions from reporters. Obama was speaking about the withdrawal of U.S. and allied combat troops from Afghanistan by the end of 2014. “Our troops will continue to come home, and the war will end,” he said. In fact, the war is unlikely to end. It may well accelerate as the Taliban

A rare peek into a Justice
Department leak probe
Washington Post, by Ann E. Marimow    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 10:39:22 PM     Post Reply
When the Justice Department began investigating possible leaks of classified information about North Korea in 2009, investigators did more than obtain telephone records of a working journalist suspected of receiving the secret material. They used security badge access records to track the reporter’s comings and goings from the State Department, according to a newly obtained court affidavit. They traced the timing of his calls with a State Department security adviser suspected of sharing the classified report. They obtained a search warrant for the reporter’s personal e-mails. The case

How the IRS seeded the
clouds in 2010 for a political
deluge three years later
Washington Post, by Zachary A. Goldfarb and Kimberly Kindy    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 10:35:11 PM     Post Reply
In early 2010, an Internal Revenue Service team in Cincinnati began noticing a stream of applications from groups with ­political-sounding names, setting in motion a dragnet aimed at ­separating legitimate tax-exempt groups from those working to get candidates elected. The IRS officials decided to single out one type of political group for particular scrutiny. “These cases involve various local organizations in the Tea Party movement,” read one internal IRS e-mail sent at the time. A few hours north in Fremont, Ohio, the owners of a drainage supply shop, Tom and Marion Bower, were wondering why it was taking so long

Obama´s Counsel Told of IRS
Audit Findings Weeks Ago
Wall Street Journal, by Peter Nicholas    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 9:04:45 PM     Post Reply
The White House´s chief lawyer learned weeks ago that an audit of the Internal Revenue Service likely would show that agency employees inappropriately targeted conservative groups, a senior White House official said Sunday. That disclosure has prompted a debate over whether the president should have been notified at that time. In the week of April 22, the Office of the White House Counsel and its head, Kathryn Ruemmler, were told by Treasury Department attorneys that an inspector general´s report was nearing completion, the White House official said. In that conversation, Ms. Ruemmler learned that "a small



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
76 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Evidence emerges that Obama
administration official knew of
IRS targeting during 2012 campaign

59 replie(s)
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

56 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

Camelot Is Burning
47 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton    Original Article
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM     Post Reply
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

46 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

46 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All
Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal

43 replie(s)
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM     Post Reply
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure


Post Reply   Close thread 709320





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~