A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Obama: Banks Must Be Regulated
Because They Make Profits
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Obama: Banks Must Be Regulated
Because They Make Profits

Breitbart's Big Government, by Tony Lee

Original Article

Posted By:Photoonist, 10/26/2012 8:02:51 PM

President Barack Obama on Wednesday said the real reason why banks need to be regulated is because they exist to make profits. On an appearance on the "Tonight Show" with Jay Leno, Obama spoke about some of the regulations his administration has supported and enacted, insisting "smart regulations" are needed because "these financial institutions are in it to make money." "But, look, these financial institutions are in to make money and that’s why we need some smart regulations and this is an example of the difference in this campaign because my opponent says he wants to roll back all those

Comments:
In the First Marxist's mind it's only okay if a company makes money and he gets some of it while he's regulating that company to death. Why does this sound like the way the mafia operates? Oh yeah, Chicago.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Scottyboy, 10/26/2012 8:05:34 PM     (No. 8965659)

This dude has a third world marxist mentality and he's an idiot to boot.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Scrubber, 10/26/2012 8:08:19 PM     (No. 8965664)

Ahh, listen to the tape. He didn't say banks must be regulated because they are in business to make money. I hate to say it, but Breitbarf is really stretching to make a point.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Hotrod, 10/26/2012 8:11:22 PM     (No. 8965668)

Government must be more tightly regulated because it takes and spends other people's money!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Kurto, 10/26/2012 8:13:48 PM     (No. 8965671)

Stoooooopid!


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: CEP, 10/26/2012 8:20:39 PM     (No. 8965685)

Make him go away please voters, vote him out of office on Nov. 6.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Bubbasuncle, 10/26/2012 8:25:59 PM     (No. 8965697)

Sorry #2, I think you should re-watch and maybe read the transcript.






















  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Robinsolana, 10/26/2012 8:45:46 PM     (No. 8965735)

Of course Obama and OBiden are 'financially illiterate'.
That would explain the stunned and 'crucified' economy and the millions of workers too discouraged to even seek jobs.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 10/26/2012 8:54:23 PM     (No. 8965754)

"A man is never so innocently employed as when making money." Samuel Johnson.

The same cannot be said of those engaged in regulating the behavior of others.

Making money is a rational activity that is guided and limited by the constraints of reality. To make money, certain things must be done, and other things must not be done. Making money requires careful attention to detail and respect for the truth, even when the particular enterprise chances to be dishonest or illegal. Nothing clarifies the mind so wonderfully as the endeavor to make money.

Regulating the behavior of other people, by contrast, is rational in name only. Fantasy, politics and brute power are the basis for such regulation. A regulation can be anything one can dream up and manage somehow to impose on others. There is no necessary or logical connection between regulation and outcome. The desire for material gain is simple and pure - as pure anyway as human motives ever are. The urge to regulate others is complex and mixed. All kinds of motives and agendas can be involved in attempts to regulate how other people behave. Making money has a clear and unmistakable goal: the accumulation of money. Regulating other people has no such distinct end point. Whether regulations are successful is much harder to determine and open to debate than whether money is in fact being made or loss.

All things considered, it is much easier to deal with an unscrupulous money maker than an overzealous regulator.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: LanieLou, 10/26/2012 9:01:13 PM     (No. 8965766)

Sharia Law condemns usury... and individual ownership.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: LAW428, 10/26/2012 9:10:46 PM     (No. 8965781)

Spoken like a true Communist! Oh, yeah, his step-father WAS a Communist...like father, like son.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: 4Justice, 10/26/2012 9:49:18 PM     (No. 8965852)

Every business is in it to make money, you dolt!!! All these excess regulations these lefties create are just ways to control the flow of money back into their own pockets and create more power for themselves. It turns into a corrupt cronyism wherein the banks are no longer acting in good faith but rather looking for sleazy ways to get through the messes caused by the politicians. Often that means campaign contribution kickbacks for special exemptions or other loopholes. I am so sick of lying leftists who KNOW they are illegally profitting from manipulating the businesses while badmouthing them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: mustang flyer, 10/26/2012 9:55:50 PM     (No. 8965864)

Banks are in business to make money??? Zippo, tell me this isn't so...HAHAHAHA!!!! What an idiot! Anybody who votes for this dolt is a clone of this 'genius'...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: 4Justice, 10/26/2012 10:07:20 PM     (No. 8965886)

Obama quote: "But, look, these financial institutions are in to make money and that’s why we need some smart regulations and this is an example of the difference in this campaign because my opponent says he wants to roll back all those regulations."

It sure sounds like it to me, #2! "(They)are in to make money and that is why we need..."

Besides, he is lying. Romney was very clear about what he wanted to do. He wanted to roll back Dodd-Frank because it had too many loopholes that allowed some larger institutions to get special treatment (despite what Obama says). Romney was the one who said we need "smart regulation" but at least he didn't say for the same reason Zero did. Yes, Zero said because the banks "are in it to make money".

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: lana720, 10/26/2012 10:17:03 PM     (No. 8965908)

zippy couldn't pass a Business 101 course.
Psst, it's called capitalism!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: stablemoney, 10/26/2012 11:55:57 PM     (No. 8966056)

Banks are regulated because they can create money, and Congress is empowered by the constitution to create and regulate the currency. Obama, who may have told you that he is a constitutional professor and scholar, having said that he taught it at the U. of Chicago, may be challenged to find a reference to profits in the constitution.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: BcdErick, 10/27/2012 12:03:42 AM     (No. 8966071)

#2 how did you listen to/watch the tape? I'd like to do so as well.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Trigger2, 10/27/2012 4:53:05 AM     (No. 8966225)

#9 has it exactly right. This is more proof that Hussein Hmmm Hmmm Hmmm is a muslim.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Tygerlily, 10/27/2012 5:02:10 AM     (No. 8966230)

What is he? A ferengi? For pity sake get him the heck outta office NOW.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: O.S. Banker, 10/27/2012 9:54:43 AM     (No. 8966660)

A Ferengi would never propose any regulation. A true Ferengi is a committed capitalist.

Banks are not regulated because they create money so much as they do it with other peoples money. Banks were initially regulated for Safety and Soundness, meaning their lending practices were scrutinized to insure that they were not taking undue risk.

As Federal Government Social Planning evolved the minions of Capital Hill found that Banks were a force multiplier for their plans and schemes. So safety and soundness expanded to insure Equal Credit Opportunity. Banks were required to keep statistics on the request that were turned down as well as the loans that were made regarding race and gender.

When Congress decided that underwriting criteria could have a disparate impact on certain neighborhoods the Community Reinvestment Act was created and Banks were required to track the loans that they made geographically within their defined trade area.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: O.S. Banker, 10/27/2012 9:55:39 AM     (No. 8966662)

Continued

When congress decided that everybody should own a home, credit standards were further relaxed. The banks were competing with Mortgage Brokers whose business assets consisted of a stack of business cards and a magnetic door sign. The default risk was minimized because Really Smart Guys (and Gals) packaged the loans purchase insurance and sold the loan packages as AA Bonds. (See The Big Short by Michael Lewis)

And when the whole thing collapsed Congress decided that the solution was more regulation. Harrumph. When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.

Let me give you a simple example. Say you have a customer who farms in a river valley. By definition this is a flood plain. Say that the farm land itself is worth $10,000 per acre and your customer has a half section (320 acres). Your typical community bank would probably loan up to 70% of that value or $224,000. But our customer is rather conservative (as most good farmers are) and is total debt load is only $160,000. On this farm is a nice machine shed/shop facility that would cost $60,000 to replace. Now you would think that a banker could say to his client "I am comfortable with the value of the ground, so I don't need insurance on the machine shed. However you do need to protect your investment so I leave that decision up to you." You would be right except for the fact that the farm is in a flood plain. Now the Federal regulations kickin and require the bank to have flood insurance to the value of the building despite the fact that the bank is more than adequately collateralized with the ground.

Old School Banker

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: tygerlily, 10/27/2012 11:18:35 AM     (No. 8966926)

Please excuse my wrong assertion. I should have asked my 9 year old - she is the Trekkie in our house. She had gone to bed, I will tell her I got properly `educated' Whatever he is he must be stopped!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: O.S. Banker, 10/27/2012 1:44:57 PM     (No. 8967336)

No slight intended. I only know such mundane trivia because my better-half is a full blown Star Trek geek.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 



 

Post Reply   Close thread 708984




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Photoonist"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Photoonist"



MA Senate: Elizabeth
Warren Defeats Scott Brown
Townhall, by Daniel Doherty    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:53:58 PM     Post Reply
We at Townhall have been covering this hotly contested Senate race for months and the results are finally in: With 36 percent of precincts reporting, Elizabeth Warren has been declared the next junior Senator from Massachusetts. Warren has never held public office before and the eye-popping $40 million she raised this election cycle evidently proved more than enough to unseat incumbent Senator Scott Brown. This was the most expensive Senate race of 2012 -- by a long shot.

Republicans lose ground
in bid to take over Senate
NBC News, by M. ALex Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:36:34 PM     Post Reply
Former Gov. Angus King, running as an independent, won the Senate contest Tuesday in Maine, NBC News projected, taking a seat that had been held by the Republicans. The loss further complicated the party's drive to take control of the Senate (Snip) Republican Ted Cruz defeated Democrat Paul Sadler to hold the open seat in Texas, succeeding retiring Republican Kay Bailey Hutchison, NBC News projected. See results Democrats held small edges in two of the other states critical to the balance of power in the Senate: In Massachusetts, where Elizabeth Warren, a law professor at Harvard University, was leading Republican

CNN Reports Romney Internal
Polling Shows Obama Leading In Ohio
Mediaite, by Meenal Vamburkar    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:23:34 PM     Post Reply
CNN’s Peter Hamby reported that Mitt Romney‘s internal polling showed President Obama leading in Ohio by five percentage points.Per Hamby’s post: The number represented a sharp final bump for Obama in Ohio, a race that had essentially been a tied race through much of the previous week, according to the campaign’s daily tracking. The polling, which also showed a tight race in Pennsylvania, explains why Romney officials decided to send their candidate on last-minute Election Day visits to Cleveland and Pittsburgh.

Obama adviser: 'They'll be counting
until 2 a.m.' in Florida
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:11:57 PM     Post Reply
The Obama and Romney campaigns may be gearing up for a very late night, with one Obama campaign adviser predicting that in Florida alone, "they'll be counting until 2 a.m." The Obama adviser said signs suggest the race is quite tight, though the campaign claimed to be "holding strong" in key battlegrounds like Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. The adviser also said turnout among black voters in Virginia was better than expected, suggesting that could be a problem for Mitt Romney. Republican operatives in Virginia, though, predicted a razor-thin victory for their candidate in the state.

No surprises for Obama,
Romney in early projections
CNN, by Tom Cohen    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:02:23 PM     Post Reply
Washington - Early returns on Tuesday in what is anticipated to be a dead even presidential election contained no surprises, as CNN projected President Barack Obama will win his home state of Illinois and eight other races while Republican challenger Mitt Romney will win nine states. All races called so far went as expected after the roller-coaster ride of an election campaign that was buffeted by a superstorm and missteps on both sides. Obama and Romney ran dead even in final polls that hinted at a result rivaling some of the closest presidential elections in history, reflecting the deep political

Exit polls 2012: Hurricane
Sandy not a factor
Politico, by Emily Schultheis    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 8:48:28 PM     Post Reply
A week after Hurricane Sandy slammed into the East Coast, a majority of voters said President Barack Obama’s response to the crisis wasn’t a factor in their vote, according to early exit polls. Fifty-five percent of those surveyed, per CBS News’ early exit polling released by radio station WKZO in Kalamazoo, Mich., said Obama’s handling of the storm was a minor factor in their vote or wasn’t a factor at all. Twenty-six percent named Sandy as an “important” factor, and 15 percent said it was the “most important” factor in their decision.

Exit polls 2012: Mitt Romney
winning independents
Politico, by Emily Schultheis    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 8:47:41 PM     Post Reply
Mitt Romney is leading among independents in both Ohio and Virginia, early exit polls show. In Ohio, the former Massachusetts governor takes 56 percent of self-identified independents, compared with 40 percent for President Barack Obama. That’s a huge decrease for Obama from 2008, when the exit polls found him winning independents in Ohio by 12 points, 52 percent to 44 percent for John McCain. The numbers are similar but slightly tighter in Virginia: Romney takes 53 percent of independents there, according to ABC News exit polls, a 12-point lead over Obama. In 2008, Obama won independents in the state by



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Has Rush Limbaugh Finally
Reached the End Of The Road?

46 replie(s)
Forbes Magazine, by Rick Ungar    Original Article
Posted By: EveningStar- 4/16/2014 7:24:05 PM     Post Reply
Like him or hate him, there is no disputing that Rush Limbaugh’s very special brand of mixing right-wing politics with his flare for entertainment has produced one of the most successful radio programs in the medium’s long history. Whatever the burning political question of the day, millions of Americans have relished the opportunity to tune into Rush’s program, knowing that he would quickly take that hot potato, throw a few gallons of verbal kerosene into the mix and elevate the matter into a five alarm fire with a just a few well-chosen words spoken in the style only Rush Limbaugh could

Casual marijuana use linked with
brain abnormalities, study finds

41 replie(s)
Fox News, by Loren Grush    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 6:12:53 PM     Post Reply
Casual marijuana use may come with some not-so-casual side effects. For the first time ever, researchers at Northwestern University have analyzed the relationship between casual use of marijuana and brain changes – and found that young adults who used cannabis just once or twice a week showed significant abnormalities in two important brain structures. The study’s findings, to be published Wednesday in the Journal of Neuroscience, are similar to those of past research linking chronic, long-term marijuana use with mental illness and changes in brain development. Dr. Hans Breiter, co-senior study author, said he was inspired to look at the effects of casual

Biden Tells Boston Bombing
Survivors, ´It Was Worth It´ (Video)

41 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Instablog, by Debra Heine    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 9:28:18 PM     Post Reply
Less than a minute into his speech at the Boston marathon bombing memorial on Tuesday, Vice President Joe Biden went tragically off script and told the crowd of Boston bombing survivors that "it was worth it." After expressing how impressed he was with the tribute, he said somberly, "let me say to those ´quote survivors,´ my God, you have survived and you have soared. It was worth it. I mean this sincerely - just to hear each of you speak. You´re truly, truly inspiring." The audience sat in stunned silence until Biden declared, "I´ve never heard anything so beautiful than

Which Actor Portrays The
Best James Bond?

38 replie(s)
American Spectator, by Jonah Goldberg and Taki Theodoracopulos    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/16/2014 11:20:22 AM     Post Reply
Look, everyone loves Sean Connery, particularly Sean Connery. That’s why he plays Sean Connery in every movie he’s in. People love that Scottish brogue so much, they don’t mind that he has it when he plays Juan Sánchez Villa-Lobos Ramírez, an immortal Spaniard in Highlander. The guy even won an Oscar for playing an Irish cop with a Scottish accent. Talk about sexist double standards: Meryl Streep has to master foreign dialects to get her golden statuettes. Connery just has to show up on time. In economics you devalue a currency by printing too much of it. In film you

Michelle Obama Riverdances
Through Dublin to the Tune
of $7,921,638

37 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Peace, by Tom Fitton    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/17/2014 6:45:16 AM     Post Reply
When it comes to tracking the cost of Obama family vacations, there are two primary challenges. First, the Obamas are prolific jet-setters, so there are many details to track. Second, the Obama administration, clearly embarrassed by these lavish and frequent family vacations, stonewalls the release of records at every turn. But we have been relentless in pursuit of this information. Our attorneys file the lawsuits and make our case, and our investigators pour through pages of records and crunch the numbers. And the information we’ve uncovered – information that would otherwise remain under lock and key – shows that the

White babies just 15 months old show racial
bias when picking playmates, study found

35 replie(s)
Daily Mail (U.K.), by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/15/2014 10:23:35 PM     Post Reply
Toddlers show racial bias when picking playmates, a study reveals. They also take account of how fairly others behave. Researchers tested the reaction of white 15-month-olds as toys were distributed. Two white adults divided the toys, one equally and the other unequally. Seventy per cent of the toddlers chose to play with the researcher who distributed the toys fairly. But in a second test, when one researcher favoured a white recipient over an Asian one, they picked the ‘fair’ researcher less often, the journal Frontiers in Psychology reports. And the babies are more likely to help those who share the same ethnicity, which is known as

Why is US Senator Harry
Reid so concerned with
a local Nevada rancher?

35 replie(s)
Fox News, by Wayne Allyn Root    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 9:37:12 PM     Post Reply
I live in Las Vegas. I live and breath Nevada politics. Something is very wrong. Something smells rotten in the Nevada desert. And Senator Harry Reid’s fingerprints are all over it. I am of course referring to the Bundy Ranch siege. This was a dispute between a Nevada ranching family with rights to the land in question for 140 years and the BLM (Bureayu of Land Management). The government claims they haven’t paid grazing fees for 20 years. The result was a government assault on the ranch- including snipers with assault rifles, SUV’s, helicopters, airplanes and over 200 heavily armed troops. No

   

Post Reply   Close thread 708984





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~