|
|
| |
Topic: Whom do the unemployed blame for being out of work? |
Whom do the unemployed blame for being out of work?
Washington Post, by D.W. Gibson
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Pluperfect, 10/6/2012 5:16:08 AM
|
| When people are out of work, there’s a lot of blame to go around. President Obama faults the “failed policies of the past,” which he says Mitt Romney would bring back. Romney says Obama had four years to fix things and couldn’t. So Democrats blame Republicans, Republicans blame Democrats, libertarians blame the Federal Reserve, businesses blame regulations, regulators blame Wall Street, and everyone blames China. But whom do the unemployed themselves blame? I spent the summer and fall of 2011 driving across the country and interviewing jobless Americans. Those out of work do not need belated coaching
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
steveW, 10/6/2012 5:23:18 AM (No. 8913557)
We blame the Washington Post for covering up for Obama, who has increased unemployment on purpose.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
country boy, 10/6/2012 5:27:33 AM (No. 8913560)
We are the Great White Satan, and we are being punished. All good Mussies like obama thoroughly enjoy watching this pain.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
MamaElephant, 10/6/2012 5:28:17 AM (No. 8913562)
The answer in the article seems to be...Romney! Or at least, business men and those who don't hand out sufficiently generous benefit checks. Obama is blameless, of course.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
sinic, 10/6/2012 6:01:14 AM (No. 8913576)
Let's see, there's millions out of work in the country and Gibson cherrypicks a handful that fit the desired result...evil corporations. I'm sure that's intended to be a subtle dig at Romney. In true WaPo style, Gibson glides right over the slew of government regulations and other meddling tactics that force the evil corporations to trim the workforce and/or ship production to more favorable states and foreign countries. I find it interesting that this article is so short...usually they'd write a lengthy one with loads of sympathetic characters and fudged facts. Must have gone for the abridged version in order to give the audience a chance at understanding it.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
fleetusa, 10/6/2012 6:10:36 AM (No. 8913579)
Never mentioned: UNIONS and their constant unreasonable demands.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
coldoc, 10/6/2012 6:24:11 AM (No. 8913588)
Those policies of the past gave us unprecedented growth and power, creating a productive and energetic society which was the envy of the world.. The policies of Obama-Biden-Chaves have given us food stamps and 4 dollar gasoline. Why is this even an issue?
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
provide, 10/6/2012 7:34:43 AM (No. 8913686)
Teachers' unions have been trying to behave like the coal miner's unions on the 20's. They need Pete Segar to lead the baseball bat parade.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
mrsbash, 10/6/2012 7:40:49 AM (No. 8913690)
I have two friends who have been unemployed for years, and a third who was unemployed for two years before finding a job.
The two who are registered Republican (one conservative, one moderate) blamed themselves. The one who is a Democrat blames big business.
I would not be surprised if the Post just naturally weeded out respondents who didn't blame business.
Oh, and which one is employed now? The moderate Republican.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
jansgraphix, 10/6/2012 7:53:55 AM (No. 8913703)
Well we all know that when Bush was President - it was Bush's fault. And when unemployment was at 4.5% - disaster was just around the corner ... for how many years?
The democrat media still singing the same old tune.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
bobdog, 10/6/2012 8:40:43 AM (No. 8913793)
That's not a complete quote. They cut it off.
He was actually referring to "...the failed policies of the past four years..."
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
javaboy, 10/6/2012 10:38:37 AM (No. 8914026)
fta: "Whatever their affiliation, many blame our democracy for not confronting the malfunctions of capitalism."
Guess which way this article leans?
As other posters have pointed out, while the article wants to pin the blame on "evil corporate" America for not making sure people have jobs, it never shows the other side where regulations, unions, taxes, and other factors squeeze the money out of businesses.
Maybe Liberals simply don't understand that private businesses can't operate the way that the govt does -- by spending money that isn't there. Business do not have a moral obligation to hire people. They are not required to pay for things (such as people) when they can't afford to do so -- and it would most likely cause a quick collapse (and maybe criminal charges) if they did.
I am not sure what world Liberals live in, but it isn't the real one.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
craige, 10/6/2012 10:43:18 AM (No. 8914039)
Most people are just plain ignorant, and do not understand business or economics.
Natural business cycles (boom and bust) are magnified by government intervention. This one is the result of Barney Frank and Christopher Dodd.
I understand why the Elite see the ignorant public as peasants.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Japanorama, 10/6/2012 3:21:15 PM (No. 8914544)
If you voted for Obama in 2008, look in the mirror for the culprit.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
NorthernDog, 10/6/2012 3:33:33 PM (No. 8914567)
They are running a commercial in our area where a young man who recently lost his job is blaming (drum roll) Romney! No logic required for the Left.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Pluperfect"
|
There’s no way Obama is telling the truth about when he learned of the IRS scandal
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jim Treacher
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/20/2013 11:17:14 AM
Post Reply
|
|
And yes, I realize that headline is eight words too long. Peter Nicholas at the WSJ: The White House’s chief lawyer learned weeks ago that an audit of the Internal Revenue Service likely would show that agency employees inappropriately targeted conservative groups, a senior White House official said Sunday. That disclosure has prompted a debate over whether the president should have been notified at that time. In the week of April 22, the Office of the White House Counsel and its head, Kathryn Ruemmler, were told by Treasury Department attorneys
|
Washington bureaucrats use force to suffocate liberty
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/20/2013 5:50:08 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Remember Armand Armendariz, the Environmental Protection Agency regional administrator who resigned after regaling an audience of Big Green activists with a history lesson to illustrate his agency´s approach to critics of the EPA´s harshest policies? When the Romans conquered a new province, he said, they would "... find the first five guys they saw and they´d crucify them ..." to make the province "really easy to manage for the next few years." The EPA, he continued, also makes "examples of people who are not complying with the law, you make examples out of them,
|
| |
|
|
Reactionaries in New York
|
|
Time, by Joe Klein
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/19/2013 8:27:40 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Democratic candidates for mayor in New York are campaigning to win the support of the teachers union. They threaten to return the city to the horrors of the David Dinkins era. Back at the turn of the 1990s, New York City was a mess. Crime was rampant. The schools were dreadful. Children in foster care were brutalized because–as the head of the Child Welfare Agency said–”oversight is racist.” The mayor was an incompetent. And, above all, the city was run for the benefit of its employees rather than its citizens. What followed was 20 years of governance
|
|
Immigration reform no sure bet
|
|
Politico, by Seung Min Kim & Jake Sherman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/19/2013 6:29:04 AM
Post Reply
|
|
After years of false starts, Washington finally appears to be on the path to rewriting the nation’s immigration laws. The Senate Gang of Eight bill is holding its own in committee and is expected to hit the Senate floor in June. And in the House this week, members of a bipartisan group agreed “in principle” on a big bill to be revealed in June. But in this case, looks are deceiving. There are still major hurdles before immigration reform can reach President Barack Obama’s desk. The biggest one is the GOP-controlled House. Right now, the Senate bill has no chance
|
At Cincinnati IRS office, surprise over claims of partisan villainy
|
|
Washington Post, by Lisa Rein & Dan Zak
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/19/2013 5:17:34 AM
Post Reply
|
|
CINCINNATI — The fog of scandal hangs over a boxy, modernist, 10-story building that looks like a monument to paperwork. Shrubs and chain smokers flank its front entrance here on Main Street, in the heart of downtown. Every day, 2,000 employees go to work at various federal agencies in this John F. Kennedy-era structure, whose chief tenant is the Internal Revenue Service — which is having just about the worst week an agency can have. Up on the fourth floor — with its gray linoleum, low ceilings and fluorescent lights, file carts heaped with manila envelopes, its keypad-coded doors labeled 4-022
|
The Smoking Gun Can Tell the AP What a Federal Leak Investigation Is Like
|
|
Atlantic, by Philip Bump
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/18/2013 5:22:57 AM
Post Reply
|
|
When, in 2006, the website The Smoking Gun released a secret CIA memo documenting prisoner organizing strategies at Guantanamo Bay, the FBI took notice. Now the site has posted details of the ensuing 44-month-long investigation, offering a timely glimpse into the black box of a Department of Justice leak prosecution. And The Smoking Gun got lucky. Over the course of the FBI´s hunt, code-named "Stubborn Ways," 43 different people were interviewed, in locations stretching from New Mexico to Boston to Saudi Arabia. After the investigation narrowed to one person who was then exonerated — a woman from Virginia
|
There Was No Surge in IRS Tax-Exempt Applications in 2010
|
|
Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/18/2013 5:03:01 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A number of people have sought to explain the IRS targeting of Tea Party, patriot, and 9/12 group applications -- as well as those from other conservative groups -- for "specialist team" treatment (mainly delays and excessive and inappropriate questions) in 2010 by pointing to the Citizens United decision that year allowing for unlimited, undisclosed fundraising by such groups. That´s the explanation IRS official Lois Lerner gave a week ago when she first revealed that the agency had improperly handled a slew of applications -- the political shorthand was a mistaken attempt to deal with a surge in applications.
|
| |
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Analyze this
|
|
Power Line, by Scott Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript
|
Obama: "As An African American You Have To Work Twice As Hard As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"
|
|
Real Clear Politics, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM
Post Reply
|
|
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
Candy Crowley: Is it Possible This Isn´t Political and IRS Didn´t Intend to Harass the Tea Party?
|
|
Newsbusters, by Noel Sheppard
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/19/2013 3:54:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
"Can you see in your mind´s eye a way that this might not have been political, that this was a misguided stupid way to sort, but that they didn´t intend it to be some kind of political attempt to harass the Tea Party?" So actually asked CNN´s Candy Crowley of her guest Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) concerning the Internal Revenue Service scandal Sunday (video follows with transcript and commentary):CANDY CROWLEY, HOST: Moving on to the IRS problem at this moment, which is really sort of in its infancy. There will be lots more hearings coming up this week
|
White House Aide calls Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´
|
|
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
| | |
|
|