|
|
| |
Topic: If He’s Lost the New Yorker… |
If He’s Lost the New Yorker…
Power Line, by John Hinderaker
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:StormCnter, 10/6/2012 6:13:02 AM
|
| …then it is hard to imagine who still believes the myth of Barack Obama. Next week’s New Yorker cover:(Snip for graphic)So I guess it’s unanimous. Clint Eastwood was right. But here is what I don’t understand: why isn’t everyone embarrassed to be a liberal? Or, put another way, a Democrat? How is it that some people can witness the latest liberal fiasco–Romney sneaked a crib sheet into the debate! That’s the only way he could remember all those facts! No one could actually know all that stuff!–and say, hey, I don’t mind associating with those people!
|
Comments: The New Yorker cover is creating a brushfire in bloggerville. There's a lot of discussion.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
RosietheObserver, 10/6/2012 6:27:21 AM (No. 8913591)
The caricature of Romney gives him quite a chin. If you color it in, he looks like Lincoln. I think that's an accident, but subliminally it could have quite a positive effect.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
frodocasey, 10/6/2012 6:36:30 AM (No. 8913597)
I know Romney was good with his facts at the debate but was he that good? - that he needed notes? Maybe you're right, Liberals and I hope you are!
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
srhcb, 10/6/2012 7:07:31 AM (No. 8913643)
I never missed an issue of "The New Yorker", (and former editor Bill Shawn insisted it be addressed that way), from 1952-87. (I "read" my parents' copy before I could actually read) When they became overtly political I sadly gave up on them.
I'm willing to bet they think the cover is a slam on Romney, by portraying him as imitating Eastwood while their poster boy Obama remains somewhere above the fray.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
lakerman1, 10/6/2012 8:48:40 AM (No. 8913814)
President Romney combined his law school education with his MBA, and added in his real world experience, (which we used to expect from our presidential candidates) and smoked barack. I have to wonder if barack even went to class in law school. And I have to wonder if barack was chewing khat.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
capecodfox, 10/6/2012 8:50:55 AM (No. 8913818)
Clint's chair has legs. Obama fit the narrative perfectly at the debate. Maybe now some of the Dims have finally gotten Clint's point.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Bubbasuncle, 10/6/2012 8:52:29 AM (No. 8913825)
FTA:" But here is what I don’t understand: why isn’t everyone embarrassed to be a liberal? Or, put another way, a Democrat?" IMHO, two reasons; one, they want to be thought of as reasonable, thoughtful, and caring. Two, if they were to finally admit it would be devastating to realize that one was so wrong for so long.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
tnorling, 10/6/2012 8:59:13 AM (No. 8913838)
Whoa. As said before, if you've lost the New Yorker...
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Maybeth, 10/6/2012 8:59:18 AM (No. 8913839)
I have a gut suspicion. I'm wondering if the Obama handlers plan to stage a phony 'hero thing' for the president, who will bravely be rescued from 'whatever.' .... My 'gut' is rarely wrong.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Holeymoses, 10/6/2012 9:06:00 AM (No. 8913854)
This cover was a surprise. All evidence that the left is angry with a loser, one of them. Axelrod has so much cleaning and pruning to do that I wonder how he gets any sleep at night.
I am sure poor Obama is getting advice (make that "direction") on how to behave on the next round. Too much prodding Axelrod, and you are going to make him petulent.
The world is watching.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
LZK, 10/6/2012 9:08:19 AM (No. 8913859)
The libbies are desperate. The American People are wise to the Chicago mob, i.e. obama and jarret.
The cover doesn't mean a thing to WE the People. It may give solace to the demorats who are whinnnning these days....
The economy will do obama in -- no matter how he cooks the books.... It's tough out here and WE KNOW it....
LZK
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Echohawk, 10/6/2012 9:08:28 AM (No. 8913860)
This is The New Yorker's clever way of warning Obama that he has to do a better job in the next two debates or he is finished. Remember, too, that those who write for and edit The New Yorker are some of the smartest wordsmiths on the planet. They knew an empty chair when they saw one.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
vwlarry, 10/6/2012 9:18:21 AM (No. 8913877)
Not to worry. The next debate between them is gonna be even MORE fun. Bet on it. King Putt is mega-flustered now and is not equipped to recover, IMO.
Pop LOTS of popcorn. :-D
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
pomom, 10/6/2012 9:22:59 AM (No. 8913886)
#2, the answer is yes to the fact that he was that good. As far as ''taking notes'', I noticed he scribbled a few notes when Obama started meandering off topic.
I needed a new wallpaper for my computer and now I have it.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
sherlock1, 10/6/2012 9:25:39 AM (No. 8913892)
Obama has been busy convincing his base of lo-info voters that CEOs are overpaid leeches who provide no value, and get by on insider conections.
Oops... one of those drones just mopped the floor with him, and sopped up the mess with a media talking head for good measure.
ps. Don't miss the comments in New Yorker article... most are more scathing on Obama's performance than the picture is!
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Douglas DC, 10/6/2012 9:32:16 AM (No. 8913911)
This is a big deal there is not on elib I know who isn't talking bout this... Ozymandias time...
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
M Stuart, 10/6/2012 9:33:10 AM (No. 8913912)
I'd love to see the New Yorker read Hillbuzz and give us some enlightenment on 0bama's drug use.
Maybe 0bama will make the cover of High Times.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
snakeoil, 10/6/2012 9:36:20 AM (No. 8913922)
The next debate is supposed to be about Foreign Policy. Jug Ears will point out that he killed Osama bin Biden and he won the Nobel Peace Prize. Every 4 years we are told that this is the most important election in American history and usually it's just hype. But if we lose this one I lose my health care in 2014. So it's plenty important to me. Along with I haven't had a pay raise in 4 years and my house is worth less each year. Speaking of debates I'm expecting Plugs to do much better than expected which will validate Clint Eastwood's observation that Ole Joe is the intellectual leader of the demoncraps.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
slab, 10/6/2012 9:37:54 AM (No. 8913926)
#13, thanks for the suggestion!
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
tylertexan, 10/6/2012 9:40:27 AM (No. 8913928)
I was told by our trusty MSM a few weeks ago that the Clint Eastwood bit was a rambling performance by a senile old coot.
Now, what is the one thing nearly everyone (Repub., Dem., Ind.) remembers from either convention?
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
cake crumb, 10/6/2012 9:41:16 AM (No. 8913929)
He hasn't lost the New Yorker, though he might have lost the cover artist: every single article about the debate that I saw in that issue wsa pro-Obama.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
William1, 10/6/2012 9:45:17 AM (No. 8913941)
Poster #2, welcome to the site! Too bad we'll never hear from you after the election...
I'll let you in on a deep, dark secret. Romney had a secret radio transmitter sewn into his Magic Mormon Underwear! That's how he really mopped up the floor with The Slug.
O, how the mighty have fallen.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Arby, 10/6/2012 9:51:10 AM (No. 8913948)
The current New Yorker is nothing like the magazine under Ross. This left-wing rag (with an occasional funny cartoon) has abandoned Fauxbama. Wow, what's next? Mother Jones?
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
tocsin, 10/6/2012 9:53:01 AM (No. 8913951)
Now it's all up to Candy Crowley & the ''undecided voters'' as selected by(the unbiased)Gallup Organization.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
frodocasey, 10/6/2012 10:15:18 AM (No. 8913990)
replies #13 and #21 - I meant my reply to be completely sarcastic to the Liberals, I should have written it better.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
JimS, 10/6/2012 10:17:39 AM (No. 8913994)
If you are reading this site, thanks Clint!
The USA owes you big time.
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
ScarletPimpernel, 10/6/2012 10:45:28 AM (No. 8914043)
I'm going to buy the magazine today. From now until election day, when the weather is good, we'll put the cover in a plastic sleeve and place it on an empty camping chair in front of our lawn. I suggest LDotters around the country do the same!
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
geronimo, 10/6/2012 11:07:41 AM (No. 8914089)
This isn't the first time The New Yorker has taken a swing at Obama:
http://www.newyorker.com/online/covers/slideshow_blittcovers#slide=1
They get over it and return to the fold.
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Gallo3, 10/6/2012 11:36:07 AM (No. 8914159)
Breathtaking, this flop of Obama. Never to be forgotten.
The rise of President Romney.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
Aria, 10/6/2012 11:44:33 AM (No. 8914173)
Like any actor zero needs someone to write his lines and is lost without a script. He also is completely dependent on the "star marker" dept - the guys who really ran the "brilliant" campaign in 2008, the publicists, the agents, the trainers, the accountants, business managers, and on and on.
With his actual work record as evidence how could anyone have expected that this man had somehow accumulated any meaningful leadership experience in life before the White House or would bother to apply himself while in the WH?
He was never anything but a reflection.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
peterfleming, 10/6/2012 11:58:52 AM (No. 8914200)
NOW is the time to stop calling all these big oppressive government promoters, the good name of liberal. They are NOT liberal. They are authoritarian, indivdual oppressing power mad traitors to the truth. If every good soul simply stops and rethinks this could change in a few days. Get over your fear to call them what they ARE. They ARE socialists, statists, collectivists reds, commies, anti Constitutioalists, not radicals but reactionaries, fellow travelers Marxists, dictator crazed, believers in ever larger cureaucracies, more taxes, more jails more bureaucratic controls, everything needs to be controlled BY THE STATE. They want to close down the internet because they can't control it. Overcome your own personal fears, and try it out in front of the mirror. Try calling them the names above, pretend like you're Ayn Rand. She called them only what they are. She came from Communist Russia, escaped, really under stood how terrifying dictator like governments are to the destruction of the individual and their natural rights. Shape up.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
rochow, 10/6/2012 12:01:05 PM (No. 8914206)
Never buy this 'rag',.... this time I shall and will frame the cover,...who knows, perhaps I should get several and give them as a present to some Dems?!
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
LC Chihuahua, 10/6/2012 12:31:00 PM (No. 8914274)
Looks like all the lefties are leaving Obama. Who knew Obama would be thrown under his own bus.
The lefties knew all those skewed polls were lies, and Obama's poor performance only confirmed what alot of people already knew. Obama lies all the time, and nobody likes a liar. The left know Obama is going to lose, and do not want to be dragged down with him.
The left will sacrifice Obama and abandon him before they will ever admit their style of government is wrong.
November 6 is 'Impeach Obama' day.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
Fat Elvis, 10/6/2012 12:31:05 PM (No. 8914275)
Please, if Obama has even a nominally good performance in the next debate, the headlines will scream OBAMA'S BACK!! The media is definitely rooting for him like they root for every democrat. No matter. Romney is the best choice for the country. Obama has got to go.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
Lalo, 10/6/2012 12:33:52 PM (No. 8914279)
Good point, 31st poster, though I suppose we have to go with the common parlance, unfortunately.
As for Bams - my theory is that Clint's stunning performance put a sort of spell on him and that Romney continued this nailing of him to the wall that Clint began, to the point that he could hardly move or speak. A sort of literal metaphor.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
Lalo, 10/6/2012 12:34:23 PM (No. 8914281)
Ooops.. #30, that is.
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
snowcloud, 10/6/2012 12:38:37 PM (No. 8914285)
The same people who think Romney "cheated" with notes are the same ones who think there is nothing whatsoever wrong with a president who can't say gesundheit without a teleprompter. Wow.
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
risailor, 10/6/2012 12:45:46 PM (No. 8914301)
If the dopes really believe that Romney had notes (it was a hankerchief), why couldn't he just memorize what was on the notes?
|
Reply 38 - Posted by:
Heraclitus, 10/6/2012 12:46:24 PM (No. 8914302)
Good reminder, #33; lefties do not really give up... they re-organize.
Great ideas, #s 26 and 31. Especially like the empty chair on the lawn. Just make sure it's a chair you can do without. I fully expect the spoiled-sports to steal and or destroy. Maybe bring it in at night.
Ramirez's cartoon is even more devastating.
I expect the going to get much, much rougher, the lies to fly fast and wildly.
|
Reply 39 - Posted by:
Safari Man, 10/6/2012 1:00:58 PM (No. 8914327)
#27 I believe that "Fist bump" cartoon was taking a swipe at the right -- they were trying to say how "ridiculous" our claims were about Obama.
|
Reply 40 - Posted by:
10sgal67 be, 10/6/2012 2:07:58 PM (No. 8914455)
#8 I have thought about that also. I believe Obama is very dangerous at this point and would try anything to get re-elected. Hope I am wrong.
|
Reply 41 - Posted by:
oriton, 10/6/2012 2:49:59 PM (No. 8914503)
I hope Mitt mentions in the foreign policy debate how many military people we've lost since obit ramped things up in Afghanistan. It seems that's the only way the news will get out there. obit can brag that he got Osama, and it's still not a fact that "he" got him, but will he take responsibility for the service members who've lost their lives. He doesn't even acknowledge the loss or the sacrifice unless it helps him. And, Mitt should throw in how he, Mitt, not obama, is fighting for military absentee voting extensions in several states.
|
Reply 42 - Posted by:
rc1776, 10/6/2012 3:01:45 PM (No. 8914520)
The only leftist to the left of the new yorker is dimfecal jaun willyms.
|
Reply 43 - Posted by:
mollybob, 10/6/2012 4:05:43 PM (No. 8914609)
Glad to know I wasn't the only one who noticed the "Lincolnesque" nature of the caricature. As #1 noted, it was almost certainly unintentional, but those are the kinds of things that often have a strong, if subtle, impact. As for the rest of it, I'm willing to take the entire matter at face--or in this case, cover--value: The New Yorker mocked Obama. It means he's lost them...for now.
|
Reply 44 - Posted by:
cat2, 10/6/2012 5:34:07 PM (No. 8914749)
The last time The New Yorker criticized Obama with a cover (showing him and Michelle as Muslims, as I recall), it promptly apologized with a cover equating him with Lincoln, and maybe godhood. Stay tuned.
|
Reply 45 - Posted by:
starboard, 10/6/2012 6:27:13 PM (No. 8914818)
All the "know it all" pundits are gleefully reporting the Town Hall meeting format favors Obama. Since when? They're always overrating this guy. We saw the real slouch vote present on Wednesday night. Sure, we know they want a horse race, but Romney is not just any horse, He's become Secretariat running in the Belmont stakes. Go Big Red.
|
Reply 46 - Posted by:
jorgecito, 10/6/2012 7:54:32 PM (No. 8914957)
Yes #45, the New Yorker you mention cover did show Obama dressed as a Muslim. Michelle was in an Angela Davis style get-up, and I believe was holding a machine gun.
When the New Yorker got flak for that cover, they claimed it was "satire," i.e. a joke ridiculing not the Obamas, but the Right -- for our allegedly unfounded fears about the Obama couple.
The irony was that the "satire" was actually very close to reality ... i.e., the Right was right after all.
Wonder if the New Yorker's editors have figured that out now?
|
Reply 47 - Posted by:
ocjim, 10/6/2012 8:40:56 PM (No. 8914996)
Eastwood Ho!
|
Reply 48 - Posted by:
fhancock, 10/6/2012 9:21:52 PM (No. 8915048)
Obama is now the object of unadulterated ridicule...He is toast...when the ridicule and reality are the same, there is ZERO chance of recovering
|
Reply 49 - Posted by:
hammondb3, 10/6/2012 9:31:16 PM (No. 8915064)
#2, AKA #24
I got it on the first read. You did nothing wrong at all. Just came at it from a little different angle than most.
|
Reply 50 - Posted by:
ocjim, 10/6/2012 9:52:29 PM (No. 8915086)
If Romney repeats in the second debate then we will truly have a very injured, desperate and powerful predator roaming the woods looking for relief, anywhere and anyhow.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"
|
Despite the WaPost, Benghazi Is a Major Scandal
|
|
American Spectator, by Quin Hillyer
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:16:56 AM
Post Reply
|
|
There’s a huge red flag in the Benghazi mess, but conservatives are letting the media get away with using a red herring to avoid it. Give the establishment media credit for obstinacy: Once it settles on a standard narrative or explanation for a particular subject, it shows remarkable discipline in explaining away any evidence that contradicts its own approved spin. So it has been with the media’s 250-day old determination to downplay the scandalous nature of the Obama administration’s treatment of its outpost in Benghazi before, during, and after the terrorist attack there that took four American lives.
|
Role of Health-Law ´Navigators´ Under Fire
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by Louise Radnofsky
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:14:03 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Lawmakers across the country are tussling over the Obama administration´s plans to create a small army of assistants to guide millions of Americans as they sign up for new health-insurance options available this fall. Backers of the health-care overhaul face an uphill battle to spread the word about the law, in the face of consumer research that suggests most uninsured people know little about it and are skeptical about the value of health insurance generally. Some Democrats have openly worried that the administration is doing too little to make sure the enrollment process goes smoothly. That is where the "patient navigators"
|
Labor unions break ranks with White House on ObamaCare
|
|
The Hill [DC], by Kevin Bogardus
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 6:04:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Labor unions are breaking with President Obama on ObamaCare. Months after the president’s reelection, a variety of unions are publicly balking at how the administration plans to implement the landmark law. They warn that unless there are changes, the results could be catastrophic. The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) — a 1.3 million-member labor group that twice endorsed Obama for president — is very worried about how the reform law will affect its members’ healthcare plans. Last month, the president of the United Union of Roofers, Waterproofers and Allied Workers released a statement calling “for repeal
|
|
Issa Warns Hillary
|
|
National Review Online, by Jonathan Strong
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:36:12 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Since Hillary Clinton last came up to Capitol Hill, we’ve learned senior State Department officials sought to scrub references to terrorism from the infamous Benghazi talking points to insulate Foggy Bottom from political criticism — citing concerns of their “building’s leadership” to justify the demands. The rising temperature of the scandal means it’s possible that Hillary could be asked to return and testify again. If she comes back, she had better be prepared, says House Oversight and Government Reform chairman Darrell Issa. “We are interviewing lots of people, most of them under oath,” Issa says, describing the “methodical” approach his committee
|
|
Billy Sol: Now That Was a Scandal
|
|
Weekly Standard, by Geoffrey Norman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:32:49 AM
Post Reply
|
|
We hear a lot, these days, about how President Obama is not like Lyndon Johnson and thanks be to heaven for that small mercy. The point seems to be that the president doesn´t know how to arm twist, sweet talk, bribe, and emasculate both friend and enemy (of which he truly had neither) in order to further his agenda. Since many among the chattering class believe, still, in that agenda, his is generally regarded as an excellent presidency. Never mind that more than half a century after Johnson declared war on poverty ...
|
How Hope and Change Gave Way To Spying on the Press
|
|
Daily Beast, by Kirsten Powers
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:11:50 AM
Post Reply
|
|
First they came for Fox News, and they did not speak out – because they were not Fox News. Then they came for government whistleblowers, and they did not speak out – because they were not government whistleblowers. Then they came for the maker of a You Tube video, and – okay, we know how this story ends. But how did we get here?Turns out, it’s a fairly swift sojourn from a president pushing to “delegitimize” a news organization, to threatening criminal prosecution for journalistic activity by a Fox News reporter, James Rosen,
|
Ex-Diplomats Report New Benghazi Whistleblowers with Info Devastating to Clinton and Obama
|
|
PJ Media, by Roger L. Simon
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 5:02:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
More whistleblowers will emerge shortly in the escalating Benghazi scandal, according to two former U.S. diplomats who spoke with PJ Media Monday afternoon. These whistleblowers, colleagues of the former diplomats, are currently securing legal counsel because they work in areas not fully protected by the Whistleblower law. According to the diplomats, what these whistleblowers will say will be at least as explosive as what we have already learned about the scandal, including details about what really transpired in Benghazi that are potentially devastating to both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
Leaks turn to deluge for reeling White House
|
|
New York Post, by John Podhoretz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”
|
Top IRS official will invoke Fifth Amendment
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
Democratic Senator uses Okla. tornado for anti-GOP rant over global warming
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care
|
Howard Dean: ‘Benghazi is a Laughable Joke’
|
|
National Review Online, by Andrew Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/21/2013 11:59:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Democratic National committee chairman Howard Dean considers the controversy over Benghazi a “joke” and “silly.” “Benghazi is a laughable joke,” Dean proclaimed twice in a discussion with Republican National Committee communications chairman Sean Spicer last week. “With all due respect, governor, when four Americans die serving this country, that’s not a joke, sir,” Spicer responded. “Oh, stop it,” said Dean. The former Democratic presidential candidate also said that there were “no serious questions being asked about Benghazi” and brushed it off as an effort by Republicans to score political points.
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|