She got it wrong. She interfered. She took a side. Candy Crowley may finally have done something else as well: so visibly tipping the scales of media bias that the end result makes Mitt Romney the next president. Taken all together, CNN's Candy Crowley, in her zeal to intrude on the presidential debate and save President Obama from himself, may just have provided the televised moment that finally sparks a revolt against the four years of fawning coverage of President Obama. Becoming to the liberal media what the Tet Offensive was to Lyndon Johnson and the Vietnam War.
She looked to me like the late John Candy in drag and her performance was a joke. Her response was so quick I believe it was coordinated with the WH. I also feel that little barry had all the questions in advance. I can't prove it but just got the feeling during the debate.
Obama's 4 weeks of steady lies about Benghazi, the complicit media's consistent coverup and media fog and finally Candy Crowley's over-the-top roll as a corrupt leftist moderator in the 2nd debate, provide what we call a 'teachable moment'.
Obama is a dangerous liar. The complicit leftist mainstream media is corrupt and biased beyond redemption.
If only the article were true. The MSM is already lying and spinning the facts into something that cannot be recognized as truth. I've already commented on my local fish wrapper lies. Those who get their news from the msm are in another world.
FTA: ''Add it all up, and Crowley's posture on Tuesday night was that of a pro-Obama participant, not the impartial moderator that voters expect.''
Great article Mr. Lord, but no one I know expected Crowley to be honest with America. The media's objective is still to get this America-hating clown re-elected and you know what? I don't think they even know why themselves, other than he's not a Republican. Honestly, the media types are really not all that bright.
No one can stay home. Everyone must vote if Obama is to be kicked out. Romney needs a indisputable majority everywhere in order to avoid a recount circus, refute Obama's agenda and to give Romney the mandate to clean house.
People are as weary of the Obama media as they are of the Obama agenda. The Misery Index has not been this high since the first Great Depression. Time to end the misery and get America back on track. Vote like your country depends upon it because it does.
The one thing which can be counted upon with these people is their unerring ability to destroy themselves. They will end up hanging themselves every time, because what they offer does not work, and their means are therefore necessarily corrupt.
The sad part is if she had read the transcript she had in her possession it would have destroyed the won, but she continued to lie to cover for the won. We all knew something was coming when the DNC objected to Candy.... It backfired, it helped Romney & hurt the so called journalist world. Lets see how many credible journalist will stand up & object to Candy's performance.
Assuming we outvote the dead and illegals and the zombified RAT voters and TAKE BACK our America from those who despise her,be ready for a massive reaction from the soon- to-be-really-disenfranchised moochers and leech class! Lock and load America, they may be heading to a city near you!
I guess I missed the memo but I don't understand why the debates are conducted only by MSM, with liberal moderators. If I were the Republican nominee, I'd say fine to one but the next one has to be with a more conservative moderator.
I've been hearing about the "tipping point", that moment when the anti-American MSM is finally exposed to Joe Sixpack, for years. I even believed it myself once. Let's face it: Joe & Jane Sixpack STILL get their information through the MSM filter. An informed electorate would have demanded accountability after Fast & Furious broke. An informed electorate would be demanding Crowley's head and her those of her bosses at CNN. The Honey BooBoos don't know or care.
Candy screened the questions prior to the debate. And she allowed that stupid woman to slur President George W. Bush, asking President Romney how he was different. There should have been an equivalent question to the kenyan klown about Carter. The 'assault weapons' ban question was out of place, and the libya question was a set up.
Above posters have it right about NerØbma' knowledge of the transcript. The Benghazi exchange in the debate highlighted the Emperor's lack of clothes and the media's excess of bias for all to see. Hopefully more voters will view what they are being fed by the media in a new light.
Jef if you think the media bias is over you must be smoking something illegal. It willnever stop too maney have been brain washed in school and in their jobs by the owners of the so called media.Its in there blood.
Yeah, I thought that was more than just suspicious when 0bama ordered Candy to read a transcript of a press conference from a couple of weeks prior, which he somehow knew that she, entirely by coincidence, had right there at her fingertips. Why, it was almost as if they had planned it in advance./s I guess Candy has her application in for 0bama's next press secretary.
My thoughts exactly #16. Obama coaxed Romney to keep going because he was waiting for the setup moment. When it came he told Candy to get the transcript. This was all preplanned. Everyone should be contacting CNN to complain about this. It is obvious it was preplanned and goes way beyond anything I have seen the media do since Rather and the typewriter. Clearly that didn't prevent them from continuing in their media bias, but in a debate, to benefit their hero??? EVERYONE MUST SPEAK OUT ON THIS!!! Sorry for yelling.
I discovered this "Tipping Point" the author writes about last night at a social event here in the city last night.
I'm a conservative who works in Manhattan, which is something akin to being a Christian living in Rome during the height of the Roman Empire.
I too was shocked by the overt bias by Crowley and revealed in the questions "chosen" to be asked during the debate. But again, work in Manhattan and I have little doubt that 60% of the people I work with- all highly educated white-collar types- have a political point of view far to the Left of mine. So, I avoided any water-cooler talk concerning the debate during the work day for fear of blowing my cover and endangering my own career prospects.
Then at a work/social last evening I happened upon a conversation by a large group of my co-workers- who are unabashedly liberal- discussing the tenor of Tuesday's debate. Almost to a person, they were dubious about the "undecided"-ness of the questioners, and were surprised at how much the questions asked were from a left-wing perspective. Then a lefty co-worker brought up Crowley's "moderating" and stated she was surprised the GOP signed off on her selection, then goes "That had to have been a set up with that transcript. You're telling me of all the speeches Obama and Romney have made - that's the single transcript she has at the ready?"
Again, I was gobsmacked!
None of these folks are going to change their votes and vote for Romney in three weeks, but what last night revealed to me is that if these folks can recognize this bias - even in their favor - millions of independents and others across the country recognized it as well.
Yes, # 16 and others making the same point: How did Obama know that Crowley had a transcript of his remarks in the Rose Garden?
This has bothered me from the moment Obama said, "Proceed" with that funny smirk on his face - like the cat that ate the canary. When he ordered Crowley, as if she were his secretary, to do his bidding and get the transcript, it all made sense.
#40 "None of these folks are going to change their votes and vote for Romney in three weeks, but what last night revealed to me is that if these folks can recognize this bias - even in their favor - millions of independents and others across the country recognized it as well."
That is what makes the job we have so hard. Do these Lefties think that they will somehow be spared in the tyranny that they will help to make possible? As someone posted elsewhere, this is "weapon's grade stupidity."
Regarding the transcript: I didn't and don't think Crowley actually had a transcript of some minor speech given in the Rose Garden. She's no genius, but she can't possibly be dumb enough to bring physical proof of her bias to a debate.
But Obama is dumb enough to let it out of the bag that there was pouring over transcripts looking for the word "terror" or "terrorism"... and Crowley somehow being aware of it.
Her rehearsed collusion was clear when Obama referred to "the transcript" and she instantly knew what to say. How would she know what he was talking about if not in on the lame attempt to claim Obama had called Benghazi a terrorist attack all along?
Too bad Romney didn't turn it on crowly and ask her why she had a transcript and how Solbama knew it. Disgustingly obvious. When will republicans stop allowing these liberal news pimps to interject themselves into supposedly honest discourse. I think I know why. Because democrats wont do a debate that isn't rigged in their favor.
The only thing Crowley tipped is the car she left the debate in... She violated the fairness of a clean debate... She should be removed from the media... Everyone like her also... We need honest GOD-FEARING media members to tell us what really happened in a news story
when I heard ''get the transcript'' I thought it might have been an arrogant throw away line. Like - ''I know what I said and I challenge you with the proof.'' But the next day I heard Candy say that she actually had the transcript and my brain said hmmmmmm. So, how did the Leader KNOW Candy had the transcript? another hmmmmm...
I worked for a huge media company for almost two decades. While there is no doubt that the vast majority of the editors and TV personalities supported Democrats, I also learned that much of what is thought to be conspiracy usually wasn't, but the way that Libya thing played out was very suspicious. Romney tries to get Obama to confirm the rose garden remark and FOR THE ONE AND ONLY TIME Obama doesn't interrupt but prompts Romney to CONTINUE, ceding him airtime. Then after Romney says it took two weeks, Obama asks Crowley to check the transcript. How did Obama know she just coincidentally happened to have that one particular transcript? Then, she actually MISQUOTES the transcript. Maybe all of that was happenstance but (and especially after all that so-called agreement between the two campaigns that Crowley wasn't supposed to interject at all) it doesn't pass the smell test to me.
Some Wiki background on the Pres. Debate Commission...
The organization, which is a nonprofit corporation controlled by the Democratic and Republican parties, has run each of the presidential debates held since 1988. The Commission is headed by Frank Fahrenkopf, a former head of the Republican National Committee, and former White House press secretary Michael D. McCurry. As of 2011, the Board of directors consists of Howard Graham Buffett, John C. Danforth, John Griffen, Antonia Hernandez, Caroline Kennedy, Newton N. Minow, Richard D. Parsons, Dorothy Ridings, and Alan K. Simpson.
They should lose their non-profit status and a class action lawsuit should be commenced by Tea Party activists, immediately
I believe that BO was talking to CC when he said, 'Get the transcript...Could you say that a little louder Candy?'. Why would he tell MR to get the transcript if he already knew that CC had it ready and waiting?
Rose Garden speech: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Nu6VZ9DeVc
BO on how our country 'respects all faiths and that we reject all efforts to denigrate the faiths of others', which seems to refer to the anti-muslim video. At the end he says, 'no acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation', not specifically that this was an act of terrorism. IMO
The original question about Benghazi was, "...Who denied enhanced security, and why?" Obama's answer was irrelevant and Crowley had the irrelevant transcript to back him up. I'd like to know how she knew what he would answer and why would she have the transcript for the irrelevant answer.
Any one with half a brain knows this already. My friend and her family I consider total idiots in regards to politics. They do not follow any politics and they voted for Obama. She does not pay attention at all to current events at all and lives in a bubble. Interestingly enough her and her family are a bit racist, but also they believe what the Tee Vee tells them. When I think of how Obama won, I think of her.
'get the transcript'.....yeah, and right on target she had it.....how did she know this would come up???? And still, they had to lie! That dame should resign and change her first name.....eye candy she ain't!
#40, Republican tolerance of the inequities proves the simple "fact" that they're stupid. It's the cowardly dogma your cohorts and all progs believe. They truly live in an echo chamber, it explains how the Obama campaign could pull such outrageous behavior. Sure, there's a huge stink being raised by the right but most progs are totally unaware.
I haven't gone back to look at the actual transcript of the debate, but my impression of this exchange was that after Romney came back with the "let me get this straight" line and Obama had his scary eyes lasered on him, did he not say.. "Candy" first.. then Romney was still in his speech, and O said again right away.. "Candy" again followed by, "get the transcript". He was talking at the same time as Romney, so it was kind of hard to hear, but I was pretty clear in that Obama was directing Crowley when the question was brought up, to get it. They knew it would be brought up.. SHE picked the questions. Of course she didnt know if they would get to it, (they buried it late in the debate, Im sure hoping to run out of time), but no mistaking that she would be prepared anyway. I just wonder what other "facts" she had at her ready to dispute either candidate. Having the chance to ask follow-up questions was her agreement before the debate. If I remember correctly, this was changed a couple days before the debate and not the norm for this town hall style.
Did any undecided women notice how Obama dismissively ordered Candy to get the transcript ? " Get the transcript , Candy ! " made Obama sound like a misogynist used to treating women like servants. Romney , because he is a gentleman and also used to dealing with women in a professional work environment , would never have ordered Crowley around like that. The story that millions saw on for themselves while watching the debate was Obama's hyperactivity and snarky nastiness, his inability to answer questions , his high pitched , unmanly voice which signaled desperation and his beady snake eyes. If the executives at CNN had any ethics ( ha ! ) , Crowley would be suspended . Instead they have gushed over Crowley and excused her terrible behavior by saying Obama speaks slowly ( stuttering and uuuuhhhs ), that's why Crowley had to give him more time. Does CNN understand that by labeling Obama a slow talker , they reinforce that he requires a time handicap. In other words , he's not too bright. Paging Chris Matthews. If FOX moderated a debate and one of their anchors behaved the way Crowley did -cutting off Romney 28 times vs 9 times for Obama , acting as Obama's teleprompter , giving him more time, refusing to let Romney answer questions, always giving Obama the last word on any subject and selecting moron questions- that alone would get them suspended for unprofessional conduct. But, actually helping a presidential candidate answer a question by presenting fraudulent information would definitely get them fired. By just by FOX. CNN will probably promote Crowley.
"Get the transcript" sounds like something an office pit bull would bark at some poor thing from the typing pool.
Duh Wun showed his true colors about the way he views women. There to do his bidding. He's been carried around on a silver platter all his life by women, hidden behind women, and basically resents them for it.
Bet you Mitt doesn't order Ann around like that, or any other woman.
People saw exactly what was going on: A pathetic president who had to be bailed out by the moderator and couldn't go toe-to-toe like a man against Romney. That means anyone who needs help in a lousy debate really shouldn't be leading the free world. Romney smacks him down AGAIN!
The reason Romney was so perplexed during this particular part of the debate was because Obama and Crowley had obviously conspired to create a "gotcha" moment to trap him. How else would Crowley have been able to so quickly declare Barry correct? How would she have known that the president was going pull this bit of trivial semantics our of his rear end? They both knew their roles and they played them.
I am absolutely convinced that this was planned in advance by Crowley and the administration. Anyone who's read any of the exchanges from the now-defunct "Journolist" knows that many reporters actively seek advice from Democratic operatives on how to attack conservatives.
This bit of contrived theater was every bit as shameful as what Dan Rather tried to do to George W. Bush.
It was reported somewhere that Crowley spent some time at the White House before the debate, possibly a tutoring session. The flub-up on the terror question gives that away, Obie and Candy outsmarted themselves trying to spring the trap too quickly. It's just too bad that most people are too stupid to have picked that up and just saw Obama as a wise and tricky debater. But then if those same people weren't so stupid, he wouldn't have been in the White House in the first place.
agree w the article. Crowley episode is another in the sequence of exploding cigars that has been the Obama campaign, where each tactical victory becomes a vaster loss. Yet to be seen, again too late, is how all the flattery the WH has demanded of the media has itself contributed to Obama's defeat, never letting him see his position clearly. Flattery is more dangerous than persecution. Too late now.
After seeing the new Gallup poll, if it is anywhere near accurate, Romney now holding a 7% lead, and Romney now holding an electoral college lead, Obie is done and Moochelle should start packing for Chicago. Good riddance.
Our guys get CROWLEY'D there all the time! Who wants to see that? Watch Fox when you can stand it and stay here reading on Lucianne. One more silly debate, then...
Romney 53% LIAR 47%
Looking forward to:
1)Money market interest increase. 2)401K value increase. 3)Better returns on investments. 4)Value of home and property increasing. 5)Traditions being honored again. 6)Our standing in the world improving. 7)Our enemies on the run.
Yes, We can! And thank God we'll relegate that Indonesian liar and his mooch wife back to the south side of Chi ca-ca....where they belong!
Evidently, Obama panicked, probably because Candy didn't 'get the transcript' quickly enough, and felt he had to prompt her. It's obvious to a blind person that there was collusion. Am I the only one who can see this? I don't think so.
PS. I have no sympathy for the GOP, they should have boycotted the debate farce long ago. No moderators. No media people. A time keeper with a mute switch. Hold them on C-Span. This has been going on since Nixon. Man up, GOP and say Enough.
She was biased. She may have had Obama talking points. She cut off Mr Romney many more times than she did Obama. She interjected herself into help Obama and her points were incorrect, but she only retracted that point the next day. Furthermore, of had been paying attention, she would have known that Obama did Not answer certain questions he was asked. He just rambled. She should have made him answer the questions, such as why the security was pulled from the Libyan city where the terror attack occurred. She presented a partisan moderator and since she represented CNN, she should be put on suspension until she can trained to present a fair/balanced neutral position.If CNN wishes to post the fact they they are in fact a left wing media outlet, then that is a different story. In that case, they would finally be telling the truth.
Look all around the edges for other perspective. Although, I would like to know why she went to the White House and what was said. a date with the most powerful man on earth might goes to a girls head.
She had some paper and some have suggested the obama camp provided her transcripts (I wouldn't kick a dog on the evidence of a partisan/participant provided transcript)--remember the Birth Certificate which names obama's father where the name on original is probably "unknown".)
What was really telling in body language and her response was his appeal to her and her facilitating him. It was the connection of her obedience to a superior in the human hierarchy that was telling. Subtle but instinctive more than coordinated between the two liberals in advance IMO.
Her own self interest would have been to do it up right as a journalist. But she responded to his cue/appeal as a female or friend.
Mesmerized and utilized. He tried the same on Raddatz.
Anyone looking at the "Duck Dynasty" uproar may wonder why A&E didn´t warn Phil Robertson about the dangers of talking too much to reporters. But it now looks like they did. (Snip)In essence, the network was asking Phil - a man of legendary individuality, who once passed up an opportunity to sign with the NFL because it might interfere with his hunting - to be somewhat less Phil-like. But that is the kind of wobbly bargain that reality TV producers have been forced to make. If they bought the show, they were getting a volatile personality in the mix. A&E could of
Mixed with the dollar bills and loose change dropped in the Salvation Army´s red kettles this Christmastime are less obvious tokens of generosity: gold coins, $50,000 from a "Secret Santa," lottery tickets and Viagra. Every holiday season, sure as Santa mounts his sleigh at the mall, the Salvation Army bell ringers are out in force, stationed along the harried pathways of holiday shoppers across the country. Less certain is how many diamond rings or South African Krugerrands will be found in those kettles, but such things happen every year. Already, outside a Wal-Mart store in Colorado Springs, Colo., one kettle got
By the time President Obama gave his news conference on Friday, there was really only one course to take on surveillance policy from an ethical, moral, constitutional and even political point of view. And that was to embrace the recommendations of his handpicked panel on government spying — and bills pending in Congress — to end the obvious excesses. He could have started by suspending the constitutionally questionable (and evidently pointless) collection of data on every phone call and email that Americans make.He did not do any of that. Sure, Mr. Obama thanked his panel for making 46 recommendations to restore
The holiday season brings with it the usual assortment of college bowl games, from the classic Rose, Orange and Sugar, all the way to the Little Caesars Pizza Bowl, the Beef ´O´ Brady´s Bowl and, my favorite, the Famous Idaho Potato Bowl. Each contest involves the migration across the country of hordes of players, coaches, alumni boosters, band members, mascots—and, of course, cheerleaders. Remarkably, recent science suggests that if this final group weren´t included, it would probably alter the quality of play. All because males can be kind of pathetic. When women are present or when men are prompted to think about
WASHINGTON — More than two years after sensitive information about the Osama bin Laden raid was disclosed to Hollywood filmmakers, Pentagon and CIA investigations haven’t publicly held anyone accountable despite internal findings that the leakers were former CIA Director Leon Panetta and the Defense Department’s top intelligence official. Instead, the Pentagon Inspector General’s Office is working to root out who might have disclosed the findings on Panetta and Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence Michael Vickers to a nonprofit watchdog group and to McClatchy. While the information wasn’t classified, the inspector general’s office has pursued the new inquiry aggressively, grilling its own investigators,
The decision this month by a federal court striking down the criminalization of polygamy in Utah was met with a mix of rejoicing and rage. What was an emancipating decision for thousands of plural families was denounced as the final descent into a moral abyss by others. Former senator Rick Santorum was among the social conservatives trying to claim the moral high ground. He tweeted on Sunday: “Some times I hate it when what I predict comes true” — referring to his 2003 claim that legalizing “consensual sex within your home” would lead to the legalization of polygamy and “undermine
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker signed an Indian mascot bill on Thursday that will make it harder for politically correct meddlers to force public schools around the state to change their mascots, logos and team names. Before he signed the bill, Walker informed state tribal leaders in a letter. “I share many of your concerns about some of the mascots and nicknames used in Wisconsin and across America,” the governor wrote, according to The Capital Times. “If it were up to me personally, I would seek viable alternatives that were not offensive to Native Americans.” In the same letter, Walker also pointed out that
For a few hours, it looked like Americans would quietly accept the suspension of popular “Duck Dynasty” star Phil Robertson for his unfiltered opinions about sin, sex, gays and blacks in a magazine interview. But then, as if on cue, hundreds of thousands of fans of the openly Christian, duck-hunting businessman took to social networks and started their backlash. As of Thursday night, more than 1.1 million people “liked” the “Stand With Phil Robertson” Facebook page, while about the same number had clicked their support for another Facebook page called “Boycott A&E Until Phil Robertson Is Put Back On Duck
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid was hospitalized early Friday morning as a “precaution” after feeling ill, a spokesman said, adding that doctors concluded "everything is normal" after testing. “Early this morning, Senator Reid was not feeling well and as a precaution decided to go to the hospital. Tests have been conducted and everything is normal. He is alert, resting and feeling better,” spokesman Adam Jentleson said in a statement. "Doctors have asked that he remain in the hospital for observation so he will not be working today." The Senate is set to finish its business for the year on Friday.
Restaurant chain Cracker Barrel posted Friday night on its Facebook page that it would no longer carry some Duck Dynasty merchandise after Phil Robertson, of the "Duck Commander" company and family, was suspended from the show. The statement reads: Cracker Barrel’s mission is Pleasing People. We operate within the ideals of fairness, mutual respect and equal treatment of all people. These ideals are the core of our corporate culture. We continue to offer Duck Commander products in our stores. We removed selected products which we were concerned might offend some of our guests while we evaluate the situation.
Phil Robertson disrespected gay employees at A&E ... and THAT´S why he was sacked from "Duck Dynasty" ... sources connected with the network tell TMZ. We´re told A&E CEO Nancy Dubuc felt she could not in good conscience ask gay employees to kill themselves for a show when he disrespected them by calling them sinners. Our sources say ... gay employees involved in the production -- and there are a number of them -- were outraged by Phil´s comments to GQ and wanted Dubuc to give him the ax. We´re told Dubuc felt this way ... If Phil had made
The suspension of Phil Robertson from A&E’s Duck Dynasty is outrageous in a nation that values freedom, according to social critic and openly gay, dissident feminist Camille Paglia. “I speak with authority here, because I was openly gay before the ‘Stonewall rebellion,’ when it cost you something to be so. And I personally feel as a libertarian that people have the right to free thought and free speech,” Paglia, a professor at the University of the Arts in Philadelphia, said on Laura Ingraham’s radio show Thursday. “In a democratic country, people have the right to be homophobic as well as they have
Former “American Idol” contestant Clay Aiken offered his thoughts on the scandal surrounding “Duck Dynasty” star Phil Robertson’s anti-gay comments on Thursday night, saying that such comments and attitudes are “built out of fear.” (Snip) “I think it certainly shows that we’ve got a long way to go when it comes to people being accepting and understanding,” Aiken, who came out as gay in 2008, said. “Homophobia, racism …. all of it’s built out of fear. All of it’s out of fear. And if you grow up in an area like Louisiana and you’re not exposed to diversity, then you
The wrecking ball swung again toward the crumbling Obamacare edifice yesterday. Ironically, it continues to be the Obama administration that is operating the heavy machinery. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius announced, in the form of a letter to Democratic senators, that Obamacare’s individual mandate tax will be waived in 2014 for persons who had their policies canceled in 2013 due to Obamacare. At this point, after months of on-the-fly pronouncements, delays, and exemptions (often announced, not coincidentally, in the days just before a major national holiday), perhaps nothing should surprise us anymore about Obamacare’s disastrous rollout. But yesterday’s announcement