A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Why Obama Will Lose
All Three Debates
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Why Obama Will Lose
All Three Debates

American Thinker, by Monty Pelerin

Original Article

Posted By:magnante, 10/8/2012 8:18:16 AM

President Obama had a terrible debate last week. Supporters and opponents were shocked that he could be so off his game. They shouldn't have been. That they were indicates that they don't understand Obama's serious, likely insurmountable re-election problem. Obama supporters and detractors expect the old Obama to show better form in the next debate. But that is not going to happen! It cannot, because Obama's critical problem is not correctable.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Not your typical New Yorker, 10/8/2012 8:27:07 AM     (No. 8917475)

His flashy smile can't make up for what he doesn't know or for what he's done the past 4 years.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Iconoclast, 10/8/2012 8:42:06 AM     (No. 8917498)

No teleprompter


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Throwback, 10/8/2012 8:54:21 AM     (No. 8917515)

He will come ready to re-fight the last debate. Pre-loaded with a string of lies to attack Romney with. The audience will be packed with dupes spouting pre-screened questions.

All Romney has to do is not play their game. Sidestep the questions and lies. No matter what is asked or said, use the time to get his own points across. Given that this is a Foreign policy debate, this could be a rout.


Reply 4 - Posted by: ZurichMike, 10/8/2012 9:17:33 AM     (No. 8917555)

Romney: "For one of our greatest allies in a time of increasingly instability and violence in the the Middle East, I took time from my campaign to meet with Prime Minster Netanyahu. I did not think like the President that being a guest on "The View" and saying that he was "eye candy" exhibited any kind of leadership from the world's greatest defender of liberty."


Reply 5 - Posted by: Mass Minority, 10/8/2012 9:18:44 AM     (No. 8917559)

The overarching leftoid response to Romneys win was some variation of "Even though Romney spewed nothing but lies" followed by a long winded recitation of how hard it is to be president and pure amazement at how poorly the annointed one performed, although obviously it wasn't his fault (Romneys cheat hanky and all).

Very few followed the "spewed lies" comment with any refutation of fact. They simply left the word Lie hang out there hoping it would stick. Those that did try to refute were left with unconvincing arguments like "Just because Romney didn't specically call for a 5 trillion dollar tax hike expert economists have shown that it could happen as a result of ... insert boogeyman conspiracy plot here.

If anything Obama is even more vulnerable on Foreign policy. Most of us had Obama's utopian worldview in our late teens. He relates so well with college students BECAUSE he has that same naieve understanding of the world.

He's pushing a worldview most in the country have strongly held, and then completely abandoned in the face of the cold harsh reality of human nature.

He is going to be the Tobacco Salesman in a room full of ex smokers. He's toast.


Reply 6 - Posted by: Jenfidel, 10/8/2012 9:22:31 AM     (No. 8917566)

0bama's was never the worldview most Americans strongly held, #6, especially after 9/11/01 and Pearl Harbor.
Research Jacksonian Democrats.


Reply 7 - Posted by: antiquegolf, 10/8/2012 9:26:28 AM     (No. 8917576)

What poster 4 said. Be ready for spew from obama about ----- "every independent fact checker, according to every independent analysis, all economists who reviewed statements made by Mr. Romney." I'm sure Mitt is well prepared for the ugly attack. He will prevail.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: ratslayer, 10/8/2012 9:31:23 AM     (No. 8917591)

"You cannot fatten the pig on market day." This I heard from an Irish student who was being encouraged to cram for a test. Obama cannot find answers to remove 4 years of abject failure.


Reply 9 - Posted by: jalo1951, 10/8/2012 10:03:03 AM     (No. 8917677)

I liked the analogy of the golden and pit bull. Very true. obama does not speak extemporaneously very well and it shows. No teleprompter to read and he just isn't very good or believable. I am sure he will boo hoo with someone from the crowd and offer a Kleenex and he cannot offer any answers. I am also looking forward to the Ryan/biden debate. I know they keep saying how good biden is but I don't believe it for a minute.


Reply 10 - Posted by: southernboy, 10/8/2012 10:05:46 AM     (No. 8917684)

#4 "All Romney has to do is not play their game. Sidestep the questions and lies. No matter what is asked or said, use the time to get his own points across. Given that this is a Foreign policy debate, this could be a rout."
Exactly!
Foxnews had Debbie Blabbermouth-Shultz on yesterday morning. She was asked a direct question…she responded with a thirty second dissertation that had absolutely nothing to do with the question but was actually a repeat of democrat talking points. Of course she wasn't called on it.
Romney and Ryan should do the same thing when hit with 'gottcha' questions.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Holeymoses, 10/8/2012 10:09:32 AM     (No. 8917705)

You can bet your boots Romney is not going to fall into his own inevitability of winning the last two debates, but will be more determined to even perfect his last performance.

What I do expect, is for Obama to try to charm his Town Hall questioners. 'Too late the phalarope,' they will be looking past that for answers. The media of course realizes it must find a little something wonderful to prop up their boy.


Reply 12 - Posted by: lakerman1, 10/8/2012 10:50:33 AM     (No. 8917826)

candy crowley and bill scheiffer are moderators. That puts romney at a disadvantage from the very beginninng.
He has to be as tough as Newt Gingrich in hitting back against silly questions.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: happy conservative, 10/8/2012 11:01:35 AM     (No. 8917854)

Look for a manufactured "October Surprise" before the next R/O debate if (probable) the debate on Thursday between Joe and Paul goes south for the administration. Word's out he's thinking about bombing or irritating Libya somehow so he can look presidential. It's all about the ME at this point. Any little skirmish there will require his "leadership" which will trump the debate.

He'd rather not be "present" at anymore of these "ridiculous" events. Give him Hollyweird where he can shine!


Reply 14 - Posted by: lonestarm3, 10/8/2012 11:09:01 AM     (No. 8917874)

The Obamamedia spin-talkers have all gotten the memo that their idol got taken to the woodshed because Romney lied with the journal-list understood implication that Jim Leher was "too passive."
[Translation: Leher failed to provide softballs tailored to Obama's know talking-point repertoire.]

Absolute certain prediction for debate #2: The "town hall" will be packed with Obama supporters all reading written questions provided in advance by Obama operatives.

We will be lucky if any of the "audience" are Romney supporters rather than Obama supporters who lied in whatever screening takes place.


Reply 15 - Posted by: MickTurn, 10/8/2012 11:33:44 AM     (No. 8917944)

Simple, his supposed nice smile is now a negative...he is arrogant and condescending and uses the smile as a signal he's upset.

Also he's got nothing to talk about but bash Mitt, and Mitt is not taking it one more second, he's fighting back and kicking Obama's rear all over the stage.

Love it Libs, it gets worse!


Reply 16 - Posted by: Judy W., 10/8/2012 12:25:31 PM     (No. 8918118)

I'm sure the debate planners are figuring out a format that will prevent Romney from repeating his performance.


Reply 17 - Posted by: Hazymac, 10/8/2012 1:00:38 PM     (No. 8918211)

As Romney was applying the surgeon's scalpel to Obama's half-truths and outright falsehoods in last Wednesday's debate, the outmatched and humiliated incumbent's face wore the phony smile of ignominious defeat.

"Monty Pelerin"--I like that nom de plume!--is surely correct that Obama won't improve in the next two debates because those abilities just don't inhere in him. He's spent a lifetime pretending to be someone he will never be: an eminence grise, a deep thinker, a wonk with abilities above those of the people whom he has chosen to surround him. In truth he's just a noisemaker that someone else must program.

Obama's trembling smile reminds me of a passage in Tom Wolfe's great Mau-Mauing the Flak Catchers.

"'Ha-unnnnh,' says the Flak Catcher. It is one of those laughs that starts out as a laugh but ends up like he got hit in the stomach halfway through. It's the first assault on his dignity. So he breaks into his s***-eating grin, which is always phase two. Why do so many bureaucrats, deans, preachers, college presidents, try to smile when the mau-mauing starts? It's fatal, this smiling. When some bad dude is challenging your manhood, your smile just proves that he is right and you are chickens***--unless you are a bad man yourself with so much heart that you can make that smile say, 'Just keep on talking, sucker, because I'm gonna count to ten and then squash you.'"

Obama the Flak Catcher has been transformed into a spear catcher.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: 4Diogenes, 10/9/2012 6:48:30 AM     (No. 8919590)

Every thing said about b0 is true and it may not matter. See Star Parker's article immediately above.
We, Lucialle readers, are not the significant part of the electorate that we once were. We have to show the non-white, non-married, non-religious that b0 is just as bad for them as he is for us. No sale = no sale.



Post Reply   Close thread 705563




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "magnante"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "magnante"



U.S. Military: We Could Have
Saved Ambassador Stevens
American Thinker, by Jonathan Moseley    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/25/2013 9:23:49 AM     Post Reply
Elite U.S. troops were completely capable of saving Ambassador Chris Stevens during the Benghazi Consulate attacks on September 11, 2012. Elements of the highly specialized Combatant Commanders In-Extremis (CIF) units are always on alert, on forward deployment, ready to respond. Their job description is to hit the ground in 3 to 5 hours. CIF elements are ready to engage in active combat anywhere in their region, 3 to 5 hours after the call. Leon Panetta, Secretary of Defense at the time, either misled the U.S. Congress or was incompetent.

Benghazi and Obama´s
Ambition to Be U.N. SecGen
American Thinker, by James Lewis    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/25/2013 9:20:44 AM     Post Reply
Washington rumor has it that Obama wants to be U.N. Secretary General. There are several reasons that make that likely, and if it´s true, it throws new light on a lot of Obama´s oddities -- including his Royalty Bows, his Apology Tours, his Muslim Sellout, and the Benghazi Cover-Up. But first -- why would Obama be planning to become the chief of the U.N. before he has even finished his second term?

Why was the Department
of Homeland Security monitoring
Tea Party IRS demonstrations?
American Thinker, by Sally Zelikovsky    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/23/2013 8:09:21 AM     Post Reply
What´s so interesting about 60 tea partiers protesting the IRS in San Jose, California on Tuesday, May 21st? The fact that this bit of information was conveyed to the protesters by a Department of Homeland Security officer who was also in attendance. What was a DHS agent doing at the San Jose Tea Party protest? (snip) they weren´t just spying on us in San Jose and monitoring us in San Francisco, they were watching us throughout the entire state

   

 



 
Lois Lerner thrown
under the bus
American Thinker, by Thomas Lifson    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/22/2013 2:52:24 PM     Post Reply
Lois Lerner, the head of the IRS operation that targeted Tea Party groups is being thrown under the bus by Obama. (snip) two Obama media operatives, both veterans of Journolist who were called into the White House yesterday for consultations, both called for her firing. The two are the Washington Post´s Ezra Klein and Josh Marshall of Talking Points Memorandum.

Obama Tosses a Grenade
Into His Own Dugout
American Thinker, by Geoffrey P. Hunt    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/22/2013 8:41:33 AM     Post Reply
Remember president Obama´s first pitch of the MLB 2010 season at the Washington Nationals ballpark? It sailed towards the home team dugout. While he couldn´t throw a baseball within ten feet of home plate -- even if it took a double bounce on the way in -- Obama has tossed perfect incendiary strikes inside his own clubhouse, sending his entire team to the disabled list, demoted to the minor leagues, or banned from the game for life. In fact Obama´s entire liberal-progressive league has forfeited the rest of the season -- and then some.

Obama thinks
liberals are stupid
American Thinker, by Sally Zelikovsky    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/14/2013 9:08:19 AM     Post Reply
Hey, liberals! Obama thinks you are stupid. Yeah, he really does. He knew Benghazi was terrorism before he didn´t know it was terrorism. Addressing a question about Benghazi in his press conference Monday, May 13, 2013, Obama´s "logic" really made an impression: "The Day after it happened I acknowledged that this was an act of terrorism." (snip) Leaving behind Obama´s initial certitude about Benghazi having been a terror attack, not only did he not know what had happened because it wasn´t clear

Benghazi: Murder and
Treachery Most Foul?
American Thinker, by Fay Voshell    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/14/2013 8:29:37 AM     Post Reply
What person ever says what he really knows at a funeral? Eulogies bearing little or no resemblance to the deceased or to the facts are trotted out by people who are often bad actors, who though they know better, lie anyway. It´s almost acceptable behavior. But any truth about the deaths of U.S. Ambassador Christ Stevens and three other Americans appears to have been put six feet under as far as our current administration is concerned. (snip)Did they love Chris Stevens the way Brutus loved Caesar?



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Mark Levin Tears Into Obama: ‘Flat-
Out, Bald-Faced Lie’ That He Knew
Nothing About IRS Targeting

51 replie(s)
Mediaite, by Josh Feldman    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/23/2013 9:48:28 PM     Post Reply
Conservative radio host Mark Levin is very skeptical of the idea that President Obama had absolutely no idea about the IRS tea party targeting before the story broke in the news mere weeks ago. Levin declared adamantly that it is a “flat-out, bald-faced lie” that Obama didn’t know beforehand, citing prior reports by a few conservative news outlets picking up on the news well before the 2012 presidential election. Levin said, “I don’t believe for two seconds that Obama wasn’t aware of this.”

Obama nominates Nuland for
assistant secretary of state

51 replie(s)
Politico, by Reid J. Epstein    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/23/2013 10:08:52 PM     Post Reply
President Obama on Thursday nominated Victoria Nuland, a State Department official involved in the editing of the administration´s talking points on Benghazi, to be the next assistant secretary of state for European and Eurasian affairs. Nuland, a career foreign service officer who was until recently State´s top spokesperson, had long been expected to be nominated the post to replace Philip Gordon, who Obama picked to serve as Middle East coordinator for the National Security Council. Nuland´s nomination -- which requires Senate confirmation -- could come under scrutiny from Republicans who see her as playing a central role in shaping

Anthony Weiner says Houston
psychiatric facility made
him ‘a new man’

51 replie(s)
Houston Chronicle, by Nicole Narea    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 10:52:02 PM     Post Reply
Anthony Weiner’s New York mayoral candidacy was only made more improbable today after he revealed that he visited a Houston psychiatric facility following his resignation from Congress in 2011. Haunted by scandal surrounding his sexually explicit online communications with women, the Democratic former congressman sought treatment for his compulsive behavior from mental health professionals at the Gabbard Center. According to its website, the facility provides “3-day outpatient psychiatric evaluation,” particularly to “professionals who are in personal or professional crises.” While Weiner did not disclose

Bystanders in their own fate
48 replie(s)
Orange County Register (Ca), by Mark Steyn    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/24/2013 5:32:34 PM     Post Reply
On Wednesday, Drummer Lee Rigby of the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers, a man who had served Queen and country honorably in the hell of Helmand Province in Afghanistan, emerged from his barracks on Wellington Street, named after the Duke thereof, in southeast London. Minutes later, he was hacked to death in broad daylight and in full view of onlookers by two men with machetes who crowed "Allahu Akbar!" as they dumped his carcass in the middle of the street like so much roadkill. As grotesque as this act of savagery was, the aftermath was even more unsettling

Benghazi and Obama´s
Ambition to Be U.N. SecGen

48 replie(s)
American Thinker, by James Lewis    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 5/25/2013 9:20:44 AM     Post Reply
Washington rumor has it that Obama wants to be U.N. Secretary General. There are several reasons that make that likely, and if it´s true, it throws new light on a lot of Obama´s oddities -- including his Royalty Bows, his Apology Tours, his Muslim Sellout, and the Benghazi Cover-Up. But first -- why would Obama be planning to become the chief of the U.N. before he has even finished his second term?

Mark Levin: "RINO" Issa Didn´t
Investigate IRS Before Because
He "Despises The Tea Party"

43 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Ian Schwartz    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/24/2013 5:38:38 PM     Post Reply
MARK LEVIN: So why didn´t Chairman Issa hold an investigative hearing a year ago? Why didn´t Chairman Camp, all Republicans, hold an investigative hearing a year ago, and all the other tripping over themselves right now? I´ll tell you why. Because the establishment Republicans, the RINO Republicans, despise the Tea Party. They despise the conservative movement. We exist to be managed, to be shuttled to the polling place, to vote for their candidates. The Karl Roves of the world, and all the rest of them. They fight us in the primaries, they fight us at the grassroots.

Fox News’s Roger Ailes responds
to Justice Dept. investigation

38 replie(s)
Washington Post, by Erik Wemple    Original Article
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/23/2013 11:00:19 PM     Post Reply
Fox News chief Roger Ailes has sent a memo to his subordinates at the leading cable news network. He sent this memo to his staff today in connection with the federal investigation into an alleged leak to Fox News reporter James Rosen, a story that the Washington Post’s Ann E. Marimow broke earlier this week. The memo’s a masterpiece, too. For all those who wonder what it is about Ailes that endears his people to him — and that makes him such a good interviewee for any media reporter lucky enough to get an audience

   

Post Reply   Close thread 705563





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~