State Department: 15 broke rules in
mishandling Hillary Clinton emails
Bicpac review,
by
Stephen Dinan
Original Article
Posted By: Ribicon,
6/17/2019 6:19:48 PM
At least 15 people broke State Department rules in mishandling former Secretary Hillary Clinton’s emails, the department said in a new review released publicly Monday. While the full review is not completed, the department said it’s found 23 violations and seven infractions of security protocols related to Mrs. Clinton’s emails. Some of the 15 people got write-ups placed in their security files at the department, according to a letter sent to Sen. Chuck Grassley. Those could affect future attempts to gain security clearances, the department said. “The department considers and violation of security policies to be a serious matter,”
Reply 1 - Posted by:
MickTurn 6/17/2019 6:32:28 PM (No. 100206)
Link the names to Hitlerys campaign contributions...Bingo = Prison!
9 people like this.
Reply 2 - Posted by:
Jerseyden 6/17/2019 6:35:57 PM (No. 100208)
On the bright side it looks like they are still alive and that’s better than a lot of people who have had dealings with them
25 people like this.
Reply 3 - Posted by:
WAN2 6/17/2019 6:43:51 PM (No. 100214)
Ahem. So...."what difference does it make NOW???" Swamp rats in charge.
10 people like this.
Reply 4 - Posted by:
fhancock 6/17/2019 6:45:46 PM (No. 100215)
Either Felonia Pantsuits was the dumbest Secretary of State in history or the most traitorous...one or the other...either way she makes Benedict Arnold look like an altar boy
38 people like this.
Reply 5 - Posted by:
Jethro bo 6/17/2019 6:55:43 PM (No. 100219)
FTA: 'At least 15 people broke State Department rules in mishandling former Secretary Hillary Clinton’s emails, the department said in a new review released publicly Monday.' Alll were given a meritorious work bonus, hazardis duty bonus (automatic when working on a Hitlery campaign) and a promotion. Who says goobernment can't get tough on ciminals that work for the goobernment?
15 people like this.
Reply 6 - Posted by:
MindMadeUp 6/17/2019 6:57:37 PM (No. 100220)
Oh, wow. They got "write-ups" in their files. Those are called resume enhancements for Democrats and will ensure they get jobs and probably under-the-table payoffs. They are set for life
23 people like this.
Reply 7 - Posted by:
Newtsche 6/17/2019 7:02:26 PM (No. 100225)
One time, shame on you.
Two times, shame on me.
Fifteen times, lock and load.
11 people like this.
Reply 8 - Posted by:
Philipsonh 6/17/2019 7:14:44 PM (No. 100232)
HRC comitted sedition, at the least, and more likely, TREASON, but no one seems to care;
But, everyone knows it, and she was not alone in these actions.
20 people like this.
Reply 9 - Posted by:
WhamDBambam 6/17/2019 7:15:34 PM (No. 100233)
Only fifteen?
12 people like this.
Reply 10 - Posted by:
DVC 6/17/2019 7:57:24 PM (No. 100247)
And how many will lose their jobs and go to prison.....none.
21 people like this.
Reply 11 - Posted by:
Uno_Thatguy 6/17/2019 8:38:01 PM (No. 100266)
“The department considers and violation of security policies to be a serious matter,”
Hmmmmm? How serious?
So serious these miscreants might have some difficulty getting security clearances in the future! I'd sure hate to be one confronted with such "serious" consequences for such a minor violation as treason!
20 people like this.
Reply 12 - Posted by:
JunkYardDog 6/17/2019 8:49:49 PM (No. 100271)
Attention! Attention! Paging James Comey! Paging James Comey!
7 people like this.
Reply 13 - Posted by:
Rumblehog 6/17/2019 10:11:06 PM (No. 100312)
Only one rule would get any Service Member tossed into Leavenworth.
23 people like this.
Reply 14 - Posted by:
JimBob 6/18/2019 1:30:45 AM (No. 100392)
When a regular person does this, it's broadcast as BREAKING FEDERAL LAW!
When a 'Rat does it, the language is different, it's "the broke the rules".
17 people like this.
Reply 15 - Posted by:
Trigger2 6/18/2019 4:20:35 AM (No. 100419)
Breaking and flaunting security regulations is considered so serious by the worthless State Dept that all they do is put your name in a file after 3 "violations". Big deal. How about clawing back Comey's declaration and all his complete immunity deals and start prosecuting?
8 people like this.
Reply 16 - Posted by:
padiva 6/18/2019 8:30:31 AM (No. 100514)
May they forfeit their pensions.
8 people like this.
Reply 17 - Posted by:
Marjbaldwin 6/18/2019 8:45:17 AM (No. 100529)
Breaking rules (laws) to cover-up Democrat crimes...? Gee, that reminds me of something.... starts with M... oh yea, the "Media".
7 people like this.
Reply 18 - Posted by:
Clinger 6/18/2019 8:49:57 AM (No. 100535)
This was not carelessness, the stumbling of a random middle age woman struggling with what the kiddies call technology (silly me I thought splitting the atom was technology). Since so many of us have our own experiences, calling on our kids or twenty somethings at work for help, or from their perspective, helping the geezers at home or work, it seems quite natural and innocent, simple incompetence, at worst carelessness. It all appears so natural. But take a step back, this is a filthy rich executive level government professional. Don’t fall for the “just like us” narrative head fake. Her acts were calculated and deliberate. This was by design set up as conduit to facilitate the transfer of classified information to foreign powers flying under the cover of simple laziness and the image of a common technologically challenged middle-aged yoga practicing wedding planner all American Mom. Bull stuff!! This was treason. She a damned communist who sold us out for personal riches. She needed to set up plausible deniability, the appearance that our secrets were stolen when in fact they were sold. We need not look for the spy when we think the Russians simply tapped into Hillary's basement bathroom server.
15 people like this.
Reply 19 - Posted by:
Strike3 6/18/2019 9:01:17 AM (No. 100543)
We know that the Beest has hundreds of flying monkeys to do her bidding but I won't be happy until the police show up in Chappaqua with that XXL orange jumpsuit. She is the one we want.
10 people like this.
Reply 20 - Posted by:
zek 6/18/2019 9:06:04 AM (No. 100551)
Rules, schmules. Notice the emphasis on broken rules instead of laws. Also remember last week how we found out so many were let off for major offenses. I smell a setup coming on all these investigations - wrist slaps seem to be the punishment.
8 people like this.
Reply 21 - Posted by:
Strike3 6/18/2019 9:11:22 AM (No. 100557)
and... both the FBI and the NSA have her e-mails, all 30,000 of them, some containing some very sensitive classified information. Never doubt that.
10 people like this.
Reply 22 - Posted by:
ROLFNader 6/18/2019 9:13:23 AM (No. 100560)
Yeah, the very FIRST thing I would do is send a letter to Charles Grassley. He'll take care of it. Expect a harsh letter from him to the to the Third Under-Secretary In Charge Of Sitting By The Door.
4 people like this.
Reply 23 - Posted by:
qr4j 6/18/2019 9:36:00 AM (No. 100578)
So quote the Beast (aka PIAPS, aka Thunder Thighs, aka Ms. Cankles): "What difference does it make, anyway?"
Seriously . . . what difference does it make? All this is swept under the rug so the Left and their Never Trump pals can go after the duly elected President of the United States on ridiculous charges.
6 people like this.
Reply 24 - Posted by:
jacksin5 6/18/2019 9:57:32 AM (No. 100607)
And this doesn't include the 30k+ e-mails that were destroyed. But no one in D.C. is going to break up the Crime Syndicate that is Congress.
3 people like this.
Reply 25 - Posted by:
HotRod 6/18/2019 9:58:22 AM (No. 100610)
Remember the young sailor who took a picture of his work station in a submarine, to show his family? Compare what happened to him vs what Hillary has (so far) gotten away with!
8 people like this.
Reply 26 - Posted by:
weejun 6/18/2019 11:02:29 AM (No. 100689)
Amen, #18: absolutely deliberate to get her emails out of the government system. It is also the result of arrogance on the part of those elitists in the government who think they are so important that the rules don't apply to them. Anybody who's had a US government security clearance knows full well that a lesser mortal would be spending time in Leavenworth Prison had they committed one iota of the security violations that this woman and her entourage of idolizers committed. Don't think we are seeing a two-tiered justice system? Wait until NOBODY pays for these egregious offenses before concluding that our American justice is "one size fits all."
4 people like this.
Reply 27 - Posted by:
iamshazzam 6/18/2019 11:59:22 AM (No. 100758)
It is blatantly obvious that we do not have a DOJ with any balls. During my time in service, I would have been sent to jail for any of these crimes. Where is the punishment????? It is time state department civil servants and all civil servants be held to the same standare our service members are...
4 people like this.
Reply 28 - Posted by:
Wary American 6/18/2019 1:44:46 PM (No. 100830)
15? JOB NOT DONE.
How many AMERICANS ever thought this would be the state of our country today?
3 people like this.
Reply 29 - Posted by:
udanja99 6/18/2019 6:31:36 PM (No. 101012)
Not only do the FBI and the NSA have those emails, but Putin, the Chicoms, the ayatollahs, the Israelis and any number of other intelligence agencies around the world also have them. Which is why it is insane for anyone to believe that Putin would have wanted to help Trump win the election instead of Illary. Just imagine the minute by minute blackmail he could have inflicted on a President Illary.
She deserves the gallows.
1 person likes this.
Reply 30 - Posted by:
Dodge Boy 6/18/2019 6:56:42 PM (No. 101029)
Any indictments yet? Didn't think so.
0 people like this.
Reply 31 - Posted by:
whyyeseyec 6/18/2019 7:10:51 PM (No. 101037)
I'm sure she didn't intend to....
0 people like this.
Below, you will find ...
Most Recent Articles posted by "Ribicon"
and
Most Active Articles (last 48 hours)
Comments:
Kinda mean for those overworked and underpaid civil servants to get "dinged" for aiding and abetting tens of thousands of federal felonies at the behest of Herself, who will not be locked up.
Please note-Correct source is bizpac