|
|
| |
Topic: Romney hailed as conquering hero at conservative conference |
Romney hailed as conquering hero at conservative conference
Washington Times, by Valerie Richardson
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Photoonist, 10/5/2012 12:46:06 AM
|
| Denver - The nation’s movement conservatives have not always been Mitt Romney’s biggest fans, but activists were downright giddy when the former Massachusetts governor made a surprise drop-in here at the CPAC Colorado gathering the day after his powerful debate showing against President Obama on Wednesday night. Attendees at the Conservative Political Action Conference-Colorado were virtually unanimous in the opinion that Mr. Romney had not only triumphed in the first presidential debate, but won decisively, outdueling President Obama on everything from stage presence to command of the issues.
|
Comments: I'm sure that 0bama's handlers, who were very cautious with him this time, will try to program him to spout memorized attack lines. This time I believed he would have pro writers like from the Daily Show craft lines for him. Next time, he certainly is going to call around. But 0bama simply isn't that smart and the more complex stuff they try to feed him before the debate the more likely his choomed-over brain is going to create a disaster.
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
killerbee, 10/5/2012 12:50:49 AM (No. 8911007)
Very smart for Romney to drop in on CPAC.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
HisHandmaiden, 10/5/2012 1:08:23 AM (No. 8911017)
What a blessing to have five sons... Sounds like Governor Romney was a more-than-welcome surrogate for the fifth son.
Not to worry, OP, was not aware of any of Baraky's convictions [that he would not need to memorize, or share on national TV] ... What he will try to memorize is another story... [With same results in second and third debates...] Thankfully ...
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
wilarrbie, 10/5/2012 2:30:50 AM (No. 8911047)
Hate to be so skeptical and wary, but I don't trust Obama. Wouldn't put it past his cabal to have told him to throw this debate. He then studies Romneys style, and finds chinks in the armour. Next debate Obama comes back hard and appears to be 10 ft tall. His followers swoon all over, send money and good vibes so he can cake walk thru debate #3.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Spidey, 10/5/2012 2:46:41 AM (No. 8911057)
I really hate Frank Luntz's focus groups but it was on yesterday for a while so I caught some of it. One of the Romney's biggest hits with these people was that he would be bipartisan and work across the aisle,based on what he did n Mass.
With all the problems Obama has created,these dolts are only worried about bipartisanship.These are the most dangerous voters out there and there's millions of them that don't have a clue on issues but vote on buzzwords like bipartisanship.
As we all know bipartisanship means the left gets at least a partial victory.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
locarno, 10/5/2012 4:01:10 AM (No. 8911081)
#3 Its not entirely out of probability that this debate was an outlier on Obama's part. But Romney has participated in many, many debates these past few years, and they certainly would have studied his style and prepared as well as possible. Which turned out to be worthless with their empty-suit of a candidate.
#4 You have a good point about the dangers of taking bipartisanship to its extremes, a la John McCain. But as we're seeing from these past 4 years, a President cannot lead only the Democrats, or only the Republicans. He (or she) has to be the LEADER of all Americans. Obama has sold his soul, and is toxic and rightfully so, among 99% of Republicans. How can anyone lead if 50% of the people hate your guts and will oppose you at every turn? You get exactly whats happening in the country right now: bitter divide and weakness abounds. Look at Reagan: while he was hated by the left, of course, he didn't try to ram his agenda through Congress. He was measured, and for good or bad, called Tip O'Neill a friend. Maybe that can work again, if Romney is willing to try. Just my two-cents.
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Malia2012, 10/5/2012 8:25:49 AM (No. 8911376)
Great article! As for me, and mine, we will enjoy the result of Mitt Romney clobbering obama at the debate, and not about whether obama was "faking his ignorance" or laying in the bushes for the next debate to topple Mitt Romney! obama IS the empty suit in this Election, and the longer it goes on, even his kool-aid-drinking-msm-sycophantic-knee-pad-wearing-worshippers will figure that out. Or not.
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Photoonist"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Photoonist"
|
MA Senate: Elizabeth Warren Defeats Scott Brown
|
|
Townhall, by Daniel Doherty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:53:58 PM
Post Reply
|
|
We at Townhall have been covering this hotly contested Senate race for months and the results are finally in: With 36 percent of precincts reporting, Elizabeth Warren has been declared the next junior Senator from Massachusetts. Warren has never held public office before and the eye-popping $40 million she raised this election cycle evidently proved more than enough to unseat incumbent Senator Scott Brown. This was the most expensive Senate race of 2012 -- by a long shot.
|
Republicans lose ground in bid to take over Senate
|
|
NBC News, by M. ALex Johnson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:36:34 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Former Gov. Angus King, running as an independent, won the Senate contest Tuesday in Maine, NBC News projected, taking a seat that had been held by the Republicans. The loss further complicated the party's drive to take control of the Senate (Snip) Republican Ted Cruz defeated Democrat Paul Sadler to hold the open seat in Texas, succeeding retiring Republican Kay Bailey Hutchison, NBC News projected. See results Democrats held small edges in two of the other states critical to the balance of power in the Senate: In Massachusetts, where Elizabeth Warren, a law professor at Harvard University, was leading Republican
|
CNN Reports Romney Internal Polling Shows Obama Leading In Ohio
|
|
Mediaite, by Meenal Vamburkar
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:23:34 PM
Post Reply
|
|
CNN’s Peter Hamby reported that Mitt Romney‘s internal polling showed President Obama leading in Ohio by five percentage points.Per Hamby’s post: The number represented a sharp final bump for Obama in Ohio, a race that had essentially been a tied race through much of the previous week, according to the campaign’s daily tracking. The polling, which also showed a tight race in Pennsylvania, explains why Romney officials decided to send their candidate on last-minute Election Day visits to Cleveland and Pittsburgh.
|
Obama adviser: 'They'll be counting until 2 a.m.' in Florida
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:11:57 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Obama and Romney campaigns may be gearing up for a very late night, with one Obama campaign adviser predicting that in Florida alone, "they'll be counting until 2 a.m." The Obama adviser said signs suggest the race is quite tight, though the campaign claimed to be "holding strong" in key battlegrounds like Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. The adviser also said turnout among black voters in Virginia was better than expected, suggesting that could be a problem for Mitt Romney. Republican operatives in Virginia, though, predicted a razor-thin victory for their candidate in the state.
|
No surprises for Obama, Romney in early projections
|
|
CNN, by Tom Cohen
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:02:23 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Washington - Early returns on Tuesday in what is anticipated to be a dead even presidential election contained no surprises, as CNN projected President Barack Obama will win his home state of Illinois and eight other races while Republican challenger Mitt Romney will win nine states. All races called so far went as expected after the roller-coaster ride of an election campaign that was buffeted by a superstorm and missteps on both sides. Obama and Romney ran dead even in final polls that hinted at a result rivaling some of the closest presidential elections in history, reflecting the deep political
|
| |
|
Exit polls 2012: Hurricane Sandy not a factor
|
|
Politico, by Emily Schultheis
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 8:48:28 PM
Post Reply
|
|
A week after Hurricane Sandy slammed into the East Coast, a majority of voters said President Barack Obama’s response to the crisis wasn’t a factor in their vote, according to early exit polls. Fifty-five percent of those surveyed, per CBS News’ early exit polling released by radio station WKZO in Kalamazoo, Mich., said Obama’s handling of the storm was a minor factor in their vote or wasn’t a factor at all. Twenty-six percent named Sandy as an “important” factor, and 15 percent said it was the “most important” factor in their decision.
|
Exit polls 2012: Mitt Romney winning independents
|
|
Politico, by Emily Schultheis
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 8:47:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Mitt Romney is leading among independents in both Ohio and Virginia, early exit polls show. In Ohio, the former Massachusetts governor takes 56 percent of self-identified independents, compared with 40 percent for President Barack Obama. That’s a huge decrease for Obama from 2008, when the exit polls found him winning independents in Ohio by 12 points, 52 percent to 44 percent for John McCain. The numbers are similar but slightly tighter in Virginia: Romney takes 53 percent of independents there, according to ABC News exit polls, a 12-point lead over Obama. In 2008, Obama won independents in the state by
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Obama a new Nixon? Oh, get serious.
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.
|
| |
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
Higher-Ups Knew of IRS Case
|
|
Wall Street Journal, by John D. McKinnon*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/17/2013 10:23:18 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service´s watchdog told top Treasury officials around June 2012 he was investigating allegations the tax agency had targeted conservative groups, for the first time indicating that Obama administration officials were aware of the explosive matter in the midst of the president´s re-election campaign. The disclosure to the Treasury general counsel and the deputy secretary was a cursory one, according to J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. He said he didn´t reveal conclusions of the probe, which was in its early stages, and his disclosure came as part
|
Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi auditor Thomas Pickering
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.
|
| | |
|
|