|
|
| |
Topic: In 1994, Obama argued for
affirmative action, against ‘return
to good old-fashioned racism’ |
In 1994, Obama argued for
affirmative action, against ‘return
to good old-fashioned racism’
Daily Caller, by Charles C. Johnson
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 10/11/2012 9:51:31 AM
|
| As the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case that could decide the future of racial preferences in college admissions, The Daily Caller obtained one of the oldest known audio recordings of President Barack Obama: an October 28, 1994 NPR broadcast in which Obama described opponents of affirmative action and certain welfare programs as favoring racism. Obama’s remarks came as part of a broadcast review of American Enterprise Institute scholar Charles Murray’s controversial 1994 book, “The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life.” Obama accused Murray of racism,
|
Comments:
Barack 0bama is no different that Michael Eric Dyson. They are both racists of the highest order.
|
 
Reply 1 - Posted by:
KingBubo, 10/11/2012 10:22:27 AM (No. 8925441)
Please define affirmative action before I cna say whether I support or oppose it (or in the middle). Different people have different meanings.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
lonestar4, 10/11/2012 10:47:57 AM (No. 8925533)
Comment by Megatron following article:
"Affirmative Action is Racism. It affirms old fashion racist notions of inequality of select groups and celebrates substandard performance."
Someone else aptly said "The bigotry of low expectations."
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
snowoutlaw, 10/11/2012 10:54:21 AM (No. 8925557)
So Obama feels some racial groups are so weak, lazy and stupid that they need affirmative action to compete? Or is he just a racist that wants to move to the front of the line because he is lazy?
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
lonestar4, 10/11/2012 11:03:21 AM (No. 8925587)
#2 Gopher1 commented under the article:
"The very idea of AA is an admission that they are not capable. It's an open admission of racism in a broad sense because it's not considered on an individual basis, but solely on the basis of race. No matter how smart an individual might be, they are labeled as "needing help" under AA and forever labeled as being less capable. It's horrible and harms those that really do achieve on their own merit."
Obama and Michelle GAMED the AA system and they still resent America.. mainly white America. They always have been, always will be race baiters. THIS find is just MORE proof! Can't wait to vote these resentful and arrogant people out. Oh.. and I STILL want to see ALL of Obama's college records.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
lonestar4, 10/11/2012 11:05:02 AM (No. 8925596)
Sorry, last comment was for #1, who needed a definition of AA. ;)
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
snowoutlaw, 10/11/2012 11:36:37 AM (No. 8925700)
I forgot about the perfect AA candidate now running for Senate in Ma. She needed the help up because she is truly disadvantaged. I can tell every time she speaks.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
grounded, 10/11/2012 11:45:13 AM (No. 8925737)
At the end of the article: "Speaking at Columbia University on Feb. 23, Attorney General Eric Holder said affirmative action may never become obsolete. 'The question,' Holder said, 'is not when does [affirmative action] end, but when does it begin. … When do people of color truly get the benefits to which they are entitled?'”
People of color should get all the benefits that they EARN. Just like the rest of us. It's simple: Stay in school, don't get pregnant out of wedlock when you're fifteen, eschew the consumption and trafficking of drugs, avoid gangs and the gangsta lifestyle. Asians, while alledgedly "people of color", don't seem to be afflicted to anywhere near the same degree with those pathologies as are large blocs of the Black, Hispanic and Native American population. In fact they are the victims of reverse dicrimination, as otherwise they would constitute about 90% of the student bodies of the so-called elite institutions.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Udanja99, 10/11/2012 12:50:25 PM (No. 8925898)
Zippy and Mooch did indeed game the system and their resentment comes from the fact that, deep down, they both know that they are complete frauds.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
Remember when Fox News
wasn’t ‘real news’?
|
|
Human Events, by David Harsanyi
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 10:21:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
We now know that the Justice Department kept exceptionally close tabs on Fox News reporter James Rosen in 2010, following his trips in and out of the State Department, hacking his personal emails and phone calls. Normal newsgathering activities are being treated as criminal activities by the White House. But consider what the same White House had to say about Fox News back in 2009. You might remember the concerted effort by White House officials to brand the right-leaning Fox News as a bogus news outlet, unworthy of attention.
|
|
More Secrets From Huma Abedin
|
|
FrontPage Magazine, by Arnold Ahlert
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 10:03:59 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Huma Abedin, former Secretary of State Hillary’s Clinton’s long time aide with extensive ties to Muslim Brotherhood groups, was granted an arrangement by the State Department to do outside consulting work, even as she remained a top advisor in the Department. Abedin did not disclose either the arrangement, or how much she earned from it, on her financial report, despite a requirement that public officials must disclose significant sources of income. Clinton advisor Philippe Reines contended she was under no obligation to do so. Abedin, who has served Clinton for 15 years, became a “special government employee”
|
Judge ruled feds need not
notify Fox reporter of search
|
|
Politico, by Josh Gerstin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 6:45:33 PM
Post Reply
|
|
A federal judge in Washington ruled in 2010 that the Justice Department was not required by law to notify Fox reporter James Rosen that prosecutors had obtained his emails in connection with an investigation into a leak about North Korean plans to test a nuclear weapon. In September 2010, Chief U.S. District Court Judge Royce Lamberth overruled the conclusion of federal magistrate John Facciola that Rosen—whose Gmail account was searched—was entitled by law to be informed. Prosecutors contended that under the statute used to get Rosen´s emails, the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, they were not
|
| |
|
DOJ Reacts to Rosen
Report in Statement
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 3:45:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Department of Justice released a statement moments ago amid reports of the department obtaining a subpoena in order to access Fox News reporter James Rosen´s personal emails. "Leaks of classified information to the press can pose a serious risk of harm to our national security and it is important that we pursue these matters using appropriate law enforcement tools. Such investigations and prosecutions, including this particular case, follow all applicable laws, regulations, and longstanding Department of Justice policies intended to safeguard the First Amendment interests of the press in reporting the news and the public in receiving it."
|
Malkin To Kelly: IRS Not Just
Scandal Because Of ‘Ideology,’
But Because Of Obama’s ‘Brass-
Knuckled Intimidation’
|
|
Mediaite, by Matt Wilstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 3:34:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Michelle Malkin joined Megyn Kelly on Fox News Monday afternoon to discuss the latest developments in the investigation into the IRS targeting conservatives for audits. Malkin insisted it was not merely her “ideology” that has led to critique the Obama administration on their handling of the IRS issue and others, but rather the evidence she’s seen of their “bully brigade tactics” to “intimidate and criminalize their political opponents.” Malkin began by going after White House Press Secretary Jay Carney for his handling of the various Obama “scandals,” saying the “clown Carney press briefings have turned in
|
Fox News Will Defend Reporter
Against ´Co-Conspirator´ Charge
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 3:05:36 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Justice Department, already under fire for seizing AP phone records, also viewed e-mails of Fox News chief Washington correspondent James Rosen, calling him a criminal ´co-conspirator´ for his reporting. Fox News´ executive vice president of news, Michael Clemente, released a statement defending Rosen. The statement issued Monday afternoon is below: "We are outraged to learn today that James Rosen was named a criminal co-conspirator for simply doing his job as a reporter," Clemente said. "In fact, it is downright chilling. We will unequivocally
|
Former Counterterrorism Head:
FBI Never Called Ft. Hood
´Workplace Violence´
|
|
Breitbart´s Big Peace, by Kerry Picket
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 2:49:11 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Michael Steinbach, former head of the FBI’s counterterrorism division and now special agent in charge of Miami, told over 30 congressional staffers in March of 2012 that, contrary to the White House´s classification, the bureau does not refer to the Fort Hood shooting as "workplace violence." As head of the FBI counterterrorism division, Steinbach oversaw the investigation into the mass murder at Texas Army base. Steinbach made this claim during an unclassified counterterrorism briefing on Capitol Hill. “Do you guys teach your agents that Fort Hood was workplace violence?” one staffer asked.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
| |
|
Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about
damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports
Obama DOJ Also Spied on
James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible
This Isn´t Political and
IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass
the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
White House Aide calls
Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´
|
|
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.
|
| |
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About
Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
| | |
|
|
