A Message From Lucianne  



Now More Than Ever
Get Your Eagles Up!
Lucianne Tees - in
Black or White
Click to Buy


































        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute
Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password


  Topic: Romney will keep
Obama's immigration policy
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Romney will keep
Obama's immigration policy

CBS News, by Leigh Ann Caldwell

Original Article

Posted By:ClangClang, 10/3/2012 12:09:16 AM

Mitt Romney softened his stance on one of President Obama's immigration directives allowing certain undocumented immigrant youth to stay in the U.S. legally. In an interview with The Denver Post Monday, Romney said he would not reverse an executive order issued by President Obama that would allow children of illegal immigrants to obtain a visa, permitting them to live and work in the U.S. legally for two years, if they meet certain criteria. "The people who have received the special visa that the president has put in place, which is a two-year visa, should expect that the visa

Comments:
Romney just lost my vote for good. And most likely hundreds of thousands of others who consider out-of-control immigration to be the defining issue of our age.

At this stage of a campaign, at the very least a candidate should know who his supporters are. The cheap labor lobby may donate lots of cash, but they don't post lots of votes. Romney doesn't seem to have a clue who his voting base is.

I wish the open borders radicals luck with four more years of Obama. They'll need it.

  

Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: Bubbasuncle, 10/3/2012 12:19:19 AM     (No. 8905877)

Sorry that something from CBS could sway you so easily OP, a real Romney supporter would at least wait for a credible explanation.


Reply 2 - Posted by: 4Justice, 10/3/2012 12:21:03 AM     (No. 8905879)

I guess OP would much rather have another 4 years (which could turn into a lifetime position) of dictator Obama instead. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.


   

 

  


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: Safari Man, 10/3/2012 12:21:45 AM     (No. 8905880)

This is exactly why Obama did this move... to try to paint Romney into a no-win corner. Seems like OP doesn't appreciate the bind this has put Romney in. I don't like it either, but letting Obama win is not a great way to stop the madness.


Reply 4 - Posted by: Lucyloo, 10/3/2012 12:24:15 AM     (No. 8905883)

I'd say someone's clangers are defective. I wouldn't jump the gun on this considering the source. Plus at this point anyone claiming to be conservative and not voting for Romney is akin to a traitor, in my view.


Reply 5 - Posted by: trapper, 10/3/2012 12:29:32 AM     (No. 8905891)

So some kids get to keep their visas for a couple years. So what? This is small potatoes in the whole immigration mess. Sure, it was pure political pandering by Obama, and probably illegal to boot. And I was angry when he did it. But Romney's right. Just fix the whole thing and take care of this in the process. Get to it when we get to it. Solve the big problems rather than run around playing whack-a-mole with details.


Reply 6 - Posted by: horacer, 10/3/2012 12:36:19 AM     (No. 8905896)

It's less of a logistical headache to let them play out. He's not renewing them. OP if not for this you'd find some other reason to not vote for Romney. I've known your type since I was a kid.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Cleanhousein2012, 10/3/2012 12:38:21 AM     (No. 8905900)

Actually, Romney should have only one executive order during his presidency should he manage to win... And at is an EO that blanket overturns all of zippy's EOs.

Nothing more or less. And yes, I am unwilling to compromise.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: ClangClang, 10/3/2012 12:58:14 AM     (No. 8905917)

The faster Obama destroys the country the better. A stacked Supreme court, completely open borders, healthcare nationalization, confiscatory taxation and institutionalized affirmative action where your children will be shut out of any real chance of a prosperous future.

I say if the GOP doesn't understand who its constituents are, then let the radicals who control the party have at it and when the smoke clears, we will, at the very least, never go down this path again.

I'm not going to contribute to the slow death of a Republic that my ancestors died fighting for. After 19 illegal aliens murdered thousands of our people, you would thing we'd wake up. And after the installation of a police state because of Muslim immigration, you'd think we'd wake up. And after an economic meltdown largely brought on by affirmative action lending to immigrants and their children, you'd think we'd wake up.

So I say, no one can sleep for that long, so it must be you really want Obama. Well now you've got him.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Safari Man, 10/3/2012 1:05:35 AM     (No. 8905921)

#8 I doubt it will collapse very fast under any conditions. The libs are boiling this frog slowly. The USSR took 70 years to finally collapse.

Personally, I am going to hold out hope for Romney and then possibly Ryan after that. If Obama wins, my life is too short to fight it any more. I have been saving/preparing for the possible disappointment and I will start to look for other countries to live in. The trajectory we're on is not a good one.


Reply 10 - Posted by: ZurichMike, 10/3/2012 1:07:15 AM     (No. 8905923)

Yes, let's stick to perfection as being the bar for your vote -- you'll end up like the GOP in California, watching from the sidelines as things come crashing down and Democrats are reelected over and over again.

Jesus Christ is not running for President, and I think it's safe to say a Romney presidency would be much, much better for the country than an Obama presidency.

Rome wasn't built, destroyed, or rebuilt in a day (or a term).

Not voting for Romney = another vote for Obama. Think about that.


Reply 11 - Posted by: danu, 10/3/2012 1:13:39 AM     (No. 8905925)

With all due respect CC, I want immigration enforcement as well, but this [reported] MR position is not in accord w/ his other statements on the subject.

Therefore, I'm inclined to wait and review the whole on this topic.

There is also a difference, imho, between a President who must be guided and kept honest by the will of the People, and a [self-styled] substance-abusing... kleptocrat ...who listens to no one and respects no law.


Reply 12 - Posted by: geoman, 10/3/2012 1:14:38 AM     (No. 8905927)

I cut the OP some slack. Someone being fed up with the entire political process is understandable. I'm voting for Romney while not being a "true Romney supporter" either. I'm a Conservative and Romney is more conservative than Obama. By his campaign conduct alone, including quotes that appear in the article, Romney appears to be slightly to the left of GW, whom I like but never considered even being close to Reagan's conservative ideological bent. Still, I hope he wins and has a largely conservative congress that can spend its time undoing Obama era legislation rather than layering on new.


   

 



 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Charactercounts, 10/3/2012 1:35:00 AM     (No. 8905937)

You don't know what you're wishing for OP. Yes, illegal immigration is a major threat, but we've got a whole row of threats lined up to deal with.

It's nice to claim ideological perfection, but not voting for Romney will certainly help Obama. So do you want to risk your country's fiscal collapse, while you complain about something a MSM purveyor is pushing and we don't even know to be true?

A fiscal collapse won't be pretty. I hope you've got your wheelbarrow ready to carry your money around in, and have ample supplies, and a way to protect them when the hordes come after them.

Unless you're really on Obama's side, and trying to demoralize the rest of us.


Reply 14 - Posted by: PChristopher, 10/3/2012 1:35:30 AM     (No. 8905938)

When I saw it was from CBS, I figured it was pure disinformation but it will bear watching just in case.


Reply 15 - Posted by: King of all trolls, 10/3/2012 1:46:31 AM     (No. 8905941)

Nice headline, SeeBS. What do we expect from the "fake but accurate" news network?


Reply 16 - Posted by: Attercliffe, 10/3/2012 1:46:53 AM     (No. 8905942)

As a legal immigrant and now an American citizen I am appalled by any slackness on illegal immigration. However, there is no way I would vote against Romney in this election, nor would I sit at home, not voting for either candidate.

I'm a little suspicious of a new poster who tries to discourage Ldotters from voting for the conservative candidate.

It's not going to work.


Reply 17 - Posted by: ClangClang, 10/3/2012 2:06:57 AM     (No. 8905949)

I've been posting here since '98. Brought here by lying POS Clinton and the destruction he wrought, including open borders and the national climate we now call political correctness.

F purity. There's no such thing. There is always a mix of good and bad policy. But willful intent to destroy a people, we the people that built this country, that is an entirely different matter. Destruction, chaos and poverty. That's precisely what the open borders radicals of the GOP have brought to our country and I say F-em.

No one in the GOP leadership wants to acknowledge what these scam artists have done. Fair enough, the GOP has been co-opted and it's their ball-game now.

But I say I will not contribute to this madness and have had enough.

Four more years should be just enough to get the party started.


   

 

  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: KimoSaavy, 10/3/2012 2:10:29 AM     (No. 8905950)

Don' sweat this. Wrong battle at this time. If I were Mitt, I would say more and more and more and more to get the latino vote. I am not suggesting lying, but once in office, he can work on real immigration reform. And the idea we are going to round up 25 million plus people and deport them is stupid. They need to be made US citizens for the right party. Latinos are conservative by nature like African Americans used to be in some respect. See how the dems are courting latino votes with lies and abandoning blacks. The other side is playing super dirty. No time for macainisms. Support Mitt. I think he is smarter than he looks.


Reply 19 - Posted by: Kurto, 10/3/2012 2:31:43 AM     (No. 8905959)

People, this is about two-year visas, not amnesty. Please keep your pants on!


Reply 20 - Posted by: frenesi1, 10/3/2012 6:11:56 AM     (No. 8906024)

Well, he will keep it until someone points out he must follow the law.


Reply 21 - Posted by: JimS, 10/3/2012 6:36:49 AM     (No. 8906049)

Grrrrr. Calm down, people.
And if you can't calm down, then just shut up.
Just because you get all cranked up that CBS News (a true paragon of truthful reporting!) would say that this is Romney's position, why would you believe it unless you saw Romney say it himself and in the proper context?
Why would you immediately conclude "Romney lost my vote for good" and encourage other people to do the same? That is totally irresponsible.
Clearly See-BS is living up to their name, and you are falling for it.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Rakasha, 10/3/2012 6:46:04 AM     (No. 8906068)

Slightly off topic but, re 'I doubt it will collapse very fast... The USSR took 70 years to finally collapse.'

We started wading into this pool nearly 80 years ago with the Social Security Act (1935). If you count the toe-dipping in the early 1900's, I'd say we're about to go under.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: absalom, 10/3/2012 1:35:21 PM     (No. 8906965)

Romney could have deflected this question w/a 'we'll see' answer but chose to give an answer that angered his core base. Amazing how this aw shucks doofus instinctively grasps defeat from the jaws of victory. Of course his hear no evil waterboys are just jake w/responses like this. Principled conservatives warned in vain about this guy from day one, as a loser w/o any core, who would surround himself w/like minded wool heads from the calcified DC progressive R establishment; but we were told to buzz off as he was a shoo in. Really? So be it.



Post Reply   Close thread 704693




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "ClangClang"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "ClangClang"



Romney will keep
Obama's immigration policy
CBS News, by Leigh Ann Caldwell    Original Article
Posted By: ClangClang- 10/3/2012 12:09:16 AM     Post Reply
Mitt Romney softened his stance on one of President Obama's immigration directives allowing certain undocumented immigrant youth to stay in the U.S. legally. In an interview with The Denver Post Monday, Romney said he would not reverse an executive order issued by President Obama that would allow children of illegal immigrants to obtain a visa, permitting them to live and work in the U.S. legally for two years, if they meet certain criteria. "The people who have received the special visa that the president has put in place, which is a two-year visa, should expect that the visa



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Analyze this
76 replie(s)
Power Line, by Scott Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: MissMolly- 5/19/2013 11:33:33 AM     Post Reply
What did President Obama do on the evening of 9/11/12 when our men were under attack in Benghazi? The invaluable Andrew McCarthy reminds us that Obama and Secretary Clinton had a 10:00 p.m. phone call of which many (including, I think, Chris Wallace) have lost sight. This morning when Wallace asked Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer what Obama was up to that evening, Pfeiffer declared the line of inquiry “offensive.” Translation: Obama and his minions would prefer to “move on” and are warning the likes of FNC off:(Snip for video)The Weekly Standard’s Daniel Halper has posted the rush transcript

Evidence emerges that Obama
administration official knew of
IRS targeting during 2012 campaign

57 replie(s)
CBS News, by Margaret Brennan    Original Article
Posted By: earlybird- 5/18/2013 9:01:39 PM     Post Reply
WASHINGTON - There were new questions Saturday night concerning if anyone in the White House was aware of the IRS´ targeting of conservative groups. Inspector General Russell George said he informed a deputy at the Treasury Department in June of 2012 about the probe into the IRS. The Treasury Department confirmed the timeline but said they did not know the details of the investigation until last week.(Snip)Marcus Owens ran the tax-exempt division at the IRS for 10 years. He said it isn´t difficult to figure out who´s doing what at the agency.

Obama: "As An African American
You Have To Work Twice As Hard
As Anyone Else If You Want To Get By"

49 replie(s)
Real Clear Politics, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 5/19/2013 6:55:47 PM     Post Reply
PRESIDENT OBAMA: You are the mantle of Frederick Douglass and Booker T. Washington and Ralph Bunche and Langston Hughes and George Washington Carver and Ralph Abernathy and Thurgood Marshall and, yes, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. These men were many things to many people and they knew full well the role that racism played in their life. But when it came to their own accomplishments and sense of purpose, they had no time for excuses. Every one of you has a grandma or an uncle or a parent whose told you at some point in life

Camelot Is Burning
47 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Big Government, by Christopher Burton    Original Article
Posted By: mitzi- 5/18/2013 8:16:11 PM     Post Reply
It began in earnest last Friday. A flash mob of latte drinking, tofu eating media that has done its best to quell, rather than fan the flames of truth, turned on one of their own. Jay Carney lay bludgeoned at the base of the podium, a victim of friendly fire. Ironically, the attack was reminiscent of the one in Benghazi he has repeatedly denied the Administration he represents bears any responsibility for. “Changed twelve times?!” came the cries. And with good reason. We were misled; no, lied to.

Watergate 2.0 -- why the
IRS scandal is far worse

46 replie(s)
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM     Post Reply
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,

Lew asks Congress for debt increase,
says it’s ´not open to debate´

46 replie(s)
The Hill, by Peter Schoeder    Original Article
Posted By: DW626- 5/18/2013 6:12:33 PM     Post Reply
Treasury Secretary Jack Lew on Friday urged congressional leaders to raise the debt limit and insisted that the White House is not going to negotiate over the increase because lawmakers have "no choice." "We will not negotiate over the debt limit," Lew wrote. "The creditworthiness of the United States is non-negotiable. The question of whether the country must pay obligations it has already incurred is not open to debate." Lew said that while President Obama is willing to discuss plans to reduce the nation´s deficit with Congress, those talks must be kept separate from any effort to raise the nation´s debt cap.

McCaskill Calls For Firing Of All
Involved In IRS Targeting Scandal

43 replie(s)
KMOX [St, Louis], by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: BuckeyeRon- 5/18/2013 2:46:31 PM     Post Reply
Washington – Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-MO, issued a video statement Friday in response to reports that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative nonprofit groups. (Snip) “There’s a reason Lady Justice wears a blindfold in America. That is because in America, we don’t apply the law based on who you are, who you know, or what you believe. We apply the law equally.” “We should not only fire the head of the IRS, which has occurred, but we’ve got to go down the line and find every single person who had anything to do with this and make sure


Post Reply   Close thread 704693





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password


© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~