A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Poll: Voters believe Obama wants
tax hikes to increase spending,
not cut deficit
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Poll: Voters believe Obama wants
tax hikes to increase spending,
not cut deficit

Washington Examiner, by Joel Gehrke

Original Article

Posted By:afortiori, 10/8/2012 12:30:00 PM

President Obama claims that tax increases will help close the deficit, but a majority of Americans believe he intends to use the money for increased spending, according to a new survey. “You can’t reduce the deficit unless you take a balanced approach that says, ‘We’ve gotta make government leaner and more efficient,’” Obama told CBS last month. “But we’ve also got to ask people – like me or Gov. Romney, who have done better than anybody else over the course of the last decade, and whose taxes are just about lower than they’ve been in the last 50 years

Comments:
Certainly this is true, but needs to be highlighted more.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Coy860, 10/8/2012 12:35:53 PM     (No. 8918144)

Other Peoples' Money is one of Obama's drugs of choice.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Revolution76, 10/8/2012 12:42:44 PM     (No. 8918163)

Obama's plan is to raise taxes and increase "investment" in government employment. Seems no one is getting fooled by what that really means. Romney should drive this home in the next debate by pointing out that "investment" means spending more money we don't have.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: mitzi, 10/8/2012 12:54:41 PM     (No. 8918194)

Obama said it himself! He wants to redistribute wealth, not cut deficits or pay debts.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Teleologicus, 10/8/2012 12:54:51 PM     (No. 8918195)

True. Leftists have no intention of cutting government spending. They want a bigger, broader, deeper, more expensive government at every level. Obama and people like him apparently sincerely believe that putting people on the government payroll is the same as job creation. It certainly looks that way to those granted a government sinecure.

But Obama et al. have another reason for their relentless push to raise taxes, particularly on "the wealthy." It is their idea of social and economic justice. They want to redistribute the wealth. Obama would be for raising taxes even if the government did not need the money. It is a matter of principle for him and people like him. They itch to rob the rich so that they can give to the poor. The irony is that though they sometimes succeed in robbing the rich, giving the loot to the poor is largely beyond their skills. Most of it is wasted or flushed down the Federal drain. A substantial part of it is transferred back to "the rich" via cronies and backroom deals.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Attila DiMedici, 10/8/2012 1:01:33 PM     (No. 8918215)

Well, they are mistaken. Obama does not wan to increase taxes in order to increase spending. He thinks that he can increase spending just by borrowing more money (or just plain printing it). He wants to increase taxes in order to make it harder for people to become one of the elites and to make it easier to take money from those wealthy persons who are not politically favored.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: CEP, 10/8/2012 1:03:44 PM     (No. 8918221)

Gotta get money from somewhere to pay for all those Obamaphones.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: GoDeacs79, 10/8/2012 1:08:31 PM     (No. 8918236)

"Obama has convinced a majority (58 percent) of Democrats, though, that he will use taxes to lower the deficit."

58% of Dems believe what they want to believe when the evidence to the contrary is printed in black and white. It is scary that Obama can hold sway over so many people.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: Kurto, 10/8/2012 1:33:31 PM     (No. 8918284)

That is all he's done so far. Why would anyone expect anything else?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    4 persons like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: craige, 10/8/2012 1:49:11 PM     (No. 8918306)

The HOUSE will remain in Republican hands. This means gridlock. Gridlock is much better than what went on in Obama's first two years.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: country boy, 10/8/2012 1:51:21 PM     (No. 8918311)

All serious economists agree. The "weapon of choice" (tax) for a second obama administration will be VAT tax, lower the boom on the middle class.

Anybody who is lucid knows that tax increases on rich will not bring in much in new revenues. The demagoguery is useful only softening up the unsuspecting voters, useful idiots and such.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Safari Man, 10/8/2012 1:58:20 PM     (No. 8918333)

Obama doesn't need tax dollars to increase spending -- he'll just increase the deficit which is good for his scheme anyway.

To Obama, taxation is a form of get-even-ism. Its a form of punishment for the rich (ie white, judeao/christian) people.

Not only is it a way to get even for past sins, its also a way to take power away from individuals. Money is power, and Obama wants all of it.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: bighambone, 10/8/2012 2:20:51 PM     (No. 8918386)

The voters hit the nail right on the head. Obama is all about spending the taxpayer's money, by essentially taking the money away from the people who worked to earn it, and giving it to people who do not work.

During his first term Obama refused to work with the Republicans and has always demanded that the Republicans abandon their political principles and simply go along with Obama to get along. The result has essentially been gridlock. If Obama is re-elected, obviously he will double down with his demands, and we will see the same result, four more years of gridlock.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    5 persons like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Stopstoreload, 10/8/2012 3:04:54 PM     (No. 8918519)

That is the standard Democratic approach: raise more money so that you can spend more.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    3 persons like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 705611




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "afortiori"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "afortiori"



Stop the Metaphor Madness
National Journal, by Major Garrett    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 11/28/2013 12:47:43 PM     Post Reply
Can we, before our L-Tryptophan coma commences, vow to abandon all attempts to festoon Obamacare with ridiculous historical metaphors? The damn law is big, with a regulatory heft now in excess of 20,000 pages. But even this governmental behemoth groans under the weight of metaphorical ornaments both daft and dull. Obamacare is not Katrina, not in fact or political impact. Obamacare is not Iraq, not in its human or material cost or in the reckless misuse of a commander in chief´s most sacred obligations of truth, judgment, and management. Obamacare is not the Bay of Pigs, not in concept, execution, or

Trayvon Martin and the
Irony of American Justice
Atlantic, by Ta-Nehisi Coates    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 7/15/2013 11:09:04 AM     Post Reply
In trying to assess the the killing of Trayvon Martin by George Zimmerman, two seemingly conflicted truths emerge for me. The first is that based on the case presented by the state, and based on Florida law, George Zimmerman should not have been convicted of second degree murder or manslaughter. The second is that the killing of Trayvon Martin is a profound injustice. In examining the first conclusion, I think it´s important to take a very hard look at the qualifications allowed for aggressors by Florida´s self-defense statute: Use of force by aggressor.

Why This Scandal Is Different
Wall Street Journal, by Peggy Noonan    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 6/1/2013 10:21:32 AM     Post Reply
Sometimes when you’re writing part of a column you keep getting close to the meaning of what you want to say but you don’t quite get there, the full formulation of the idea eludes you. Then two days later, relaxing in conversation with friends, the thought comes to you whole, and you think: That’s what I meant to say. That’s what I was trying to get. This week I had one of those moments.

   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Where Obama Went Wrong
In The Gun Control Fight
BuzzFeed, by Evan McMorris-Santoro & Ruby Cramer    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 4/20/2013 6:03:36 PM     Post Reply
In one of the toughest defeats of President Obama´s political career, the Senate this week sank a piece of gun control legislation that the White House had been laboring over for months. As the post-mortems of the loss begin, some have questioned if gun control got bogged down with the president´s ongoing struggle to effectively operate the levers of power in Washington. Culprits for the bill´s demise are plenty — from gutless Senate moderates, to inflexible pro-gun conservatives, to a brazen gun lobby that waged an aggressive, and sometimes misleading, campaign to defeat the legislation.

Let Not Your Heart Be Troubled
RedState.com, by Erick Erickson    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 4/20/2013 11:26:22 AM     Post Reply
I remember it so clearly — a memory you can only remember so clearly when it is from sadness. You can’t let it go. I was sitting in the mud by the rear passenger side tire of my old Acura cradling my one year old in the steady, driving rain. I was sobbing doing my best not to fall apart in front of my little girl. But the tears ran. My throat hurt as I tried to suppress the guttural cries I wanted to cry there in the mud.

With background check proposal,
Toomey’s not just firing off the cuff
Tribune-Review [Pittsburgh PA], by Eric Heyl    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 4/15/2013 9:41:37 AM     Post Reply
Pat Toomey obviously isn´t flummoxed by basic arithmetic. The Republican Pennsylvania senator is proving that as he and Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., attempt to modestly modify requirements for criminal background checks on gun purchases. The two senators, both gun-rights advocates, are pushing legislation that would require such checks for all gun show and Internet sales. Toomey is being labeled a Judas in conservative circles for backing what is being described incorrectly as a gun control bill. It is not.

Why I Didn´t Write About
Gosnell´s Trial--
And Why I Should Have
Daily Beast, by Megan McArdle    Original Article
Posted By: afortiori- 4/13/2013 10:45:59 AM     Post Reply
Kermit Gosnell, a Pennsylvania abortion doctor, is on trial for a lurid series of lurid crimes at his clinic. I can´t bring myself to describe them, so I´ll let Kirsten Powers do it. Infant beheadings. Severed baby feet in jars. A child screaming after it was delivered alive during an abortion procedure. Haven´t heard about these sickening accusations? It´s not your fault. Since the murder trial of Pennsylvania abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell began March 18, there has been precious little coverage of the case that should be on every news show and front page.



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Has Rush Limbaugh Finally
Reached the End Of The Road?

47 replie(s)
Forbes Magazine, by Rick Ungar    Original Article
Posted By: EveningStar- 4/16/2014 7:24:05 PM     Post Reply
Like him or hate him, there is no disputing that Rush Limbaugh’s very special brand of mixing right-wing politics with his flare for entertainment has produced one of the most successful radio programs in the medium’s long history. Whatever the burning political question of the day, millions of Americans have relished the opportunity to tune into Rush’s program, knowing that he would quickly take that hot potato, throw a few gallons of verbal kerosene into the mix and elevate the matter into a five alarm fire with a just a few well-chosen words spoken in the style only Rush Limbaugh could

   

 



 
Michelle Obama Riverdances
Through Dublin to the Tune
of $7,921,638

40 replie(s)
Breitbart Big Peace, by Tom Fitton    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/17/2014 6:45:16 AM     Post Reply
When it comes to tracking the cost of Obama family vacations, there are two primary challenges. First, the Obamas are prolific jet-setters, so there are many details to track. Second, the Obama administration, clearly embarrassed by these lavish and frequent family vacations, stonewalls the release of records at every turn. But we have been relentless in pursuit of this information. Our attorneys file the lawsuits and make our case, and our investigators pour through pages of records and crunch the numbers. And the information we’ve uncovered – information that would otherwise remain under lock and key – shows that the

Why is US Senator Harry
Reid so concerned with
a local Nevada rancher?

39 replie(s)
Fox News, by Wayne Allyn Root    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 9:37:12 PM     Post Reply
I live in Las Vegas. I live and breath Nevada politics. Something is very wrong. Something smells rotten in the Nevada desert. And Senator Harry Reid’s fingerprints are all over it. I am of course referring to the Bundy Ranch siege. This was a dispute between a Nevada ranching family with rights to the land in question for 140 years and the BLM (Bureayu of Land Management). The government claims they haven’t paid grazing fees for 20 years. The result was a government assault on the ranch- including snipers with assault rifles, SUV’s, helicopters, airplanes and over 200 heavily armed troops. No

Which Actor Portrays The
Best James Bond?

38 replie(s)
American Spectator, by Jonah Goldberg and Taki Theodoracopulos    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/16/2014 11:20:22 AM     Post Reply
Look, everyone loves Sean Connery, particularly Sean Connery. That’s why he plays Sean Connery in every movie he’s in. People love that Scottish brogue so much, they don’t mind that he has it when he plays Juan Sánchez Villa-Lobos Ramírez, an immortal Spaniard in Highlander. The guy even won an Oscar for playing an Irish cop with a Scottish accent. Talk about sexist double standards: Meryl Streep has to master foreign dialects to get her golden statuettes. Connery just has to show up on time. In economics you devalue a currency by printing too much of it. In film you

Elizabeth Warren whines about coverage
of her fraudulent Indian claim

35 replie(s)
Daily Caller, by Patrick Howley    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 9:54:52 PM     Post Reply
Democratic Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren wrote in her forthcoming book that she was “hurt” and “angry” by 2012 reporting on her fraudulent claim to Native American heritage. “What really threw me, though, were the constant attacks from the other side,” Warren wrote in her book “A Fighting Chance.” “I would almost persuade myself that I was starting to get the hang of full-throttle campaigning and then — bam! Out of left field, the state Republican Party, or the Brown campaign, or some blogger, would launch a rocket at me,” Warren wrote, adding, ”I was stunned by the attacks.” This reporter (blogger?) reported extensively

Former US president joins
opposition to Keystone XL

33 replie(s)
Houston Chronicle, by Jennifer A. Dlouhy    Original Article
Posted By: JoniTx- 4/16/2014 10:32:12 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON — Former President Jimmy Carter joined fellow Nobel laureates Wednesday in opposing Keystone XL, insisting that approving the pipeline would trigger “more climate upheaval” around the globe. In an open letter to President Barack Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry, Carter and the nine other Nobel Peace Prize winners bluntly warned the leaders: “Your decision on the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline will define your climate legacy.” The missive, published as an advertisement in Politico, represents the first time Carter has taken a position on the $5.4 billion project and makes him the first former president to come

Fox News Poll: Many voters say Obama lies
to the country on important matters

30 replie(s)
Fox News, by Dana Blanton    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/16/2014 7:39:27 PM     Post Reply
About six in ten American voters think Barack Obama lies to the country on important matters some or most of the time, according to a Fox News poll released Wednesday. Thirty-seven percent think Obama lies “most of the time,” while another 24 percent say he lies “some of the time.” Twenty percent of voters say “only now and then” and 15 percent “never.” Click here for the poll results. President Obama has been accused by political opponents and media fact-checkers alike of telling falsehoods. Frequently cited: His repeated claim that under Obamacare “If you like your plan, you can keep

   

Post Reply   Close thread 705611





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~