America could go to Hell and the NY Times would see nothing significant to make the front page! They are but traitors to America!!

I recall that the "Tut, Tut" defense was used by the mainscum media during Clinton's impeachment gala. It worked then; it will work now with the booboisie.

The slimes is politicizing the news & everybody knows it.

Glad to see the NYT continuing to destroy itself. They have lied at least since the 1930's when they reported how great communism was in Russia under Stalin.

The very last NY Times editorial, read by its last remaining reader, will be its endorsement of the reelection of Michelle Obama as president.

Paper will cease to exist after one final exhortation that the best person for ending the 12 year depression and World War III is President Michelle Obama.

Maybe. as far as democrats being dishonest, cheating, stealing, murdering, sidestepping, evading, being confused, lying, covering up, clamming up, making false accusations, and calling everybody a racist.

Nothing significant? Tell that to the four dead Americans and their families.

New York Times still has the Walter Duranty Pulitzer Prize on their wall for his coverup reporting of the Ukrainian famine created by Stalin. Millions died.

The NYT has been covering up for Marxists since the '30s.

How this rag can continue to call itself a newspaper is beyond me.

lalalalalalalalalalalalalalala - MSM

The Gray Lady is in her death throes. It is not a pleasant spectacle - and all the signs are that it will get worse and worse until she gives up the ghost. Those in charge of her are unworthy of her. They will continue to damage her credibility and sully the remains of her reputation, all in the service of a sordid partisanship that is blatantly obvious to everyone but themselves.

Well, their Master DID say this was just a ''bump in the road.'' Since when do roadbumps make the front page?

No one is so blind as the one who refuses to see.

The NY Times is BLIND.

This article is a good example of why the NYTs is insignificant. There have been 4 hours of hearings, much of it taken by Cummings irrelevant comments, and the Mass. rep talking about everything but Libya.

Oh nothing except for the TREASON put forth by Obama and his minions...

When I realized last week that the administration was actually going to take the tack of blaming Romney/Ryan and ignoring the the attack itself (after sticking to the lame line of a cleric-approved video nobody saw long after it had reached its stale date) and stick with the dead bodies are just "bumps in the road" schtick, I wondered if the American people would stand for it.

As if the rape, the murders and the multiply ignored requests for security and the regimes subsequent lies weren't "significant" enough? Oh, I forgot, the NYT didn't think they were significant enough. Neither, apparently, does Obama. We'll see if the public is awake enough to care.

I watched that entire hearing and was sick afterwards. Didn't think anything could make me sicker until yesterday. Even after the slaughter which our government watched real time on a video camera (and the video is "unavailable" to the congress)and then re-played in my head, the casual way obama treated this, the way the people around him are treating it, this is a horror show and has to stop on November 6, 2012.

According to Cutter, Americans could have cared less about the murder of 4 embassy employees until Romney/Ryan brought it up. Once Barry vacates the WH kicking and screaming and trashing the place, Cutter will probably go to work at the NY Slimes at some outlandish salary which hopefully will bankrupt this Pravda so-called newspaper once and for all.

Not true #1. The NY Times would report America going to hell. and the headline would look something like this:

America Gong to Hell: What did Bush Know and When Did He Know It, Women and Minorities Affected Most.

Then they would editorialize on how if the Republicans would just get out of the way, Obama would fix it.

they would sing a different tune if one of their own was killed.

How many consecutive days was Abu Ghraib on the front page with ZERO change in the story? 35 days? Do they think we don't remember this stuff. Close up shop, NY times.

When the New York Times announces that the hottest story out there is not newsworthy and, therefore, not worth their time ..... you KNOW the Obama administration has a problem.
A huge, gigantic problem.

The video scenario was dreamed up by White House Staff/Campaign. I am sure they did a search on You Tube. There are ways to search You Tube archives to see if there are any searches for the videos by govt ie white house addresses or staff accounts?

The leftie elite that support the new york slims will ride the ship down....it's kinda like "water boarding" -- eh???

Who cares........

LZK

I used to subscribe the Ny Times--now I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole.

During the congressional hearings, a video was mentioned.....but it was the video our government watched of the attack and destruction of that consulate. And they watched it AS it happened.

Newspapers are so hard to find that we don't use them for lining anything any more. The free local ones we get are reserved for starting fires in the fireplace.

I have a better place for the "old lady"; my new chicken coop

My cat refuses to even crap on this rag.

FORGET THE NYTIMES, THIS is the day to go to BUSINESS INSIDER and read the fascinating article on Matt Drudge and the newly evaluated multi million dollar article
on THE DRUDGE REPORT. Matt's mini staff (3) equals NYSlime's 1200 droids in spectacular results of millions of readers per day, and absolutely incredible numbers. Read it, you'll love it and everything that Drudge has done to innovate and transform the internet to the key to unedited truth.