And Piers is one of the most biased and dishonest talking heads.
Certainly, he is the most pompous and arrogant

Shut up, Piers.

We allow you to be here ...

... we don't need your opinion on our matters.

We took steps to end that some time ago.

Wow, I am gobsmacked.

Deport the arrogant obnoxious Brit.

I guess he hasn't met Obama yet.

drinking the Kool Aid! yuk

It depends on what your definition of principled is.

Take a hike, Piers. Not only do we not pay any attention to you, neither do the libs you pander to. Embarrassing, isn't it?

Does this guy have a TV show or something? I think I might have clicked through his show on cable.

Morgan is almost laughable. How does this clown keep his job?

As for character and integrity, Romney is the best man to run for president since Reagan and Truman. He's going to be a very good leader, and Lord knows we need him after the last four years.

such a twit..and Piers..you have a weak chin..stick to judging singers...

It is not repacing "the first black President with a Mormon". It is replacing the first moron President with a Mormon

If Romney's saying the truth about his country's Olympic management is "don't like your drapes", what is that lousy Brit doing commenting on our candidate?

BTW, unprincipled translates to 'doesn't agree with Piers Morgan'. We get it. Obama is honorable for 'evolving' on gay marriage, but Romney flipflops, got it.

Oh and Obama improving our image worldwide?? You must be joking. There were twenty embassies under siege recently, and we have 4 dead in Libya. If that's an improvement, I'll take a little less improvement.

Romney is the most principled man - and the stupid Morgan proves it in his own post - even admitting that the UK has nothing like him.

What a jerk. A stupid jerk. A blind stupid jerk.

Piers Morgan is more proof that liberals are not very intelligent people.

Free clue, Piers... Mitt has a long history of being a successful executive.

And another free clue: our Presidency is an executive position.

Interesting coming from Piers.

Hey folks, this very very liberal entertainer just grudgingly endorsed Romney. Wow.....

...one of the least principled politicians..

In other words, he's not a flaming leftist.

Morgan is not a "liberal", none of them are--he is a LEFTIST.

Piers, take a long walk off a short PIER!

Piers Morgan is a clueless nit! Listen to him at your own peril.

If you're walking along a sandy beach with your mom, and you complain to her that you don't "feel fresh" down there, your mom will recommend you go to the drugstore and pick up a Piers Morgan.

If Romney policies work, then it will be a Higher Power that saves America (Americans must save America and give the credit where Romney will IMO)and hence the world as that Higher Power wills.

Where does Piers find a more "principled" politician or all of those above Romney on his list?

Romney going to the base in the primaries and the center in the national is standard operating procedure that even a board dumb person like me knows by now following politics and the ins and outs and ups and downs.

Faulting Romney on keeping his campaign promises to the electorate of the most liberal state in the union is plain dumb if not hypocritical. He was elected to serve Mass. He pulled them rightward fiscally for awhile and modified their legislature's healthcare ideas. What more can be asked of a politician that he serves those who elect him and achieves what he campaigned to do.

If Romney were the ambitious and coreless individual some make him out to be, he would have switched long ago from the religion of his father's. Would have made his political rise easier, or would it?

Believing in a Higher Power than onesself cleanses souls? Nominal selection for political purposes? So Barack IMO. Muslim of his childhood, atheism of soscialism of philosophies or "Christian" of Wright's church? Still hasn't found a new one in Wash DC?? Hmmmn. IOW I don't see it as Piers does. But does he? He has to get a column out for a living on a deadline not as necessarily inspired by dynamic Poe-like inspiration.

Piers Morgan, your go-to guy when you need the ponce perspective.

Sometimes you guys behave like Democrats. Lighten up on poor Piers, who is hedging a bet here. Perhaps he's hoping that after President Romney is sworn in he'll get a job offer from Fox.

The title says it all, folks. The first sentence is CYA so Piers doesn't lose street creds with loony leftists. The second sentence is where it's at. Piers has offered a nice gift...and we're staring into its mouth, looking for cavities.

What part of "I believe Mitt Romney might just save America." did you have a problem with?

More succinctly: Will Morgan be found writing a different tone as he himself evolves in opinion or flip flops?

He'd be much better off doing interviews with Ginger from Gilligan's Island.

Well said #2.

I suspect Stacey Dash sold him.

Obama is not a hated figure among most Americans by any means

Piers, you haven't been to Texas lately.

Obama does deserve plaudits for improving the reputation of America abroad after the war-ridden years of George W. Bush

Bull. We are a laughing stock now and being pushed around all over the place.

Piers proves that his IQ is on par with his tv show ratings...single numbers.

Disclosure: I detest Piers Morgan.

So do a lot of Britons and that's probably why Morgan came over here--to milk a fresh bunch of--what was that term about low information or something? You know the Honey Boo Boo crowd.

But scan over the bit you hate and read the whole thing. He's praising with faint damn, is the way I see it. More positive than negative, albeit grudgingly, as No. 16 has already observed.

Whatever Piers!

We will take it from here, we'll attempt to transform things the best way for all.

Next time try the mea culpa. You guys shoved a leftist upon us and his experience a total fraud. I'm still scratching my head from 2008.

People like you Piers are mostly to blame.

Isn't he rock-bottom in the ratings? I can see why.

Is this a repost? I could swear I read this article and all these comments days ago.

Many of you a blasting Piers for his "least principled" comment. Isn't this exactly what many of us conservatives had reservations about Romney during the primaries? He was presenting himself as more conservative than he really was? I hate to say this, but I actually agree with Piers on this point. That's probably part of the reason that Ryan was selected as VP...to help offset that "flip-flop" charge. That doesn't mean I not going to vote for Romney, I certainly am. We have a much better chance of saving this country with Romney than we do with Obama.

Always thought Romney was a fairly good debater. The problem was his record and message, but it was clear he was for smaller government. If you want smaller government, its unclear that Romney would be the ideal choice. Romney was the best funded candidate, best organized, and wanted the nomination. He convinced enough conservatives, and he won.

Romney should win easily since Obama's performance has been awlful. Even the lefty media cannot save Obama's sorry rear end.

Novmember 6 is 'Impeach Obama' day.

Obama could have answered yes to all those questions ... many times over.

#33 and others get it. Indeed Romney is a far superior choice to our Narcissist-in Chief but he is not now nor has he ever been a conservative. Morgan's observation about Romney's lack of core principle is stone cold reality yet the irrational animus toward Morgan won't allow the predictible ranters to accept a small favor; a Romney endorsement. They do him no favors by insisting Romney is something that he is not.