|
|
| |
Topic: Busy schedule forces President Obama to cancel mock debates with John Kerry, stand-in for Mitt Romney |
Busy schedule forces President Obama to cancel mock debates with John Kerry, stand-in for Mitt Romney
Boston Globe (MA), by Bryan Bender and Matt Viser
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:Scottyboy, 9/27/2012 8:05:35 PM
|
| WASHINGTON -- President Obama has been forced to cancel several debate practice sessions with Senator John F. Kerry, whom he tapped to play stand-in for Republican challenger Mitt Romney, leaving little time for them to spar ahead of next week’s first presidential debate. The Massachusetts senator has held at least one mock debate with Obama to help him prepare for the first matchup against the former Massachusetts governor to be held Oct. 3 in Denver, but several others were cancelled due to the the president’s busy schedule, said deputy Obama campaign manager Stephanie Cutter.
|
Comments: Skipping intelligence briefings, failing to meet with world leaders, blowing off our closest allies, spamming his supporters with desperate pleas for cash, sending out his rotund unkempt Sect. of State - Madam Hillary - to meet with other heads of state and now canceling debate prep. with Viet Nam war hero Lieut. Flapjack Kerry. Not to mention the gigantic lie they were just caught in re: the 9/11 terror attack.....
Whose campaign is in trouble??
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Cardsfan, 9/27/2012 8:07:48 PM (No. 8894808)
Just another way to set low expectations for the debates - too busy saving the country, the world, the ratings of the View, whatever.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
sgtfox of the jarhead clan, 9/27/2012 8:11:22 PM (No. 8894812)
The president doesn't do well without his teleprompter and back stage helpers frantically feeding him the answers to questions. Expect to see a tiny wire from his ear to the little receiver in his back pocket. The giveaway will be pauses after he is asked to explain something. He has to wait for the answers to feed into the hidden ear bud.
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
Wetlandz, 9/27/2012 8:13:26 PM (No. 8894813)
Don't be fooled he's preparing feverishly and secretively
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
killerbee, 9/27/2012 8:15:00 PM (No. 8894818)
#3: he's also providing the questions for the moderators. Romney's going to be playing against a stacked deck. It won't even matter that it will be obvious, they're desperate and they'll do it just to help their anointed one over the finish line.
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
cartcart, 9/27/2012 8:18:01 PM (No. 8894822)
He will also cancel the debate!
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
quigley, 9/27/2012 8:29:25 PM (No. 8894848)
I remember in the 2004 debates Kerry said "If I had been president, I would have gotten our allies to fight the Iraq war for us", or some such BS.
Bush was floored. How does a real human being respond to such absolute BS?
Get ready, Romney, to say something like "anybody can SAY anything, but your record says you couldn't do it."
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
wendybird, 9/27/2012 8:31:37 PM (No. 8894853)
Senator Kerry planned to quiz the President on the proper wind surfing attire.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
DanvilleBill, 9/27/2012 8:31:45 PM (No. 8894854)
Didn't I just read this same humorous article on The Onion?
Too busy governing...?
Yeah, I'm sure the Globe just copied the Onion article.
Great satire!!
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
Bazi, 9/27/2012 8:33:57 PM (No. 8894857)
#4 Exactly.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
SoCalGal, 9/27/2012 8:36:11 PM (No. 8894861)
Just setting low expectations. Once again he is transparent when it comes to this kind of stuff.
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
CJohnson, 9/27/2012 8:42:04 PM (No. 8894871)
Just another clue as to who wrote the questions Obama will be asked. I hope Romney tests a beta-blocker (a great aid for appearing Cool and coherent).\ That is what I believe Obama has been doping with and why he acts so unhinged when not at scheduled events.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Holeymoses, 9/27/2012 9:02:34 PM (No. 8894905)
He's probably been fighting with Moochelle long enough to get the hang of it.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Rabidrabbit1, 9/27/2012 9:02:45 PM (No. 8894906)
Zero is the most eloquent speaker since Lucifer, himself. So, he shouldn't have no trouble at all mopping the floor with Romney. /sarcasm off
I can hardly wait.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
Fiesta del sol, 9/27/2012 9:04:00 PM (No. 8894908)
Yeah sure. I don't believe a word of it. On the other hand, how hard will HIS questions be? They're written and asked by the Kneepad Media.
Sample Question: President Obama, how does it make you feel when Chris Matthews says Romney is a racist?
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
john56, 9/27/2012 9:25:20 PM (No. 8894928)
Between Obama's campaigning, fund raisers with Beyonce and the rest of Hollywood stars, and golf outings and Jon Cary's (who, by the way, served in Vietnam) windsurfing trips, driving down to Rhode Island for a yacht trip (saves those pesky taxes that the little people pay)and helping lovey soak the raisins in rum, I can see where it would be tough for the two of them to find dates both were open to have mock debates.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
HicksvilleKid59, 9/27/2012 9:25:34 PM (No. 8894929)
Bravo Sierra
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
snapper451, 9/27/2012 9:26:27 PM (No. 8894930)
It's not my fault I lost the debate! I can hear it now.
|
| |
|
Reply 18 - Posted by:
mythman, 9/27/2012 9:32:06 PM (No. 8894937)
This cancellation of the rehearsal is the run-up to the cancellation of the actual debate(s) because of some sudden national emergency.
|
Reply 19 - Posted by:
JoniTx, 9/27/2012 9:33:47 PM (No. 8894941)
~~But the Obama team appeared Thursday to go out its way to lower expectations for the trio of one-on-one debates that the president will hold with Romney next month.~~
It's what they do.....excuses, excuses....he didn't have time to prepare...GACK!
|
Reply 20 - Posted by:
Shimp, 9/27/2012 9:39:10 PM (No. 8894947)
More sample questions from the MSM moderators:
"Mr. Romney, how do you define quantum mechanics in two words?"
Mr.PRESIDENT, what is Michelle growing in her garden right now?"
"Mr. Romney, why is your foreign policy despised by all Americans?"
"Mr President, why has your economic plan and saving millions of American jobs been so successful?"
Just a small preview of what to expect...........
|
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Illinois Mom, 9/27/2012 9:52:27 PM (No. 8894959)
When a person has a "razor sharp" mind and speaks spontaneously with such (Um, duh, um) eloquence...one does not need any practice.
I hope they're checked for earbuds. I'm not concerned about Romney, can't wait for the Ryan /Biden debate...but Barak he's not one to play on a level field.
He'll find a way (other than those softball questions)to cheat.
|
Reply 22 - Posted by:
Charactercounts, 9/27/2012 9:59:08 PM (No. 8894973)
I'm not as worried about earbuds, #21, as I am about Obama's team getting questions planted. With the MSM so firmly in his corner, I don't think it would be all that difficult to "suggest" a type of question that would be welcomed.
This accusation has been made against Obama in the 2008 debates.
|
| |
|
Reply 23 - Posted by:
Janjan, 9/27/2012 9:59:34 PM (No. 8894974)
Setting the stage for a handy excuse in case he tanks. Just too too busy to practice for this. He is so perfect he shouldn't need to practice so no problem. Heh heh
|
Reply 24 - Posted by:
Crashnburn, 9/27/2012 10:08:50 PM (No. 8894989)
Well, if Obama can't make it to the debates, too busy, you know, Romney could debate an empty chair. It would do as well as N0Bama without a teleprompter.
|
Reply 25 - Posted by:
reddfroge, 9/27/2012 10:12:36 PM (No. 8894996)
Based on the 'nightmare' bad press from events in the Middle East I am 50-50 that Obozo cancels the debate due to 'national security'....I could be wrong
|
Reply 26 - Posted by:
readaholic, 9/27/2012 10:33:16 PM (No. 8895023)
I've long had the same thought as #25 -- can't believe he'd expose himself as the total fool he is.
|
Reply 27 - Posted by:
MDConservative, 9/27/2012 10:37:26 PM (No. 8895027)
This doesn't add up. Either he is unconcerned about the outcome, or he is cocksure of the outcome. I really wonder sometimes whether he is conceding the election. For all his supposed competitiveness, I have never seen evidence of it. He's a frontman, the con's face...are they pocketing the leftover cash? Would anyone be surprised?
|
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Calvinesq, 9/27/2012 10:38:25 PM (No. 8895028)
Eh ... Uh ... John ... Um ... Uhh ... Why ... xxxmmm ... ehh the ... um ... ahh long ... aghh .. ehh ... umm face.
|
Reply 29 - Posted by:
ironchefw, 9/27/2012 10:39:14 PM (No. 8895029)
Too busy? Come on. We can all see he hasn't even broke a sweat in four years.
|
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Nevadadad46, 9/27/2012 10:39:28 PM (No. 8895030)
I have to agree with posters thinking Øbama will cancel at the last minute. He is exhausted- his appearances have been practically non-stop. Every one of them takes a tremendous amount of energy- even for a nut-job like Øbama. He lives in a sea of personal fear, insecure about his own ability to think quickly on his feet. Without his teleprompter security blankey, he will be a nervous wreck. The reason for cancelling the meetings with Kerry tells me he has another plan. Reading the book about his and his obsessive/compulsive disorder, I just can't imagine that he will appear. I strongly suspect either a fabricated national crisis, or a sudden "1st family" health crisis will be the prime excuse for cancelling.
|
Reply 31 - Posted by:
reddfroge, 9/27/2012 10:55:24 PM (No. 8895045)
I got it....he will cancel because Michelle has succumbed to the diet she has imposed on all of America's school children.
|
Reply 32 - Posted by:
Lonestar Jack, 9/27/2012 11:16:04 PM (No. 8895058)
I am sending Obama a case of Oral Imodium for the debate.
|
Reply 33 - Posted by:
harper, 9/27/2012 11:27:02 PM (No. 8895068)
Revealing the shocking "new" fact that the Benghazi murders were done by AlQueda, BO will "have to" cancel all the debates to make contact with secret operatives at various golf courses.
|
Reply 34 - Posted by:
ColonialAmerican1623, 9/28/2012 12:08:45 AM (No. 8895114)
Deputy Dawg just isn't into it anymore. Notice the Wookie is doing the real campaigning ?
Isn't he getting the questions ahead of the debate ? It's a shame real people won't be asking the hard questions.
|
Reply 35 - Posted by:
annie xango, 9/28/2012 12:09:54 AM (No. 8895115)
Or he shows for the first one...but won't be able to skd the others..too busy working for the American people..just like Billy Jeff
|
Reply 36 - Posted by:
FormerDem, 9/28/2012 12:30:07 AM (No. 8895154)
thank you, Rob Portman, for doing an unsparing job. I hope you are trying bold lies to make sure Mitt can handle that. Lot of them. And tricky ones where if he corrects you he looks pedantic or racist or ageist or anti-Catholic or homophobic or something bad. Think up some good ones. Zippy will for sure. Providentially our guy is very very smart.
|
Reply 37 - Posted by:
belwhatter, 9/28/2012 4:49:12 AM (No. 8895291)
Romney can always counter with "I reject the premise of your statement/question"
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Scottyboy"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "Scottyboy"
|
FBI ID´s Benghazi suspects - but no arrests yet
|
|
Associated Press, by Kimberly Dozier
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The U.S. has identified five men who might be responsible for the attack on the diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, last year, and has enough evidence to justify seizing them by military force as suspected terrorists, officials say. But there isn´t enough proof to try them in a U.S. civilian court as the Obama administration prefers. The men remain at large while the FBI gathers evidence. But the investigation has been slowed by the reduced U.S. intelligence presence in the region since the Sept. 11, 2012, attacks, and by the limited ability to assist by Libya´s post-revolutionary law
|
Top IRS official will invoke Fifth Amendment
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.
|
|
The Limbaugh Theorem
|
|
Commentary Magazine, by Peter Wehner
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 11:29:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Earlier this week I wrote a piece about how Barack Obama was criticizing “Washington’s priorities” and the IRS scandal, as if he had not been president for the past four years and four months. There is something brazen and audacious in even attempting something like this. I speculated that Mr. Obama is unable to take responsibility for the problems that have occurred on his watch for reasons rooted in cognitive dissonance (failures cannot possibly happen on the watch of the Great and Mighty Obama). He is engaged in what psychiatrists call disassociation
|
Tea Party group files first lawsuit against IRS over targeting scandal
|
|
The Hill (Washington D.C.), by Daniel Strauss
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 9:42:28 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A California Tea Party group has become the first to sue the Internal Revenue Service over the targeting of conservative groups. The lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Cincinnati by the NorCal Tea Party Patriots alleges that the IRS violated the constitutional rights of the group by applying "intensive and intrusive scrutiny" when they applied for tax-exempt status. “NorCal and its members suffered years of delay and expense while awaiting the exemption and spending valuable time and money answering the IRS´ questions.
|
|
Obama´s just getting better and better
|
|
Daily Star (Oneonta, NY), by Chuck Pinkey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 9:24:24 AM
Post Reply
|
|
I’ve always been an admirer of President Barack Obama. One can only marvel at a man who writes his autobiography before he does anything noteworthy. Some critics have labeled him a narcissist, but I say it’s just good, old American can-do attitude. You have to appreciate a man who has never experienced the complexities of a paper route or the discipline of the Boy Scouts becoming President, and leading the world’s largest economy and commanding history’s most powerful military. Upon taking command, he was faced with severe economic troubles, due to the actions of Presidents Carter
|
|
It’s time for Holder to go
|
|
The Hill (Washington D.C.), by Bill Press
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: scottyboy- 5/20/2013 6:48:13 PM
Post Reply
|
|
One of many good things you can say about President Obama is that he is loyal to his friends. But sometimes, he is loyal to a fault, as is the case with Attorney General Eric Holder. Presidential buddy or not, it’s time for Holder to go. You expect a Democratic attorney general to make Republicans unhappy — which Holder has, on several fronts. He was even held in contempt of Congress by House Republicans over the “Fast and Furious” gun-walking scandal.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
White House Chief of Staff knew about damaging IRS audit, kept Obama in the dark
|
|
New York Post, by S.A. MILLER
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 4:15:03 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – The Internal Revenue Serviced scandal today spread further within the White House and closer to President Obama. White House spokesman Jay Carney today disclosed that Obama’s chief of staff, Dennis McDonough, and other top White House officials had advance warning that the IRS was targeting conservative groups. But he insisted McDonough and the other White House officials purposely kept Obama out of the loop.McDonough “rightly chose not to take action” to inform Obama, Carney told reporters at the daily White House briefing.
|
BREAKING: WashPost Reports Obama DOJ Also Spied on James Rosen of Fox News
|
|
Newsbusters, by Tim Graham
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: drive- 5/20/2013 7:29:20 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The Washington Post on Monday reported that Obama’s Department of Justice was investigating journalists before they started wiretapping the Associated Press – for one, Fox News correspondent James Rosen in 2010. Their headline wasn´t "Obama Team Also Spied on Fox News." Fox wasn´t in the headline, on A-1 or on A-12, where the story continued. Newly obtained court documents “reveal how deeply investigators explored the private communications of a working journalist — and raise the question of how often journalists have been investigated as closely as Rosen was in 2010.” Reporter Ann Marimow began:
|
Top IRS official will invoke Fifth Amendment
|
|
Los Angeles Times, by Richard Simon and Joseph Tanfani
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Scottyboy- 5/21/2013 3:53:35 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – A top IRS official in the division that reviews nonprofit groups will invoke the Fifth Amendment and refuse to answer questions before a House committee investigating the agency’s improper screening of conservative nonprofit groups. Lois Lerner, the head of the exempt organizations division of the IRS, won’t answer questions about what she knew about the improper screening – or why she didn’t reveal it to Congress, according to a letter from her defense lawyer, William W. Taylor 3rd. Lerner was scheduled to appear before the House Oversight committee Wednesday.
|
Leaks turn to deluge for reeling White House
|
|
New York Post, by John Podhoretz
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/21/2013 4:49:13 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The wheels came off the Obama administration yesterday. We learned of a startling assault on freedom of the press by the Department of Justice, following the revelation last week of the unprecedented information-gathering foray by that department against The Associated Press. Then, a few minutes later, the Justice Department’s inspector general released a report declaring that the US attorney in Arizona used the leak of a confidential memo to try to discredit a whistleblower in the notorious “gun-walking” scandal known as Fast and Furious (which got two federal agents killed). The leak was called “egregious.”
|
White House Aide calls Criticism of Obama ´Offensive´
|
|
New York Times, by Brian Knowlton
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: FlyRight- 5/20/2013 7:01:33 AM
Post Reply
|
|
A senior adviser to President Obama mounted a combative defense of the administration on Sunday, saying the controversies enveloping the White House were the result of Republican lawmakers’ trying to “drag Washington into a swamp of partisan fishing expeditions, trumped-up hearings and false allegations.”The remarks came from Dan Pfeiffer, a member of the president’s inner circle, as he appeared on all five major Sunday morning talk shows in an effort to move the administration past what commentators have described as a “hell week” of controversy and missteps.
|
If Your Doctor Asks You About Guns, Do You Have to Answer?
|
|
Fox News, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/20/2013 1:12:07 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Stuart Varney said this morning on "Varney & Co." that one of his producers was given a questionnaire with some surprisingly intrusive questions on it when he switched doctors. One of the questions was whether he/she was concerned about unsecured weapons in the home. Another asked whether he/she was "in a relationship in which you have been physically hurt or are you afraid of your partner?" Judge Andrew Napolitano explained that the question about guns comes out of a post-Sandy Hook executive order by President Obama, but it will be required under Obamacare. Varney expressed amazement
|
Democratic Senator uses Okla. tornado for anti-GOP rant over global warming
|
|
Daily Caller, by Jeff Poor
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: bamapreacher- 5/20/2013 8:20:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
While many Americans were tuned into news coverage of the massive damage from tornadoes ravaging the state of Oklahoma, Rhode Island Democratic Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse took to the Senate floor to rail against his Republican colleagues for denying the theory of anthropogenic global warming. Whitehouse spent 15 minutes chastising GOP senators and justified his remarks by alluding to states that seek federal assistance in the wake of natural disasters. “So, you may have a question for me,” Whitehouse said. “Why do you care? Why do you, Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, care
|
|
|

Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | Register | Rules & FAQs | Search | Post | Contact | RSS | Contribute | Logout | Forgot Password
© 2013 Lucianne.com Media Inc.
~~~c~~~
|