A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: How the 2012 Election
Is Stacked for the GOP
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
How the 2012 Election
Is Stacked for the GOP

New York Magazine, by Jonathan Chait

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 10/13/2012 11:58:28 AM

One thing you may have missed even if you’re following the election really, really closely is that Americans get to vote this November to decide control of not on one or even two but three bodies: The president, the Senate, and the House of Representatives. The relative importance of the three could be apportioned about 50:25:25. The ratio of news coverage to the race for control is about 80:19:1. Hardly any public polls exist. Every couple of weeks, the handful of Congressional handicappers update their projections, based on entrail-reading

Comments:
Jonny-Little's sky is falling. This time, I think he's right, but for the wrong reasons.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: chance_232, 10/13/2012 12:10:17 PM     (No. 8930414)

"Forced to hold Republican-leaning territory, they give their candidates wide latitude to break from the party."

Pure Barbara Streisand! What this actually means is that democrat senators from red states are in a better position to extort more stuff for their votes.

All in all.....this article whines that really.....republicans are in the "natural" majority. What was unsaid, but alluded too is that democrats have to lie about their true beliefs to win outside of Boston, Chicago, New York and Berkeley.


Reply 2 - Posted by: higgins1990, 10/13/2012 12:23:08 PM     (No. 8930435)

In 2010, the GOP picked up 63 seats in the House, 6 in the Senate, over 700 seats in statehouses and flipped control of 20 statehouses.
.
The sentiment remains. Obama is toxic, as is the liberal agenda. Seeing how the looney left has purged the moderates from their party, the Dems will be a minority for the next generation.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Knotwyrkin, 10/13/2012 12:39:33 PM     (No. 8930460)

"There are two incredibly depressing lessons here. The first is that the incredibly important decision of which party controls the House is something we Americans have little say over."

NO! NO! NO! Us Americans have a lot to say about it, and you will hear us in November. You may think we are in flyover country, but we are just as happy for you to never come here with your condescending attitute and elitism. The Silent Majority will rule.


Reply 4 - Posted by: engrpat, 10/13/2012 12:39:37 PM     (No. 8930461)

Wonder if Jonathan was this concerned when the dems held a lock on the majority...somehow I doubt it.


Reply 5 - Posted by: woofwoofwoof, 10/13/2012 12:43:12 PM     (No. 8930464)

Chait is the archetype of the brainy liberal with not a whit of sense. His concerns are valid, and he is entirely delusional on virtually every statement he makes after the setup. Chait could be the poster boy for some kind of neo-Stalinism.


Reply 6 - Posted by: dallasdude, 10/13/2012 12:43:17 PM     (No. 8930465)

The wave will build and the house, senate and white house will be republican. Touch you know what..


Reply 7 - Posted by: Knotwyrkin, 10/13/2012 12:43:41 PM     (No. 8930467)

I just broke my rule and read some of the comments. Those guys crack me up!!!


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: ccprops, 10/13/2012 12:46:33 PM     (No. 8930469)

This is the legacy of the 111th congress, the worst in the history of the Republic. The payback should (and may) last for years.


Reply 9 - Posted by: killerbee, 10/13/2012 12:48:09 PM     (No. 8930472)

#3: what the heck does he mean by "we Americans"? Insane! His complaint, I suspect, is that he and his leftist tyranny-lovers can't get the rabble to do what they want.


And he has no clue as to why what he's saying is absurd and offensive. Classic Chait.


Reply 10 - Posted by: jglas, 10/13/2012 12:48:39 PM     (No. 8930475)

You want to talk about totally partisan legislating how about mentioning Obamacare?


Reply 11 - Posted by: Deedo, 10/13/2012 1:11:08 PM     (No. 8930518)

Jon Chait is the Boy in the Plastic Bubble. He is so lost in the liberal hive mind that he's trapped in a labyrinth of misunderstandings of his own creation.


Reply 12 - Posted by: GoDeacs79, 10/13/2012 1:12:45 PM     (No. 8930520)

Somebody dial 911. This guy needs a whambulance.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: terry_tr6, 10/13/2012 1:41:09 PM     (No. 8930552)

" huge, wasted majorities " You just can't make this stuff up!


Reply 14 - Posted by: sinic, 10/13/2012 1:53:42 PM     (No. 8930574)

#13...many of the ARE wasted on a daily basis.


Reply 15 - Posted by: ronnietheK, 10/13/2012 2:00:20 PM     (No. 8930585)

The best part is the complaint about unpopular and radical policies the Repubs supposedly advocate-this in the face of Obama care which last I looked is oppossed by a majority in this country and was encacted without a single Republican vote. Too funny.


Reply 16 - Posted by: BeatleJeff, 10/13/2012 2:23:01 PM     (No. 8930621)

What a load! Typical lamestream screed - GOP is radical, extreme, fanatical, blah blah blah. I'm sure it never ocurred to little Jonathan that Middle America ababdoned the Democrats because it is they who are the extremist and it's their supporters in urban areas who are the fanatics. After all, it isn't GOP supporters who are running wild in the streets screaming "I's gots my free Obamaphone! Romney sux!"


Reply 17 - Posted by: dvc, 10/13/2012 2:32:29 PM     (No. 8930635)

Unreal - in this loon's world "we Americans" is a group in opposition to "the Republicans" who have somehow magically managed to steal the House and are going to destroy everything. Stopped wasting my time after that.

Insane clown, fully detached from reality.

Based on the available data, apparently living in NYC puts one at great risk of loss of grip on reality.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: FenwayFrank, 10/13/2012 2:37:01 PM     (No. 8930640)

Another reason to dislike New York, right along with Schumer, Nanny, Weiner and his Mosbro Ho, Rangel, NBC News, NYT, Streisand etc. God help the good people of this state.


Reply 19 - Posted by: NorthernDog, 10/13/2012 2:42:47 PM     (No. 8930654)

The Democrat model for winning elections is unraveling before his eyes. 2008 was an anomaly and it's just dawning on them now.
The Dems are dependent on getting lopsided support from a few segments of society, plus an odd assortment of uniformed and/or naive voters.
Perhaps he should ask himself why no Democrat has served 2 full terms besides Bubba Clinton in the last 75 years. Voters get sick of them real fast.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Passion, 10/13/2012 3:33:15 PM     (No. 8930736)

What little Johnnie fails to mention is that with all the libs crammed into the high rise cities - when they are in control - we are ruled by folks who really don't know what the country is about.

He would have Seinfeld and Castanza rule us all, from their inner city walk everywhere out of touch existence.


Reply 21 - Posted by: jackburton, 10/13/2012 6:23:13 PM     (No. 8930990)

FTA: But conceding Republican control of the House means allowing all manner of extreme and unpopular policies. One is that Republican control means that the debt ceiling will become a regular game of Russian roulette with the world economy rather than a posturing opportunity,

I'll remember that. Supporting the Constitution, following the law, representing your constituents is...

...extreme. Oh, and using the debt ceiling to obtain concessions is Russian Roulette. You know, I don't recall it being called that when the Donks did it.



Post Reply   Close thread 706609




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



Boehner: House won´t just ´take up
and accept´ Senate immigration bill
The Hill [DC], by Russell Berman & Mike Lillis    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 3:26:29 PM     Post Reply
Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) on Thursday said the House won't pick up the Senate immigration bill and pass it. "The House remains committed to fixing our broken immigration system, but we will not simply take up and accept the bill that is emerging in the Senate if it passes," said the statement from Boehner, his top three lieutenants and Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, which has jurisdiction on immigration. "The House remains committed to fixing our broken immigration system, but we will not simply take up and accept the bill that is emerging in the Senate if it passes," the statement said. "Rather, through regular order,

Holding AWOL Obama Accountable
American Spectator, by Betsy McCaughey    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 6:20:22 AM     Post Reply
President Obama offers only weasel words to explain deaths in Libya and IRS abuses. He’s the master of verbal evasion. House Republicans need to replace debate with action to hold the president accountable on these issues. To get to the bottom of why four Americans died in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012, House Republicans should issue a formal resolution demanding to know where the president was on the night September 11 and what role he played. Obama needs to be put on the hot seat. Benghazi- For eight months, the White House has maneuvered

What the White House Really Thinks
Commentary Magazine, by Jonathan S. Tobin    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:59:25 AM     Post Reply
Much has been written and said about the astoundingly tone deaf performance of White House spokesman Jay Carney during this past month of scandals. The former journalist has lost the confidence of the people who were once his colleagues due to his unwillingness to tell the truth about his own deceptive statements (never mind those he represents in front of the press) about the Benghazi talking points or even to acknowledge that he has changed his story. The same applies to the shifting story he has told about the Internal Revenue Service scandal

All in the Family
Washington Free Beacon, by C.J. Ciaramella    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:44:55 AM     Post Reply
A nonprofit connected to Rep. Corrine Brown (D., Fla.) and run by a local political power player overbilled Medicaid by nearly $1.4 million, the Florida Times-Union reported. According to an audit by the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration, the Community Rehabilitation Center in Jacksonville overbilled Medicaid by nearly $1.4 million. Reggie Gaffney, a former Jacksonville Port Authority board member, runs the nonprofit, which provides medical services for mental illness, substance abuse, and HIV/AIDS for low-income residents. Brown’s daughter, Shantrel, is a lobbyist for Arlington-based Alcade and Fay, whose clients include the nonprofit. C

Slain Russian ‘intimidated’ neighbors
Boston Herald, by Laurel J. Sweet*    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:40:57 AM     Post Reply
Former Cambridge neighbors of a Russian mixed martial arts brawler shot dead by an FBI agent early yesterday in Florida — after ?being questioned about his ties to the marathon bombing and a Waltham triple murder — said he was nasty. Ibragim Todashev, 27, also hung around with slain marathon bombing mastermind Tamerlan Tsarnaev, 26 — swilling beer and eating chicken on a stoop on Harding Street, they said. “I was the happiest person when they moved. ... It’s a little more peaceful since they left,” a neighbor told the Herald yesterday of the Russian buddies.

The Real Voter Suppression of 2012
National Review Online, by John Fund    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:29:41 AM     Post Reply
The 2012 election season was filled with angry cries of “voter suppression,” almost all of them regarding attempts by states to require voter ID and otherwise improve ballot integrity. Bill Clinton warned that “there has never been — in my lifetime, since we got rid of the poll tax and all the other Jim Crow burdens on voting — the determined effort to limit the franchise that we see today.” Democratic-party chairwoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz said “photo-ID laws, we think, are very similar to a poll tax.” All of this proved to be twaddle.

The ‘Criminal’ press
New York Post, by Michael A. Walsh    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/23/2013 5:24:39 AM     Post Reply
The Justice Department’s secret seizure of phone records from The Associated Press and its monitoring of Fox News reporter James Rosen are nothing less than thuggish attempts to criminalize the practice of journalism — the only profession specifically protected by the US Constitution. Free and open inquiry is also the cornerstone of our democracy, a legacy of the Enlightenment that found its clearest expression in the First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press.” By which the Founders specifically meant political speech. They understood that, even with the checks and balances



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Anthony Weiner announces NYC mayor run
75 replie(s)
Politico, by Kevin Robillard    Original Article
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/22/2013 6:06:40 AM     Post Reply
Former Rep. Anthony Weiner, whose career in public life came to an abrupt end when he sent lewd pictures to a college student on Twitter, jumped back into politics on Wednesday by announcing a bid for mayor of New York City. “Look, I’ve made some big mistakes and I know I’ve let a lot of people down,” the Democrat said in a 2-minute video announcing his bid. “But I’ve also learned some tough lessons. I’m running for mayor because I’ve been fighting for the middle class and those struggling to make it for my entire life.

A Crack in the IRS Dam
55 replie(s)
Power Line, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/21/2013 10:50:44 PM     Post Reply
The dam protecting the IRS scandal began to crack today when Lois Lerner, the IRS official who announced, and apologized for, the improper singling out of conservative-leaning organizations by IRS employees under her command, announced through her criminal defense lawyer that she will not testify as scheduled tomorrow before the House Oversight Committee. Rather, she will assert her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This marks an enormous milestone in the IRS investigation. It can now be taken as more or less established that crimes were committed by Obama administration employees. Lerner’s lawyer tried to minimize the significance

Lois Lerner´s Brief And
Awful Day On Capitol Hill

53 replie(s)
NPR, by Frank James    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 10:21:38 PM     Post Reply
The public got its first look Thursday at Lois Lerner, who has gone from faceless IRS bureaucrat to the face that launched what feels like 1,000 congressional hearings and conspiracy theories. But it was only a brief sighting since she didn´t stay long at a House hearing to further probe her role in how some IRS workers came to target conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status. (Snip)She did make a short statement to declare her innocence, however. Lerner´s motivation was more transparent than much of what the IRS has done in connection with this controversy. She was determined to

Criminality Appears To Lie at the
Heart of the IRS Scandal

52 replie(s)
New York Sun, by Lawrence Kudlow    Original Article
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/23/2013 5:59:27 AM     Post Reply
When you get right down to it, the political targeting and stalling of tax-exempt applications by the IRS was an effort to defund the Tea Party. Rick Santelli, one of the Tea Party founders and my CNBC colleague, was the first to make this point. I’ve taken it a step further: The IRS was taking the Tea Party out of play for the 2012 election, as it looked to avoid a repeat of 2010 and another Tea Party landslide.There are a lot of numbers out there.

Man questioned in Boston Marathon
bombing shot, killed by FBI

51 replie(s)
WCBV-TV [Boston], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/22/2013 7:21:44 AM     Post Reply
One of two men allegedly being questioned in connection with the Boston Marathon bombings was shot and killed by an FBI agent in Florida on Tuesday, (Snip)A friend of Ibragim Todashev said he and Todashev were being investigated as part of the Boston bombings. He said Todashev, 27, knew bombing suspect Tamerlan Tsarnaev because both were MMA fighters. The man claims he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for nearly three hours on Tuesday. The friend said he left the interview, and when he came back to the apartment he found that there had been a shooting.

Why was the Department
of Homeland Security monitoring
Tea Party IRS demonstrations?

45 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Sally Zelikovsky    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/23/2013 8:09:21 AM     Post Reply
What´s so interesting about 60 tea partiers protesting the IRS in San Jose, California on Tuesday, May 21st? The fact that this bit of information was conveyed to the protesters by a Department of Homeland Security officer who was also in attendance. What was a DHS agent doing at the San Jose Tea Party protest? (snip) they weren´t just spying on us in San Jose and monitoring us in San Francisco, they were watching us throughout the entire state

Darrell Issa: Lois Lerner
lost her rights

42 replie(s)
Politico, by Rachel Bade    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 3:34:05 PM     Post Reply
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said embattled IRS official Lois Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights and will be hauled back to appear before his panel again. The California Republican said Lerner’s Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination was voided when she gave an opening statement this morning denying any wrongdoing and professing pride in her government service. “When I asked her her questions from the very beginning, I did so so she could assert her rights prior to any statement,” Issa told POLITICO. “She chose not to do so — so she waived.”


Post Reply   Close thread 706609





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~