Canada’s global warming models
threw out actual historical data
and substituted models of what
the temperature should have been
American Thinker,
by
Thomas Lifson
Original Article
Posted By: M2,
9/22/2019 7:30:59 AM
Environment Canada, led by Justin Trudeau-appointed Environment Minister Catherine McKenna, is all-in on the hypothesis that manmade global warming is an existential threat to humanity. It is so important to hand control of energy use to the government that mere actual, historical data that might raise doubt about the extent of purported warming over time must be thrown out and replaced by “models” of what the “scientists” think the historical temperature record must have been.
In other words, the computer models Canada uses to measure and project “global warming” are themselves based on other computer models.
Reply 1 - Posted by:
franq 9/22/2019 7:41:59 AM (No. 186179)
Preaching to the choir, sadly. The latte-drinking, Birkenstock-wearing, Volvo-driving, tree-hugging true believers won't care.
Off topic, slightly, where's uno been? Did he get banned?
9 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
tsquare 9/22/2019 8:23:10 AM (No. 186206)
Much of the true historic data has been lost, left behind or destroyed in the (well funded) march to AGW. Even satellite data are compromised by bad “ground truth” data. Lamb’s well documented, peer reviewed, and published work and perhaps the 167 high quality US ground stations, are the data sets that separate history from hysteria.
5 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
LesUNo 9/22/2019 8:24:17 AM (No. 186207)
“Climate change is a religion for people who think they are too smart for religion”.
It is also very big business.
11 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
Zarin 9/22/2019 8:26:08 AM (No. 186209)
They conveniently threw out raw data. Which seems to be a common practice - East Anglia's Climate Research Unit & NASA have done it. Why do these so called scientists accuse the skeptics & the realists of 'denying' science? The answer is 'follow the money' and the power. As noted in the last line of the article - these people are using fraudulent methods to come up with their alarmist predictions. How can we not call their 'global warming' a fraud when they use fraud & deception to 'prove' the theory?
7 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
bad-hair 9/22/2019 9:11:32 AM (No. 186260)
Statistics … the shortest distance between an unwarranted assumption and a foregone conclusion.
You actually CAN make this sh* up.
7 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
red1066 9/22/2019 9:54:29 AM (No. 186299)
So what else is new? This is standard operating procedure for climate nut jobs.
6 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
HotRod 9/22/2019 10:10:51 AM (No. 186317)
Wasn't it Biden who said we must believe in truth, not facts? When the facts are against them, a truth is constructed in the minds of deranged people. Their fake truth sustains their fantasies.
6 people like this.
climate change science is fake science so using fake data is perfectly acceptable.
5 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
jlw509 9/22/2019 10:42:39 AM (No. 186360)
Phil Jones (East Anglia) and Michael Mann (Penn State) threw out the raw land-based weather station data years ago--- and brazenly used that as their excuse for why the couldn't produce "the numbers" in court cases!
But the world is ending in 11.087 years!
These guys are the Jehovah's Witnesses of science.
Keep this mind: Rarely will a researcher produce findings which conflict with his funding.
8 people like this.
There have been calls for years to check the models by running them backward and checking how they match historical data. (The 1971 "Global Dynamics" model of Jay Forrester, which predicted the collapse of civilization around the year 2000 was debunked when it was run backwards and found to "postdict" that civilization collapsed around 1900. Forrester is a scientist and altered his model, not the historical records. These "scientists" have fallen in love with their models. If the data don't agree, they are wrong!
2 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
anonymous 9/22/2019 7:48:32 PM (No. 186677)
Remember that it's always about make-believe. This is how they operate. They make things up to suit their agenda, and they do it with impunity. The lack of accountability is due to the lack of oversight and an extremely compliant mainstream media that simply accepts and spreads whatever it is fed by the government. There is also a lack of punishment for those who distort and propagandize.
3 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
Trigger2 9/23/2019 2:16:54 AM (No. 186783)
This proves the hoax is nothing more than a planned honey pot for raising money for corrupt politicians to waste and for the citizens to suffer so they're more controllable. If they can't actually prove their hoax, they add fake data to make it appear real. Fake, fake, fake.
1 person likes this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "M2"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)