|
|
| |
Topic: 12-Year-Old Defends Herself with Gun, Proves Need of 2nd Amendment |
12-Year-Old Defends Herself with Gun, Proves Need of 2nd Amendment
Townhall, by Celia Bigelow
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Judy W., 10/20/2012 7:38:31 AM
|
| As the left continues to advocate for further restrictions on the Second Amendment, others are using it to save their lives. This past Wednesday a young 12-year old girl in Bryan County, Oklahoma was able to protect her life when an intruder kicked in her back door and entered her house. Frantically, she called her mother who advised her to grab their household gun, hide in the closet, and call 911. The intruder made his way through the house, and as he was opening the door of the closet, the young girl shot him through the closet door.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
bkt23, 10/20/2012 7:55:13 AM (No. 8947414)
Actually, the outrageous goings-on in D.C. more accurately demonstrate the need for 2A, which is about defending our lives, property, wealth, liberty and freedom from any force intent on depriving us of these things.
Good for the 12-year-old girl. She did the right thing.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
HotRodLincoln, 10/20/2012 7:57:51 AM (No. 8947419)
This young lady is from Oklahoma on the Texas boarder. Kids in those parts know how to safely handle firearms. Her mother gave her good advice...get the gun and hide in the closet. When the perp turned the knob boom! she shoots him through the door. The gun must have been a .357 magnum because the bullet went through the door, the perp and then the wall! Apparently from what can be had from the article the perp was not seriously injured as he was treated in the hospital and released to police custody. Another example of a crime thwarted by someone exercising her God given right to self defense.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
bubby, 10/20/2012 8:04:53 AM (No. 8947436)
If every adult in the theater in Colorado had been carrying do you think more or less than 12 people would have been killed? I think a lot less. As one Lucianne poster once wrote "If more sane people were armed, the crazy people would get off fewer shots." how true! Thank God for our 2nd Amendment right I just wish more citizens would exercise that right.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
zeldafitzg, 10/20/2012 8:11:41 AM (No. 8947457)
God bless this dear child.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
metalman2, 10/20/2012 8:34:29 AM (No. 8947499)
Thursday night I was staying at the double Tree Motel in Johnson City, TN. When entering the restaurant there I saw the "no guns allowed" sign on the door. I turned around and went somewhere else for dinner. Yes, I was armed. That sign says to me, ok bad guys, come in this place to rob and kill. No one in here can defend themselves.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Pinchem, 10/20/2012 8:37:10 AM (No. 8947503)
Liberals and Democrats (is that an oxymoron) don't have IQ's high enough to know that gun laws do not keep guns out of the hands of criminals. They can buy them everywhere outside the law such as illegal gun sellers, out of the trunk of a car, etc.
Can any Liberal who thinks they are intelligent explain how to stop those gun sales? When they solve that problem then talk to me about my legal gun. Until then, SHUT UP!
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
sgtfox of the jarhead clan, 10/20/2012 8:47:40 AM (No. 8947528)
Meanwhile the "family gun" is tagged and bagged in the evidence locker at the courthouse where it will stay until next August . There is no Question that it was used correctly and probably saved a life. It should have been unloaded and passed back to Dad with a nice "thanks for your help" from the Chief of Police. This family may not ever see their gun again. This is called taking guns off the street.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
FlatCityGirl, 10/20/2012 9:02:48 AM (No. 8947572)
Here's a link to the article from Durant: http://www.newson6.com/story/19858704/12-year-old-girl-shoots-intruder-during-home-invasion
#7, I wouldn't take bets that the gun has been confiscated. I grew up in that part of the world [Lake Texoma area], and that's a different breed of people down there, different kind of law. Not your typical NYC or LA police force.
Comments after the article are just what I would expect.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Evocatus, 10/20/2012 9:02:59 AM (No. 8947574)
Regarding the "family gun" being taken for evidence.
The gun has "fulfilled its destiny." So many guns live out their full existence without ever being called on to save a life or defend a cause.
The family can, and probably will, acquire a new "family gun." Perhaps some of their friends, or even the NRA, can help with the selection and purchase. The girl herself should receive recognition from the police, and range-time for life at a local range.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
MisterDickens, 10/20/2012 9:44:26 AM (No. 8947707)
Too bad she did not have an opportunity to aim for his head or heart. If she had it might ultimately have been harder on her than the way it turned out but society would have certainly been better off.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
HPmatt, 10/20/2012 9:46:01 AM (No. 8947716)
#8 the law is what we call 'regular law', not the law in DC or NYC. Damn right they'll get their gun back and the local Rotary Club will have the girl and her father to receive an award at their next lunch meeting.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
4Justice, 10/20/2012 9:50:12 AM (No. 8947733)
#5, if I had a restaurant, I would have a sign stating "CCW welcome". With regard to the gun being taken as evidence, they will give it back after the case is completely closed out. That is what they normally do.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Refried, 10/20/2012 9:57:15 AM (No. 8947756)
I doubt seriously the Glock .40 was taken into custody. Both the deputies and the District Attorney praised the young girl for her actions. Hate to think what would have happened if this happened on the Left Coast or in the NE part of the country! Mom would be in jail for letting a minor use a pistol. The young girl would be in custody of the juvenile bureau. The thug would be back on the street with a civil suit against the family.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Salt5792, 10/20/2012 10:06:29 AM (No. 8947777)
Excellent gun control.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
mws50, 10/20/2012 10:29:56 AM (No. 8947830)
This is where tort reform is critical. In Texas, the perp can no longer sue the home owner if he is in the act of committing a crime. If the perp is killed while committing a crime, the perp's relatives cannot sue.
Tort reform is an excellent way to keep criminals "in check".
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
MickTurn, 10/20/2012 11:47:36 AM (No. 8948007)
Yea Baby, kill the succah!
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
sgtfox of the jarhead clan, 10/20/2012 12:32:20 PM (No. 8948129)
Glad to hear from so many Americans on the guns return. Here in Maine { the other California } they would probably not be so lucky.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
NYbob, 10/20/2012 3:37:21 PM (No. 8948412)
EVERY Democrat, including the 'pro-gun' ones are fine with this girl being harmed. It would empower their 'sensible' gun control laws, which are steps toward their ultimate goal of disarming most American citizens. They all work at it one way or another. The ones that vote against any measure that comes up only do so when it does not matter. They would be happy to see a Supreme Court that simply over rides the constitution and makes every armed citizen a criminal.
Maybe you are the unusual human who would not fight with everything you had to protect your life or your family, but if you aren't, arm yourself while you can and stop voting for the politicians who want you to be disposable.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
mominNoCA, 10/20/2012 3:39:40 PM (No. 8948418)
Good. The intruder's motive may not have been just burglary. Too many kidnappings of children are in the news these days.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Judy W."
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Judy W."
|
|
Obama´s most fiendish plot yet
|
|
Daily Caller, by Mickey Kaus
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/17/2013 8:55:18 AM
Post Reply
|
|
An idea so crazy it just might … Opponents and supporters of “comprehensive immigration reform” (i.e. amnesty) agree it doesn’t do well on the front burner of public debate. (Snip) Back in March, I didn’t see how the Obama team, however brilliant, was going to protect its amnesty bill from this threat of publicity, given that the mainstream press was “commmitted to overcovering this issue.” Now we know the answer! In its most fiendish strategem yet, Team Obama has launched a series of not-quite-devastating but press-obsessing scandals against itself! The confluence of the Internal Revenue Service, Benghazi and AP
|
In defense of Jason Richwine and Charles Murray
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Michael Barone
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/16/2013 8:52:17 PM
Post Reply
|
|
My American Enterprise Institute colleague Charles Murray came to the defense of our former colleague Jason Richwine, who was fired by the Heritage Foundation amid protests about his Harvard Ph.D. thesis, on nationalreview.com. Charles was entirely accurate in stating that Richwine’s conclusion that Hispanics have lower-than-average IQs is accurate and, among specialists in this area, non-controversial. Richwine was careful to say that the average Hispanic IQ might rise over time, as has been observed of other groups’ average IQs. And the Heritage Foundation paper co-authored by Richwine estimating the fiscal cost of legalizing current illegal immigrants
|
| |
|
Obamacare isn´t about health care, it´s about power
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Jim DeMint
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/16/2013 8:27:29 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Members of the House of Representatives are scheduled to vote Thursday to repeal all of Obamacare. Given that the House voted to repeal the law last year, some commentators and observers have questioned the need for another repeal vote. However, the scandals coming to light over the last week perfectly make the case for why Congress must eradicate the law from the statute books. (Snip) While we don´t yet know all the details about these scandals, we do know that the IRS grossly abused its power at a time when Obamacare grants it massive new authority.
|
Even liberals are leaping off bandwagon
|
|
Boston Herald, by Margery Eagan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/16/2013 7:09:14 AM
Post Reply
|
|
You know the worm has turned when even MSNBC’s Chris Matthews and Rachel Maddow hold their noses at the stench from Barack Obama’s scandals — when so many stories from the so-called liberal press now describe the erstwhile Messiah as “aloof,” “arrogant” and “holier than thou.” (Snip) The same media types accused of covering Obama on bended knee — such as myself — are now turning our collective backs. And no wonder. What we’re learning about his administration has undermined our basic trust in government. Yet the president seems oblivious to how serious and unsettling these scandals are,
|
Quabbin Reservoir Tests Normal After Trespassing
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/16/2013 6:08:11 AM
Post Reply
|
|
BELCHERTOWN, Mass. — Testing done on water samples from the Quabbin Reservoir showed no abnormalities after seven people were seen at a reservoir park entrance shortly after midnight, officials said Wednesday. The Massachusetts Water Resources Authority said water quality samples were analyzed at its lab Tuesday and all came back normal after the alleged trespassing incident. The central Massachusetts reservoir supplies drinking water to Boston. State police spokesman David Procopio said a trooper saw two cars parked at a reservoir park entrance at 12:30 a.m. Tuesday, then saw five young men and two young women
|
Soros Gave $6.1 Million to Groups Linked to Pressure on IRS to Target Conservative Nonprofits
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Mike Ciandella
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/15/2013 1:12:08 PM
Post Reply
|
|
With Soros funding, anything is possible. The growing scandal where the IRS unfairly targeted politically-conservative groups can be traced back to a lobbying effort begun by George Soros-funded liberal groups in 2010, after the Supreme Court´s Citizens United ruling. The talking points of these groups then bounced around a carefully created progressive "echo chamber," until they eventually made their way into established media outlets. Key IRS policy changes about how it investigated conservative groups took place soon after it received three separate letters sent by Soros-funded liberal organizations.
|
|
True Grit
|
|
Townhall, by John Stossel
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Judy W.- 5/15/2013 7:55:58 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Are you a real man (or woman)? Do you have "grit"? Compare yourself to the man on the $20 bill: Andrew Jackson, our seventh president. During the Revolutionary War, Jackson volunteered to fight. He was just 13 years old at the time. The British captured him and made him a servant for British officers. (Snip) Jackson had grit. Do your kids have that much grit today? I doubt it. Parents now try to protect kids from all danger. In New York City, some won´t let teenagers go to school by themselves. Lenore Skenazy, author of Free-Range Kids, thinks that´s absurd.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Obama a new Nixon? Oh, get serious.
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
NBC´s Todd Warns: If GOP Investigates Obama Scandals, ´The Voters Will Punish Them´
|
|
Newsbusters, by Kyle Drennen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/16/2013 1:51:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
On Thursday´s NBC Today, in a desperate attempt to deflect from the scandals engulfing the Obama administration, co-host Savannah Guthrie wondered: "I read a headline yesterday that said Republicans see blood in the water. That they see a president who´s very vulnerable politically. Is there a danger that they will overreach?" Chief White House correspondent Chuck Todd agreed with the slanted premise: "There is. I mean, that´s what happened to Republicans in 1998 with Bill Clinton.
|
When it rains, it pours: Ten press conference take aways
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,
|
Obama 47 minutes late for his press conference; leaves reporters in the rain
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/16/2013 1:20:06 PM
Post Reply
|
|
“I look forward to taking some questions at tomorrow’s press conference,” President Obama said last night, after announcing the resignation of the acting IRS commissioner Steven Miller. The president scheduled a noon press conference today with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in honor of his visit. Reporters, however, found themselves waiting outside in the rain for Obama, who was 47 minutes late. Only New York Times reporter Mark Landler had an umbrella.
|
| | |
|
|