A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Media Ignore Independents'
Swing Toward Romney
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Media Ignore Independents'
Swing Toward Romney

Breitbart's Big Journalism, by Dustin Hawkins

Original Article

Posted By:Photoonist, 9/27/2012 4:16:08 PM

Not long ago, Independents were the go-to demographic for determining who would win elections. How the Independents swung, so too would the election. In 2008, Barack Obama carried Independents in Ohio by 8 points and in Florida by 7 points. (Snip) In both Ohio and Florida, Barack Obama’s “clear leads” all come from heavy over-sampling of Democrats, not from winning the crucial Indie vote. In fact, most of the polls that show Obama with big leads also show Romney handily winning Independent voters. Yet, somehow, Obama manages to increase his performance from 2008 despite Independents now opposing him. Let's take

Comments:
Unless every last registered Democrat came out and voted (and then some, with some voting more than once) 0bama could in no way win a state where he loses the Independent vote, often by double digits. With the Ohio Newspaper Organization, clearly not a pro-Republican group, stating Romney leads among Independents there by 28% what gives with the tallying by polling organizations? And it's going to get worse.

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: goose, 9/27/2012 4:28:56 PM     (No. 8894413)

It's obvious. The pollsters are expecting the Dems to cheat more to make up for the point spread.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: BaseballFan, 9/27/2012 4:47:14 PM     (No. 8894460)

Obamedia ignores anything that puts Obama in a bad light.

There's a whole lot of ignoring going on.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: wtm, 9/27/2012 5:11:30 PM     (No. 8894513)

You have to understand, close polling sells newspapers, and has people watching TV.

If they showed a landslide, no one would do that then.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 4 - Posted by: John c, 9/27/2012 5:23:30 PM     (No. 8894549)

He will still have 3 months to damage America.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: NY Betsy Rose, 9/27/2012 5:59:06 PM     (No. 8894617)

These polls are all over the place. Too bad they're all so dishonest. Makes them as useless as sneakers on a snake.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: planetgeo, 9/28/2012 8:44:26 AM     (No. 8895532)

This is the single most telling indicator in all the polling internals. The independents are approximately one third of the entire electorate. If Romney has flipped the independent vote from 2008, there is no way Obama can win. None.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 7 - Posted by: Felixcat, 9/28/2012 8:46:27 AM     (No. 8895535)

According to the Larry Sabato outfit (Center for Politics) at the University of Virginia Obama has already won per the 290 electoral votes he collected if the election was held today.

source: Washington Examiner

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: mabelkitty, 9/28/2012 8:52:49 AM     (No. 8895549)

All they are doing is pretty much guaranteeing that Dem turnout is dampened. Cheating is no longer a viable option, hence Soros's closing of the Secretary of State Project. He's toast.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: mc squared, 9/28/2012 9:15:35 AM     (No. 8895583)

#1; Of course. The reported closeness of the race is to keep the money flowing in.
And as an extra added bonus, Dems will claim fraud when they lose because the actual vote doesn't match the polls.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: Holeymoses, 9/28/2012 9:36:44 AM     (No. 8895653)

Do let us keep Obama pre-occupied with explaining Libya. It may put him off his game, at least for the debates.

In the meantime, Hillary's facial expressions in the various pictures reflect big time concerns for her legacy.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: Udanja99, 9/28/2012 9:47:15 AM     (No. 8895685)

Zippy is going to lose Virginia too. The constant TV and radio ads he's running tell me that he's in BIG trouble.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: RosietheObserver, 9/28/2012 9:54:57 AM     (No. 8895708)

They will cheat.
The ads they are running show they are trying to fool the public into thinking that Romney is like Obama and vice versa.
If that doesn't work they can vote dead people and stuff the ballot box with fake votes.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: AnnaS, 9/28/2012 10:14:20 AM     (No. 8895760)

As I just posted elsewhere--Chris Wallace is on FOX just now saying all trends are showing an Obama win. Dear Lord will somebody tell me why?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: dbdiva, 9/28/2012 10:27:49 AM     (No. 8895819)

0bama's up in the polls? My, my must be a lot of free phones floating about out there.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: kayjaymac, 9/28/2012 10:38:01 AM     (No. 8895853)

#14, my guess is they are calling all those free phones to get his approval numbers up.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: steph_gray, 9/28/2012 11:25:26 AM     (No. 8895976)

#15 Bingo!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: kennedylaw, 9/28/2012 12:09:55 PM     (No. 8896102)

Obama is going to get >90% of the Democrat vote, Romney is going to get >90% of the Republican vote, and most of the independents (I'm betting >60%) are going to vote for Romney. Whichever side gets a bigger turnout of their base will win the election.

If we had a much better candidate on the top of the ticket, I think we could reasonably have expected a Republican landslide election similar to what occurred in 1980, 1984, 1994, or 2010. As it is, I think the best we can hope for is a repeat of 2004.

All of the MSM polls currently anticipate that the Democrats will have a much better turnout than they did in 2008, which is nothing more than a liberal fantasy.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Quiet Observer, 9/28/2012 12:31:03 PM     (No. 8896152)

Does anyone really think that the 400+ members of the JournoList (remember, only about 1/3 of them were identified) stopped communicating and strategizing with each other just because Tucker Carlson exposed the list’s existence? Sure, they temporarily scattered – like a bunch of roaches when a light is turned on. But I have no doubt that they re-formed – just a little further underground this time – and continue to act in lock-step with the White House and Obama campaign to influence (control?, dictate?) the MSM message.

The consistency with which the MSM reports glaringly skewed polls accompanied by “Romney’s Bad Week” and/or “Obama’s Insurmountable Lead” stories leads me to conclude that “stories of JournoList’s demise are greatly exaggerated.”


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: foont, 9/28/2012 1:41:32 PM     (No. 8896324)

Truly cunning propagandists recognize and play on fears. In this case they play on Republican/conservative fear generated by Hussein's election in 2008: That a majority of the electorate is now so degraded/ignorant/indifferent that they will vote for such a candidate.

They also play on the fear generated among those on the right by Romney himself: That he is, at best, an untrustworthy RINO who never won a majority of Republican votes in the primaries.

Fear works to paralyze reason and halt action.

The propagandists' constant pumping up of Hussein despite the obvious dismal record he has amassed works, they hope, to increase interest and enthusiasm among his base.

My own take is that this will not work. Romney/Ryan will win comfortably. The GOP will hold and even expand its majority in the House and will take control of the Senate.



  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: jimboendaatl, 9/28/2012 2:55:05 PM     (No. 8896521)

Yeah, funny how the Independents are a non-factor according to the MSM, now that they favor Romney.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: snowcloud, 9/28/2012 3:12:56 PM     (No. 8896570)

If you want to make it to the election with your sanity in place then in the name of all that is good and holy TURN OFF THE NEWS! Yes, EVEN FOX! Do yourselves a favor. When election day rolls around, do your civic duty and get out and get it done!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 22 - Posted by: Ding! Fries are Done, 9/28/2012 3:54:31 PM     (No. 8896681)


#17. I disagree strongly that we would do better if we had a better candidate because our candidate is already very very good. John McCain WAS a bad candidate who was a poor student, a poor pilot, a poor husband, and did not have the temperament to be President. McCain would have done MUCH worse if it weren't for Palin and her ability to electrify crowds.

Mitt has been successful in both the public and private sector and gave up a very lucrative business practice to serve his country. He is squeaky clean, a great family man, and has the values, temperament, and skills needed to save us from the current Presidential disaster.

The problem is that Obama is a complete cult of personality figure (and empty suit..)with armor plated skin that liberal white voters do NOT want to see fail. He has so many skeletons in his closet that the MSM ignores because deep down they know he wasn't qualified to be Prez after 140 days in the Senate, no business or econ experience, etc... Just vote the current scam artist out so we can get back to the business that made the US great.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: Ladyhawke, 9/28/2012 7:37:50 PM     (No. 8897102)

As a former Republican and a fairly new Independent, I can shed some light on this. Being a Rep means nothing in California and I was tired of being ignored. Now I even get polled! Also, I think a lot of Tea Partiers are sick on lifelong politicians on both sides.

There is no way I wold vote for Obummer. There is no way that I will not vote. I am not alone.

When Demonicrats (meant the typo) call me, after I give them the bad news, I put down the phone without hanging up. That prevents them from quickly calling some other victim. I am considering calling them on election day and telling them I need a ride to the polls. When they drop me back at home, I'll tell them I voted for Romney! At least that's my fantasy - but would not want to be physically harmed.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: Dodge Boy, 9/28/2012 8:00:12 PM     (No. 8897139)

Precisely my point made in L.com's other thread. THe pollster's can spin the figures pretty well depending who they are working for. Normally, the polls (if they are to be believed at all) suddenly become more precise as we get closer to election day. But, this time is different. I think they will over-sample the dim voter because of the large exposure they get when trying to portray jug ears as the won.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 703802




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "Photoonist"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "Photoonist"



MA Senate: Elizabeth
Warren Defeats Scott Brown
Townhall, by Daniel Doherty    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:53:58 PM     Post Reply
We at Townhall have been covering this hotly contested Senate race for months and the results are finally in: With 36 percent of precincts reporting, Elizabeth Warren has been declared the next junior Senator from Massachusetts. Warren has never held public office before and the eye-popping $40 million she raised this election cycle evidently proved more than enough to unseat incumbent Senator Scott Brown. This was the most expensive Senate race of 2012 -- by a long shot.

Republicans lose ground
in bid to take over Senate
NBC News, by M. ALex Johnson    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:36:34 PM     Post Reply
Former Gov. Angus King, running as an independent, won the Senate contest Tuesday in Maine, NBC News projected, taking a seat that had been held by the Republicans. The loss further complicated the party's drive to take control of the Senate (Snip) Republican Ted Cruz defeated Democrat Paul Sadler to hold the open seat in Texas, succeeding retiring Republican Kay Bailey Hutchison, NBC News projected. See results Democrats held small edges in two of the other states critical to the balance of power in the Senate: In Massachusetts, where Elizabeth Warren, a law professor at Harvard University, was leading Republican

CNN Reports Romney Internal
Polling Shows Obama Leading In Ohio
Mediaite, by Meenal Vamburkar    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:23:34 PM     Post Reply
CNN’s Peter Hamby reported that Mitt Romney‘s internal polling showed President Obama leading in Ohio by five percentage points.Per Hamby’s post: The number represented a sharp final bump for Obama in Ohio, a race that had essentially been a tied race through much of the previous week, according to the campaign’s daily tracking. The polling, which also showed a tight race in Pennsylvania, explains why Romney officials decided to send their candidate on last-minute Election Day visits to Cleveland and Pittsburgh.

Obama adviser: 'They'll be counting
until 2 a.m.' in Florida
Fox News, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:11:57 PM     Post Reply
The Obama and Romney campaigns may be gearing up for a very late night, with one Obama campaign adviser predicting that in Florida alone, "they'll be counting until 2 a.m." The Obama adviser said signs suggest the race is quite tight, though the campaign claimed to be "holding strong" in key battlegrounds like Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. The adviser also said turnout among black voters in Virginia was better than expected, suggesting that could be a problem for Mitt Romney. Republican operatives in Virginia, though, predicted a razor-thin victory for their candidate in the state.

No surprises for Obama,
Romney in early projections
CNN, by Tom Cohen    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 9:02:23 PM     Post Reply
Washington - Early returns on Tuesday in what is anticipated to be a dead even presidential election contained no surprises, as CNN projected President Barack Obama will win his home state of Illinois and eight other races while Republican challenger Mitt Romney will win nine states. All races called so far went as expected after the roller-coaster ride of an election campaign that was buffeted by a superstorm and missteps on both sides. Obama and Romney ran dead even in final polls that hinted at a result rivaling some of the closest presidential elections in history, reflecting the deep political

Exit polls 2012: Hurricane
Sandy not a factor
Politico, by Emily Schultheis    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 8:48:28 PM     Post Reply
A week after Hurricane Sandy slammed into the East Coast, a majority of voters said President Barack Obama’s response to the crisis wasn’t a factor in their vote, according to early exit polls. Fifty-five percent of those surveyed, per CBS News’ early exit polling released by radio station WKZO in Kalamazoo, Mich., said Obama’s handling of the storm was a minor factor in their vote or wasn’t a factor at all. Twenty-six percent named Sandy as an “important” factor, and 15 percent said it was the “most important” factor in their decision.

Exit polls 2012: Mitt Romney
winning independents
Politico, by Emily Schultheis    Original Article
Posted By: Photoonist- 11/6/2012 8:47:41 PM     Post Reply
Mitt Romney is leading among independents in both Ohio and Virginia, early exit polls show. In Ohio, the former Massachusetts governor takes 56 percent of self-identified independents, compared with 40 percent for President Barack Obama. That’s a huge decrease for Obama from 2008, when the exit polls found him winning independents in Ohio by 12 points, 52 percent to 44 percent for John McCain. The numbers are similar but slightly tighter in Virginia: Romney takes 53 percent of independents there, according to ABC News exit polls, a 12-point lead over Obama. In 2008, Obama won independents in the state by



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Megyn Kelly and the
Sandberg Head Shaker

47 replie(s)
American Thinker, by Richard F. Miniter    Original Article
Posted By: magnante- 4/15/2014 9:16:05 AM     Post Reply
Megyn Kelly’s "Kelly File" is a great news show. She’s incisive, informed and customarily handles the toughest guest with aplomb. But her lengthy interview of Facebook C.O.O. Sheryl Sandberg about her second book in the Lean In series Lean In: For Graduates was a head shaker. Amazing that she of all people allowed Sandberg to restring the same old, same old, shamed, and shopworn feminist myths about women and girls and then jangle it in front of her viewing audience like something new out of the box. Indeed Kelly all but genuflected in front of this woman. Kept her on thru

Why You Should Be Sympathetic
Toward Cliven Bundy

44 replie(s)
Powerline, by John Hinderaker    Original Article
Posted By: Toledo- 4/15/2014 8:40:58 AM     Post Reply
On Saturday, I wrote about the standoff at Bundy Ranch. That post drew a remarkable amount of traffic, even though, as I wrote then, I had not quite decided what to make of the story. Since then, I have continued to study the facts and have drawn some conclusions. Here they are. First, it must be admitted that legally, Bundy doesn’t have a leg to stand on. The Bureau of Land Management has been charging him grazing fees since the early 1990s, which he has refused to pay. Further, BLM has issued orders limiting the area on which Bundy’s cows can

Has Rush Limbaugh Finally
Reached the End Of The Road?

43 replie(s)
Forbes Magazine, by Rick Ungar    Original Article
Posted By: EveningStar- 4/16/2014 7:24:05 PM     Post Reply
Like him or hate him, there is no disputing that Rush Limbaugh’s very special brand of mixing right-wing politics with his flare for entertainment has produced one of the most successful radio programs in the medium’s long history. Whatever the burning political question of the day, millions of Americans have relished the opportunity to tune into Rush’s program, knowing that he would quickly take that hot potato, throw a few gallons of verbal kerosene into the mix and elevate the matter into a five alarm fire with a just a few well-chosen words spoken in the style only Rush Limbaugh could

Biden Tells Boston Bombing
Survivors, ´It Was Worth It´ (Video)

41 replie(s)
Breitbart´s Instablog, by Debra Heine    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 9:28:18 PM     Post Reply
Less than a minute into his speech at the Boston marathon bombing memorial on Tuesday, Vice President Joe Biden went tragically off script and told the crowd of Boston bombing survivors that "it was worth it." After expressing how impressed he was with the tribute, he said somberly, "let me say to those ´quote survivors,´ my God, you have survived and you have soared. It was worth it. I mean this sincerely - just to hear each of you speak. You´re truly, truly inspiring." The audience sat in stunned silence until Biden declared, "I´ve never heard anything so beautiful than

Casual marijuana use linked with
brain abnormalities, study finds

40 replie(s)
Fox News, by Loren Grush    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/15/2014 6:12:53 PM     Post Reply
Casual marijuana use may come with some not-so-casual side effects. For the first time ever, researchers at Northwestern University have analyzed the relationship between casual use of marijuana and brain changes – and found that young adults who used cannabis just once or twice a week showed significant abnormalities in two important brain structures. The study’s findings, to be published Wednesday in the Journal of Neuroscience, are similar to those of past research linking chronic, long-term marijuana use with mental illness and changes in brain development. Dr. Hans Breiter, co-senior study author, said he was inspired to look at the effects of casual

Which Actor Portrays The
Best James Bond?

38 replie(s)
American Spectator, by Jonah Goldberg and Taki Theodoracopulos    Original Article
Posted By: Drive- 4/16/2014 11:20:22 AM     Post Reply
Look, everyone loves Sean Connery, particularly Sean Connery. That’s why he plays Sean Connery in every movie he’s in. People love that Scottish brogue so much, they don’t mind that he has it when he plays Juan Sánchez Villa-Lobos Ramírez, an immortal Spaniard in Highlander. The guy even won an Oscar for playing an Irish cop with a Scottish accent. Talk about sexist double standards: Meryl Streep has to master foreign dialects to get her golden statuettes. Connery just has to show up on time. In economics you devalue a currency by printing too much of it. In film you

White babies just 15 months old show racial
bias when picking playmates, study found

34 replie(s)
Daily Mail (U.K.), by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/15/2014 10:23:35 PM     Post Reply
Toddlers show racial bias when picking playmates, a study reveals. They also take account of how fairly others behave. Researchers tested the reaction of white 15-month-olds as toys were distributed. Two white adults divided the toys, one equally and the other unequally. Seventy per cent of the toddlers chose to play with the researcher who distributed the toys fairly. But in a second test, when one researcher favoured a white recipient over an Asian one, they picked the ‘fair’ researcher less often, the journal Frontiers in Psychology reports. And the babies are more likely to help those who share the same ethnicity, which is known as


Post Reply   Close thread 703802





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~