|
|
| |
Topic: I Was Right About That Strange Jobs Report |
I Was Right About That Strange Jobs Report
Wall Street Journal, by Jack Welch
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Dreadnought, 10/9/2012 11:32:57 PM
|
| Imagine a country where challenging the ruling authorities—questioning, say, a piece of data released by central headquarters—would result in mobs of administration sympathizers claiming you should feel "embarrassed" and labeling you a fool, or worse. Soviet Russia perhaps? Communist China? Nope, that would be the United States right now, when a person (like me, for instance) suggests that a certain government datum (like the September unemployment rate of 7.8%) doesn't make sense. Unfortunately for those who would like me to pipe down, the 7.8% unemployment figure released by the
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Robinsolana, 10/9/2012 11:54:58 PM (No. 8921961)
Jack Welch takes you through his thinking on Obama's strange unemployment number.
One take away is that there are 3 million less workers working or looking since Obama took office. This tends to artificially tweak the unemployment number. These people no longer count. Also the number of people on disability has been leaping upward. Sometimes the increase is more than the increase in employment. That can twist the unemployment number. Another thing to notice is that this a poll. They call people. I have gotten wary of polls for some reason. And lastly Jack Welch says that there is no sign of sudden economic activity to produce a .3% drop in unemployment.
The kindest thing that can be said is that this was a statistical fluke.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
devnull, 10/9/2012 11:56:05 PM (No. 8921963)
Just take the 'L' out and be done with it.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Photoonist, 10/10/2012 12:28:42 AM (No. 8921997)
We knew it was phony as soon as they announced a new jobs figure of less than 200,000. Below that number you can't have a genuine decrease in the unemployment percentage.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Veritas2009, 10/10/2012 12:31:46 AM (No. 8921998)
Seems to me more definative numbers could be obtained by summing the SS TAX$ REPORTED to the IRS and dividing by the number of unique SSN numbers it is being credited to.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Davids918, 10/10/2012 1:03:29 AM (No. 8922028)
Knowing how many will lose their unemployment benefits, and then tweaking the household survey by an amount that is the largest number in 29 years in this economy is VERY suspect to say the least.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Clark Kent, 10/10/2012 1:05:33 AM (No. 8922033)
interesting that Austan Goolsbee, who defended these numbers, accused the Bush administration of cooking the the same numbers back in 2003.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
dman, 10/10/2012 1:28:47 AM (No. 8922050)
You're not alone, Mr. Welch.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
NMPatriot, 10/10/2012 1:47:59 AM (No. 8922061)
The DNC propaganda machine assumes everyone is as stupid as they are! It would be laughable it it weren't so dangerous.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
rexhandsom, 10/10/2012 6:52:33 AM (No. 8922213)
Close to a year ago RUSH LIMBAUGH predicted this..........
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
pineledger, 10/10/2012 7:19:56 AM (No. 8922264)
If anything, they managed to get to this number on the backs of part-time workers -- people forced to take low-paying jobs with no benefits just to have something.
FOX last night was quite clear on this: employers are not going to hire full-time people with benefits in this climate, where you don't know what the government is going to hit you with next...a mandate, a tax, an OSHA requirement, etc.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
HisHandmaiden, 10/10/2012 7:21:50 AM (No. 8922268)
"A relentless Jack Welch gives the pot of cooked numbers another dash of Tabasco."
Brilliant, Miss Lucianne and Team! Well done!
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Judith, 10/10/2012 7:28:24 AM (No. 8922289)
Now, now Jack, Gov. Romney has told everyone that those figures are 100% accurate and to stop this nonsense.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
msctex1, 10/10/2012 7:52:07 AM (No. 8922337)
Outright lies are all they have left. Imagine what it is going to be like if the second debate mirrors the first, if not worse for BHO.
On the other hand, Foreign Policy is his strong suit.
s///
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Mermaid1, 10/10/2012 7:52:37 AM (No. 8922340)
It's about time someone opened a can of whoop@ss on these liars.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Freeloader, 10/10/2012 7:54:30 AM (No. 8922347)
Mr. Welch has performed a great public service by exposing this latest gibberish from the Obama Administration. In the words of William W. Watt, "Do not put your faith in what statistics say until you have carefully considered what they do not say."
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
LZK, 10/10/2012 8:39:25 AM (No. 8922441)
Thank you Mr. Welch for validating most of US here on Lucianne...
WE knew obama would scramble the jobs' report.
WE don't believe anything this administration says. When their mouths move -- they are lying.
LZK
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Maybeth, 10/10/2012 8:47:24 AM (No. 8922462)
Jack Welch is not running for any office, does not have to kiss DNC or GOP butts and is, therefore, free to state the facts. That freedom of speech hasn't been ripped away from us yet, but it is definitely on Obama's Marxist Menu. .... I even heard some scolding from the GOP regarding Jack's article, but those reprimands come from the usual 'turn the other cheek' crowd.
Why would ANYbody believe the 7.8% story from the same president who reported that because some unknown person created some unknown video which 'hurt the feelings' of Muslims, our U.S. Lybian embassy was attacked and the ambassador murdered .... along with 3 other Americans?
Not only is the I-Won emperor naked, but he has called wolf one too many times.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
BetseyRoss, 10/10/2012 9:11:48 AM (No. 8922526)
Jack Welch's final reason for the Big Lie is absolutely right on. There isn't enough economic activity to support a .3 drop. No growth. Not even a glimmer of growth. Not a long glimmer of growth. It's going to take Romeny some time to get that unemployment number down. It will start as soon as Nov. 7, but until Obamacare is repealed no one is going to be satisfied. That albatross is a job killer.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
planetgeo, 10/10/2012 9:35:51 AM (No. 8922593)
This isn't some schlub saying this. Jack Welch was one of America's most competent CEOs. He knows numbers, and he knows when they don't smell right. These numbers stink.
And for me the real scandal here isn't just that this corrupt regime tried to cook the books, since many of us predicted this would happen. No, it's that the Bureau of Labor Statistics uses a friggin SURVEY (!!!) to confirm the state of the world's largest economy. Jeez, they might as well use darts or a Oujah Board or Magic 8-Ball. Even if the survey questions and questioners were legit, this method seems absurdly inexact. How about using, you know, actual company-filed personnel action reports?
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
joeyinempirestate, 10/10/2012 9:53:25 AM (No. 8922640)
Ever since Mitt kept hammering away at 8%+, they had to find a way to get to 7. The problem is, .3 of a percentage point is feeble growth.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
kwddave, 10/10/2012 9:56:24 AM (No. 8922656)
So is Chris Matthews gonna invite him back to re-discuss this subject?
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Me?Opinionated?Nah!, 10/10/2012 10:10:05 AM (No. 8922700)
I’ve been observing Jack Welch from afar for many years. He’s one tough, smart cookie. He doesn’t mince words, suffer fools gladly, tell it like it isn’t or enter, much less win, any Mr. Congeniality contests. Compare his pragmatic words with the bilge water that oozes constantly from Obama and his power-at-ANY-cost cohorts; Axelrod, Gibbs, Jarrett et al. Need I say more? Nope!
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
joew9, 10/10/2012 10:11:32 AM (No. 8922705)
#6 Yes the Dems accused the same thing about Republicans. But you see here's how it works. The Dems make an accusation that they know is just a political lie. They keep saying it over and over. Over time many of the Democrats forget that it was a just a lie in the first place. Then the Democrats start to justify their own behavior against the way they believe the Republicans are and not take into account that their perceived characterization of Republicans was a made up lie. Now the Dems cheat at something and say to themselves that well it's cheating but not as bad as the Republicans cheat. But they have compared their action against a lie they created. And the end result is their cheating is much worse than anything the Republicans ever even thought of doing.
Example: Nixon thought of using the IRS to investigate some political opponents in a private rant one day. His subordinates knew it was just a rant. They didn't do it. A few days later he told them it was correct not to do it. But the Dems characterize the action as if he actually followed through on that notion. So the Dems regularly use the IRS to investigate their opponents and justify it in their mind that at least it is not as bad as Nixon.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
globalwarmer, 10/10/2012 10:25:10 AM (No. 8922750)
Some of the ComicRat comments following the article in the WSJ are breathtaking in their twisted view of reality. Liberalism really is a mental disorder.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
BeatleJeff, 10/10/2012 10:27:57 AM (No. 8922764)
Notice how the very people who marched around chanting "challenge autority" no longer approve of challenging authority now that they're the authority being challenged.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
Pepper Tree, 10/10/2012 10:41:52 AM (No. 8922806)
When this bogus jobs report floated by the administration's bureaucratic puppets made it to FOX News, I watched Mrs. Tree's reaction. At first her brow furrowed and eyes narrowed... then she started laughing.
It occurred right then that Axelrod had made another of his stupid mistakes. Cheating comes so naturally to him he seems to start doing it before the game begins. And if Mrs. Tree is laughing at his clumsy manipulation, so are a million other women.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
Layne's Soapbox, 10/10/2012 10:44:00 AM (No. 8922815)
#21: because that makes too much sense. If it makes sense the government does the opposite.
This explains how they are able to make the numbers say what they want. I actually thought it was a little more, I don't know, statistical, than a poll. Shows what I know.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
distorted, 10/10/2012 10:44:05 AM (No. 8922816)
Of the low level government clerks charged with checking a box on their forms after an interview, what percentage do you think are avid Obama supporters? 90%...95%? Do you think they know and/or have been informed that decreasing unemployment numbers at this critical stage of the election process accrue to zer'O's benefit? What checks are in place to guard against such jiggling of the numbers in a collusive workforce "adjustment?"
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
weejun, 10/10/2012 10:58:12 AM (No. 8922845)
This job report and the Libyan run-around are exactly what you get when a bunch of socialists are put in power. I hope and pray we clean house (along with the aiding and abetting education system and the lamestream media) before it's too late.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
RancherJack, 10/10/2012 11:23:36 AM (No. 8922911)
How quickly we forget what a Turncoat Welch proved himself to be during the GW years.
The numbers were cooked, yes.
Jack Welch is no American.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
GLS2, 10/10/2012 11:27:50 AM (No. 8922933)
#9 The October jobs report of 3.2% will be released on Nov. 3 just in time for elections.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
NotaBene, 10/10/2012 11:37:15 AM (No. 8922976)
Obama corrupted the Federal Government for campaign purposes.
If you want statistics look at the boarded up storefronts near you and today's price of gasoline.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
Speedypetey, 10/10/2012 11:41:06 AM (No. 8922991)
What is really scary is when the next President is decided in November by December the "adjusted" unemployment rate will skyrocket to 11%+ and the new "adjusted" Cost of Living Index will also be double digits. Rick Santelli will blow another gasket because at the same time the stock market will be heading south.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
Franz, 10/10/2012 11:56:28 AM (No. 8923048)
Just think how many working age people had to leave the work force (reduce the Participation Rate) to produce this drop in the Unemployment Rate. The last time we saw this great a reduction in a work force in so short a time is when the "Black Death" was ravaging Europe during the Middle Ages.
This BLS Unemployment Rate only proves Mark Twain's observation that, "there are lies, damn lies, and statistics."
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
ilovedogs, 10/10/2012 12:07:16 PM (No. 8923076)
It all sounded bogus to me since I'm STILL looking for work myself.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
HDGalley, 10/10/2012 2:29:46 PM (No. 8923453)
Has any one noticed that the Bureau of Labor Statistics is run by an appointed Obama political hack from California who just happens to be a socialist and a good party member... how could she "cook" the books and why? /s
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
leopardtwo, 10/10/2012 4:49:50 PM (No. 8923820)
Let's take the B.S. out of the BLS!
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy, 10/10/2012 7:58:58 PM (No. 8924228)
I thought only Romney got inside Obie's head., Looks like Welch did, too. Atta boy, Jack.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
Charactercounts, 10/10/2012 10:48:14 PM (No. 8924500)
I'm glad he didn't back down. The report isn't strange, it's bogus. Someone who collects cans and bottles from the roadside for a couple of hours would be counted as employed.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Dreadnought"
|
Obama signals retreat in the fight against terrorism
|
|
Power Line, by Paul Mirengoff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 11:23:10 PM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama delivered an address today at the National Defense University called “The Future of our Fight Against Terrorism.” Actually, part of the speech was about the past, including much self-congratulation and some shots at President Bush. This part of the speech is revisionist rubbish. As Max Boot explains: Obama said, for example, that after he came into office, “we unequivocally banned torture, affirmed our commitment to civilian courts, worked to align our policies with the rule of law, and expanded our consultations with Congress.” Umm, actually all of that happened in Bush’s second term.
|
Obama’s Speech: Hamlet as Wartime Leader
|
|
National Review Online, by Bing West
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 11:19:52 PM
Post Reply
|
|
In seventy lugubrious paragraphs, President Obama today asked America whether as commander-in-chief he should bomb terrorists. He concluded that sometimes he should, and sometimes he shouldn’t. He couldn’t quite make up his mind. Therefore, he would appoint a panel to advise him. Mr. Obama has already authorized more than 200 such drone bombings. His staff has bragged that before ordering a bombing, he personally reviews who lives and who dies. Imagine if Prime Minister Churchill or President Truman had appeared on television to announce an advisory panel before bombing our enemy. We would be appalled
|
Cars, people in the Skagit River after I-5 Bridge collapse
|
|
KOMO-TV [Seattle, WA], by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 11:15:26 PM
Post Reply
|
|
MOUNT VERNON, Wash. -- The Interstate 5 bridge over the Skagit River collapsed Thursday evening, injuring an unknown number of people. Both the northbound and southbound portions of the bridge dropped into the river sometime before 7 p.m., according to Washington State Patrol trooper Mark Francis. Francis said several cars were on the bridge when it collapsed, and some are now in the water. Bart Treece with the Washington State Department of Transportation was unsure when the bridge was last inspected. "All of our bridges in the area are pretty old," he said.
|
Fox News’s Roger Ailes responds to Justice Dept. investigation
|
|
Washington Post, by Erik Wemple
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 11:00:19 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Fox News chief Roger Ailes has sent a memo to his subordinates at the leading cable news network. He sent this memo to his staff today in connection with the federal investigation into an alleged leak to Fox News reporter James Rosen, a story that the Washington Post’s Ann E. Marimow broke earlier this week. The memo’s a masterpiece, too. For all those who wonder what it is about Ailes that endears his people to him — and that makes him such a good interviewee for any media reporter lucky enough to get an audience
|
Anthony Weiner says Houston psychiatric facility made him ‘a new man’
|
|
Houston Chronicle, by Nicole Narea
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 10:52:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Anthony Weiner’s New York mayoral candidacy was only made more improbable today after he revealed that he visited a Houston psychiatric facility following his resignation from Congress in 2011. Haunted by scandal surrounding his sexually explicit online communications with women, the Democratic former congressman sought treatment for his compulsive behavior from mental health professionals at the Gabbard Center. According to its website, the facility provides “3-day outpatient psychiatric evaluation,” particularly to “professionals who are in personal or professional crises.” While Weiner did not disclose
|
Arrests of 2 in British soldier’s slaughter signal wider Islamist terror plot
|
|
Washington Times, by Peter Carvill and Ruby Russell
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 10:44:05 PM
Post Reply
|
|
LONDON — British police late Thursday arrested a man and a woman in connection with the butchering of a British soldier on a London street, as anti-Muslim protests sprang up across the country. The arrests fueled speculation that the gruesome knife attack Wednesday — the first successful terrorist act in Britain since 2005 — was part of a wider plot, and prompted questions about the prevalence of Islamic extremism in the country and how to combat it. British officials moved quickly to increase security in London and other major cities Thursday as police raided
|
Answers on IRS only raise more questions and calls for a special investigation
|
|
Washington Times, by Tom Howell Jr.
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 10:41:36 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Three days of hearings have shown that IRS scrutiny of conservative organizations extended beyond a few rogue employees in Cincinnati, that the agency staged its announcement of the bad news to try to limit the damage, and that the White House knew more, and knew it earlier, than it first admitted. Republicans argue that they also uncovered evidence that the auditor’s report could have been completed months ago — even before the November elections. They also said an internal IRS investigation confirmed the untoward behavior as early as July 2012.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Lois Lerner´s Brief And Awful Day On Capitol Hill
|
|
NPR, by Frank James
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 10:21:38 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The public got its first look Thursday at Lois Lerner, who has gone from faceless IRS bureaucrat to the face that launched what feels like 1,000 congressional hearings and conspiracy theories. But it was only a brief sighting since she didn´t stay long at a House hearing to further probe her role in how some IRS workers came to target conservative groups seeking tax-exempt status. (Snip)She did make a short statement to declare her innocence, however. Lerner´s motivation was more transparent than much of what the IRS has done in connection with this controversy. She was determined to
|
Criminality Appears To Lie at the Heart of the IRS Scandal
|
|
New York Sun, by Lawrence Kudlow
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/23/2013 5:59:27 AM
Post Reply
|
|
When you get right down to it, the political targeting and stalling of tax-exempt applications by the IRS was an effort to defund the Tea Party. Rick Santelli, one of the Tea Party founders and my CNBC colleague, was the first to make this point. I’ve taken it a step further: The IRS was taking the Tea Party out of play for the 2012 election, as it looked to avoid a repeat of 2010 and another Tea Party landslide.There are a lot of numbers out there.
|
Eva Longoria graduates with master´s degree in Chicano studies
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Nardine Saad
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: NorthernDog- 5/23/2013 3:03:53 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Eva Longoria is backing up her beauty with a whole lot of brain. The actress graduated with a master´s degree Wednesday. Longoria, 38, took home a real degree (not an honorary one) in Chicano studies from Cal State Northridge, where she physically attended classes for three years, according to TMZ. "Big day today!!! Very excited to graduate for my master´s degree in Chicano studies! You´re never too old or too busy to continue your education!" the actress wrote on her Who Say site Wednesday, sharing loads of pics of her big day, posing with her family, cohorts and diploma.
|
Why was the Department of Homeland Security monitoring Tea Party IRS demonstrations?
|
|
American Thinker, by Sally Zelikovsky
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: magnante- 5/23/2013 8:09:21 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What´s so interesting about 60 tea partiers protesting the IRS in San Jose, California on Tuesday, May 21st? The fact that this bit of information was conveyed to the protesters by a Department of Homeland Security officer who was also in attendance. What was a DHS agent doing at the San Jose Tea Party protest? (snip) they weren´t just spying on us in San Jose and monitoring us in San Francisco, they were watching us throughout the entire state
|
Obama nominates Nuland for assistant secretary of state
|
|
Politico, by Reid J. Epstein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/23/2013 10:08:52 PM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama on Thursday nominated Victoria Nuland, a State Department official involved in the editing of the administration´s talking points on Benghazi, to be the next assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs. Nuland, a career foreign service officer who was until recently State´s top spokesperson, had long been expected to be nominated the post to replace Philip Gordon, who Obama picked to serve as Middle East coordinator for the National Security Council. Nuland´s nomination -- which requires Senate confirmation -- could come under scrutiny from Republicans who see her as playing a central role in shaping
|
The Mystery Night
|
|
Politico, by Rich Lowry
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: RappVol- 5/23/2013 7:36:59 AM
Post Reply
|
|
On “Fox News Sunday” last weekend, White House aide Dan Pfeiffer was asked about President Barack Obama’s whereabouts the night of the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi. This was the night when we lost our first ambassador in 30 years, and when three other Americans were killed in an attack that lasted all night long at multiple locations within the eastern Libyan city. Since the president is commander in chief, one would think where he was and what he did during such an event would be of obvious public concern.
|
Darrell Issa: Lois Lerner lost her rights
|
|
Politico, by Rachel Bade
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/22/2013 3:34:05 PM
Post Reply
|
|
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said embattled IRS official Lois Lerner waived her Fifth Amendment rights and will be hauled back to appear before his panel again. The California Republican said Lerner’s Fifth Amendment right to avoid self-incrimination was voided when she gave an opening statement this morning denying any wrongdoing and professing pride in her government service. “When I asked her her questions from the very beginning, I did so so she could assert her rights prior to any statement,” Issa told POLITICO. “She chose not to do so — so she waived.”
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|