Mulligan.

Bull Pucky.

Sounds like all he did was repeat the lie.

gain 1 lose 10,000

what a guy! Thousands heard his rose garden remarks and did not hear him say this was a terrorist act. How is he going to explain Rice and her many statements, Clinton's statement plus the advertisement paid for by Americans saying this was due to a film. Also, why hasn't the film maker been released. Lies, upon lies, upon lies!

Instant fame. It can turn heads.

Oh, so he thought of a better lie, too slow.

Greta Van Susteren has it on her Gretawire:

This posting updates the GretaWire posting at 3:25pm.

My FNC colleage Sarah Courtney just spoke to Kerry Ladka (the man who asked the Libya question at last night’s Presidential debate.) I have highlighted in red text what I think odd — why did he pedal that video/protest story? The terrorism happened Sept 11…..and the President was pedaling it as late as Sept 18 on David Letterman and then September 25 at the UN. It is weird that he is saying that he wanted ‘all the information’ yet was going out with, at best, misinformation.

http://gretawire.foxnewsinsider.com/2012/10/17/more-about-president-obamas-post-debate-conversation-with-audience-member-kerry-ladka/

Most of us here on Lucianne know there is a lot more to this story. The impostor in chief has sinister stuff to hide.

Wasn't it odd that he asked Candy Crowley to "get the transcript" and she had it right there?

i'm concerned about the last debate. romney should mop the floor with obama on foreign policy but bob schieffer is the moderator. that maggot is as crooked as a dog's hind leg

Don't forget Crowley chose the questions. humm. Also she began her "show" by reminding only she and her people were the only ones who know what the questions are.

So let me get this straight: we don't want to jump to conclusions, so we just say it's the video for three weeks while we investigate?

Hep me if I'm wrong here.

Did the USEmbasy in Egypt not appologize PRIOR to the Consulate attack?

How did THEY know it was a U-tube clip?

And they had argued with State Dept HQ about releasing the appology before they published it.

This part needs to come out on Monday also.

TIMELINE?????

Kind of like Candy-baby clarified her "fact check" intrusion after the debate.

Maybe that's when we should be tuning in. Clearly honesty is not what we're getting in the real thing.

Re #14, the ambassador to Egypt was not in Cairo when the embassy there was attacked. She was in Washington, DC for four days. Her charge d'affairs is the one who released the "apology". It was this apology that prompted Mitt Romney's remarks which he put on hold until midnight because of the "nothing from either campaign on 9/11" agreement.

That apology by the ambassador's charge d'affaires was to the protestors for having offended them (with the video). This is what Mitt Romney objected to. It has become so twisted by O&Co that no one even remembers what it was about. Now it is just called "Romney politicking".

(hit submit too soon)

The attack in Benghazi came later the night of 9/11. 9:40 as I recall. That could have resulted in some complication re Mitt Romney's statement after the Cairo attack and apology .... the statement that was held for some hours, but surely was time stamped.

dumm kopf!

(I suspect the fellow was a bit awed by The President engaging him in a conversation??? Maybe he'll come to his senses, if he has any???)

Romney MUST lay out the entire scenario beginning with Charlene Lamb and others watching the attack "in real time" as the atrocity was in process.

If BO & Co., Inc. was so intent on "getting it right," "getting all the facts," why the heck did BO & Co., Inc. repeatedly utter the lie about the utube?

a rhetorical question here.

TELL THE TRUTH

I'm confused even more so than usual by these changing stories. During the debate, assisted by Candy Crowley, the President insisted that, Yes, he had attributed the attacks to terrorism on Sept. 12 in the Rose Garden speech. Then he speaks to the questioner, and tells him that he held off attributing the attacks to terrorism because he wanted to get all the facts before speaking. Sounds to me as if he contradicted himself in his little one-on-one with the questioner.

I'm not stupid. What am I missing here?
/SP/

#19, the man was one of Obama's plants. I wager if he was ever vetted, he would be found to be a supporter of the Wun! (Zero is not a "one" in any way, shape or form. Or spelling, for that matter.)

Poster 20, the whole aim is to confuse and lose everyone so we just shut up about it. You know the truth; stick with that. Obit lied, continues to lie and thinks we're too stupid to figure out the truth.

Ladka, any relation to the guy on Taxi?

#'s 8&10 say exactly what I was going to say. Thanks for your brilliance and insight. :-)

...in the presence of the family pets?

This guy sounds perfectly normal until he says he will vote for the candidate that supports universal health care and doesn't cut Medicare. Of course if someone told him Obama cut $716 Billion from Medicare he wouldn't believe it so what's the point?