|
|
| |
Topic: Romney says White House is ‘doubling down on denial’ about Libya attack |
Romney says White House is ‘doubling down on denial’ about Libya attack
Washington Post, by Anne Gearan
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Dreadnought, 10/12/2012 11:57:40 PM
|
| Republicans escalated their charges against the Obama administration for alleged failures in handling last month’s Libya attack, thrusting the death of the U.S. ambassador there into the center of the presidential campaign Friday. Mitt Romney accused his rival of “doubling down on denial” about the true origins of the Sept. 11 siege in Benghazi, which senior Obama officials initially said appeared to be an outgrowth of anti-American protests, not terrorism. Whether the administration has truthfully disclosed what it knew about the perpetrators of the attacks became a flash point
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
lakerman1, 10/13/2012 12:31:58 AM (No. 8929554)
Hillary sets up a straw man - 'we never said we had all the answers.' (NO one said they did - all they did was send the dimwitted susan rice out to lie. That is almost as bad as al quaeda finding retarded children to become suicide bombers.)
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
smsnod, 10/13/2012 1:00:31 AM (No. 8929582)
I'll say one thing for this bunch, they tell their lies & they stick to them
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
enuf8, 10/13/2012 1:42:14 AM (No. 8929593)
Charlene Lamb at the State Dept. watched the attack in REAL TIME and was in communication with those in Benghazi. This came out at the hearing on Wednesday. It was known immediately that the "protest" was fictional.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
JAN, 10/13/2012 2:50:27 AM (No. 8929620)
Tonight for the first time I heard that they needed to send in a second rescue plane because there wasn't enough room for everyone in the first plane.
We still are being lied to and information is being withheld in the hopes of running out the clock until after the election.
Benghazzi had a plane that was taken away from them against their wishes. These murders did not need to happen.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
leopardtwo, 10/13/2012 6:45:07 AM (No. 8929734)
The US State Department spent tens of thousands of dollars on a re-charging station for Chevy Volts at Vienna's US Embassy and REPEATEDLY DENIED added security for the consulate in Benghazi? They used four-dollar- an-hour unarmed guards to secure that Libyan consulate?
Shame.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
pineledger, 10/13/2012 7:21:41 AM (No. 8929775)
Exactly 4. This administration is totally incompetent.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
sorosisbehindit, 10/13/2012 7:39:35 AM (No. 8929806)
I am not sure which group thrown under the bus is more dangerous for Obama/Biden. If you say that the white house was ignorant of the request and resulting denial for more security in Benghazi, in means that Hillary did not know what her organization was doing. Or perhaps she knew but the white house got no information in their briefing. If you say the "intelligence community" did not know what was going on in Benghazi, you have some really angry spooks out there. Just own it fellas!
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Bad Dog, 10/13/2012 7:41:38 AM (No. 8929809)
Again, this administration is NOT merely incompetent ... they are evil. There is something afoot here that goes beyond our imaginations.
My theory is that the October Surprise was commenced a month earlier, in September, on the 11th no less. I'll even go so far as to say the Cairo upheaval was instigated at the same time for the same reason.
Global security expert Tony Shaffer was just on Fox and Friends, and he said he reviewed the entire hearing again. According to him, THERE ARE CLUES in the answers given that tell him this will blow wide open within the next 3 weeks. Our intel agencies are NOT going down at the manipulation of this White House team. I sensed clues were being given at the time, but I'm not a super-smart and I can't put my finger on them and tie them up. But I'll guaran-dang-tee that it's bad and it leads DIRECTLY back to the top, the VERY top.
Shaffer also said there were things going on in that consulate in Benghazi that needed to be denied, destroyed, covered up. Whether poor Ambassador Stevens was intentionally killed (RAPED and killed!) is a big question I have.
Was this all staged? Why?! Pre-election martial law here? Cancellation of the election altogether?
We are witnessing a presidential race that is Good vs. Evil personified.
I want answers, and I want them IMMEDIATELY. Issa needs another hearing, ASAP.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Maybeth, 10/13/2012 7:43:27 AM (No. 8929816)
... So, if the State Department and intelligence community were doing their jobs, the security requests and reasons given by the Lybian embassy would have been part of the daily presidential briefings. Right? ... So, if this president were doing his job, he would have known that security was denied. Then, of course, he would have been informed of the beginning attacks. Right? ... So, for the White House to keep denying they knew ANYTHING is an admission that they are not paying attention to the Middle East terrorism against the U.S. and are not interested.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
bigken2, 10/13/2012 8:05:33 AM (No. 8929838)
armed marines in barbados non in libia what a bunch of duffuses
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
zbogwan2, 10/13/2012 8:14:24 AM (No. 8929862)
Obama's Benghazi Quagmire is starting to sound like that old Abbot & Costello Whose on first routine?
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
LZK, 10/13/2012 8:23:22 AM (No. 8929872)
It's kinda difficult to keep accusing the "same" group of lying.
It's a continuing accusation -- because if their mouths are moving -- THEY are lying.....
LZK
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
bluehouse, 10/13/2012 8:37:54 AM (No. 8929900)
The testimony under oath before congress on Wednesday proves Clinton & Carney are a liers. Keeping Americans safe is not important to this administration whatsoever.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Holeymoses, 10/13/2012 9:05:29 AM (No. 8929958)
Tis said that Bubba Clinton is getting involved, seeking legal advice to protect his beloved's legacy. The Clintons must see this as more than " a bump in the road."
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
zek, 10/13/2012 9:34:04 AM (No. 8930026)
Boy, would I like to be one of those people that gets to ask a question at the next Townhall Debate.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Arby, 10/13/2012 9:36:39 AM (No. 8930035)
If this were a republican administration the press would say that the white house coverup made Watergate look like a non-event.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Poliskeptic, 10/13/2012 9:56:20 AM (No. 8930089)
This is the Washington Post. Now 'protest because of an anti-Islamic video' has been shortened to just an 'anti-American protest,' Wrongly demonizing an American expressing free speech now needs to be forgotten.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
RancherJack, 10/13/2012 10:19:18 AM (No. 8930147)
OTOH website Indiegogo.com is holding a fundraiser to buy Joe Biden a classic Trans Am in appreciation of his killer debate performance. So far have raised $4,600 and counting
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Udanja99, 10/13/2012 10:20:11 AM (No. 8930149)
Come on Langley, step into the ring and deliver the knock out punch to this hideous mess. As usual, it's the cover up which comes back to bite you on the butt. It's past time for zippy and PIAPS to get bit.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Starlady, 10/13/2012 10:27:58 AM (No. 8930170)
I saw the Shaffer interview on Fox and Friends as well. Shaffer said he has been hearing from many in the intelligence community he has never spoken with before. He said the administration is covering up something that will make them look very bad in the eyes of the American people. My impression was that Mr Shaffer knew what it would be, and he seemed to indicate it could come out in the next few weeks. A Congressman from PA who serves on the oversight committee was also on later and said the budget for State had been increased by five million dollars for 2012 due to concerns in the Middle East. He said the priorities at State seemed to be off since they were spending large in European embassies for Chevy Volts and charging stations, to impress the EU, instead of for security for ambassadors in unsafe places.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
tommydeus11, 10/13/2012 11:30:30 AM (No. 8930336)
The most important mission for Paul Ryan during the vice-presidential debate was to get the administration on the record on three things; why did the white house say it was not a terrorist attack, who told them this, and who denied the request for more security by the ambassador. Ryan was about 75% successful. In the course of the debate, he got Biden on record that the intelligence agencies told the white house the attack grew out of an anti-video demonstration. That can be verified. Basically Biden threw the CIA under the bus. I doubt that they will take that lying down. Watch for "leaks" over the next week. Biden tried to lie about when the white house knew it was a terrorist attack, again, this is going to come out, most likely that they knew within 24 hours it was a terrorist attack. Lastly, Biden finished up by throwing the state department (Hilary) under the bus, for not approving additional security for the ambassador. These things are important for the next debate. Romney has the opportunity here to demand Obama fire Hillary for incompetence leading to the death of the ambassador. Obama can either fire her, which I don't see him doing, since he would have to face Bubba's wrath, or not fire her, and get hammered big time. I can see a future transcript of the upcoming debate:
-Romney "It seems Mrs Clintons job is a lot safer than the ambassador ever was." "Harry Truman used to say 'the buck stops here'. President Obama wants us to believe the buck never got here."
Biden was playing checkers on Thursday, Romney/Ryan were playing chess.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
saildreamer, 10/13/2012 11:45:22 AM (No. 8930365)
Looks to me like Obama should have attended his intelligence briefings that week instead of flying off to Vegas.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
geronimo, 10/13/2012 11:56:41 AM (No. 8930385)
The truth will come out in the 'next few weeks'? Never mind running out the clock to attempt to save Obama's scrawny butt. We need it NOW, before Nov. 6.
The entire administration, all three branches, are setting new records for incompetence if not outright criminal behavior. Obama strutted around crowing that he killed bin Laden without having any idea that he was bear-baiting? Is he really that stupid or was it his intention to put the situation in Libya on high simmer?
As was inevitable, it boiled over, right on time, and the circular finger-pointing is in full swing.
There are people who know the truth - why not come out with it now? Does anyone care about this country at all?
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
NotaBene, 10/13/2012 12:58:55 PM (No. 8930500)
In the meantime the Coptic Christian video maker is in Federal prison. His video "Innocence of Muslims" had 16,650,000 views in YouTube. Towards the end it is quite funny. It is only 13 minutes, everyone should watch it.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Douglas DC, 10/13/2012 1:18:09 PM (No. 8930528)
This has turned into a Mongolian cluster a thermonuclear one of the highest order. I think the Spooks are waiting until the proper time to lay it out-like Oct 15...
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
ebuilder, 10/13/2012 1:19:47 PM (No. 8930531)
This is what you are missing. The President -- at the U.N. no less -- declares the revolt, rape, killing, and burning in Benghazi and elsewhere, to be the result of a Muslim "insulting" video. Clearly this is not true. But it is now irrelevant because he also said that the "future does not belong to those who slander [blaspheme]the prophet of Islam." What he has done is more than cover lying to cover his butt. He has collaborated in, and justified the murder of every non-dhimmified Christian who dares to profess his faith. If you say that Jesus Christ is God's essence and His only begotten Son, who saves us from sin, and tells us "There is no other way under God given among men whereby we must be saved" -- you slander the prophet of Islam. Al-Qaida just declared war on America and Israel, following Obama's casis belli at the U.N. So this "amateurish" man, who wears a ring with the Shahada on it, has given aid and comfort to the enemy. Would this be treason, Mr. Krauthammer? Obama is counting on the media voices and Congress to do nothing, because they are compromised, corrupt, fellow travellers. or "lacking in all conviction" and Biblical understanding. He is probably correct. But he also expects to be re-elected for the same reasons. Do not underestimate his strategy.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Nordlander, 10/13/2012 1:25:53 PM (No. 8930538)
Obama should have known - but he missed that day's Presidental briefing and overlooked the mention of it when he scanned the Cliff Notes on his tablet.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
peterfleming, 10/13/2012 3:04:25 PM (No. 8930679)
Lying is rampant in Washington with the 27/7 help of the TV Diane Sawyers, the Mafia Media, the Traitors to the Truth, the union of TV Traitors, millionaires bribed to lie and live in penthouses, drive around in limousines, only attend VIP parties where all the big liars gather together to re-affirm they're ALL ON THE TAKE. It just ain't right, and all this protectio has encouraged daring, bald faced, outrageous political lying like the Stevenson murders. New Media is bringing this to a Breitbartian Drudge like ending soon enough. Again, "the good news now, is we are getting most of the bad news quickly" !
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Japanorama, 10/13/2012 3:55:45 PM (No. 8930775)
FYI, I happen to be visiting Davis, California, home of a branch of the University of California. Here there are five registered Democrats for every registered Republicans, so sporting a Republican bumper sticker invites getting your car keyed, at the very least. In 2008, there were thousands of Obama bumper stickers. In 2012, I've seen only one or two. I wish that meant that Democrats have come to (what's left of) their senses, but I doubt it.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
federale, 10/13/2012 4:03:51 PM (No. 8930794)
With respect to the White House in the old days it was "The Buck Stops here". Now it is: "We Spend the Buck But Don't Know Where".
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
Ida Lil, 10/13/2012 4:09:00 PM (No. 8930806)
If Romney has been briefed since 9-11-12 as declared he already has the proof of the doubling down.He however has to let others out the truth because he has to maintain classified status. This also gives the intelligence officials the back up they need to make the administration crumble.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
DustDevil31, 10/13/2012 7:48:13 PM (No. 8931119)
time for the intel community to wiki leak everything about about 0Bama's past so we cAn run a few buses over him and Moochele. Somebody must know how to access the goods.. z
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
Aria, 10/13/2012 10:39:35 PM (No. 8931348)
It's just too sad that we don't all realize how wonderful zero is:
"In today’s Washington Post, I quote NSC spokesman Tommy Vietor as explaining why his boss has skipped more than half his daily intelligence meetings since taking office – including every day in the week leading up to the attacks on our diplomatic facilities in Egypt and Libya: Obama, they say, doesn’t need briefers because he is just so much smarter than everyone else. As Vietor put it to me in an email, “Unlike your former boss [President Bush], he has it delivered to his residence in the morning and not briefed to him.”
The White House takes pride in the fact that Obama’s PDB is “not briefed to him” – because, they say, he is “among the most sophisticated consumers of intelligence on the planet.” That hubris brings to mind this revealing quote from a September 2008 New York Times profile of Obama:
“I think that I’m a better speechwriter than my speechwriters,” Mr. Obama told Patrick Gaspard, his political director, at the start of the 2008 campaign, according to The New Yorker. “I know more about policies on any particular issue than my policy directors. And I’ll tell you right now that I’m going to think I’m a better political director than my political director.”
So it should come as no surprise that apparently Barack Obama thinks he’s a better intelligence briefer than his intelligence briefers."
http://www.aei-ideas.org/2012/09/obama-im-a-better-intelligence-briefer-than-my-intelligence-briefers/
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
ConradNY, 10/14/2012 1:52:02 AM (No. 8931567)
The ambassadors guards had no ammunition.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
|
Tea party looks to take advantage of moment
|
|
Associated Press, by Thomas Beaumont
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 11:02:05 PM
Post Reply
|
|
DES MOINES, Iowa — Is the tea party getting its groove back? Shouts of vindication from around the country suggest the movement´s leaders certainly think so. They say the IRS acknowledgement that it had targeted their groups for extra scrutiny — a claim that tea party activists had made for years — is helping pump new energy into the coalition. And they are trying to use that development, along with the ongoing controversy over the Benghazi, Libya, terrorist attacks and the Justice Department´s secret seizure of journalists´ phone records, to recruit new activists incensed about government overreach.
|
America Waiting on Big Decisions from SCOTUS
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Ken Klukowski
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 10:49:58 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Several major cases will be decided by the Supreme Court over the next six weeks, including historic issues such as gay marriage and affirmative action. These cases make the remainder of the Court’s term—which ends in June—one of the most carefully watched terms by millions of Americans. In addition to several significant cases that have already been decided this year, the justices of the High Court have at least ten important issues to decide before adjourning for the summer. Two headline cases involve race relations
|
The Emerging Scandal Narrative: To Make Obama Pay, GOP Blasts ´Culture of Intimidation´
|
|
National Review Online, by Eliana Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 10:47:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Since his emergence as a national political figure, Barack Obama has managed to deflect accusations of wrongdoing and impropriety with ease. Republicans on Capitol Hill are determined to put that to an end by making him pay for the unfolding scandal at the Internal Revenue Service. “Ultimately responsibility lies with the president. Obama has spent the better part of the last five years doing non-stop campaigning,” says a senior Republican Senate aide who points to the administration’s larger pattern of “using political offices to intimidate and harrass” its opponents. “When bureaucrats see the leader
|
Obama’s turn inward poses risk for U.S. interests abroad
|
|
Washington Post, by Fred Hiatt
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 10:41:20 PM
Post Reply
|
|
“And the war will end by the end of next year .?.?. ” In the elusive search for an Obama Doctrine, that struck me as a telling phrase when I heard the president deliver it last week as he and British Prime Minister David Cameron took a couple of questions from reporters. Obama was speaking about the withdrawal of U.S. and allied combat troops from Afghanistan by the end of 2014. “Our troops will continue to come home, and the war will end,” he said. In fact, the war is unlikely to end. It may well accelerate as the Taliban
|
A rare peek into a Justice Department leak probe
|
|
Washington Post, by Ann E. Marimow
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 10:39:22 PM
Post Reply
|
|
When the Justice Department began investigating possible leaks of classified information about North Korea in 2009, investigators did more than obtain telephone records of a working journalist suspected of receiving the secret material. They used security badge access records to track the reporter’s comings and goings from the State Department, according to a newly obtained court affidavit. They traced the timing of his calls with a State Department security adviser suspected of sharing the classified report. They obtained a search warrant for the reporter’s personal e-mails. The case
|
How the IRS seeded the clouds in 2010 for a political deluge three years later
|
|
Washington Post, by Zachary A. Goldfarb and Kimberly Kindy
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 10:35:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
In early 2010, an Internal Revenue Service team in Cincinnati began noticing a stream of applications from groups with political-sounding names, setting in motion a dragnet aimed at separating legitimate tax-exempt groups from those working to get candidates elected. The IRS officials decided to single out one type of political group for particular scrutiny. “These cases involve various local organizations in the Tea Party movement,” read one internal IRS e-mail sent at the time. A few hours north in Fremont, Ohio, the owners of a drainage supply shop, Tom and Marion Bower, were wondering why it was taking so long
|
Obama´s Counsel Told of IRS Audit Findings Weeks Ago
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Peter Nicholas
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/19/2013 9:04:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The White House´s chief lawyer learned weeks ago that an audit of the Internal Revenue Service likely would show that agency employees inappropriately targeted conservative groups, a senior White House official said Sunday. That disclosure has prompted a debate over whether the president should have been notified at that time. In the week of April 22, the Office of the White House Counsel and its head, Kathryn Ruemmler, were told by Treasury Department attorneys that an inspector general´s report was nearing completion, the White House official said. In that conversation, Ms. Ruemmler learned that "a small
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Evidence emerges that Obama administration official knew of IRS targeting during 2012 campaign
|
|
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
Camelot Is Burning
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.
|
Lew asks Congress for debt increase, says it’s ´not open to debate´
|
|
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.
|
McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal
|
|
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|