A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Biden 2016? It could
happen, my friend.
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Biden 2016? It could
happen, my friend.

Washington Post, by Jules Witcover

Original Article

Posted By:Pluperfect, 10/13/2012 10:13:27 AM

Before becoming vice president, Joe Biden declared his intention to “restore the balance” between his office and that of the president. In his view, Dick Cheney had essentially created a separate power base, nearly independent of the Oval Office. Biden’s vice presidency was going to restrain those impulses. He would integrate his role and staff more smoothly and fully with the White House, more in the style of Walter Mondale during Jimmy Carter’s presidency and, to a degree, Al Gore in the Clinton years. But Biden has hardly taken a back seat. Instead, he has become President Obama’s workhorse

Comments:
The answer to every Pubbie's prayer, Biden heading a ticket against incumbent President Romney in 2016.

And Witcover's comparison of VP Biden to VP Cheney is giggle-making.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: anniej, 10/13/2012 10:22:05 AM     (No. 8930152)

Stop it.

The only presidency which Joey the Jackal is suited for is the Hair Club for Men.

And even that's a reach.


Reply 2 - Posted by: javaboy, 10/13/2012 10:22:16 AM     (No. 8930153)

“restore the balance”

In the Star Wars saga, I seem to recall that "restoring balance" is what brought the evil emperor to power and led to a tyranny that lasted decades.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: jimmiet, 10/13/2012 10:25:55 AM     (No. 8930162)

Jules needs the bolts holding his head in place adjusted.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Scottyboy, 10/13/2012 10:28:35 AM     (No. 8930172)

Joe Biden 2016 = Bob Dole 1996


Reply 5 - Posted by: mitzi, 10/13/2012 10:34:26 AM     (No. 8930183)

This Jules person must be kidding. Biden is a basket case now - imagine what he'll be doing in 2016. But maybe this is the best the Dems can do.

I pity his wife. Imagine what living him must be like?


Reply 6 - Posted by: farmwife, 10/13/2012 10:37:39 AM     (No. 8930193)

If it is true that this man actually have a chance to be elected president, we are truly doomed.


Reply 7 - Posted by: wilko, 10/13/2012 10:52:03 AM     (No. 8930249)

Biden's spot on impression of Jack Nicholson as the Joker will win him some Batman movie fans, but no one else would ever vote this guy for prez.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: WimeTarmerFable, 10/13/2012 10:52:32 AM     (No. 8930251)

Jules, please stop taking the pink acid...your chromosomes are too twisted already. Jeepers.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Freeloader, 10/13/2012 10:56:28 AM     (No. 8930258)

Biden in 2016? Professor Witcover has completely discounted then Senator 1%'s dismal Democrat Primary performances of 1988 and 2008.


Reply 10 - Posted by: eoddad, 10/13/2012 10:57:06 AM     (No. 8930261)

Oh man, did I get a real laugh out of this ridiculous article. Biden has to embarrass any surviving THOUGHTFUL Democrat if one survives. The debate finished him as a possibly anything. On second thought, he could sell Reverse Mortgages or life insurance policies to the elderly that don't require a physical.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Hazymac, 10/13/2012 11:00:01 AM     (No. 8930269)

Microdot, blotter, or Orange Sunshine, Jules? Good God Gerty.


Reply 12 - Posted by: fire_mission, 10/13/2012 11:00:54 AM     (No. 8930273)

This would make me happier than Christopher Columbus with speed boats.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: mws50, 10/13/2012 11:18:48 AM     (No. 8930315)

Assuming the people in Delaware are as brain-dead as the last time Joe ran for re-election, he would probably amass 3 electoral votes in Nov 2016.


Reply 14 - Posted by: jt26, 10/13/2012 11:19:05 AM     (No. 8930316)

If Joe Biden is the best and brightest hope of the Dems for 2016, then what does that tell you about the Democrat party in general?


Reply 15 - Posted by: mws50, 10/13/2012 11:21:14 AM     (No. 8930321)

And thanks, Jules, for creating another fine example of why journalism is the dumbest profession on this planet.


Reply 16 - Posted by: wepeople, 10/13/2012 11:28:20 AM     (No. 8930330)

Witcover is 85 years old and is obviously showing signs of dementia. He and Germond wrote columns for decades and were so far left they had to expand the print page to accomodate their column.


Reply 17 - Posted by: chance_232, 10/13/2012 12:47:24 PM     (No. 8930470)

Guarantee he loses, and loses early, in the primary. He was never able to get more than 11% as a candidate. Only slightly more popular than Ron Paul in the REPUBLICAN party.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: dr fate, 10/13/2012 12:52:10 PM     (No. 8930481)

First of all, Jules. you're not my friend. Second of all, you're nuts.


Reply 19 - Posted by: SouthSanAntonio, 10/13/2012 12:55:57 PM     (No. 8930493)

The ONLY way that happens is if Romney/Ryan have such a great first term the the Demon-RATS know that, no matter who they run in 2016, they don't have a chance in Hell to win.

It's like when the Republicans sacrificed Dole or McPain in elections they knew really weren't winnable. They rewarded a couple of reasonably faithful long-serving Republicans with there chance to be in the history books -- knowing they wouldn't have a chance to win.

However, this could very reasonably happen when Romney wins the presidency, and gets a fully Republican Congrss, and uses his business sense and experience to clean up the disaster of the last 4 years.

Constant prayer and broken glass from the SouthSanAntonio family!!!!!!!!


Reply 20 - Posted by: navybrat, 10/13/2012 1:52:51 PM     (No. 8930573)

Grinning Joe. His capped teeth look like a row of Chicklets.


Reply 21 - Posted by: TrueBlueWfan, 10/13/2012 1:55:50 PM     (No. 8930577)

This guy is nuts. I do think the dems will run OH Sen. Sherrod Brown in 2016 unless he's defeated by Josh Mandel. Brown is an ultra-liberal and his wife is just like him. Stop Brown - elect Mandel Ohio!


Reply 22 - Posted by: coldoc, 10/13/2012 1:58:48 PM     (No. 8930581)

I think they would be better off running big bird. He's got way more "gravitas".


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: KimoSaavy, 10/13/2012 7:51:24 PM     (No. 8931123)

He will be too old and probably showing signs of dementia. Everything he says and does should be audion and video chronicled then put on display when the dems make him the candidate but not before.



Post Reply   Close thread 706587




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"



Reactionaries in New York
Time, by Joe Klein    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/19/2013 8:27:40 AM     Post Reply
The Democratic candidates for mayor in New York are campaigning to win the support of the teachers union. They threaten to return the city to the horrors of the David Dinkins era. Back at the turn of the 1990s, New York City was a mess. Crime was rampant. The schools were dreadful. Children in foster care were brutalized because–as the head of the Child Welfare Agency said–”oversight is racist.” The mayor was an incompetent. And, above all, the city was run for the benefit of its employees rather than its citizens. What followed was 20 years of governance

Immigration reform no sure bet
Politico, by Seung Min Kim & Jake Sherman    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/19/2013 6:29:04 AM     Post Reply
After years of false starts, Washington finally appears to be on the path to rewriting the nation’s immigration laws. The Senate Gang of Eight bill is holding its own in committee and is expected to hit the Senate floor in June. And in the House this week, members of a bipartisan group agreed “in principle” on a big bill to be revealed in June. But in this case, looks are deceiving. There are still major hurdles before immigration reform can reach President Barack Obama’s desk. The biggest one is the GOP-controlled House. Right now, the Senate bill has no chance

At Cincinnati IRS office, surprise
over claims of partisan villainy
Washington Post, by Lisa Rein & Dan Zak    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/19/2013 5:17:34 AM     Post Reply
CINCINNATI — The fog of scandal hangs over a boxy, modernist, 10-story building that looks like a monument to paperwork. Shrubs and chain smokers flank its front entrance here on Main Street, in the heart of downtown. Every day, 2,000 employees go to work at various federal agencies in this John F. Kennedy-era structure, whose chief tenant is the Internal Revenue Service — which is having just about the worst week an agency can have. Up on the fourth floor — with its gray linoleum, low ceilings and fluorescent lights, file carts heaped with manila envelopes, its keypad-coded doors labeled 4-022

The Smoking Gun Can Tell
the AP What a Federal Leak
Investigation Is Like
Atlantic, by Philip Bump    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/18/2013 5:22:57 AM     Post Reply
When, in 2006, the website The Smoking Gun released a secret CIA memo documenting prisoner organizing strategies at Guantanamo Bay, the FBI took notice. Now the site has posted details of the ensuing 44-month-long investigation, offering a timely glimpse into the black box of a Department of Justice leak prosecution. And The Smoking Gun got lucky. Over the course of the FBI´s hunt, code-named "Stubborn Ways," 43 different people were interviewed, in locations stretching from New Mexico to Boston to Saudi Arabia. After the investigation narrowed to one person who was then exonerated — a woman from Virginia

There Was No Surge in IRS
Tax-Exempt Applications in 2010
Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/18/2013 5:03:01 AM     Post Reply
A number of people have sought to explain the IRS targeting of Tea Party, patriot, and 9/12 group applications -- as well as those from other conservative groups -- for "specialist team" treatment (mainly delays and excessive and inappropriate questions) in 2010 by pointing to the Citizens United decision that year allowing for unlimited, undisclosed fundraising by such groups. That´s the explanation IRS official Lois Lerner gave a week ago when she first revealed that the agency had improperly handled a slew of applications -- the political shorthand was a mistaken attempt to deal with a surge in applications.

Obamacare and Chicago’s Unions
American Spectator, by Eileen Norcross    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 6:13:58 AM     Post Reply
Much has been said about the trouble with public-sector pensions. Many state and local plans are underfunded and, unless policy and accounting changes are undertaken, some major plans will run out of assets to pay benefits over the coming years. That means these plans will have to operate on a pay-as-you-go-basis, forcing budgetary tradeoffs and tax hikes. Public-sector pensions often come with legal guarantees. For instance, Illinois and New York offer a constitutional guarantee of promised benefits. Many other states offer statutory protections. That’s why economists make the case that pension benefits

The AP and the NRA
Politico, by Rich Lowry    Original Article
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:56:10 AM     Post Reply
Rarely has the White House briefing room so resembled the main ballroom at a meeting of Conservative Political Action Conference. When he woke up on Tuesday morning, White House press secretary Jay Carney probably thought that he would have to deal with querulous reporters pressing him on all fronts. Little did he know he’d really have to confront citizens bristling with anger over perceived encroachments on their rights by an overweening government. At times, Carney must have wondered whether he had wandered into a congressional town hall circa 2009 with himself in the role



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Officials on Benghazi:
"We made mistakes,
but without malice"

55 replie(s)
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM     Post Reply
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.

Evidence emerges that Obama
administration official knew of
IRS targeting during 2012 campaign

51 replie(s)
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.

Analyze this
50 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

46 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

46 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All
Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal

42 replie(s)
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM     Post Reply
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure

Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
41 replie(s)
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM     Post Reply
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part


Post Reply   Close thread 706587





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~