|
|
| |
Topic: Candy Crowley: ‘I’m not a fly on the wall’ |
Candy Crowley: ‘I’m not a fly on the wall’
Politico, by Dylan Byers
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:BuckeyeRon, 10/15/2012 11:11:57 AM
|
| The town-hall debate is the one presidential faceoff in which the audience gets to ask the questions. But don’t tell that to moderator Candy Crowley. Like any journalist worthy of the assignment, Crowley concedes that the debate on Tuesday night isn’t about her, but she just as eagerly acknowledges her role in it. “I understand that I’m there. I’m not a fly on the wall,” she told Politico recently. “We don’t want the candidates to spout talking points. That doesn’t help voters … I’m going to react organically to what’s happening.” In a move that has unnerved both campaigns,
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Coy860, 10/15/2012 11:15:06 AM (No. 8934277)
Let this be a lesson to Republicans all over the fruited plain. We will no longer accept extreme liberals to be in control of debates. Paul Ryan was prevented from making excellent points in the debate, thanks to Biden and the moderator. We must demand that Mark Levin and other conservatives are part of the process next time.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
fire_mission, 10/15/2012 11:15:35 AM (No. 8934278)
More like a water buffalo on the wall.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
pomom, 10/15/2012 11:16:03 AM (No. 8934279)
You're supposed to be a facilitator, Candy, not a participant hack.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
mitzi, 10/15/2012 11:16:52 AM (No. 8934282)
I've seen pictures of Candy Crowley.
The phrases "fly on the wall" and "react organically" bring some really repulsive images to mind.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Scottyboy, 10/15/2012 11:17:20 AM (No. 8934284)
Both Crowley and 0bama are going to overreach tomorrow night and it is only going to help Mitt because he will be viewed as the only adult on the stage.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
starsNstripes, 10/15/2012 11:23:48 AM (No. 8934309)
Her statement about not allowing the candidates to spout their campaign talking points is a red herring.
She sees herself as the one who gets to determine what is a talking point and the one who gets to stifle that point and steer the conversation to a direction she thinks it should go.
In other words, she thinks she is a part of the debate rather than a sideline official that monitors the clock.
We all know how these ego-maniacal lib reporters think. She will obviously interrupt Mitt and claim she is doing so because he is spewing talking points--then she will try to throw him a curveball question full of spin and innuendo. For Obama, she will interrupt once or twice, but it will be because he is floundering and she will try to throw him a lifeline.
Seen it all too often...
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
pgvoisin, 10/15/2012 11:25:41 AM (No. 8934313)
“Organically”? Try “Progressively”!
Recent commentary…..
CROWLEY: We’ve already had this debate. All they have to do at Obama Reelect is open up the files because this debate has already happened. They just bring it back, it goes, it is, you know, what they talk about. But I think the other thing that’s worth pointing out is not every Republican has signed on to this kind of, I mean, they will publicly. But there is some trepidation…
GLORIA BORGER, CNN: They're afraid. CROWLEY: ...that this might be, looks a little bit like some sort of ticket death wish.
CROWLEY: This is the same woman who eulogized Kennedy by dismissing Mary Jo Kopechne like this: It's an imperfect story of an often reckless young man who lived hard and as a U.S. senator drove a car off a bridge after a party, killing a young campaign aide. Imperfect story? And he didn’t just kill her by driving off a bridge; Kennedy left her to suffocate to death. In the Senate was redemption. In the Senate, the dream came alive.
CROWLEY: Try this: in June of this year, defending Obama’s national security leaks, Crowley actually said,
“Usually you kind of give the President a pass on leaking confidential stuff.”
No one should give Crowley a pass on anything.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
gobushcheneygo, 10/15/2012 11:26:57 AM (No. 8934319)
React organically? Will she be wearing her Depends?
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
MHR, 10/15/2012 11:29:04 AM (No. 8934325)
Organically? Really? LOL
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
mickturn, 10/15/2012 11:31:04 AM (No. 8934335)
That is your job, don't try to take over the debate.
BY the way, not a fly on the wall but sugarey Goo...Candy!
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
pgvoisin, 10/15/2012 11:32:59 AM (No. 8934349)
When Crowley "reacts organically" to Mitt during the debates, Romney should look directly into the camera and say to the American people:
"Ms. Crowley wants to "organically" redirect my message to you".
"I have been on the campaign trail listening to you and you want solutions to our economic and world leadership problems."
"Here they are." (5 point plan)
Then he should look back at Ms. Crowley and invite her to join him on the campaign trail so she can better understand why her "organic" participation is out of step with teeh American People.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Scottyboy, 10/15/2012 11:33:29 AM (No. 8934351)
Fly on the wall - No
Elephant in the room - Yes
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Teleologicus, 10/15/2012 11:54:50 AM (No. 8934427)
Ms. Crowley's aspirations are high enough for her to file and run as a candidate herself. That is really what she ought to do instead of exploiting her role as moderator to join in the debate and express her own opinions. But it may work to the public good to have her be the Joker in the deck. It is bound to keep the real candidates on their toes.
All of this conflict and confusion about moderators could easily be avoided in the future by eliminating the role of moderator, which is an unnecessary and intrusive encumbrance in the first place. There is no need whatever to have a third party, and a journalist of all people, sticking their nose into a presidential debate. Moderators merely get in the way and obstruct the view. They deprive Americans of the opportunity to see how the candidates would handle themselves in a free exchange of ideas and insults.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Halfvast Conspirator, 10/15/2012 11:57:18 AM (No. 8934432)
More like a fly on s... well, you know what I mean.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
broken01, 10/15/2012 12:06:09 PM (No. 8934458)
More like a rhinocerous beetle on the wall.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
TXknitter, 10/15/2012 12:07:16 PM (No. 8934462)
Again, here we are trying to make the best of an unfair debate process and obviously biased and compromised moderator. The point isn't that Romney will probably do great. Of course he will. Question remains as to why the GOP has given all decision-making about Presidential debates to the Democrats on a silver platter. The other side merely takes advantage of our cowardice - again.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
faldo, 10/15/2012 12:20:56 PM (No. 8934502)
If Candy "Sam Kinison" Crowley acts up Mitt can always ask her what she meant when she uttered on air "Romney/Ryan...that's a death wish" moments after Romney officially announced his GOP running mate.
Are professional journalists required to subjectively question and condemn candidates like she did...?
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
harper, 10/15/2012 12:22:16 PM (No. 8934504)
If Crowley wears one of her Che T-shirts, she'll be able to have all of Che on it, not just the usual head shot [sic]
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
stablemoney, 10/15/2012 12:41:40 PM (No. 8934572)
Crowley should wear her Obama button.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
southernboy, 10/15/2012 12:48:30 PM (No. 8934587)
"Just imagine! I'm controlling the subject matter of a discussion by a sitting president and a presidential candidate. How important does that make me!!!"
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Philipsonh, 10/15/2012 12:50:02 PM (No. 8934591)
The point is that Ms Crowley favors one side and is not an independent minded journalist. WHY can't the GOP insist on a neutral moderator. i think that they agreed to ANY moderator so that the debates would take place. Otherwise, Obama may have just declined to debate. He figured he had it in the bag with moderators that leaned his way.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
bpl40, 10/15/2012 2:08:13 PM (No. 8934833)
Well, you certainly look like Candy somebody has already eaten!
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
geoman, 10/15/2012 3:45:48 PM (No. 8935107)
Why do so many criticize only the GOP as if Romney has absolutely no control? The fact that Romney is agreeing to participate in the MSM controlled debate process means he believes he is up to the task.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Smaj, 10/15/2012 3:47:18 PM (No. 8935117)
She will try to be Fuzzy Thurston (Thurston is better looking) to Empty Chair's Paul Hornung. I'm sure Romney is prepared to shut down their game plan.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
connor, 10/15/2012 4:16:09 PM (No. 8935229)
When I saw the list of moderators I shuddered. Who agreed to this? This is not going to turn out well. After the debate is done and the words are exchanged it is done. Nothing afterward can fix it. I saw the look on Ryan's face after the debate was over and he looked sick.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "BuckeyeRon"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "BuckeyeRon"
|
|
Obama’s trust-in-government deficit
|
|
Washington Post, by Dan Balz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 3:27:32 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Whatever else happens as a result of the multiple controversies that have engulfed the administration, one thing is clear: President Obama has failed to meet one of the most important goals he set out when he was first elected, which was to demonstrate that activist government could also be smart government. (Snip) As he put it then: “I think what you saw in this election was people saying, ‘Yes, we don’t want some big, bureaucratic, ever-expanding state. On the other hand, we don’t want a state that’s dysfunctional, that doesn’t believe in its mission, that can’t carry out
|
McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal
|
|
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure
|
Ken Cuccinelli is Virginia GOP gubernatorial nominee
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:13:58 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Richmond, Va.—Virginia´s activist conservative attorney general has won the Republican Party´s gubernatorial nomination by acclamation. At the GOP´s statewide convention, thousands of conservatives and tea party followers who dominated the Richmond Coliseum on Saturday roared their unanimous support for Ken Cuccinelli. He was unopposed for the nomination and is generally beloved by the tea party for his aggressive challenges to federal mandates. Cuccinelli is an abortion foe who was the first state attorney general to challenge President Barack Obama´s health care reforms in 2010. He faces former Democratic National Committee chairman and Clinton family protege Terry McAuliffe
|
Abortion, affairs and how tennis great Chris Evert the man eater and Jimmy Connors the cad deserved each other!
|
|
Daily Mail [UK], by Tom Leonard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 11:31:12 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Legions of Wimbledon fans may find it hard to credit in the man who once defined bad behaviour on the tennis court, but Jimmy Connors says he ‘turned on the charm’ the first time he chatted up Chris Evert.(Snip)Although she has since bitterly regretted giving up on a ‘good, solid marriage’, what some have described as her mid-life crisis struck in 2006 when she divorced Mill after 18 years. The Evert pendulum had swung back again towards an assertive Alpha Male: she had fallen in love with Australian world golfing champion Greg Norman. He was Mill’s best friend
|
|
House votes to repeal ObamaCare
|
|
Hill [Washington,DC], by Pete Kasperowicz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/16/2013 9:49:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The House voted to repeal ObamaCare on Thursday for the third time since Republicans took over the chamber in 2011. Only two Democrats sided with Republicans in the party-line 229-195 vote — Jim Matheson (Utah) and Mike McIntyre (N.C.). All Republicans voted in favor of repeal. This is the 37th time the House GOP has voted to repeal or defund at least part of the bill, but this latest bill will also not become law given Democrats´ control of the Senate. Still, many House Republicans had clamored for the bill from Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) to be considered,
|
Meet Danny Werfel, New IRS Acting Chief
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Damian Paletta
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/16/2013 6:45:37 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Back in March, The Wall Street Journal’s Damian Paletta profiled Daniel Werfel — then the controller for the White House budget office, and today the newly named acting commissioner of the IRS — focusing on his role in instructing the government how to deal with the sequester’s $85 billion in budget cuts. Here are some highlights from the profile: Known in the White House as “Danny,” Mr. Werfel graduated from Cornell University, earned a master’s degree in public policy from Duke University and a law degree from the University of North Carolina. His first 12 years in the federal
|
Claim: Obama Campaign Co-Chair Attacked Romney with Leaked IRS Docs
|
|
Breitbart Big Government, by Matthew Boyle
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/15/2013 9:29:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
One of President Barack Obama´s re-election campaign co-chairmen used a leaked document from the IRS to attack GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney during the 2012 election, according to the National Organization for Marriage (NOM).(Snip)NOM discovered that when HRC published its confidential financial documents, it failed to conceal the source of the documents. “After software removed the layers obscuring the document, it is shown that the document came from the Internal Revenue Service,” NOM asserted in its April 2012 release. “The top of each page says, ‘THIS IS A COPY OF A LIVE RETURN FROM SMIPS. OFFICIAL USE ONLY,’"
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part
|
McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal
|
|
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure
|
Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi auditor Thomas Pickering
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.
|
IRS sued for seizing 60 million medical records
|
|
Washington Times [DC], by Cheryl K. Chumley
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 9:29:25 PM
Post Reply
|
|
A healthcare provider has sued the Internal Revenue Service and 15 of its agents, charging they wrongfully seized 60 million medical records from 10 million Americans. The name of the provider is not yet known, United Press International said. But Courthouse News Service said the suit claims the agency violated the Fourth Amendment in 2011, when agents executed a search warrant for financial data on one employee – and that led to the seizure of information on 10 million, including state judges. The search warrant did not specify that the IRS could take medical information, UPI said.
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|