A Message From Lucianne  







S-G1




























ST-GC



        
 

 
Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


  Topic: Democrat Senate Hopeful Warren
Exposed As Complete Fraud
Change your user profile.
If you are having trouble posting, please take the time to register.
Your User Name :
Your Password
  I forgot my password
Your Reply  :
Preview Reply     Post Reply
Democrat Senate Hopeful Warren
Exposed As Complete Fraud

Investors Business Daily, by Editorial

Original Article

Posted By:StormCnter, 9/27/2012 5:29:20 AM

Democrat Elizabeth Warren has framed her race in Massachusetts against Sen. Scott Brown around integrity and intellect, as if she's a cut above other pols. In fact, she's beneath even the sleaziest. On top of fraudulently claiming minority Indian status without any documented ancestry, the Harvard law professor has now been busted practicing law in Massachusetts without a state license. Worse, her client list includes the type of corporations that Ms. Populist has demonized on the campaign trail as greedy polluters and exploiters of the "little guy." Turns out working-class champion Warren in 1995 hired herself out as a legal gun

      


Post Reply  

Reply 1 - Posted by: provide, 9/27/2012 5:32:33 AM     (No. 8892682)

Do you think Democrats cared about Adam Clayton Powell?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 2 - Posted by: Spidey, 9/27/2012 5:47:43 AM     (No. 8892691)

Warren is an inherently corrupt and dishonest person along with being a super hypocrite. In a sane,moral world,these things matter but when your banner is big government intervention and redistribution,all those things are magically erased.I guess you can't disbar someone who doesn't have a law license to begin with.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R-G1
  
R-VAR_AD


 
Reply 3 - Posted by: EnsignO'Toole, 9/27/2012 6:00:02 AM     (No. 8892701)

Am I the only person who is tired of frauds in the U.S. Government?

The "natural born" clause in the U.S. Constitution should be re-inforced with some mechanism whereby a candidate must prove, beyond a shadow of doubt, who they are and that they are qualified to fill an office.

Oh, you say there is a mechanism? It's called vetting, you say? Ok, so now we have to vett the vetters? And we wonder why our country is going to "hell in a handbasket"?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 4 - Posted by: Maybeth, 9/27/2012 6:01:38 AM     (No. 8892705)

BUT .... it's too late to replace this amazingly corrupt Harvard professor in her campaign for the U.S. Senate. So, even though she lied about being a minority to secure a spot at Harvard and she lied about being licensed to practice law, she still DEFINES the word Democrat.
... This is who they are. Catch her if you can.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 5 - Posted by: Trigger2, 9/27/2012 6:09:31 AM     (No. 8892715)

Lies, fraud, and corruption are resume enhancers to the gimme, gimme, gimme demonrats in MA. Actually, that applies across the country.

A good example is Barry going to Republican Governor states and claiming HE'S the reason the state is in such good shape. Worse yet, it appears the dumb voters actually believe it.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 6 - Posted by: steph_gray, 9/27/2012 6:13:33 AM     (No. 8892720)

I see lots of Brown signs, even as Howie says they are routinely being stolen. I know this is true - in MA any Republican sign is always stolen at least one (mine were).

MA independents need to come through for Scott - Granny is too hideous to contemplate on any level.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 7 - Posted by: miceal, 9/27/2012 6:43:32 AM     (No. 8892765)

Ditto's #4. She typifies the modern democrat...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 

  


 
Reply 8 - Posted by: John c, 9/27/2012 6:53:49 AM     (No. 8892783)

Her union sponsored ads are everywhere.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 9 - Posted by: Merlin251, 9/27/2012 7:06:27 AM     (No. 8892809)

Pinocchahontas is a fitting moniker for this evil, dishonest, lying piece of human debris, but Fauxcchahontas is still my favorite. In the future, when gauging just how badly someone is lying instead of assigning the statement a given number of Pinocchios, it should be given an equal number of Warrens instead!!!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 10 - Posted by: lakerman1, 9/27/2012 7:08:40 AM     (No. 8892814)

Practicing law without a license is a felony, I believe.
I am shocked that the Harvard Law School faculty, most of whom are licensed to practice law, don't file charges against her, and demand her termination. (Tenure does not protect a professor from moral turpitude charges.)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 11 - Posted by: pineledger, 9/27/2012 7:23:15 AM     (No. 8892836)

It didn't stop obama.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 12 - Posted by: Red Jeep, 9/27/2012 7:53:39 AM     (No. 8892885)

This is a new high, low...I don't know what for the Democrats.

Usually many of their officials are disbarred or resigned lawyers, like Clinton and Obama

But now we have a pretend lawyer in the Democrat Party who is also a pretend Indian. Fantasy land.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

B-G1


 
Reply 13 - Posted by: Phil_hk, 9/27/2012 7:57:33 AM     (No. 8892896)

This woman is vile even for Boston

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 14 - Posted by: Grambo, 9/27/2012 8:07:29 AM     (No. 8892919)

She's chose the approptiate party affiliation.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 15 - Posted by: novakid, 9/27/2012 8:11:18 AM     (No. 8892927)

Gee, perhaps she DID inherit her forked tongue from her Great Great Great Great Great Grandma....

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 16 - Posted by: veritas, 9/27/2012 8:14:11 AM     (No. 8892934)

Our gracious site hostess notes, "First she's not an Indian. Now she's not a lawyer."

What next? She shouldn't be using the Ladies' Room?

#3: The states' Secretaries of State determine who is qualified to be on the ballot. Apparently, none of them stood up in 2008, and the Dems went after these offices hard in 2010. I don't know the R-D count.

#10: Ah, but they all see themselves as being in service to the Highest Calling -- "leading the [poor, dumb, unable to live without the hand-holding of their 'betters'] 'less fortunate' to the Utopia only 'Progressives' can find" [read -- more power in the hands of the Left ]. "Progressives" would all be running around with copies of Bastiat and wearing Adam Smith t-shirts if they thought free markets would put more power in their hands. One. Thing. Matters. Power. Power in their hands.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 17 - Posted by: MHR, 9/27/2012 8:14:28 AM     (No. 8892936)

Ditto to #6...I have resorted to putting my Brown sign INSIDE a window

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


   

 

R_DBL_B
  


 
Reply 18 - Posted by: Mermaid1, 9/27/2012 8:14:56 AM     (No. 8892938)

My mother used to call me "Princess." According to Ms. Warren's logic that puts me in line for the British Throne.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 19 - Posted by: southernboy, 9/27/2012 8:16:25 AM     (No. 8892944)

Just another example of the liberal philosophy that you can be whoever you want to be.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 20 - Posted by: Arby, 9/27/2012 8:17:32 AM     (No. 8892951)

Lies, corruption, dishonesty, a past that she's lied about? For the dims those are the qualifications for president.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 21 - Posted by: planetgeo, 9/27/2012 8:19:44 AM     (No. 8892960)

The most disturbing aspect of the Warren revelations is that there are still about 50% of the electorate that will nevertheless going to vote for her. They just don't care. And it's the same with Obama.

What this means is that this country is now about evenly divided between the law-abiding and the lawless. Laws, truth, values mean something for one group, but absolutely nothing for the other.

It's Zombie time in America. And what happens when there are more of them than there are of us?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 22 - Posted by: gilbi, 9/27/2012 8:30:13 AM     (No. 8892982)

#23 - I think you meant to say 47%.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


   

 



 
Reply 23 - Posted by: red oak, 9/27/2012 8:31:33 AM     (No. 8892986)

I guess the thug "cab driver" that roughed up the camera man told the truth when he said "you don't know who you're messing with."

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 24 - Posted by: provoking 1, 9/27/2012 8:31:44 AM     (No. 8892987)

She should be the Democrats Litmus test, similar to what Aikens is to the GOP on talk shows.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 25 - Posted by: Susannah, 9/27/2012 8:38:10 AM     (No. 8892999)

According to a Massachusetts poll published last Sunday, Brown is running 57-35 ahead of Warren with independents. I hope this is true, because there are more registered independents in Mass. than Democrats.

She just got the endorsement of the Mass. Firefighters Assoc., which is disappointing but predictable, I guess.

Her most ardent supporters, who self-identify as socialists, simply don't care what she says or does, or how hypocritical she is. It's her agenda they love.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 26 - Posted by: LZK, 9/27/2012 8:38:52 AM     (No. 8893002)

Soooooooo -- you're telling me Massachusetts doesn't care about integrity????

Well -- they did vote in teddy/swimmer/kennedy for 40 years.....

They deserve what they get....

LZK

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 27 - Posted by: maryc, 9/27/2012 8:40:49 AM     (No. 8893010)

The best is that obama 'stole' her ideas about "you didn't build that". One liar to another and yet the press and the left love her. Do you really think these sheep will look up and realize that they are jumping off the cliff behind the 'popular' folks ?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 28 - Posted by: Canuckchopper, 9/27/2012 8:42:47 AM     (No. 8893015)

Another Havard professor who ran for high office didn't do particularly well in a recent election. Michael Ignatieff (sp?) returned to Canada, was elected leader of the Liberal party and ran in the last general election. Got absolutely trounced, now back at Havard.
Completely out of touch with the Canadian electorate...

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 29 - Posted by: Jethro bo, 9/27/2012 9:00:07 AM     (No. 8893060)

What is shocking about all this is the Dems have found someone that has better presidential qualification and are more impressive than Obambi's. We thought his lies and faux achievements were something. There nothing compared to Lieawatha's.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 30 - Posted by: nonsense, 9/27/2012 9:08:20 AM     (No. 8893086)

All that Soros money down the tubes. Tsk, tsk, ha, ha, ha.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 31 - Posted by: Soldiers Father, 9/27/2012 9:13:53 AM     (No. 8893100)

Well of course she would be a perfect seat mate for Al Franken.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 32 - Posted by: seminolesecure, 9/27/2012 9:18:45 AM     (No. 8893114)

Everybody lies about sex, American Indian heritage, and the status of their law license.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 33 - Posted by: Poliskeptic, 9/27/2012 9:27:29 AM     (No. 8893141)

This is the same woman that was showcased giving a big speech at the convention. Typical Dem.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 34 - Posted by: bob913, 9/27/2012 9:42:27 AM     (No. 8893184)

obama was a constitutional scholar and a lawyer and worked for the little guy too. He also went to Harvard.

Did he attend Elizabeth Warren class on how to pull the wool over people's eyes?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 35 - Posted by: capecodfox, 9/27/2012 9:42:53 AM     (No. 8893185)

Elite educational snobs (need I say they're Dems?) can't handle the fact that she's the least qualified faculty member at Harvard Law. They know it supports the argument that she benefited from her diversity claim.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 36 - Posted by: roger h. cook,MD, 9/27/2012 9:43:34 AM     (No. 8893186)

I guess we know two things ,1. she is female and 2. she is a lying democrat.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 37 - Posted by: Beowoof, 9/27/2012 9:45:26 AM     (No. 8893190)

I asked my father, an attorney who has practiced in a number of states and who is no fan of this administration, Elizabeth Warren, etc. This is no big deal - these licensing arrangements are state-by-state and it isn't unusual for exemptions to be made for law professors who occasionally charge for their services but who are primarily engaged as professors. He thinks this is no big deal. I was disappointed, too.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 38 - Posted by: zephyrgirl, 9/27/2012 9:53:09 AM     (No. 8893204)

In a normal voting population, her lies whould be the kiss of death, but we are talking about Massachusetts.....

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 39 - Posted by: mathman, 9/27/2012 9:54:16 AM     (No. 8893209)

She is NOT a complete fraud.
She is a complete Democrat.
She exemplifies what Democrats stand for: lie, cheat, steal, repeat.
Of course she used a false claim to get her Harvard job.
Of course she practiced law without a license--laws are for little people.
Of course she published a plagarized recipe in a false Indian cookbook.
Of course she phonied up some data to write a book.

An old quote from "Millenium": "This is who we are. This is what we do."

So the citizens of MA will vote for Liz: where else in the world can you get elected Mayor of Boston while dead?

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 40 - Posted by: Susannah, 9/27/2012 10:00:13 AM     (No. 8893234)

#39, I'm pretty sure that why neither Brown nor the conservative press have jumped on the licensing issue and run with it. Warren was "of counsel" in federal court. If she had a New Jersey or Texas license at the time she was involved in those cases, then she's in the clear on that matter. Howie Carr's column yesterday was about...stolen yard signs. You can be sure it would have been about Warren's illegal practice if that were the case.

There's plenty of other ammunition to use against her. It's vitally important that Brown win this race.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment

    2 persons like this.


Reply 41 - Posted by: realrep, 9/27/2012 10:07:52 AM     (No. 8893270)

And the dems will vote for her, 'She's just like us.'

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 42 - Posted by: TheLadyNextDoor, 9/27/2012 10:14:14 AM     (No. 8893292)

Elizabeth Warren is a typical liberal. Never present the truth. I would disagree with this post when he refers to the senate as "august body." According to the dictionary,"august" is "marked by majestic dignity or grandeur." Sorry, the little runt from Nevada has taken the "body" down the drain.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 43 - Posted by: DaBigGuy, 9/27/2012 10:22:59 AM     (No. 8893320)

#28, Massachusetts might deserve what they get, but the rest of us don't who have been and will be negatively affected by the election of hoodlums like Warren, the swimmer, Lurch, Bawney, etc.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 44 - Posted by: RancherJack, 9/27/2012 10:36:41 AM     (No. 8893370)

Someone really brave needs to peek into Warren's underthings and see if she's really a woman.

Everything else is a lie

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 45 - Posted by: snowoutlaw, 9/27/2012 10:46:23 AM     (No. 8893396)

When the constitution is not followed and illegal things like affirmative action are permitted, the whole honest hard working community gets the shaft. In this country it should not matter who their parents were, it’s their actions and character that the Constitution was written to protect. Open the door to illegal actions you have to expect it to cause even more illegal actions.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 46 - Posted by: Persecutor2, 9/27/2012 10:54:31 AM     (No. 8893430)

Well, I was going to ask if there was a barratry law in Mass., but maybe #39 has answered that question. Still, you would think a hifalutin law firm would be pretty embarrassed to have an unlicensed professor listed as "of counsel" with them.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 47 - Posted by: chicodon, 9/27/2012 11:25:37 AM     (No. 8893551)

When you think of the term "fellow traveler", Warren's face should come to mind.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 48 - Posted by: Reality, 9/27/2012 11:25:54 AM     (No. 8893555)

Mrs Warren typifies what she is. A carpetbagger, unqualified, prevaricator, cheat and arrogant.
She is so untrustworthy that even the democrat controlled senate would not confirm her, so they decided to buy her "Teddy's seat"
Very appropriate, he was expelled from Harvard for cheating and daddy had to buy his way back in, and she had to lie and cheat to get in.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 49 - Posted by: garyhope, 9/27/2012 11:27:30 AM     (No. 8893563)

Warren is creepy. She has the dangerous glint of an insane fanatic in her eyes and manner. If it were WWII, she'd be a Nazi. Right now, she's a "Democratic" fascist.

She's dangerous and an insane fanatic. She'd be happy to send people to "the showers". I'm sure she loves Che.


  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 50 - Posted by: Marzon, 9/27/2012 1:05:28 PM     (No. 8893864)

Don't forget this is also the woman who claims to be the "spiritual mother of the occupy movement".

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 51 - Posted by: Lawsy0, 9/27/2012 1:11:02 PM     (No. 8893889)

Next, we'll find out she isn't really a woman.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 52 - Posted by: SnowQueen, 9/27/2012 1:16:06 PM     (No. 8893902)

My grandparents used to call me "Pumpkin." I should have used that to claim special status as a person of color. (In my heart, I know I'm orange.)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 53 - Posted by: happyv, 9/27/2012 1:27:33 PM     (No. 8893948)

Her only claim may have been that she owned a Jeep Cherokee at one time.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 54 - Posted by: Photoonist, 9/27/2012 2:01:00 PM     (No. 8894067)

She's as crazed a liar as is 0bama. And if 0bama's school records and other details of his past were fully exposed to the general public as we have seen them 0bama would behave in much the same fashion.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 55 - Posted by: butch, 9/27/2012 2:15:39 PM     (No. 8894099)

Practicing law without a law license is (I believe) a gross misdemeanor. Fraud is a felony. It's high time Elizabeth Warren, aka Inmate #395204, got a personalized Big House Preview.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 56 - Posted by: richdet, 9/27/2012 2:21:03 PM     (No. 8894112)

At last week's debate Squaw Warren explained that her momma told her at age 7 that she was an Indian. I expect at next week's debate we will learn that at age 8 her daddy told her she was a lawyer! -- case closed for the morons, moonbats, and cynics who vote Dem in MA.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 57 - Posted by: wlit22z, 9/27/2012 2:33:52 PM     (No. 8894146)

This would only happen in a state like Mass. and others that don't vet their candidates if they are Democraps.

She's like the Mulatto Kid. If her mouth is open, she's probably or usually lying.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 58 - Posted by: OdinsAcolyte, 9/27/2012 3:07:12 PM     (No. 8894224)

Not a lawyer is a plus.
Attorneys are responsible for the reprehensible state of our nation and our freedoms. I am learning to detest them completely.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 59 - Posted by: ladycatnip, 9/27/2012 3:22:29 PM     (No. 8894259)

How does this affect the outcomes from all the law clients she represented in court at Harvard? Is this not grounds for verdict reversal? I can only imagine the lawsuits that will be filed as a result of this. She should drop out quietly and hope there's no door knock for an arrest. This is unconscionable.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 60 - Posted by: lencu255, 9/27/2012 3:44:38 PM     (No. 8894299)

I am absolutely sure that with the resources lefties have, they do very thorough vetting of their candidates.
I am serious about that: they vet the people who will carry leftist radical torch no matter what - lies, backstabbing, coercion, blackmail, etc. The rest doesn't matter to them. It didn't matter for fascists/commies and our radicals are using exactly this strategy/tactics!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 61 - Posted by: mominNoCA, 9/27/2012 3:50:39 PM     (No. 8894313)

Democrats will vote for her anyway, especially Massachusetts Democrats.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 62 - Posted by: lana720, 9/27/2012 4:13:00 PM     (No. 8894377)

Perfect fit for the dem party. Return to your alternate universe and OWS "people."
Not a fit for the once august Senate.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 63 - Posted by: faith_and_reason, 9/27/2012 4:57:55 PM     (No. 8894485)

The Party of Envy, whatever name it uses in a given nation or era, will individually rob you on the street or in your home. When given the chance, they will assert a religious right to rob you, because that's "what Jesus would do." In the political realm, they will vote for any liar, cheat or murderer, as long as he (or she, in this case) shares the ill-gotten gains with the "oppressed."

On a jury, these same people will vote for huge awards against any "deep pocket" defendant, and will vote "innocent" if any of the "oppressed classes" is the accused.

This is a culture war, and the future of civilization is at stake.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 64 - Posted by: trapper, 9/27/2012 5:28:59 PM     (No. 8894563)

#15 - No, she's not a woman. She's a Mann.

(Heh heh. Go look it up.)

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 65 - Posted by: thefield, 9/27/2012 5:31:24 PM     (No. 8894566)

#61 With Holder and democrats controlling MA law, she has nothing to worry about.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 66 - Posted by: mseegal, 9/27/2012 5:38:08 PM     (No. 8894580)

Even more interesting to me, on Sept. 11, 2012, Fauxcahontas found time in the midst of her busy campaign to give up her New Jersey law license. WHY?

http://legalinsurrection.com/2012/09/elizabeth-warrens-law-license-problem/

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 67 - Posted by: Billyc, 9/27/2012 8:06:54 PM     (No. 8894804)

In a small MA colonial town where we live neigbors are great and always helpul if we need assistance.We don't litter the place with political signs, Exception must be avid Democrats they have signs for the local Representative and Warren. Feel like running over them but this is the USA and we all can vote for whom we want.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 68 - Posted by: ScrIbelus, 9/27/2012 8:55:14 PM     (No. 8894896)

Might be a good idea to count the candidate's X chromosomes.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 69 - Posted by: NMPatriot, 9/27/2012 10:05:52 PM     (No. 8894982)

Elizabeth Fork-Tongue:
Indian without the lineage
Lawyer without the license
Plagiarist extraordinaire
Democrat's next proud candidate for President!

  Click Here if you Like this Comment


Reply 70 - Posted by: bifgroovey, 9/27/2012 10:29:05 PM     (No. 8895019)

Refuse to help a drowning girl to protect yourself from a DUI?

Lie about diddling a White House Intern to a Grand Jury?

Cheat on your deathly sick wife and use campaign money to hush your pregnant love child?

Finally someone has emerged to lay claim from John Edwards for the "Great Liar Chair" of the Democrat Party.

This will be close.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.


Reply 71 - Posted by: geoguy, 9/27/2012 10:49:27 PM     (No. 8895043)

Poster #6, I've got an idea on how to stop the theft of those signs. It involves anchoring the signs so they are difficult to pull up and using honed-edged items along the base of the plastic board. It would only have to happen once and that would be the end of sign stealing for the whole state.

  Click Here if you Like this Comment

   1  person like this.



Post Reply   Close thread 703675




Below, you will find ...

Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"

and

Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)




Most Recent Articles posted by "StormCnter"



Are You a Modern Day Gentleman?
Country Life Magazine [UK], by Rupert Uloth & Emma Hughes    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 9:49:13 AM     Post Reply
Gentlemanliness is, without a doubt, Britain´s most enduring export. For Evelyn Waugh, writing breathlessly to Nancy Mitford in 1956, it provided no less than an explanation for ‘all our national greatness´. But, although he spent his entire life in thrall to the concept, he never explained what he actually meant by it. He, like most of us, assumed that you simply knew a gentleman when you saw one. Other writers have only managed to come up with partial definitions. For George Bernard Shaw, a gentleman always ‘puts more into the world than he takes out´. Oscar Wilde thought that a gentleman

President Obama’s ‘Selfie Doctrine’
Washington Times, by Charles Hurt    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 6:06:43 AM     Post Reply
In these selfie times when freedom, joy and posterity are just a head-tilt, grin and finger-click away, it is only fitting that the United States of America would have as commander-in-chief the undisputed King of Selfies. The Selfie Presidency for the Selfie Generation in a Selfie World. President Obama is that rightful king. There he is with the greatest baseball players of our day. The president mugging for a selfie outside the White House. Later he feigned outrage when it became public that the picture of him with Boston Red Sox slugger David Ortiz and a “44” jersey was just part of

Obama and the Most [REDACTED]
Administration in History
Reason Magazine, by Gene Healy    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 6:00:37 AM     Post Reply
Good news: thanks to a ruling by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Monday, the "most transparent administration in history" is going to have to tell American citizens when it believes it´s legally entitled to kill them. The lawsuit arose out of Freedom of Information Act requests by two New York Times reporters for Office of Legal Counsel memoranda exploring the circumstances under which it would be legal for U.S. personnel to target American citizens. The administration stonewalled, asserting that "the very fact of the existence or nonexistence of such documents is itself classified," and a federal district judge

How Lindsey Graham
outmaneuvered the tea party
Politico, by Manu Raju    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 5:57:13 AM     Post Reply
SUMMERVILLE, S.C. — Sen. Lindsey Graham recognized the threat years before it had a chance to form — and knew immediately what he had to do. After the tea party wave in the 2010 election, right-wing groups were itching to get one of South Carolina’s newly elected conservative congressmen to challenge Graham, the blunt-spoken, deal-making congressional veteran of two decades. Rep. Mick Mulvaney, a favorite of the grass roots, was high on their list. So when Graham got wind in 2012 that Mulvaney wanted a seat on the House Financial Services Committee, he quietly lobbied his longtime friend, Speaker John Boehner, to

The Problem With Student-Loan Forgiveness
National Journal, by Sophie Quinton    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 5:51:46 AM     Post Reply
If you have student loans, chances are you wish there was a way to make them disappear. And in a way, there is: The federal government now offers three repayment plans that lower monthly payments and will—eventually—forgive remaining debt. A separate plan forgives loans for people who take certain public-service jobs. Some of these options, however, are so new that nobody knows how well they´ll serve borrowers. Even when it comes to well-established repayment plans, many students don´t truly understand their options. And some analysts say that policy adjustments are needed to ensure that students don´t get too comfortable taking on

BOOM: The Left’s Favorite Talking
Point Disproved by Science
Washington Free Beacon, by Andrew Stiles    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 5:35:05 AM     Post Reply
The Democratic Party’s obsession with income inequality and “the one percent” is factually misguided, science has found. Over the weekend, leading academic professor Mark R. Rank discussed the findings of a recent scientific study on income inequality in the New York Times. It turns out that, according to scientific data, the Left’s horror stories about a rigid class structure in the United States fueled by nefarious, wealth-hoarding one-percenters is false. “The picture drawn of the 1 percent has been that of a static population, just as the 99 percent is often portrayed as unchanging,” Rank writes. “There is a line drawn between

Raced-Based Preferences Forever
National Review Online, by John Fund    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/23/2014 5:32:21 AM     Post Reply
You can often tell when advocates of one side in an argument fear they will ultimately lose. They change their branding. A few years ago, warnings about “global warming” were replaced with scare stories about “climate change.” One reason? The Earth had stopped appreciably warming in the late 1990s, making the change a PR necessity. Supporters of affirmative action are now signaling similar weakness. What was called “racial quotas” in the 1970s and has been referred to as “affirmative action” since the 1990s is giving way to a new term: “race-sensitive admission policies.” The language shift is telling — race-based preferences



Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)



Benghazi attack could have been prevented if
US hadn´t ´switched sides in the War on Terror´
and allowed $500 MILLION of weapons to reach
al-Qaeda militants, reveals damning report

57 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/22/2014 7:02:40 PM     Post Reply
The Citizens Commission on Benghazi, a self-selected group of former top military officers, CIA insiders and think-tankers, declared Tuesday in Washington that a seven-month review of the deadly 2012 terrorist attack has determined that it could have been prevented – if the U.S. hadn´t been helping to arm al-Qaeda militias throughout Libya a year earlier. ´The United States switched sides in the war on terror with what we did in Libya, knowingly facilitating the provision of weapons to known al-Qaeda militias and figures,´ Clare Lopez, a member of the commission and a former CIA officer, told MailOnline. She blamed the Obama administration

Why Does Nation Tolerate A
Habitual Liar As President?

55 replie(s)
Investors Business Daily, by Editorial    Original Article
Posted By: Desert Fox- 4/22/2014 2:10:54 PM     Post Reply
Public Trust: Sixty-one percent polled say President Obama lies "some of the time" or "most of the time" on matters of national importance. Americans have to ask: Why do we let him get away with it? It´s no surprise that a Fox News poll of 1,012 registered voters last week found immense distrust of a president whose main domestic initiative was based on a lie. The shock is that the same poll found his disapproval level down to its lowest since last fall. Asked, "How often do you think Barack Obama lies to the country on important matters?" 37% replied "most of

Obama to free hundreds of drug
felons under clemency rules
designed to un-do mandatory
sentences from ´War on Drugs´ era

54 replie(s)
Daily Mail [UK], by David Martosko    Original Article
Posted By: Attercliffe- 4/21/2014 11:37:51 PM     Post Reply
The Obama administration is poised to entertain a flood of new clemency applications from thousands of federal prisoners who were given harsh sentences under mandatory-minimum laws following drug convictions, Attorney General Eric Holder said Monday. Holder said in a short videotaped statement that he wants to shrink the federal prison population by a modest amount while ensuring ´that those who have paid their debts have a chance to become productive citizens.´ At the center of the move is a set of old sentencing rules that punished crack-cocaine offenders with more time behind bars than users or traffickers of powder cocaine.

Dole: Cruz, Paul & Rubio
lack experience for 2016

44 replie(s)
The Hill [Washington, DC], by Mario Trujillo    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/22/2014 11:18:06 AM     Post Reply
Former Sen. Bob Dole (R-Kan.) said a number of junior GOP senators considering a presidential run in 2016 do not yet have the experience — specifically naming Rand Paul (Ky.), Marco Rubio (Fla.) and Ted Cruz (Texas). The former 1996 GOP presidential candidate sounded particularly skeptical of Cruz in an interview this week with The Wichita Eagle. "A number of the younger members, first-termers like Rand Paul, Rubio and that extreme-right-wing guy, Ted Cruz — all running for president now. I don´t think they´ve got enough experience yet," Dole said. The 90-year-old former senator said, however, his main concern about 2016 is living

Jeb Bush is your only chance
against Hillary, Republicans

42 replie(s)
Hot Air, by Bob Schrum    Original Article
Posted By: quantumman- 4/22/2014 6:32:54 AM     Post Reply
If Jeb reaches for the nomination, there will be a titanic battle between the party establishment and the Tea Party. Steve Schmidt, McCain’s strategist in 2008, insists that in the end Republicans usually settle on the most electable candidate. To get by, this Bush may be forced to trim his positions, although the cautionary tale of Romney suggests that he would have to tack artfully and carefully for the sake of the general election. Certainly he will have the resources to outlast, discredit, and disqualify his rivals.

Michelle Obama:
´splurging is the key to life´

40 replie(s)
Associated Press, by Staff    Original Article
Posted By: KarenJ1- 4/21/2014 9:31:25 PM     Post Reply
Washington - Michelle Obama said "splurging is the key to life" if you regularly eat right and stay active. Her biggest guilty pleasure: French fries. "How would you appreciate vegetables if you never had chocolate?" she asked. "You couldn´t live without a little chocolate, a little French fries." The first lady took questions from children reporters Monday after appearing at the White House Easter Egg Roll. She told the children that if they eat right the majority of the time, then a splurge or snack is not going to hurt them. "I still splurge when I can, but that's why I try to exercise almost every day," she said.

Fraud runs rampant in Census Bureau
37 replie(s)
New York Post, by John Crudele    Original Article
Posted By: StormCnter- 4/22/2014 5:03:20 AM     Post Reply
There’s a pattern of falsifying statistics throughout the entire Census Bureau. And anyone who attempts to blow the whistle on the fraud is either retaliated against or ignored, according to two new sources who have experienced the process firsthand. As I’ve been writing for more than six months, the Census Bureau office in Philadelphia uncovered a case of fraud in 2010, did nothing about it and allowed the practice to continue. In that instance, a data collector named Julius Buckmon was faking reports that went into the nation’s all-important jobless tally and consumer-inflation survey. Because the Census Bureau’s surveys are scientific — meaning


Post Reply   Close thread 703675





Home Page | Latest Posts | Links | Must Reads | Update Profile | RSS | Contribute | Register | Rules & FAQs
Privacy Policy | Search | Post | Contact | Logout | Forgot Password | Search Using Google


© 2014 Lucianne.com Media Inc.

~~~c~~~