|
|
| |
Topic: Sensitive documents left behind at American mission in Libya |
Sensitive documents left behind at American mission in Libya
Washington Post, by Michael Birnbaum
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Oblio, 10/3/2012 4:16:30 PM
|
| BENGHAZI, Libya — More than three weeks after attacks in this city killed the U.S. ambassador to Libya and three other Americans, sensitive documents remained only loosely secured in the remains of the U.S. mission here on Wednesday, offering visitors easy access to delicate details about American operations in Libya.Documents detailing weapons collection efforts, emergency evacuation protocols, the full internal itinerary of Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens’s trip and the personnel records of Libyans who were contracted to secure the mission were among the items scattered across the floors
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Teleologicus, 10/3/2012 4:28:47 PM (No. 8907327)
CNN and WaPo reporters seem to have no difficulty touring the ruined remains of the U.S. Embassy - but our State Department and other official agencies are afraid to venture near the place. It is too dangerous there for the FBI but not, it seems, for U.S. journalists, who are a more courageous lot than I thought. It is also to the great credit of CNN and the WaPo that they are informing Americans of their findings. It is the only way we will find out what happened. No rational adult would trust this administration or the State Department to tell the truth, regardless of how many internal investigations there are or how long they are dragged out.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
FenwayFrank, 10/3/2012 4:31:19 PM (No. 8907333)
CNN and WaPo made it to the compound and picked up documents. Did their cameras and press credentials scare off al-Qaeda? Is this what the FBI waiting for? A camera-crew escort?
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
earlybird, 10/3/2012 4:32:51 PM (No. 8907336)
The Independent's [UK] "exclusive", dateline September 14, 2012:
The killings of the US ambassador to Libya and three of his staff were likely to have been the result of a serious and continuing security breach, The Independent can reveal.
American officials believe the attack was planned, but Chris Stevens had been back in the country only a short while and the details of his visit to Benghazi, where he and his staff died, were meant to be confidential.
The US administration is now facing a crisis in Libya. Sensitive documents have gone missing from the consulate in Benghazi and the supposedly secret location of the "safe house" in the city, where the staff had retreated, came under sustained mortar attack. Other such refuges across the country are no longer deemed "safe".
Some of the missing papers from the consulate are said to list names of Libyans who are working with Americans, putting them potentially at risk from extremist groups, while some of the other documents are said to relate to oil contracts.
According to senior diplomatic sources, the US State Department had credible information 48 hours before mobs charged the consulate in Benghazi, and the embassy in Cairo, that American missions may be targeted, but no warnings were given for diplomats to go on high alert and "lockdown", under which movement is severely restricted.
The entire article is here:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/revealed-inside-story-of-us-envoys-assassination-8135797.html
Ambassador Stevens had just returned there from a visit to Germany, Austria and Sweden.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
earlybird, 10/3/2012 4:34:00 PM (No. 8907339)
PS. The Obit administration was denying this long after September 14.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Aria, 10/3/2012 4:34:24 PM (No. 8907342)
Maybe Valerie Jarrett can give up her guards so they can go to Libya and get our documents.
And on that subject - since when are we taxpayers supposed to provide multiple people to protect a slumlord who happened to worm her way in to the WH?
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Robinsolana, 10/3/2012 4:35:53 PM (No. 8907344)
Weeks later and Obama is still lying about this debacle.
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
JLoophole, 10/3/2012 4:38:29 PM (No. 8907351)
Hillary has promised a full and thorough investigation. It may take time, though. You know how it is. Pics to photoshop, docs to shred, inflammatory videos to film, guns to run to Mexico oops sorry, getting my treason situations all tangled up in the nest of vipers.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
oh-heck, 10/3/2012 4:46:26 PM (No. 8907368)
This reminds me of the story about parents who need to take a business trip and leave the kids at home under the care of the "responsible" oldest kid. The kids take the family BMW out for a party on the town and when they get home in the morning it badly damaged by a wreck and a small fire. They try to fix the situation by leaving it on the street in a bad part of town and hope it gets stolen. If they can just wait long enough, all the papers will be stolen and any remaining evidence destroyed by a fire.
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
steveW, 10/3/2012 4:47:59 PM (No. 8907372)
Smart power. Does this cover-up lead all the way to President Lady Parts?
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Philipsonh, 10/3/2012 4:51:20 PM (No. 8907375)
Obama left the MOST sensitive document behind the first day he took over as President, The U>S> Constitution. Unfortunately a butt kissing Congress has not taken him to task and the DOJ is in his hip pocket. There is nothing left to do but vote against him.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
krause, 10/3/2012 5:05:49 PM (No. 8907393)
The administration commands no respect or fear.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
cartcart, 10/3/2012 5:11:45 PM (No. 8907398)
This is the ultimate freedom of information act: Bomb the building and take whatever documents you want. Is this any way to run things? I know I am preaching to the choir, but come on!
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
mollyb0122, 10/3/2012 5:15:14 PM (No. 8907403)
All of this is part of the plan for taking over America. He tells us everyday who he is, but very few want to believe it.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
BoeufRiver, 10/3/2012 5:18:58 PM (No. 8907407)
Can't help but think that this was just a way for oFraud and Hilary to pass classified secrets to whomever without them eventually being exposed as traitors. And to them, sacrificing 4 Americans just would serve to make it look more realistic; and certainly wouldn't cause them any care, concern, or regret. Unless of course, it blows up in their faces.
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
LittleHoodedMonk, 10/3/2012 5:22:47 PM (No. 8907413)
The more that 0bama lies & his administration obfuscates as to what really happened, I begin to believe that sadly, Ambassador Stevens was set up to be murdered by Al Qaeda, but with the assistance of our State Department [Hillary Clinton] at the very least. Why?
First, if 0bama is too afraid to move a bunch of Marines in immediately to take back & salvage our Embassy, which is suppose to be sovereign territory, and its classified documents left behind, then he must be working somehow with the EVIL Muslim presence in the world that looks to destroy US & Israel. When we sent the Marines to kill Osama, they had to take the time to destroy the classified helicopter that was left behind. It makes no sense that the State Department does not see the urgency to do the same with whatever is strewn about the compound in Benghazi.
This is not an FBI matter, but rather an act of war that needs US to go back and bloody the animals' noses who killed our unarmed people. With the threat of an attack on Iran by Israel at any time, I wonder how much info from intel left there could hurt this mission.
I fear first for Israel & then US in the days ahead. Especially since our conservative talking heads continue to waste our time and attention on the useless discussion of racism, which 0bama throws at the GOP machine as ''red meat'' to distract from our real dangers, the Muslim terrorist organizations hell bent on our destruction. And, if the Muslim Brotherhood government in Egypt does get our $500M ''front'' money to support them, the ''Four Horseman of the Apocalypse'' may finally be let loose beginning in the Middle East.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
Calvinesq, 10/3/2012 5:30:22 PM (No. 8907421)
Oh great, just like any other crime scene, eh??
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Griz70, 10/3/2012 5:31:56 PM (No. 8907425)
Don't forget, PIAPS, in her finest southern drawl, has promised not to rest until she gets to the bottom of this.....waiting....crickets...
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
earlybird, 10/3/2012 5:43:35 PM (No. 8907438)
The intrepid WaPo reporter is a little tardy with his outrage. Per the Independent [UK] exclusive quoted at #3, the really sensitive classified documents were taken at or shortly after the time of the attack on the consulate.
Where was the WaPo's outrage while Nero was fiddling with blaming the video?
Once again, The Independent knew on 9/14 that the State Department had received at least 48 hours notice about both Cairo and Benghazi and had done absolutely nothing. Not even warned Ambassador Stevens and the senior staffs of both embassies. Also to be noted is that the ambassador to Egypt was on a four-day trip to Washington DC at the time of the attack on her embassy.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Japanorama, 10/3/2012 5:48:33 PM (No. 8907451)
Why paper? Why not encrypted files that are deleted when tampering occurs. Also fill the hard disk with other encrypted files full of junk. Make 'em work for it. Our embassies resemble our post offices.
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
qmcgs, 10/3/2012 6:44:41 PM (No. 8907560)
Either someone wanted Stevens dead (Vince Foster, Ron Brown, et al) or doesn't want the truth about the incident to become public (TWA Flight 800). No one wants to go look because no one wants to find something that needs to be explained.
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Reilly, 10/3/2012 6:50:28 PM (No. 8907575)
Wouldn't it be nice if old crackpot Daffy Gaddafii was still in power? He's not? How come?
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
srhcb, 10/3/2012 7:16:44 PM (No. 8907633)
Destruction of documents is one of the primary duties of the Marines posted to our embassies.
Oh. Never mind.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Attercliffe, 10/3/2012 7:35:35 PM (No. 8907669)
#20, you mirror my thoughts.
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
smoolie, 10/3/2012 7:44:43 PM (No. 8907688)
The FBI does not have a mandate outside of the US so they must get permission from the Administration to do so. They must get visa's courtesy the State Department. They must get permission from the host country to operate within that country's borders. If any of these things have not happened then they cannot go. I doubt if it is the FBI's fault that they are not there yet.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
Heraclitus, 10/3/2012 8:11:48 PM (No. 8907741)
Here's the real concern of WaPo, in the third paragraph, This complicates the Obama administration efforts "to respond to what has rapidly become a major foreign policy issue." ISSUE?
Four men brutally murdered, the consolate unguarded, "sensitive materials" gone missing? just an "issue"?
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Oblio"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Oblio"
|
|
The Secrets of Princeton
|
|
New York Times, by Ross Douthat
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 8:08:09 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Susan Patton, the Princeton alumna who became famous for her letter urging Ivy League women to use their college years to find a mate, has been denounced as a traitor to feminism, to coeducation, to the university ideal. But really she’s something much more interesting: a traitor to her class. Her betrayal consists of being gauche enough to acknowledge publicly a truth that everyone who’s come up through Ivy League culture knows intuitively —
|
Piercing the secrecy of offshore tax havens
|
|
Washington Post, by Scott Higham, Michael Hudson*
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/7/2013 7:06:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A New York hedge fund manager allegedly swindles $12 million from a prominent Baltimore family. An Indiana couple is accused of bilking hundreds of customers by charging for free trials of cosmetic products. A financial manager in Texas promises 23-percent returns but absconds with $33.5 million of his investors’ money in a classic Ponzi scheme.All three cases have one thing in common: money that ended up in offshore accounts and trusts set up in tax havens around the world.
|
Former News Corp President Chernin bids $500 million for Hulu
|
|
Reuters, by Ronald Grover and Jennifer Saba
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 8:49:03 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Former News Corp president Peter Chernin has bid around $500 million for Hulu, the online video streaming service he helped create in 2007, according to two sources with knowledge of Hulu´s sale process. The website, jointly controlled by News Corp and Walt Disney Co, reached out to potential buyers in March after initially contemplating a deal in which one would buy out the other. It is not clear whether that transaction is still being contemplated.
|
After Pentagon investigations, three Army generals censured for misconduct
|
|
Washington Post, by Craig Whitlock
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 8:08:11 AM
Post Reply
|
|
After lengthy investigations, the Pentagon has determined that three Army generals committed misconduct in separate incidents, adding to an unusually long list of senior military commanders who have been censured over the past year.On Friday, defense officials confirmed that Army Maj. Gen. Ralph O. Baker, the commander of a strategic counterterrorism force on the Horn of Africa, was fired March 28 on charges of sexual misconduct. Two officials familiar with the case said Baker was investigated for allegedly groping a female civilian employee after he had been drinking.
|
Diplomacy downplay: Obama administration minimizes latest North Korean nuke threat
|
|
Washington Times, by Guy Taylor and Shaun Waterman
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 7:02:06 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Obama administration appeared eager Thursday to downplay the North Korean military’s latest threat that it has the final authority to carry out “cutting-edge, smaller, lighter and diversified” nuclear strikes on the United States.“This is just the latest in a long line of aggressive statements,” (Snip)the recent tension between Washington and Pyongyang “does not need to get hotter.”The remarks were the first public reaction from the Obama administration since Wednesday’s claim by the North Korean military that the “moment of explosion is approaching fast” with the possibility of war breaking out “today or tomorrow.”
|
Why Obama´s ´Best-Looking Attorney General´ Comment Was a Gaffe
|
|
The Atlantic, by Garance Franke-Ruta
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 4/6/2013 6:51:15 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama´s biggest gaffe yesterday when speaking of California Attorney General Kamala Harris was not in flirtatiously complimenting her as "the best-looking attorney general," but in introducing an observation from the system of beauty into a forum that was about the system of power.What´s that, you say? Irin Carmon does a great job in Salon in laying out the bounds of propriety for when it´s appropriate to talk about a woman´s looks as a general matter. But I´ve long felt we lack a solid theoretical underpinning for easily discussing these issues, and why precisely it is that
|
|
Charles Murray´s Gay-Marriage Surprise
|
|
New Yorker, by Jane Mayer
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Oblio- 3/17/2013 5:00:38 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Political scientist Charles Murray has never backed away from controversy, but usually his opponents have been liberals. Friday, however, he managed to upset conservatives at the annual conference known as CPAC, where thousands of bewildered Republicans gathered to figure out the way forward after their party’s 2012 electoral defeat. Murray ditched his prepared remarks on “America Coming Apart” in favor of an impromptu admonition to fellow conservatives to accept the legalization of both gay marriage and abortion.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Edward Snowden Is In The Process Of Destroying Any Support And Sympathy He Has Built Up
|
|
Business Insider, by Brett LoGiurato
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 6/18/2013 5:34:23 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Amid a steady rise of backlash, Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old former National Security Agency contractor who was the source of a spring of leaks about the agency´s surveillance methods, conducted a live chat on The Guardian´s website Monday morning. Judging from some of the pointed questions he´s been asked and the reaction to newly leaked revelations over the past few days, it´s clear that much of the sympathy and support Snowden had built up for his early exposures is eroding. Many Americans supported his decision to leak information about a pair of National Security Agency surveillance programs, which, he detailed, gathered information
|
Barbara Walters Defends Maher Calling Trig Palin Retarded: ‘I Don´t Think He Intended it to be Mean-Spirited’
|
|
Newsbusters, by John Nolte
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 6/17/2013 5:19:02 PM
Post Reply
|
|
As NewsBusters reported last week, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin called out vulgarian comedian Bill Maher for referring to her Down Syndrome son Trig as "retarded." On ABC´s The View Monday, co-host Barbara Walters astonishingly defended Maher saying, "I don´t think he intended it to be mean-spirited" (video follows with transcript and commentary): WHOOPI GOLDBERG: At a recent standup show in Las Vegas, comedian Bill Maher apparently called Sarah Palin’s five-year-old developmentally-challenged son Trig retarded. And Sarah blasted him on Twitter as a bully. Is that, is it, is he a bully? Is he a bad, what is he?
|
Who is he? Obama keeps allies, enemies guessing in second term
|
|
The Hill, by Justin Sink
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: ketchuplover- 6/17/2013 6:31:12 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Five months into his second term, allies and enemies are as confounded as ever about who President Obama really is. Is he the dyed-in-the-wool liberal that his biggest supporters and critics suggest? Or is he a pragmatic, even cynical, politician who cares more for his popularity than taking risks for his ideological goals or living up to his rhetoric? Even in the short period since his reelection, Obama has provided evidence to support conflicting interpretations. His efforts to pass immigration reform, the unsuccessful push for stricter gun controls and tax hikes on high earners buttress the case for Obama-as-ideologue.
|
Jeb Bush labels conservative critics ‘the chirpers’
|
|
Washington Post, by Aaron Blake
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 6/17/2013 1:22:30 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Jeb Bush says he’s not worried that his work toward comprehensive immigration reform and his ties to the GOP establishment will alienate conservatives and negatively impact a potential 2016 presidential campaign, referring to critics as “the chirpers.” “If I decide to run for office again, it will be based on what I believe, and it will be based on my record,” the former Florida governor said in an interview with the Christian Broadcasting Network’s David Brody. “And that record was one of solving problems completely from a conservative prospective.” Bush (R) pointed to his conservative
|
Rubio Aide: ‘There Are American Workers Who, For Lack of a Better Term, Can’t Cut It’
|
|
National Review Online, by Rich Lowry
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: trapper- 6/16/2013 11:18:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Politico’s Playbook has an excerpt from a new Ryan Lizza piece from the New Yorker that is not yet online. It contains a passage on the back-and-forth between labor and the Chamber that has a quote from a Rubio staffer that is going to raise eyebrows, to say the least: “There are American workers who, for lack of a better term, can’t cut it. There shouldn’t be a presumption that every American worker is a star performer. There are people who just can’t get it, can’t do it, don’t want to do it. And so you can’t obviously discuss that publicly.” Here is the entire context:
|
Iran to send 4,000 troops to support President Assad in Syria as British Armed Forces play war games on border
|
|
Daily Mail [UK], by Suzannah Hills
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Attercliffe- 6/16/2013 11:08:12 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Iran is preparing to send 4,000 troops in to Syria to support Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in the wake of America´s announcement it will be providing ´military aid´ to the country´s Muslim rebels. President Barack Obama made the pledge earlier this week after the U.S. claimed it found ´conclusive evidence´ Assad´s regime has used chemical weapons against the rebel forces--which includes the most extreme Sunni Islamists--and has called for Britain and France to back the move. While Britain hasn´t made a guarantee either way as yet, more than 350 Royal Marines are being sent to Jordan
|
Marco Rubio doesn´t know if ´he´s getting played´ by Democrats
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Fiesta del sol- 6/17/2013 6:42:44 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Is Marco Rubio, R-Fla., getting played by Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.? During his interview with ABC’s Jonathan Karl this morning, Rubio didn’t even seem to understand what that meant. “Are you being played by the Democrats?” asked Karl. “Is Chuck Schumer playing you?” “I don’t — I quite frankly, I don’t even know what that means,” Rubio replied. “Is he using you?” Karl continued. “Is he using you to try to accomplish something that the Democrats want and is not — not a conservative bill?” Rubio responded that immigration reform was a bi-partisan issue that “all Americans
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|