|
|
| |
Topic: Iranian Regime: Obama Sent Secret Message Recognizing Our Nuclear Rights |
Iranian Regime: Obama Sent Secret Message Recognizing Our Nuclear Rights
Human Events, by Jim Hoft
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:ketchuplover, 10/22/2012 1:16:13 AM
|
| Last week, Reza Kahlili, a former Revolutionary Guard member wrote that Iran had reached a deal with the Obama Administration to preserve portions of its nuclear program. Hossain Ebrahimi told reporters yesterday that Obama sent the regime a secret message. On Saturday, the Iranian regime confirmed this report. The Iranian regime revealed on Saturday that the Obama Administration sent them a secret message through the Swiss Embassy recognizing their nuclear rights. The Swiss government, acting through its Embassy in Tehran, serves as protecting power for U.S. interests in Iran.
|
Comments: This would be unbelievable except for that microphone having picked up O's words to Medvedev last March about having more flexibility after he wins reelection. According to this report, he also apologized to Iran for having been forced by Congress to impose sanctions against them.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Robinsolana, 10/22/2012 1:23:10 AM (No. 8951496)
This is one heck of a surprise. So that is what Jarrett and Obama have been up to. Talk about throwing Israel and ourselves under the bus.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
janylou, 10/22/2012 1:24:26 AM (No. 8951498)
It also reeks of HillBilly when they allowed the N. Koreans to keep their nukes in exchange for food because the N. Koreans promised that they wouldn't use them for harmful purposes. I have no doubts that this admin would offer the same kind of deal with the Iranians.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
ColonialAmerican1623, 10/22/2012 1:28:49 AM (No. 8951505)
Congress still on recess ?
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
FilAm, 10/22/2012 1:36:09 AM (No. 8951511)
Can you imagine if Roosevelt sent a secret message to Hitler that it is entitled to its nuclear rights? This is so wrong on many levels.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
lindamay, 10/22/2012 1:38:03 AM (No. 8951514)
Let's see the letter.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Spidey, 10/22/2012 1:44:19 AM (No. 8951518)
Some sort of bizarre peace deal with Iran wouldn't do them any good unless Obama lifted the sanctions also.Don't know how that would be received by people who aren't Obama backers who couldn't care less about the threat to Israel this would result in.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
JHSMom02, 10/22/2012 1:45:35 AM (No. 8951519)
OMG! Other words fail me.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Douglas DC, 10/22/2012 1:49:21 AM (No. 8951521)
The Fit has hit the Shan. This is not going to be pretty...
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
KTWO, 10/22/2012 2:08:38 AM (No. 8951525)
Our secret dealings with Iran apparently are real. And may already have O in a swamp. (Tar Baby can no longer be used.)
Nuclear rights could just mean peaceful reactors. That was never is dispute. But then why say it? And telling Iran you want to defy Congress but can't won't fly with Americans.
But can it get into the last debate. Half of Washington will be spinning furiously if this story can't be debunked.
The WH just bashed the NYT, they they might not be so happy to run cover again. But they will.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
LOL Thomas, 10/22/2012 2:14:14 AM (No. 8951528)
From the article (emphasis mine):
“. . . during the session to submit the message, the Swiss ambassador to Tehran quoted the US president as saying that ‘we (the US) recognize your nuclear rights’.”
. . . Swiss diplomat had also quoted Obama as saying that “I didn’t want to impose sanctions on your central bank but I had no options but to approve it since a Congress majority had approved the decision.”
That strikes me in the gut as treason. Will someone please put this in front of Mitt Romney’s eyes in time for the debate?
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Kurto, 10/22/2012 2:28:39 AM (No. 8951533)
OMG! More disastrous stupidity from the 0-team. This October surprise will be a mushroom cloud over what's left of 0 & Co.
Let's see Candy Cowley run interference on this one.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
stablemoney, 10/22/2012 3:37:33 AM (No. 8951547)
The Iranians use the word submitted. That is what Obama has done.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
coldoc, 10/22/2012 4:01:12 AM (No. 8951552)
Just because the muslim crapweasel we have for a president says it doesn't make it so.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Th-Gr-Sil-Majority, 10/22/2012 4:51:16 AM (No. 8951555)
...DISGUSTED...I find myself feeling it more and more as we head up to the election...all of this may have been avoided if the press simply did their job four years ago...
...amazing how many of us could foresee this at that time. There is still so much to be exposed that most have not tuned into that will be part of the history to be written...
...and the american taxpayer will be on the hook until he leaves this world...
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
steph_gray, 10/22/2012 5:09:46 AM (No. 8951561)
Would like to see as must read. Must get to the bottom of this one!
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
pineledger, 10/22/2012 5:58:14 AM (No. 8951586)
I would say this falls under the rubric of "Foreign Relations."
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
kate3513, 10/22/2012 6:00:27 AM (No. 8951590)
Does treason not enter the mind with this guy? Incredible. He has no interest in the well being of this country. Unbelievable if even one sentence is true.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Keekng, 10/22/2012 6:34:15 AM (No. 8951639)
Words cannot match my hatred of the person.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
uno, 10/22/2012 6:34:41 AM (No. 8951642)
#17 - Does treason not enter the mind with this guy? No. The question should be: Does treason not enter the minds of Congress with this guy?
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Mazeman, 10/22/2012 6:53:41 AM (No. 8951663)
Romney has so much to cover in tonight's debate......
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
quegley, 10/22/2012 6:54:58 AM (No. 8951666)
I have no fear. Someone in the press is hot on the Swiss Embassy to find out if the story is true or not. At the same time asking Rice if indeed she had sent the same letter. Incredible.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
uno_thatguy, 10/22/2012 7:00:11 AM (No. 8951671)
That's my question, #19!
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Vast Right Winger, 10/22/2012 7:04:14 AM (No. 8951674)
This could be an EVIL LEFT plot.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Attercliffe, 10/22/2012 7:08:00 AM (No. 8951677)
What worries me most is to whom else has Obama sent secret messages of this sort besides Russia and, if true, Iran?
And what a damn shame it is that we don't know whom to believe, Iran or Obama and his administration.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
saraguay, 10/22/2012 7:15:37 AM (No. 8951687)
will this information be in any of the msm or just in conservative papers? this needs to be shouted from the rooftops - from the leftie papers as well as the right.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
planetgeo, 10/22/2012 7:20:05 AM (No. 8951695)
The secret message: Dudes, I can be more flexible once I'm re-elected. Send donations. Operators are standing by.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
chicodon, 10/22/2012 7:24:46 AM (No. 8951703)
Obama has always supported Shiites in my opinion. The Arab Spring is an example. I also believe he supports Assad in Syria. Selling out our interests to Iran wouldn't surprise me. If anyone has another view I'd like to hear it.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Pros7767, 10/22/2012 7:26:21 AM (No. 8951709)
# 19, 22, the answer is no. They would be accused of being racist!
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
a man over thirty, 10/22/2012 7:27:28 AM (No. 8951712)
Unfortunately, this article is in Human Events instead of the NYT or WaPo. No one will see it except us and it will gain no traction before Nov. 6.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
jackburton, 10/22/2012 7:29:11 AM (No. 8951716)
This is debate material. How does it get brought up? Ask Romney a question and he answers "i would do x or y but never, ever, tell a rouge regime that is trying to develop nuclear weapons with the clearly stated goals of wiping out one of our allies that they have a 'nuclear right.'"
Watch the Won do a melt down.
Get elected.
Really, if I were Obama I would have a handy excuse for just cancelling right now.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
Bad Dog, 10/22/2012 7:29:19 AM (No. 8951718)
I'm with 23..... This could be a mega setup for the debate tonight.
But if this is true, and Obama loses (which we all pray, trust, believe, and KNOW he will), imagine what he'll do in the 71 days between election day and Inauguration Day....
I hope every conservative legal foundation in America is gearing up to go on this. I know Landmark Legal is....
God bless our enlisted men and women, the 'dispensible' pawns in this evil man's chess game.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
Maybeth, 10/22/2012 7:33:21 AM (No. 8951725)
In addition, there is another story out there this morning that the Mullahs are very nervous that Obama may lose this election. .... Now why do you suppose terrorist types would worry about Obama being replaced?
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
Red Jeep, 10/22/2012 7:33:55 AM (No. 8951731)
Do we impeach over this... or over Benghazi... or...
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
FlatCityGirl, 10/22/2012 7:34:35 AM (No. 8951733)
Right here: "The US letter follows threats by Iran last month to shut off the Strait of Hormoz – the world’s most important oil shipping lane – if new US and EU sanctions over its nuclear program halted Iranian oil exports."
Do you see what he's doing? He's bargaining with/begging a despot regime not to cut off our oil.
He doesn't want to be seen sending our military resources into the Straight Hormoz to keep the shipping lanes open. He knows the world runs on oil.
Not one peep out of FOX this morning about this. Why?
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
countryDoc, 10/22/2012 7:42:37 AM (No. 8951749)
We need to be careful and make sure we have good evidence on this. We could get egg on our face if we make claims that turn out not to be true. At the same time, if true, I think it is equivalent to treason
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
fransand, 10/22/2012 7:43:00 AM (No. 8951750)
I agree, he can do a lot of damage between Nov. 6 and Jan. 20 but if congress gets busy immediately and beats the drum about impeachment for treason, corruption, etc., it could keep him busy refuting, back-filling, lying...
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
LAW428, 10/22/2012 7:45:04 AM (No. 8951754)
Are there any testicles left in Congress? Is there nothing that will qualify as an "impeachable offense?"
Watergate was like a "traffic infraction" compared to the "homicides" that are occurring in THIS administration.
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
FlatCityGirl, 10/22/2012 7:45:50 AM (No. 8951755)
If it's not true, wouldn't the Swiss already be shouting it from the rooftops?
The Swiss are neutral, supposedly, in all things. They would logically be the one to carry the messages. So if it's not the truth, why wouldn't they be screaming at the top of their lungs?
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
Blue-Z-Anna, 10/22/2012 7:49:12 AM (No. 8951765)
Trump is teasing a "Huge" announcement re: Obama on Wed.
Hmmmmmmm.....
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
mindyourbubble, 10/22/2012 7:53:40 AM (No. 8951772)
FTA: "The source, who remains anonymous for security reasons and is highly placed in Iran’s regime, said that once Khamenei receives Obama’s guarantees, he will authorize an announcement by Iran on a solution to the nuclear crisis before the U.S. presidential elections"
WHOA, BHO is going to use this as a tool by which he wants to show us all that he is practicing "Good Foreign Polcy"?
We don't even have an "Embassy" in Iran.
This sounds flakey to me. Something is rotten in the Oval office.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
nerdowell, 10/22/2012 7:59:18 AM (No. 8951779)
One thing puzzles me:
Why bother the Swiss and get them involved? Jimmy Carter is still looking for something to do.
Oh...
Never mind.
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
benignczar, 10/22/2012 8:14:04 AM (No. 8951805)
There could be an upside to this:
1. Iran gets the nuke. 2. Obama loses and he and his gang go back to Chicago. 3. Iran launches a nuke at the USA. 4. The nuke hits Chicago and wipes it out. 5. USA, with an adult in charge, then wipes out Iran.
A win-win for America.
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
LZK, 10/22/2012 8:15:03 AM (No. 8951810)
OMG -- the man's a traitor.
How long did WE think it would be before he threw US under the bus?
Wow -- he "IS" an enemy of the state....a foreign operative in our beloved White House....
LZK
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
faith_and_reason, 10/22/2012 8:16:32 AM (No. 8951814)
Anti-Christ makes secret deals with world leaders, according to the Book of Revelation, and makes a public deal with Israel. Anti-Christ then betrays Israel, making war against Israel.
Insincere "Christians" and "Jews" side with Anti-Christ. Those who remain dedicated to the true God resist the Anti-Christ.
Our God is King of kings and Lord of lords, and, according to Romans 13, those who resist Him will receive to themselves damnation. God alone is the rightful ruler, and I take Romans 13 to refer primarily to Him. Peace and prosperity and the brotherhood of man would be the rule throughout the world if people's God-given rights were respected.
As for me and my household, we will serve the Lord.
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
cake crumb, 10/22/2012 8:24:28 AM (No. 8951832)
Obama supports a nuclear Iran.
And the media will sweep this (nuclear) bombshell under the rug. Unless The Hut sends them a script to stick to.
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
hadass23, 10/22/2012 8:35:45 AM (No. 8951861)
A treasonous swine lives in our White House.
American voters will effectively deal with Democrat Party liars soon.
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
askrenrl, 10/22/2012 8:39:09 AM (No. 8951866)
Early voting starts in Texas today; I shall do my part prior to the polls closing tonight!
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
Grambo, 10/22/2012 8:40:25 AM (No. 8951867)
Iran is not going to go out on a limb making a deal with a president who might be gone in 2013. Obama should know that. For him to offer any deal right now makes him look utterly weak and foolish in Iranian eyes; which is to say, he might very well have done so.
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
lasvegaslou, 10/22/2012 8:43:03 AM (No. 8951873)
I'm not about to take the word of some Iranian Parliamentary official on anything. I think I'll keep my powder dry until this is confirmed by at least 2 other sources.
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
MattMusson, 10/22/2012 8:44:03 AM (No. 8951875)
When Obama said 'all options were on the table' with respect to Iran, who knew that one of them was just to let the Ayatollah's have their Nukes?
|
Reply 51 - Posted by:
artlover, 10/22/2012 8:49:58 AM (No. 8951886)
It don't matter - it don't matter - it don't matter. The news media will not let this get out to the voters. They will keep this out of the news ----- until after the election. It does not matter what anyone says. The news media will elect Obama for another term. Our only hope is that ALL the republicans in this country get out and vote. Don't let anything keep you away from the voting booth this time. Please.
|
Reply 52 - Posted by:
Jebediah, 10/22/2012 8:52:20 AM (No. 8951891)
Will BET that nobody picks this up, newswise!
|
Reply 53 - Posted by:
artlover, 10/22/2012 8:57:31 AM (No. 8951901)
I'm beginning to wonder if Obama isn't programed like the men who bombed the World Trade Center - to destroy this country even if he dies in the process. Why else would he want Iran to have nuclear weapons.
|
Reply 54 - Posted by:
Flightdecker, 10/22/2012 9:06:38 AM (No. 8951929)
Dick Morris was on the Fox News Channel this weekend and said this event would be the October Surprise!
|
Reply 55 - Posted by:
zek, 10/22/2012 9:15:45 AM (No. 8951969)
Candy Crowley and the whole MSM will run interference on this. This man is untouchable. He will destroy us.
|
Reply 56 - Posted by:
lylacat, 10/22/2012 9:15:58 AM (No. 8951971)
Why would this not be treason? I would not believe this story, except my own ears heard 0bama making a deal with the Russians that he would be "more flexible" after he was reelected. This man has to go. I am really worried for my country.
|
Reply 57 - Posted by:
jeffblair, 10/22/2012 9:16:56 AM (No. 8951974)
It's a shame that the issue of Iran's "nuclear rights" has to be debated.
It's axiomatic that Iran, by virtue of its sovereignty, has "nuclear rights."
Even the NPT explicitly acknowleges that self-evident truth when it states, in Article IV, that: "Nothing in this Treaty shall be interpreted as affecting the inalienable right of all the Parties to the Treaty to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination and in conformity with Articles I and II of this Treaty."
That's the inconvenient truth that has to be confronted by people trying to derail Iran's nuclear program.
|
Reply 58 - Posted by:
Udanja99, 10/22/2012 9:20:42 AM (No. 8951982)
Where's the /s, # 43? As bad as some things might be in Chicago, it is in the heartland of America and any attack on any single square inch of America is a huge tragedy.
|
Reply 59 - Posted by:
bob913, 10/22/2012 9:23:48 AM (No. 8951993)
I remember last year or so that obama sent out people to test what the reaction was going to be from the public "so what if Iran has nuclear weapons, they are not going to use them" kind of talk.
If obama gets elected then Israeli will need to strike the next day as nothing will stop obama from helping Iran get the weapons.
|
Reply 60 - Posted by:
stryker714, 10/22/2012 9:36:47 AM (No. 8952032)
Just because almost all of Obama's stories are full of holes, is no reason the Swiss should do him any favors. Let them stick with cheese, please, SWISS cheese.
I think we all could agree that we would love to delete several nation's phone numbers from bamboozler's rolodex - from Switzerland to China to Iran to Al Qaeda and beyond. The man got his priorities alll wrong.
Switzerland-puh leez, let that fraud traitor send his own messages. Obama can put them in the latest US drone(the one he sent them lastly is getting kinda dated-plus Israel shot down their first prototype) and pretend it crash landed over Iran, again.
|
Reply 61 - Posted by:
rightwinggranny, 10/22/2012 9:49:36 AM (No. 8952070)
I tend not to believe anything I read two weeks before an election. I did, however, post the story at rightwinggranny.com. The thing that is important to me about this story is that it is plausible. What does that say about the Obama administration? One aspect that makes the story plausible is the off-mic comment by President Obama to Medvedev about being flexible in his second term. I think we need to do all we can to make sure that the President loses this election--for our own well being!
|
Reply 62 - Posted by:
FelineFine, 10/22/2012 9:59:06 AM (No. 8952094)
#29, I forwarded this on to Rush. Hopefully, he'll comment on it today.
|
Reply 63 - Posted by:
Nan, 10/22/2012 9:59:55 AM (No. 8952098)
Why does this not surprise me.
|
Reply 64 - Posted by:
joeyinempirestate, 10/22/2012 10:04:53 AM (No. 8952108)
0 will do a phony, lame-duck deal with Iran over their nuke program, just to give Romney and Bibi a major headache in 2013, i.e., bait Romney and Bibi into kicking the can down the road and letting Iran go nuclear. 0 is a classic loser who will lash out at everything we hold scared before he leaves.
|
Reply 65 - Posted by:
hoosiergirl71, 10/22/2012 10:08:10 AM (No. 8952124)
If this is true, and I think it may well be, what does Obama gain from taking this position..that's what scares me. Colluding with Russia and telling Iran to go ahead with nukes is NOT in the best interests of America, or the free world. There are plots and plans and financial cliffs looming out there. But I know God has His hand firmly in the mix. His Will will ultimately be done. As for no one but a few knowing about this...it will go viral on Twitter; I already did my part.
|
Reply 66 - Posted by:
Adam, 10/22/2012 10:09:46 AM (No. 8952128)
Like Carter, Obama came to office thinking "if only Americans weren't so arrogant and acting respectfully to other nations, the world would be at peace. Why should the USA decide who should and who should not be a nuclear power." What liberals (and sometimes Americans in general) do not understand is that, this isn't a conflict resolution seminar at Harvard. In his famous Cairo speech June 2009 (the sort of speech that creates war and wins Nobel Peace Prizes) the President said this, "I understand those who protest that some countries have weapons that others do not. No single nation should pick and choose which nations hold nuclear weapons. That is why I strongly reaffirmed America's commitment to seek a world in which no nations hold nuclear weapons. And any nation – including Iran – should have the right to access peaceful nuclear power if it complies with its responsibilities under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. " Iran doesn't see this as an invitation to a peace parley. She sees it as weakness and an invitation to the nuclear bomb dance.
|
Reply 67 - Posted by:
TruthandJustice, 10/22/2012 10:16:27 AM (No. 8952156)
The Islamocommunist in our White House it's a traitor.
Because he called the obvious something else did not make it so. There was No Arab Spring...there was a turning over and an assist to the IslamoCommunists of the Mulim Brotherhood...and to their agents AlQaeda.
These are Communists and IslamoCommunists working in concert, with an assist from Obama for more "FLEXABILITY". This was the destruction of America's allies in the Middle East and elsewhere to help destroy the USA. No oil drilling so as to put us in a very precarious position for a war in the a Middle East ...nukes to Iran, to help destroy Israel...weapons to our enemies AlQaeda to arm them against our Allies, which is the true story of Benghazi--with the planned protests from a video to provide cover as they moved arms through Turkey (another former frien) to Syria for the arming of AlQaeda...to slaughter more Christians, though 30,000 have to date been savagely murdered...
Obama should be arrested with Holder and Clinton...stop quivering against their race war threats ...and take decisive action.
|
Reply 68 - Posted by:
Holeymoses, 10/22/2012 10:21:49 AM (No. 8952174)
They'll be a hot time in the old town tonight. How is he going to spin this in the debate ?
|
Reply 69 - Posted by:
ScarletPimpernel, 10/22/2012 10:26:50 AM (No. 8952196)
Where is the Republican "leadership" in Congress?? A poster after the article asks the question, "If this story is true, wouldn't it be tantamount to a President unilaterally entering into a treaty without the advice and consent of Congress? If so, wouldn't this be an impeachable offense?"
Again, where is the Congress?
|
Reply 70 - Posted by:
pigop, 10/22/2012 10:31:19 AM (No. 8952208)
Obama cannot recognize anything! This falls in the realm of a treaty-like deal and will take Congress to ratify it. It has no meaning and it's worth the paper it's written on. Not much of an October Surprise.
|
Reply 71 - Posted by:
TruthandJustice, 10/22/2012 10:33:57 AM (No. 8952218)
Libya, Egypt, Tunisia, Jordan, Syria...have all been lit on fire by the arsonist of the Middle East...Obama's Communist organisers were on the ground in Egypt and elsewhere to insure it happened...Trumpka, Stern and Leo Gerard led the way for the revolutionaries....and handed the biggest, strongest army that we built (Egypt's) over to the IslamoCommunists.
Obama has outsourced our manufacturing to China, our drilling to Brazil and others (the spill was sabotage) our tax dollars to the Federal Reserve on their way to the IMF and TARP went to prop foreign banks, not the USA....Obama has redistributed the wealth of the USA to others in the world...He took a stance at every point against freedom and liberty.
He has reduced the value of your dollar by massive printing stealing directly out of every Americans bank account, inflated the cost of food, destroyed the value of homes through his CRA schemes...he must go...and prison rather than his new 30 million dollar estate in Hawaii.
|
Reply 72 - Posted by:
snowoutlaw, 10/22/2012 10:39:04 AM (No. 8952241)
I'm not a bit surprised. I knew in 2008 that the guy will do what ever he can to distroy this formally free country. Sadly everything he has done as President has proved that I was right.
|
Reply 73 - Posted by:
PoliticalJunky, 10/22/2012 10:42:02 AM (No. 8952251)
Where is Congress? Well, the Senate is in Democrat hands.
|
Reply 74 - Posted by:
Butch59, 10/22/2012 10:49:02 AM (No. 8952269)
Given the lunacy of the leaders in Iran and their oft stated desire to eliminate Israel from the earth, and their push to convert the entire world to Islam, does any thinking person really believe that all Iran wants is nuclear energy for "peaceful" purposes? It's as clear as the nose on your face that if they acquire enough enriched nuclear material, it will not be long until they have bomb.
And if the Swiss were engaged in this letter swapping mess, wouldn't it be a simple thing for someone to simply call the Swiss Ambassador to Iran and ask him? I mean, the Swiss are supposed to be neutral with everybody, so what would keep them from answering a question of that importance?
|
Reply 75 - Posted by:
MSD78, 10/22/2012 10:51:12 AM (No. 8952278)
Why is everyone so surprised to learn this ??? A good thing though, this has come out before the debate tonight... I pray to Almighty God that Romney wins the elections as O-Bummer is not for the american people, he has his own agenda. PEOPLE ! get rid of him and fast !
|
Reply 76 - Posted by:
buckrog, 10/22/2012 11:02:34 AM (No. 8952310)
Bowing to other governments.....I recall a special related to the coverage of the Kennedy assassination and they interviewed a protocol expert who was asked by Mrs. Kennedy if she should curtsy to the queen during a visit she and JFK had made; and the protocol expert said, 'Chiefs of state and wives of chiefs of state do not go around curtsying to one another...'
|
Reply 77 - Posted by:
ebuilder, 10/22/2012 11:07:39 AM (No. 8952322)
Rove backstabs Akin. McCain backstabs Bachmann. Liars rule. Oil Can Harry rules. Empty establishment ruling class candidates with "insincere" Christian views, and foreign money bankrolling some of them, is what we have devolved to. Bush 1, who ran the CIA, and Bush 2, the calculating and overspending "compassionate conservative" remain silent. Palin, once the Maid of Orleans, is writing now about looking at her derriere in the mirror. Even she knows there won't be a day of reckoning for this domestic enemy, whether he wins or loses. Why? There is no adequate definition of domestic enemy, or treason, or perversion, or whatever, because there is no controlling legal authority. What there is is a future that won't belong to those who slander the prophet of allah. The surrender of our absolute truths, and so the ability to communicate in any meaningful America sense has paralyzed action. We have also booed the Creator who endows our Liberty and rules in the affairs of men. Study to show yourself approved. Contend for the Faith. Fast and Pray.
|
Reply 78 - Posted by:
rc1776, 10/22/2012 11:18:07 AM (No. 8952353)
Now we can be certain what the enemy is. POGO was only partially right. He declared that he had seen the enemy and it is us. Now we are told that the enemy is us and them.
This message approved by valarium jarrett and sasquatch
|
Reply 79 - Posted by:
geronimo, 10/22/2012 11:31:39 AM (No. 8952421)
As Valerie Jarrett sees her power slipping from her grasp, there is no telling what anti-US plans she is getting ready to push ahead in the coming weeks.
|
Reply 80 - Posted by:
rocco49, 10/22/2012 11:58:18 AM (No. 8952550)
What time do the Impeachment Proceedings begin?
|
Reply 81 - Posted by:
thatsomewhereplace, 10/22/2012 12:04:48 PM (No. 8952585)
How surprising!!! zero is one politician who campaigned (2008) and campaigned and when elected fulfilled every one of his campaign promises...and then more. No one will go after impeachment. No one will charge him with treason. No one will prosecute him. Congress is useless and has been made more useless by executive orders. obama has not endorsed or supported any dem candidates because he thinks he's the king and does not need Congress. Why is any one surprised by the latest...a secret message recognizing Iran's nuclear rights? I can't get over Benghazi...and now this. He thought in heart of hearts the media would not investigate Benghazi. He went to bed and the Nevada thinking no one would question his handling of Benghazi. Surprise zippy. Unfortunately I don't think the media will run with this one.
|
Reply 82 - Posted by:
DebiAnn, 10/22/2012 12:29:51 PM (No. 8952660)
Uh....If this in the NYT at all, its on page 55D. Sorry, but the general dimwits out there won't hear about this, and if they do, they'll believe some spin Obama pukes up.
TWO MORE WEEKS!
|
Reply 83 - Posted by:
Billyc, 10/22/2012 12:47:14 PM (No. 8952716)
Obama knows he is going to lose this election. Goodness knows what this narcissist will do next. Strikes me about the Libyan murder of 4 American Personnel . This lemon was on the nightly talk shows and same day Airforce one to Las Vegas all on the taxpayers dime .Obama's senior Political advisor is Valerie Jarrett ,Iranian born to US parents and speaks fluent Farsi.Obama has to go toute suite.
|
Reply 84 - Posted by:
Nimby, 10/22/2012 1:02:04 PM (No. 8952756)
Why don't we send all of them to Iran on Jan 20th, 2013?
|
Reply 85 - Posted by:
paulfromTexas, 10/22/2012 1:03:54 PM (No. 8952758)
Ridding the WH of the Churchill bust comes to focus now.....the Neville Chamberlain bust must have arrived..... what a buncha traitorous nonsense....
|
Reply 86 - Posted by:
wtm, 10/22/2012 1:06:59 PM (No. 8952767)
Quick....somebody tell Ms Barbra S, and all the other Jewish elites in Hollyweird !!!
Continue to fund this guy, and he will be happy to use you as gun fodder and throw you and all your Jewish friends under the Iranian bus !!!
|
Reply 87 - Posted by:
dman, 10/22/2012 1:10:37 PM (No. 8952785)
Trial balloon, satire, or whatever: it's time to (re)read Neville Chamberlain's September 30, 1938 quote:
"We, the German Fuhrer and Chancellor, and the British Prime Minister, have had a further meeting today and are agreed in recognizing that the question of Anglo-German relations is of the first importance for our two countries and for Europe.
We regard the agreement signed last night and the Anglo-German Naval Agreement as symbolic of the desire of our two peoples never to go to war with one another again.
We are resolved that the method of consultation shall be the method adopted to deal with any other questions that may concern our two countries, and we are determined to continue our efforts to remove possible sources of difference, and thus to contribute to assure the peace of Europe.
My good friends, for the second time in our history, a British Prime Minister has returned from Germany bringing peace with honor. I believe it is "peace for our time." Go home and get a nice quiet sleep."
Scary. Downright scary. Learn history or repeat it.
|
Reply 88 - Posted by:
lencu255, 10/22/2012 1:22:33 PM (No. 8952820)
commies/fascists; fascists/commies - are very much alike for sadistically treating their subjects, but one stark difference: mussolini and hitler were fighting for their homelands. lenin/stalin and mao were willing to lose the international battle: russia in 1918 signed the peace treaty with germans giving away pieces of Russian Empire, and mao didn't fight japanese army in the 1940s, letting Chiang Kai-shek do the fighting and preserving his commie army and then defeating Chiang Kai-shek. What a nice patriot! Nothing amazes me anymore! I'll say it again: they are sick sadists, nothing moral and conscientious about them!
|
Reply 89 - Posted by:
twinspineve@gmail.com, 10/22/2012 1:30:45 PM (No. 8952845)
the democrates treat us like idiots. they don't even try to make it a good lie. no thought put into it. they insult our intelligence. they act as if we don't even exist. good riddance to them. can't wait to vote.
|
Reply 90 - Posted by:
fairplay, 10/22/2012 1:42:30 PM (No. 8952889)
This could be Donald Trump's surprise bombshell to be announced this wednesday!
|
Reply 91 - Posted by:
mollyb0122, 10/22/2012 1:48:02 PM (No. 8952904)
Rush was just talking about this.
|
Reply 92 - Posted by:
neanderthal, 10/22/2012 2:54:24 PM (No. 8953078)
Lucianne: does SS stand for Schutzstaffel or Secret Service?
|
Reply 93 - Posted by:
OregonBoomerGirl, 10/22/2012 3:23:01 PM (No. 8953155)
If he gets re-elected, it will be hell on earth.
As for the Republican leadership, it's non-existent. Boehner and McConnell just go along to get along, period. Do you EVER see either of them at any microphone, on TV, as you did with Pelosi, who was out there everyday? NO, you don't.
|
Reply 94 - Posted by:
jackburton, 10/22/2012 3:30:24 PM (No. 8953169)
Just to clarify: The Swiss were involved because they have maintained diplomatic relations with Iran and we haven't; they were doing us a favor. And by leaking, they've done us one more.
As mentioned (once) above, Obama delivered a drone to the Iranians.
My question: Building a missile warhead capable nuke is a supposed technological roadblock. Is this also true for a drone-delivered nuke?
|
Reply 95 - Posted by:
lana720, 10/22/2012 3:45:17 PM (No. 8953194)
This needs to be flushed out tonight! Every day, it's a new fresh hell from these thugs.
I just voted and came home to this? Voters were 700+ just past noon - good sign!
|
Reply 96 - Posted by:
leopardtwo, 10/22/2012 4:15:20 PM (No. 8953261)
Zero. Here's a not so secret message: Resign!
|
Reply 97 - Posted by:
rightdog, 10/22/2012 5:06:09 PM (No. 8953362)
Didn't guys that did treasonous stuff like this face a firing squad in the old days?
|
Reply 98 - Posted by:
sorosisbehindit, 10/22/2012 5:21:06 PM (No. 8953382)
We knew that Obama WHISPERED to the Russians that he would have more flexibility after the election, and then today we read that Obama sent a SECRET message to Iran through the Swiss recognizing their nuclear rights! What else will be in "the big reveal" if he gets reelected?
|
Reply 99 - Posted by:
m0j0mojo, 10/22/2012 5:46:07 PM (No. 8953419)
when iran attacked our embassy and took prisoners for 444 days under jimmy carter that was an act of war if this is true it sounds like treason to me
|
Reply 100 - Posted by:
DustDevil31, 10/22/2012 8:00:32 PM (No. 8953621)
Some banana republic is missing its idiot dictator......oh, that would be our banana republic. Maybe New Zealand isn't so bad; how tough is it to get a work visa there????
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "ketchuplover"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "ketchuplover"
|
Uh-Oh: Hillary´s Benghazi Scapegoat Speaks Out
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Peace, by John Sexton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: ketchuplover- 5/21/2013 3:13:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Daily Beast reports that one of the Benghazi fall guys is refusing to take the fall. Raymond Maxwell was put on indefinite leave by the State Department after its Administrative Review Board (ARB) investigation of Benghazi for reasons that are still unknown to him. The person he claims made the decision to cast him out was Cheryl Mills--Hillary Clinton´s former chief of staff and counsel at the State Department. It is the second time Mills´ name has turned up during scrutiny of the State Department´s response to the attack. According to a new report by Josh Rogin: "On the
|
´Tornado clearly targets conservatives´: Daily Show creator faces backlash over insensitive tweet
|
|
Daily Mail [UK], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: ketchuplover- 5/21/2013 2:54:57 AM
Post Reply
|
|
She thought she was making a topical political joke, but a co-creator of ‘The Daily Show’ managed to enrage many of her followers after tweeting joke about the Oklahoma tornado’s political motivations. ‘This tornado is in Oklahoma so clearly it has been ordered to only target conservatives,’ wrote comedian Lizz Winstead, in a tweet, around 3:30 Monday afternoon. The tweet was an apparent attempt at using the occasion of the May 20 twister to comment on the scandal currently plaguing the IRS and Obama administration. Winstead, co-creator and former head writer for ‘The Daily Show,’ promptly received a stream of angry responses
|
Obama Admin Wins Ruling to Deport German Homeschooling Family
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Dr. Susan Berry
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: ketchuplover- 5/17/2013 1:45:30 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld the Obama administration’s denial of asylum granted to the Romeike family, who fled Germany over its strict anti-homeschooling laws. In a press release Tuesday, Michael Farris, founder and chairman of the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA), said, “We believe the Sixth Circuit is wrong and we will appeal their decision. America has room for this family and we will do everything we can to help them.” The Romeikes fled Germany in 2008 when they were subjected to criminal prosecution for homeschooling, which is largely illegal in their country.
|
Rich Manhattan moms hire handicapped tour guides so kids can cut lines at Disney World
|
|
New York Post, by Tara Palmeri
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: ketchuplover- 5/15/2013 2:42:58 AM
Post Reply
|
|
They are 1 percenters who are 100 percent despicable. Some wealthy Manhattan moms have figured out a way to cut the long lines at Disney World — by hiring disabled people to pose as family members so they and their kids can jump to the front, The Post has learned. The “black-market Disney guides” run $130 an hour, or $1,040 for an eight-hour day. “My daughter waited one minute to get on ‘It’s a Small World’ — the other kids had to wait 2 1/2 hours,” crowed one mom, who hired a disabled guide through Dream Tours Florida.
|
|
Expert: Denials 'bound to unravel’
|
|
Boston Herald, by Hillary Chabot
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: ketchuplover- 5/15/2013 2:35:31 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The shadow of Watergate is looming larger over the growing IRS and Associated Press leaks scandals amid I-know-nothing denials from the president and his attorney general, with Republicans smelling blood in the water and a former Nixon official saying the Obama administration needs to avoid the impulse to cover up. (snip) “This is how these situations unravel. First it gets blamed on some low-level employee and then it tracks back to Washington,” said Keith Appell, a Republican strategist based in Washington, D.C. “All the way back to Watergate when it was blamed on some third-rate burglary. The more it
|
IRS scandal raises fears about enforcing Obamacare
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Byron York
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: ketchuplover- 5/15/2013 2:22:46 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service scandal would be bad enough if the IRS just handled issues like collecting income taxes and granting nonprofit status. But the immensely powerful federal agency is about to become even more powerful with the arrival of national health care, and that makes the still-unfolding scandal even more troubling. (Snip) The IRS is critical to Obamacare. The structure created by the Affordable Care Act requires the government to know about both the health care coverage (or lack of it) and the financial resources of every American. The IRS, which already knows the latter, was the only
|
Attorney: Benghazi Whistle-Blowers Threatened by White House
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Peace, by Awr Hawkins
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: ketchuplover- 5/1/2013 2:54:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Victoria Toensing, Republican Counsel to the Senate Intelligence Committee, says her client, a State Department official now considered a whistle-blower in the investigation of the September 11, 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi, has been "threatened" by Obama administration officials. According to Toensing, these threats weren´t related to ambiguous matters. Rather, they were "specifically about Benghazi." She says the threats went beyond the four State Department officials who´ve currently retained counsel. "People have been threatened at the CIA" as well, she claimed. (Snip) Toensing claimed the threats relate to ending the careers of those with information about the attacks who
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
|
|
Politico, by Kevin Robillard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.
|
Leaks turn to deluge for reeling White House
|
|
New York Post, by John Podhoretz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”
|
Top IRS official will invoke Fifth Amendment
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.
|
A Crack in the IRS Dam
|
|
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance
|
Man questioned in Boston Marathon bombing shot, killed by FBI
|
|
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM
Post Reply
|
|
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.
|
Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi is a Laughable Joke’
|
|
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|