|
|
| |
Topic: Paul Ryan Says He's Now Okay With Gays in the Military |
Paul Ryan Says He's Now Okay With Gays in the Military
Cybercast News Service, by Pete Winn
|
|
Original Article
|
|
Posted By:KarenJ1, 9/26/2012 9:57:51 AM
|
| Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, the Republican vice-presidential nominee, told a West Palm Beach, Fla., television station over the weekend that he is now okay with homosexuals in the military and does not want to reverse the repeal of the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy. “I talked to a lot of good friends of mine who are combat leaders in the theater, and they just didn’t think the timing of this was right to do this when our troops were in the middle of harm’s way in combat,” Ryan told WPTV Saturday, when asked about
|
Comments: This is very disappointing. Romney has said the same thing, although the link below indicates if he was president he could instruct the Pentagon to reverse the repeal.
http://thehill.com/blogs/defcon-hill/army/250563-one-year-later-dont-ask-dont-tell-issue-fades
|
Reply 1 - Posted by:
Bubbasuncle, 9/26/2012 10:08:09 AM (No. 8891022)
I think it's the right thing to say. We are ready to go over the cliff with debt and this is something they want to ask. It's just a gotcha question to give the lib press something to bash him with. He did the right thing, don't give them what they want and stay on message.
|
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Whimsy, 9/26/2012 10:08:42 AM (No. 8891027)
Everytime these guys go further to the left is yet another set of votes heading for Obama. If our side is no different than their side, why vote Obama out???
|
| |
|
Reply 3 - Posted by:
oceanbeach, 9/26/2012 10:12:57 AM (No. 8891040)
Gay military participation is a bad idea, but it is WAY down the list of problems facing our nation. He's right. Don't worry about that until the big problems are fixed.
We can't slap a new coat of paint over rust. Fix the structure first.
|
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Michaelus, 9/26/2012 10:20:34 AM (No. 8891063)
Combat my foot. Our troops are not in combat. They are wandering around getting picked off and blown up while their leaders gather more power and riches for themselves. Politicians are more interested in rich homosexual donors than in poor, one legged, PTSD afflicted vets.....
|
Reply 5 - Posted by:
mickturn, 9/26/2012 10:21:55 AM (No. 8891071)
As Al Bundy says to Peg...Do I have to touch you?
|
Reply 6 - Posted by:
Feebie, 9/26/2012 10:42:32 AM (No. 8891126)
Gays have always served in the military - I hate to break it to you.
What I disagree with - is the "openly" (officially on paper) part. No where in "God, Country, Corps, Family" is there room for sexual preferences, status or other personal distractions (of any nature). It's a distraction is what it is (similar to what has happened now with many women in the military and charges of discrimination, sexual harassment, "rape", etc.).
You are serving your country, not yourself - and we are so grateful. We don't care who you love or how, we just appreciate your service. But please do not sacrifice the cohesiveness of the Military for your own egos and political posturing.
(I knew two marines who were gay and my neighbors. Coolest dudes on the planet. Never, ever hid they were gay or Marines and never groused about not being able to be "open". They were open in their personal lives and not "open" in their work/professional lives. Kinda like how we all are.)
|
Reply 7 - Posted by:
CEP, 9/26/2012 10:54:22 AM (No. 8891153)
But what does Ryan think about junk food in society? Isn't that the newest National Security Issue facing this country? That's what the administration and some military are saying.
|
| |
|
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Redneck In NY, 9/26/2012 11:01:16 AM (No. 8891175)
#1 has it right, this was a question meant to deflect from Romneys message of jobs and economy. More MSM flackery...
|
Reply 9 - Posted by:
reilly, 9/26/2012 11:10:55 AM (No. 8891212)
If the MSM wants to change the subject, they bring up gays. Don't ask, don't tell, and don't mention the spread of AIDS, the out-of-control lifestyle, or their life-expectancy.
|
Reply 10 - Posted by:
Rotten In Denmark, 9/26/2012 11:13:57 AM (No. 8891222)
Since the R&R ticket isn't as "appealing" as the "down low" ticket "headed" by the bamster, why not say something like, interesting but at this time we have real work to do and opining on every liberwsal talking point isn't a high priority for us....
|
Reply 11 - Posted by:
conspicio, 9/26/2012 11:38:47 AM (No. 8891283)
Gangs, religious zealotry of all stripes, and drugs are far greater threats than the homosexual agenda. Oh, and I almost forgot the neutered rules of engagement by the peacenik effete lawyers in DoD. They have gotten more troops killed than anyone wants to discuss.
R2 want ot have a discussion about threats to the military? pick one of the above. Gays aren't anywhere near the top of that list at the moment.
|
Reply 12 - Posted by:
geminale, 9/26/2012 11:51:31 AM (No. 8891316)
What is this about? The RR campaign slogan seems to be "Vote for us, we're just like Obama, but with a sounder fiscal policy."
Ugh. I'm going from excited back to holding my nose while pulling the lever.
|
| |
|
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Judith, 9/26/2012 11:57:16 AM (No. 8891331)
Romney's record in Ma was one of pro-choice and pro-gays. His RECORD, not a supposition but something factual. Ryan has been told he must comply with Romney's platform, which includes Romney's healthcare package, Romney's budget (different than Ryan's)and all the other liberal, social gobbledygook. I still think Romney and Ryan are a safer path to take.
|
Reply 14 - Posted by:
tehtriggerman, 9/26/2012 12:26:37 PM (No. 8891396)
CNN: Excuse me Senator Ryan? Who is exactly your favorite Smurf?..And why?
|
Reply 15 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec, 9/26/2012 12:44:54 PM (No. 8891431)
#1 is correct. This is a gotcha question designed to illicit a response in hopes of RR saying something the Big Media can glam on to. The best answer is to say you`re fine with it an any follow up questions should be answered with the same response.
R & R will be asked about abortion sometime during the debates also. A good answer is to say `abortion is legal and safe and will remain so`. Leave it go at that and tell the moderator to move on.
|
Reply 16 - Posted by:
phillyred, 9/26/2012 12:52:43 PM (No. 8891442)
If Obama gets his way there won't be anyone in the military.
|
Reply 17 - Posted by:
snowcloud, 9/26/2012 1:08:02 PM (No. 8891487)
#2, how about death panels and Obamacare?
|
| |
|
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Most Recent Articles posted by "KarenJ1"
|
Colorado sheriffs seek to block new gun restrictions, file lawsuit against state
|
|
Associated Press, by Staff
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:12:54 PM
Post Reply
|
|
DENVER — Colorado sheriffs upset with gun restrictions adopted in the aftermath of last year’s mass shootings filed a federal lawsuit Friday, challenging the regulations as unconstitutional. The lawsuit involves sheriffs from 54 of Colorado’s 64 counties, most representing rural, gun-friendly areas of the state. The sheriffs say the new state laws violate Second Amendment protections that guarantee the right to keep and bear arms. Opponents are criticizing the lawsuit as political maneuvering. The filing targets Colorado laws that limit the size of ammunition magazines and expand background checks. The regulations
|
´We could lose everything´: Tea Party groups prepare to sue IRS
|
|
Fox News, by Barnini Chakraborty
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 10:04:13 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON – Jay Devereaux hadn’t paid much attention to the daily drumbeat of partisan politics in D.C. He wasn’t a Washington nerd, and didn’t know who said what during congressional hearings -- nor did he care. But when news broke that the government was using taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street banks, he started paying attention and didn’t like what he was hearing. So the Florida father and information technology specialist decided to form a group, Unite in Action, to educate people in his area about the issues, he said.
|
First Lady Expands Anti- Obesity Campaign to Museums
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Elizabeth Harrington
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:51:43 PM
Post Reply
|
|
First Lady Michelle Obama has expanded her anti-obesity campaign to museums, enlisting them to offer “healthy food options,” and change their menus. Mrs. Obama’s “Let’s Move!” initiative is now calling for museums, zoos, gardens, science and technology centers to “join the call to action,” to decrease obesity among children. The first lady is recruiting these institutions to join the “Let’s Move! Museums and Gardens” project because of their power to “influence real and sustained behavior change” on the eating habits of kids. “With their impressive reach and great potential for impact, museums and gardens can launch community
|
Congressman: IRS asked pro- life group about ´the content of their prayers´
|
|
Washington Examiner, by Charlie Spiering
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 9:26:42 PM
Post Reply
|
|
During a House Ways and Means Committee hearing today, Rep. Aaron Schock, R-Ill., grilled outgoing IRS commissioner Steven Miller about the IRS targeting a pro-life group in Iowa. "Their question, specifically asked from the IRS to the Coalition for Life of Iowa: ‘Please detail the content of the members of your organization’s prayers,’" Schock declared. “Would that be an inappropriate question to a 501 c3 applicant?” asked Schock. “The content of one’s prayers?” “It pains me to say I can’t speak to that one either,” Miller replied. After Schock pressed him further, Miller explained that although
|
| |
|
Treasury Knew of I.R.S. Inquiry in 2012, Official Says
|
|
New York Times, by Jonathan Weisman & Jeremy W. Peters
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:51:48 PM
Post Reply
|
|
WASHINGTON — Congressional Republicans, not resting with the Internal Revenue Service scandal, are moving to broaden the matter to an array of tax malfeasances and “intimidation tactics” they hope will ensnare the White House. Republican charges range from the clearly questionable to the seemingly specious, and they grow by the day. On Friday, lawmakers sought to tie the I.R.S. matter to the implementation of President Obama’s health care law, which will rely heavily on the agency. Whether they succeed holds significant ramifications for Mr. Obama,
|
HHS:´Telework´ Gives Gov´t Employees More Time for ´Planning and Preparing Healthy Meals´
|
|
Cybercast News Service, by Terence P. Jeffrey
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 8:40:41 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services says it wants as many as 20 percent of its workers to "telework," use an "alternative work schedule," or do both, in order to "reduce green house gas emissions," decrease "employee stress," and give these government workers more time for "planning and preparing healthy meals." So says one of the HHS "performance measures" detailed in an appendix to the department´s latest strategic plan. HHS´s performance measure "4.D.05" says: "Increase the percent employees on telework or on Alternative Work Schedule." Telework means working from home via phone and computer.
|
Will real villains in IRS scandal ever be punished?
|
|
Fox News, by Juan Williams
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: KarenJ1- 5/17/2013 7:46:14 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Bloodletting, in the form of firings, dismissals, resignation, and expulsions, is a tribal rite in political Washington. It is most often used by the powerful on anyone less powerful as a symbolic sacrifice. Steven Miller, the now former acting commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, is the latest victim of ritual sacrifice. This week the Obama White House demanded his resignation to demonstrate the president’s “anger” at news that the IRS targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status for added review and slow approval. Next, we’ll watch as Congress takes up the bloodletting knife.
|
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
|
Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice"
|
|
CBS News, by Sharyl Attkisson
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Drive- 5/17/2013 3:02:24 PM
Post Reply
|
|
Obama administration officials who were in key positions on Sept. 11, 2012, acknowledge that a range of mistakes were made the night of the attacks on the U.S. missions in Benghazi, and in messaging to Congress and the public in the aftermath. The officials spoke to CBS News in a series of interviews and communications under the condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments. They do not all agree on the list of mistakes and it's important to note that they universally claim that any errors or missteps did not cost lives and reflect "incompetence rather than malice or cover up.
|
Raindrops wash away reeling O’s fake veneer
|
|
New York Post, by Michael Goodwin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:28:00 AM
Post Reply
|
|
Watching President Obama trying to dodge raindrops and responsibility yesterday reminded me of the moment when Dorothy pulls back the curtain and discovers that the Wizard of Oz is “just a man.” Stripped of his spell of mystery and power, the wizard is worse than mortal. He’s a fake. So it was with Obama in the Rose Garden. His performance was tired and trite, ordinary to the point of dull. His veneer of passion was so transparent that you could see him trying to summon his old-time magic by pushing the buttons
|
Obama a new Nixon? Oh, get serious.
|
|
Washington Post, by Editorial
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Dreadnought- 5/16/2013 10:54:51 PM
Post Reply
|
|
STANDING BEFORE reporters Thursday, President Obama declined an invitation to compare the recent scandals weighing down his administration with those that forced President Nixon to resign in 1974. So allow us to do the work for him: There is no comparison. Nixon, in a series of crimes that collectively came to be known as Watergate, directed from the White House and Justice Department a concerted campaign against those he perceived as political enemies, in the process subverting the FBI, the IRS, other government agencies and the electoral process to his nefarious purposes. Mr. Obama has done nothing of the kind.
|
Weiner’s Wife Didn’t Disclose Consulting Work She Did While Serving in State Dept.
|
|
New York Times, by Raymond Hernandez
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/17/2013 5:43:54 AM
Post Reply
|
|
The State Department, under Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton, created an arrangement for her longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin to work for private clients as a consultant while serving as a top adviser in the department. Ms. Abedin did not disclose the arrangement — or how much income she earned — on her financial report. It requires officials to make public any significant sources of income. An adviser to Mrs. Clinton, Philippe Reines, said that Ms. Abedin was not obligated to do so. The disclosure of the agreement that Ms. Abedin made with the State Department comes as her husband,
|
Watergate 2.0 -- why the IRS scandal is far worse
|
|
Fox News, by Matt Kibbe
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: StormCnter- 5/18/2013 5:59:17 AM
Post Reply
|
|
In the wake of one of the worst abuses of government power in recent history, many are rushing to frame the Internal Revenue Service scandal as simply an attack on conservative activists. That view risks creating a partisan political football and misses a fundamentally scarier abuse that exceeds the scandals of Watergate or any other prior government abuse. The IRS has admitted that since May 2010 it targeted grassroots-conservative organizations that had applied for tax-exempt status, unfairly subjecting them to rigorous scrutiny due to their political leanings. Such groups were told they were required to comply with IRS requests,
|
When it rains, it pours: Ten press conference take aways
|
|
Washington Post, by Jennifer Rubin
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: Pluperfect- 5/17/2013 4:52:42 AM
Post Reply
|
|
President Obama’s press conference in the rain was not a success, if by success, his supporters would mean an event which convinces anyone who doesn’t work for him that he’s getting ahead of the scandal deluge. The sight of a Marine holding an umbrella over his head only added to the weirdness of the event. So what did we learn? 1. He has full confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder, the man who purportedly recused himself (whenever) without putting it in writing (whatever). When asked about the untrammeled snooping on Associated Press reporters and editors,
|
Rep. Issa subpoenas Benghazi auditor Thomas Pickering
|
|
The Hill [Washington DC], by Julian Pecquet
Original Article
|
|
Posted By: JoniTx- 5/17/2013 3:53:45 PM
Post Reply
|
|
The lawmaker leading the charge to investigate the Benghazi terror attack on Friday subpoenaed the co-author of a report that slammed the State Department but didn´t interview Hillary Clinton. House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) formally demanded that retired ambassador Thomas Pickering submit to being deposed by the committee next Thursday. The subpoena comes in the wake of a series of acrimonious public exchanges this week between the two men. Issa didn´t issue a subpoena to former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Michael Mullen, who co-authored the Benghazi report with Pickering.
|
| | |
|
|