The NYY "Editors" are so ashamed of carring Obama's water that they refuse to list their names.

Pathetic!

Here's more of Obama's 16 reasons to smoke Newports.

Reason #12 - This is the last real wet kiss the MSM will deliver. It's all bad from here.

As the sun slowly sets in the West (and on the Debates), you can bare witness that the Times is definitely in the dark

This settles it - - leftist delusion is permanent and irreversible.

Oh, well - - we won't have to worry about NYT editorials for the next presidential election. Their chances of surviving that long are very Slim.

Thanks, NYT, for once again publishing more proof that journalism has devolved into the dumbest profession on this planet.

Your emotionally based denigration of Romney's performance was expected and, as usual, totally devoid of any facts.

Bwhahahahahahahahaha!

Now let's stop talking about it so all the lies and posturing can stand.

# 1, editorial writers are surely named Chrissy Matthews, Lawrence O'donnell, Ed Schultz and Racialist Maddow. Saves the Times from having separate writers for this vicious nonsense.

Watching the NYT commit suicide isn't pretty, but not as painful as reading their "Obama is god" editorials.

How's that bottom line these days, editors?

I keep hoping the limited number of free views will kick in and I won't be able to read the dreck in the NYT, but no such luck. All the same stuff. Attack Romney, and when it's time to cite Obambi's achievements.... attack Romney!

I like NY Times. If you tear the pages into strips, you can use them to clean the liberal clutter off your orifice.

Biden & the NYT times have a difficult road this morning making Romney look bad.

They can't attack him on policy. Our foreign policy is bipartisan. Mitt agrees with liberals on Iraq, Iran, Egypt and Afghanistan.

Clearly Romney is the better man to lead America out of the Obama induced depression.

It's the economy that concerns American families.

How devoid of accuracy and substance they are. It further justifies why I dropped them more than a decade ago when I no longer had to know what the other side was reading.

"The New York Times had nothing substantive or coherent to say about the debate".

NYT Editors is a pseudonym for Moronic Marxists

Is 'briefing book" a misprint for "binders?"

The newspaper of record is dead.

perception

The New York "WHAT??" Yes, we know the Gray Lady has no teeth and is really getting old. Sorry New Yorkers, your cheat sheet is really full of you know what in this world Obama lives in...socialism/ marxism so on and so on. YOu don't stand up in America and kill the golden goose that made Americans and this great country exceptional!!

In the days of its greatness, the editors of the Times would feign an Olympian aloofness to proclaim that upon their educated and politically disinterested analysis, the Democrat won. Today, the Times editorial writers sound as if they are still writing for their college dailies, engaging in nakedly partisan personal snipes and undignified metaphors. Its descent from the mountain top into the swamp has not been a pretty sight. Another reason it is a dying newspaper.

One has to wonder how the NYT got it's reputation. They sound exactly like MSNBC.

Sarcasm ON:

"I am an intellectual because I read the New York Times, take every word as gospel, and can repeat each article back word for word."

Sarcasm OFF.

I remember getting a landline call a few years ago about subscribing to the NYT. I told them I wouldn't read that paper trash if they delivered it to me in bed, with breakfast, with cash. The person on the phone said he was sorry to hear that. I told him he should be and hung up.

This fishwrap newpaper has no credibility whatsoever!

I migh be bothered by this if Romney stood a snow ball's chance of carrying New York. New York lost its sanity after Pataki and Guliani. New York is California East.

NYTs, Wil Duranty. Somethings just never change.

My bad.. Walter Duranty

Obviously it was written before the debate, which they obviously didn't see either.

Dear Editors:

Thank you sincerely for your newspaper. My dog loved pi**ing all over it and my birds loved cra**ing on it.Then we wrapped some fish in it and later we used it to stoke the fire in the fireplace. Keep them coming, they are so much more useful than you idiot lefties ever imagined!

Romney/Ryan win on Nov. 6th!
The Marxist Muslim and the clueless Mooch go back to Chi-ca-ca!

When Romney wins the election, expect to see the headline buried on page 4.

And yet in the first paragraph, the New York Times can't even bring themselves to mention the guy that they support--rather, they spend their precious newspaper space on bashing Romney. It appears that the Times fully believes that Romney is winning, otherwise, they'd ignore him.

What a shame....the Old Gray Lady is fit for little more than papering the bottom of a birds cage these days.

This from the people who brought you the last four years.

Waiting for the Times to drop their print version and go strictly online. It'll be known as the Tiny Times. After a while the advertisers will mostly bail, and the online version will slim down to a daily crossword puzzle with weekly columns by Paul Krugman writing summaries of NFL games and NY society news. In its final stages the Really Tiny Times will morph into an LGBT escort/dating service listing on Craigslist.

Yeah, this guy is right. Let's vote for Kenya Boy and continue the catastrophe for 4 more years. It will be great to see unemployment at 25 to 30% and our entire GDP be used for welfare. I'd be happy to see gas at $15 a gallon and heating oil at the same level. And screw all those job creators. They are just out for themselves. Kenya Boy will do the right thing and drive them all out business. Good! they deserve it.

Vote for Kenya Boy! Paradise is just around the corner.

Tomorrow's headline: ''New York Times public editor reads latest editorial, runs screaming into street yelling, 'It's inhuman! I can't take it anymore!' ''

The newspaper of Stalin has spoken.